Karakamsha - SJC

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri Narasimha Rao

 

If you have been following the discussions,kindly give your opinion

on the evident sutra starting with - Paparkshe Mande - where Papa

Rashi and Saturns placement has been clealry mentioned as qualifiers

of Karakamsha Rashi.

 

It is not at all required from your part to reply to my mail or give

explanations.When students,i don't know how many,have been taught the

other way,i feel when found wrong,it may be a moral right to correct

them.

 

Moreover in another sutra -Varga of Shukra and Mars are mentioned in

the rashi,which is second to swamsha/karakamsha.We cannot say it

depends on how we translate sutras.As Sutras follow a logical

order ,the sequence is the very deciding factor.

 

If we see the rectification exercise on your navamsha,shri Rath is

mentioning about planet Venus being aspected by Mars(Though to

consider aspect is wrong from a such a disposition).We all know the

role Mars and Venus plays,if we have studied such combinations

present in numerous charts.Such being a case it should be pretty

clear,to Mr.Rath and you that sage is mentioning about Mars and Venus

having Varga in the 2nd from Karakamsha Rashi.

 

As you know there are many students who place tremendous faith in the

Gurus.With great ''power'' comes great responsibilties.

Erring,especially in a divine and oceanous shasthra like Jyotish is

ok and nobody is infallible.But if we are not willing to correct our

mistakes,then what moral right do we have to criticize the scientists

who are criticizing astrology.If the Guru is not correcting who will

do it?

 

Shri Sanjay Rath rightly identifies the term amshaka.If you are

having any malayalee friends,you may verify how the ''navamsha

chakra'' is termed in a hand written horoscope.It is called AMSHAKAM.

 

Even if you do not want to reply,kindly give a thought,during a satwa

muhurhta.

 

Satyameva Jayathe

 

Thanks and Best Regds

Pradeep