False propagation by foreign scholars and then who ??

[Guest guest]

False propagation by foreign scholars*Most foreign scholars and Indologists believe that Indians taught andlearnt their lessons verbally, without the aid of any writtenmaterial. Indians did not even know how to write. They were notinclined towards maintaining any historical records, nor did they haveany notion of placement of events in its proper sequence in time. Theybelieved that the Aryans came from abroad, defeated the originalinhabitants of India, the Dravidians, and settled here. The Harappancivilisation was destroyed by invading Aryans. The human history theyknow is only 5,000 years old. The ancestor of man was an ape or achimpanzee.In brief it can be stated that all the above assertions of foreignscholars are unscientific, illogical, untrue and pure falsepropaganda. It has been revealed across the world today that scholarslike Max Muller, H H Wilson, A A MacDonell, Rudolph Roth, AlbrechtWeber, Ralph T H Griffith, M Winternitz, Monier-Williams, all had thesame basic objective which is expressed in Max Muller's words which hewrote in a letter to his wife: 'This edition of mine and thetranslation of the Veda will, hereafter, tell to a great extent on thefate of India. It is the root of their religion and to show them whatthe root is, I feel sure is the only way of uprooting all that hassprung from it during the last three thousand years.' (Life andLetters of F Max Muller, Vol I, Chapter XV, Page 34).Similarly, Monier-Williams wrote in the preface of hisSanskrit-English dictionary: 'I must draw attention to the fact that Iam only the second occupant of the Boden Chair and that its founderColonel Boden stated most explicitly in his will (dated August 15,1811 AD) that the special object of his munificent bequest was topromote the translation of scriptures into English so as to enable hiscountrymen to proceed in the conversion of the natives of India to theChristian religion'. Prof Goltuster had revealed that Roy, Weber,Whitling, Fuhan, and other scholars were determined because of somemysterious reason to ruin the prime glory of India in any waypossible.More recently, in July 2007, a book titled Invading the Sacred: Ananalysis of Hinduism studies in America edited by Krishna Ramaswamy,Antonio de Nicolas and Aditi Banerjee was released in Mumbai. The bookstates, 'Unlike in India, the academic study of religion is animportant undertaking for intellectuals in America and a few hundredscholars study Hinduism and other Indian religions. Many of them havecontinued to perpetuate myths and biases about Indian culture andreligion through misinterpretation and mistranslations. These are inline with the colonial and missionary caricature of India.' The bookis the product of a multi-year research project that uncovered shoddyand biased scholarship driven by certain power cartels, its authorssaid.Let us also know the fact that McCaulay did not know even one Indianlanguage but he commented on all Eastern wisdom, James Mill nevervisited India but he wrote on Indian history. None of the foreignIndologists like Max Muller, Winternitz and Griffith had any knowledgeof Vedic grammar , astronomy, metre (chhand) etc but they alltranslated Vedas and assumed the status of authorities.As per Vedic time computation and tradition, the age of creation is4.32 billion years, and the sankalp mantra 'Om tatsat adhay bharamanodutya parardhey swetvarahakalpe saptmein vaivasvat manvantareastahvinsatitame kaliyuge kaliprathme charne _____ gatabde'. They havekept intact the history of the time of creation and the advent of manon earth till today. Man arrived on earth exactly 1,97,29,49,108 yearsago (approximately two billion years ago). Some Vedic scholars alsobelieve that man was created on earth only in the seventh manmantar ofVaivasvat Manu. The sun, planets, stars, earth, sea, vegetation, floraand fauna were created in the earlier six manmantars in a veryscientific manner. If we accept this theory, then man was born about12,05,33,108 years ago. At least this much is certain, that thehistory of mankind is indeed very long.Indians always knew the art of writing. The Rig Veda (10.71.4) saysspeech has two forms -- one which can be heard (shravya) and one whichcan be seen (drishya). Script was in vogue since ancient times inIndia. Bhojpatra and tadpatra (papyrus) were abundantly available innature before man walked the earth. Like paper, even these forms ofrecording scripts was not permanent. Manuscripts were copied onto newpapyrus if they got damaged due to climatic conditions. How else wouldwe find thousands of ancient manuscripts in India? How else would weremember the Vedas, epics, scriptures, and other astronomicalsubjects?Yes, there were definitely a few people who felt pride in memorisingone or more of the Vedas. If we believe that at that point in time theintellect and memory of the people were very sharp and elephantinecompared to the modern man, then this logic also goes against theevolutionary principles of Darwin. The truth is that Indians knew howto write -- and wrote a lot! No other country in the world has such arich and vast literary treasure. What other proof can be asked for tosay that the Indians could write?Darwin's unnatural and unscientific theory is now also being rejectedby many scientists and scholars world-wide. Because of their religiousfaith some Western scholars who earlier believed that the age of theearth was approximately 6,000 years, now agree that the earth is agedbetween 3.96 and 4.3 billion years. If earth is so old then how canman inhabited it after such a gigantic time gap?American scholar Michael Cremo's recent books Forbidden Archaeologyand Devolution of Man based on scientific discoveries prove that theDarwin theory has hardly any truth and that man came on earth at leasttwo billion years ago. Cremo and his co-author Richard Thompson havequoted a lot of archeological evidences which undoubtedly prove thatscientists in the last 150 years have collected so many facts whichdisprove many fundamental theories in history, linguistics andscience. Many scientific journals had also published these discoveriesbut the mental block created by the evolution theory of Darwin and thelimit of 5,000 years of human history did not pay due attention to thenew discoveries. These scientific discoveries and facts prove that thehistory of mankind is billions of years old.