Guest guest Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 dear grp why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru posts only by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all other grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r interacting ,but yes without belittling others . sounds funny .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as sanat ji claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or anti abt those posts i done . Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like i only hav brain ) pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy any thing ,as truth only will prevail . Or R u r afaid of some body ?? Am i in wrong grp ?? where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was mother of all sciences ?? regrds prashanth . ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( not grp moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all discussions and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on fear of failing or loosing . Other wise this can prolong like "egg or chicken first "debate . i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct experts or after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 Resp. Prashant Ji, Namaskar, Thanks for your detailed msg about Nadi in 5 parts. I am sorry as I am not responding on that msg., because I have not yet gone through the details due to some very busy schedule. But do not worry I am definitely going to respond on that msg. and I hope you will support the content of that article. Previously I was waiting for Sh Deshmukh Ji for writing some thing on Nadi before I proceed to analyze it. Because I am of the opinion that there must be some one for defending the stand for proper discussion. Otherwise there is no use of writing unilaterally. I think there is no fence sitter in the forum. As it is not a chat group. This forum was created for proper discussion on astrological principles. Hence your view >>>>> simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or anti abt those posts i done .<<<<<<< is not correct. Because in my opinion every member is astrologer (learner or expert), otherwise what he is doing in this group. But problem is this that they think that if they answer they will have to face the subsequent question and ultimately they will have no answer to support their stand, and this situation will destroy their business. Hence it is better to observe silence even on very simple questions, which you may refer in my msg No. 1, various SOA_____ files in file section and even in various msg. And there you will find the answer of your point >>>>where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was mother of all sciences ??<<<<<< I hope you will like to answer on various questions. Please wait for a day or so on my observation on Nadi (as msg is in 5 parts and I will like to go through each and every line before answering). I am not in the habit of answering any msg. without understanding the content; hence I am always late in answering. So please wait. Thanks, Yours truly, Sanat PS: Ms Dipika ji, I am reading your msg., which is self explanatory about the bogus business of Nadi. If some one come forward then I will offer my comments. Pl wait for my comments on the msg of Sh prashant ji. I am waiting for comments on my various msg. from the learner or expert astrologers. I can assure that their business will not be destroyed if the continue to answer on various points, and I am also not writing in other forums, where their ignorant and innocent clients are waiting. , " prashanthnair999 " <prashanthnair999 wrote: > > > > > dear grp > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru posts only > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all other > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r interacting ,but > yes without belittling others . > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as sanat ji > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or anti abt > those posts i done . > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like i only hav > brain ) > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy any thing > ,as truth only will prevail . > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ?? > > Am i in wrong grp ?? > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was mother of > all sciences ?? > > > > regrds prashanth . > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( not grp > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all discussions > and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on fear of > failing or loosing . > > Other wise this can prolong like " egg or chicken first " debate . > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct experts or > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine . > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 Dear Prashant ji, I along with Shri Chalapathi Rao a friend of mine met Shri Rayudu at his residence in Hyd.We mostly talked about his recently published book and the topic of Naadi Shastra did not come up for discussion.I did not know about his interest in Naadi as otherwise I would have loved to discuss the same.All the same, having read his write up now through your courtsey, I would be glad to respond in my own way taking my time because of my indifferent health. Thanx for the trouble taken. Regds, VB Deshmukh --- prashanthnair999 <prashanthnair999 wrote: > > > > dear grp > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud > talk tru posts only > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter > there ) ,all other > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl > r interacting ,but > yes without belittling others . > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are > astrologers ??( as sanat ji > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to > watch some game > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving > comments pro or anti abt > those posts i done . > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont > appreciate ( like i only hav > brain ) > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect > /destroy any thing > ,as truth only will prevail . > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ?? > > Am i in wrong grp ?? > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? > which was mother of > all sciences ?? > > > > regrds prashanth . > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one > moderater ( not grp > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in > all discussions > and at times it is human to not to stick to > discussions on fear of > failing or loosing . > > Other wise this can prolong like " egg or chicken > first " debate . > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some > subjuct experts or > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer > mine . > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger./invite/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 dear deshmukh ji namaskar Thanks for ur post and i 'am also praying u for ur health ,get well soon . it is so nice to hear that u had interaction with shri rayudu ji Garu .but which book u r talking abt and when did u see him ? As i think some 6 months b4 one of my senior collegue wanted to conct him for some astro guidance and Rayudu ji said ( tru a common frnd ) he is no more interested in giving consultancy and wants to retire frm activ astrology as he wanted to mov to some where a retiremnt home .( if my memory is correct to chennai ) also i am waiting for ur exprnce in nadies .it is part of my enquiry and i am least bothered abt branding ,bashing or trashing going on here .Every one has right to use their time on any hobby's/karma they feel like and some r using like this And i am in search ,pls answer only when u r happy and healthy .Dont over exert ur body or mind . thanks for ur time wish u all the best with pranams and regrds prashanth ps - i read abt this chaya sastries or nadi experts in maharastra ( or both r same in Maharashtra ??) frm shri Kurein 's biography appeared in some new paper .He was then chairman of Anand Milk coop ,Gujarath and How astrologer predicted for him by looking at him or measuring his shadow ( now dont remebr exactly ) and even he cud not blv that he will become so famous as predicted by astrologer .But his memoirs are a testimony for the astrologers readings and it future results .( even he was just accompanying a frnd and on his insistance he took reading ) Even i think that was his first and last encounter with any astrologer . , vbdeshmukh <deshmukhv wrote:>> Dear Prashant ji,> I along with Shri Chalapathi Rao a friend of mine met> Shri Rayudu at his residence in Hyd.We mostly talked> about his recently published book and the topic of> Naadi Shastra did not come up for discussion.I did not> know about his interest in Naadi as otherwise I would> have loved to discuss the same.All the same, having> read his write up now through your courtsey, I would> be glad to respond in my own way taking my time> because of my indifferent health.> Thanx for the trouble taken.> Regds,> VB Deshmukh> --- prashanthnair999 prashanthnair999 wrote:> > > > > > > > > dear grp> > > > > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud> > talk tru posts only> > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter> > there ) ,all other> > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl > > r interacting ,but> > yes without belittling others .> > > > > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are> > astrologers ??( as sanat ji> > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to> > watch some game> > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving> > comments pro or anti abt> > those posts i done .> > > > > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont> > appreciate ( like i only hav> > brain )> > > > > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect> > /destroy any thing> > ,as truth only will prevail .> > > > > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ??> > > > Am i in wrong grp ??> > > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ?> > which was mother of> > all sciences ??> > > > > > > > regrds prashanth .> > > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one> > moderater ( not grp> > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in> > all discussions > > and at times it is human to not to stick to> > discussions on fear of> > failing or loosing .> > > > Other wise this can prolong like "egg or chicken> > first "debate .> > > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some> > subjuct experts or> > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer> > mine .> > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger./invite/> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 raspected sanat ji Namaskar yes ,i am waiting for ur response on each mails to u along with other cut and paste posts .Even u can try on others un attented mails which is lying for long time in this grp .As i will lov to hear ur opinions . offcource u can brand me according ur perceptions and intelliegnce ( which is normal with any one's mindset) .I hav no problems ,if it will serv any purpose .Other wise i was not looking for defending or offending mails rather a clear .clean honest own exprnces,suggestions queries etc ( like in Nadi astrology grp they r not pro or anti but rather trying to help nativs to know waht is nadi and allowing others to form their own opinions without censoring or interfering or branding ). But sure u need not change ur stand . happy to know that There is only 256 astrologers in this world and u can spoil their business .And they r waiting for ur mercy in this world having 5 or 6 billion population ( but u assured them and let us see if they r opening their mouths ) .Any way a small scanning on ur membership area dont reveal any business tycoons who endlessly waiting here . If K G ( kinter garden ) is the criteria for qualification for a getting a branding or certifications i wud like to enrol my son to NASA .WHy i shud loose this sudden opportunity ?? i am looking for science of astrology not science in astrology nor astrology in science ( actualy contents in home page is misleading also pls add this loosing of business part there too ) Hope u will correct ur wording s. So not interested to answer ur file section messges ,so i am not even bothered now at presnt abt its applicability as easy ways of knowing truth are there .where as some other files i find good for my quest and down loaded it .May b i hav a low intellect so bear with me and avoid me frm ur interrogations .Also pls save me frm some hit and run mails too which may appear in future . same time if u find answers to ur own questions u can share with us in future .I will b also sharing what ever i come across within my limited luck and resources . Also pls post contents of ur books in serealised way as u r eger to stop frads in this world .So poor ppl like me will get benefitted too .May b some more memebrs will come forward to answer their exprnce or knowldge . any way thanks for ur time ,sure i can wait for ur responses . regrds prashanth ps -actualy u forget to answer on moderater part . , "sanat2221" <sanatkumar_jain wrote:>> Resp. Prashant Ji,> Namaskar,> Thanks for your detailed msg about Nadi in 5 parts. I am sorry as I > am not responding on that msg., because I have not yet gone through > the details due to some very busy schedule. But do not worry I am > definitely going to respond on that msg. and I hope you will support > the content of that article. Previously I was waiting for Sh Deshmukh > Ji for writing some thing on Nadi before I proceed to analyze it. > Because I am of the opinion that there must be some one for defending > the stand for proper discussion. Otherwise there is no use of writing > unilaterally. > > I think there is no fence sitter in the forum. As it is not a chat > group. This forum was created for proper discussion on astrological > principles. Hence your view > >>>>> simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game> ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or anti > abt> those posts i done .<<<<<<<> is not correct. Because in my opinion every member is astrologer > (learner or expert), otherwise what he is doing in this group. But > problem is this that they think that if they answer they will have to > face the subsequent question and ultimately they will have no answer > to support their stand, and this situation will destroy their > business. Hence it is better to observe silence even on very simple > questions, which you may refer in my msg No. 1, various SOA_____ > files in file section and even in various msg. And there you will > find the answer of your point >>>>where is discussion abt science of > astrology here ? which was mother of> all sciences ??<<<<<<> > I hope you will like to answer on various questions. > > Please wait for a day or so on my observation on Nadi (as msg is in 5 > parts and I will like to go through each and every line before > answering). I am not in the habit of answering any msg. without > understanding the content; hence I am always late in answering. So > please wait. > > Thanks,> Yours truly,> Sanat> > > PS: Ms Dipika ji, I am reading your msg., which is self explanatory > about the bogus business of Nadi. If some one come forward then I > will offer my comments. Pl wait for my comments on the msg of Sh > prashant ji. > > I am waiting for comments on my various msg. from the learner or > expert astrologers. I can assure that their business will not be > destroyed if the continue to answer on various points, and I am also > not writing in other forums, where their ignorant and innocent > clients are waiting.> > > > , "prashanthnair999" > prashanthnair999@ wrote:> >> > > > > > > > dear grp> > > > > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru posts > only> > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all other> > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r > interacting ,but> > yes without belittling others .> > > > > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as > sanat ji> > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game> > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > anti abt> > those posts i done .> > > > > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like i > only hav> > brain )> > > > > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy any > thing> > ,as truth only will prevail .> > > > > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ??> > > > Am i in wrong grp ??> > > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was > mother of> > all sciences ??> > > > > > > > regrds prashanth .> > > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( not > grp> > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all > discussions > > and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on fear of> > failing or loosing .> > > > Other wise this can prolong like "egg or chicken first "debate .> > > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct experts > or> > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine .> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Dear Prashant Nair Ji, Why don't post your Naadi articles in Naadi astrology ? The information will be very much useful for the naadi members. regards, harish From: prashanthnair999Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:46:03 +0000 Re: Nadi predictions and my posts raspected sanat ji Namaskar yes ,i am waiting for ur response on each mails to u along with other cut and paste posts .Even u can try on others un attented mails which is lying for long time in this grp .As i will lov to hear ur opinions . offcource u can brand me according ur perceptions and intelliegnce ( which is normal with any one's mindset) .I hav no problems ,if it will serv any purpose .Other wise i was not looking for defending or offending mails rather a clear .clean honest own exprnces,suggestions queries etc ( like in Nadi astrology grp they r not pro or anti but rather trying to help nativs to know waht is nadi and allowing others to form their own opinions without censoring or interfering or branding ). But sure u need not change ur stand . happy to know that There is only 256 astrologers in this world and u can spoil their business .And they r waiting for ur mercy in this world having 5 or 6 billion population ( but u assured them and let us see if they r opening their mouths ) .Any way a small scanning on ur membership area dont reveal any business tycoons who endlessly waiting here . If K G ( kinter garden ) is the criteria for qualification for a getting a branding or certifications i wud like to enrol my son to NASA .WHy i shud loose this sudden opportunity ?? i am looking for science of astrology not science in astrology nor astrology in science ( actualy contents in home page is misleading also pls add this loosing of business part there too ) Hope u will correct ur wording s. So not interested to answer ur file section messges ,so i am not even bothered now at presnt abt its applicability as easy ways of knowing truth are there .where as some other files i find good for my quest and down loaded it .May b i hav a low intellect so bear with me and avoid me frm ur interrogations .Also pls save me frm some hit and run mails too which may appear in future . same time if u find answers to ur own questions u can share with us in future .I will b also sharing what ever i come across within my limited luck and resources . Also pls post contents of ur books in serealised way as u r eger to stop frads in this world .So poor ppl like me will get benefitted too .May b some more memebrs will come forward to answer their exprnce or knowldge . any way thanks for ur time ,sure i can wait for ur responses . regrds prashanth ps -actualy u forget to answer on moderater part . , "sanat2221" <sanatkumar_jain wrote:>> Resp. Prashant Ji,> Namaskar,> Thanks for your detailed msg about Nadi in 5 parts. I am sorry as I > am not responding on that msg., because I have not yet gone through > the details due to some very busy schedule. But do not worry I am > definitely going to respond on that msg. and I hope you will support > the content of that article. Previously I was waiting for Sh Deshmukh > Ji for writing some thing on Nadi before I proceed to analyze it. > Because I am of the opinion that there must be some one for defending > the stand for proper discussion. Otherwise there is no use of writing > unilaterally. > > I think there is no fence sitter in the forum. As it is not a chat > group. This forum was created for proper discussion on astrological > principles. Hence your view > >>>>> simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game> ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or anti > abt> those posts i done .<<<<<<<> is not correct. Because in my opinion every member is astrologer > (learner or expert), otherwise what he is doing in this group. But > problem is this that they think that if they answer they will have to > face the subsequent question and ultimately they will have no answer > to support their stand, and this situation will destroy their > business. Hence it is better to observe silence even on very simple > questions, which you may refer in my msg No. 1, various SOA_____ > files in file section and even in various msg. And there you will > find the answer of your point >>>>where is discussion abt science of > astrology here ? which was mother of> all sciences ??<<<<<<> > I hope you will like to answer on various questions. > > Please wait for a day or so on my observation on Nadi (as msg is in 5 > parts and I will like to go through each and every line before > answering). I am not in the habit of answering any msg. without > understanding the content; hence I am always late in answering. So > please wait. > > Thanks,> Yours truly,> Sanat> > > PS: Ms Dipika ji, I am reading your msg., which is self explanatory > about the bogus business of Nadi. If some one come forward then I > will offer my comments. Pl wait for my comments on the msg of Sh > prashant ji. > > I am waiting for comments on my various msg. from the learner or > expert astrologers. I can assure that their business will not be > destroyed if the continue to answer on various points, and I am also > not writing in other forums, where their ignorant and innocent > clients are waiting.> > > > , "prashanthnair999" > prashanthnair999@ wrote:> >> > > > > > > > dear grp> > > > > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru posts > only> > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all other> > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r > interacting ,but> > yes without belittling others .> > > > > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as > sanat ji> > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game> > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > anti abt> > those posts i done .> > > > > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like i > only hav> > brain )> > > > > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy any > thing> > ,as truth only will prevail .> > > > > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ??> > > > Am i in wrong grp ??> > > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was > mother of> > all sciences ??> > > > > > > > regrds prashanth .> > > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( not > grp> > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all > discussions > > and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on fear of> > failing or loosing .> > > > Other wise this can prolong like "egg or chicken first "debate .> > > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct experts > or> > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine .> >> Give the world a slice of your life. Get a Live.in id Check it out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2008 Report Share Posted November 11, 2008 Resp Prahant ji, Namaskar, Now I have gone through your msgs about Nadi in 5 parts. From these msgs I came to know that it is not your observation but copy of an article. Now I do not know as to whether you are supporting Nadi or denying it. If you are denying the Nadi then there is no discussion. If you support Nadi then you have to answer the questions it self written in the article. I am not able to understand as to what you want to say. Just to start the discussion from the beginning I will like to know as to why thumb impression was taken. Whereas, matching the thumb impression and knowledge that every thumb has different pattern of lines was not known to our sages. It is a very new technique devised after the construction of microscope. Moreover matching thumb impression is not a child job. It requires a perfect skill and training. Whereas Nadi reader was neither so literate nor they have any microscope in their centre with matching thumb impression on the socalled Index bundle. This practice is only used to take advantage of the mindset of the clients, who knows that thumb impression of every person is different; hence he is going to find a Nadi totally individualized for him. Whereas it is not so. Lighter side of this practice may be that Master at HQ of such Nadi centre may laugh as to how many illiterate (mentally) persons (thumb impression is used by illiterates) they have traced so far. Hi. Hi. Many mentally illiterate persons are always around us (majority at the doors of astrologers). I am waiting for your answer for further digging. Yours truly, Sanat , " sanat2221 " <sanatkumar_jain wrote: > > Resp. Prashant Ji, > Namaskar, > Thanks for your detailed msg about Nadi in 5 parts. I am sorry as I > am not responding on that msg., because I have not yet gone through > the details due to some very busy schedule. But do not worry I am > definitely going to respond on that msg. and I hope you will support > the content of that article. Previously I was waiting for Sh Deshmukh > Ji for writing some thing on Nadi before I proceed to analyze it. > Because I am of the opinion that there must be some one for defending > the stand for proper discussion. Otherwise there is no use of writing > unilaterally. > > I think there is no fence sitter in the forum. As it is not a chat > group. This forum was created for proper discussion on astrological > principles. Hence your view > >>>>> simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or anti > abt > those posts i done .<<<<<<< > is not correct. Because in my opinion every member is astrologer > (learner or expert), otherwise what he is doing in this group. But > problem is this that they think that if they answer they will have to > face the subsequent question and ultimately they will have no answer > to support their stand, and this situation will destroy their > business. Hence it is better to observe silence even on very simple > questions, which you may refer in my msg No. 1, various SOA_____ > files in file section and even in various msg. And there you will > find the answer of your point >>>>where is discussion abt science of > astrology here ? which was mother of > all sciences ??<<<<<< > > I hope you will like to answer on various questions. > > Please wait for a day or so on my observation on Nadi (as msg is in 5 > parts and I will like to go through each and every line before > answering). I am not in the habit of answering any msg. without > understanding the content; hence I am always late in answering. So > please wait. > > Thanks, > Yours truly, > Sanat > > > PS: Ms Dipika ji, I am reading your msg., which is self explanatory > about the bogus business of Nadi. If some one come forward then I > will offer my comments. Pl wait for my comments on the msg of Sh > prashant ji. > > I am waiting for comments on my various msg. from the learner or > expert astrologers. I can assure that their business will not be > destroyed if the continue to answer on various points, and I am also > not writing in other forums, where their ignorant and innocent > clients are waiting. > > > > , " prashanthnair999 " > <prashanthnair999@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > dear grp > > > > > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru posts > only > > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all other > > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r > interacting ,but > > yes without belittling others . > > > > > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as > sanat ji > > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game > > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > anti abt > > those posts i done . > > > > > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like i > only hav > > brain ) > > > > > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy any > thing > > ,as truth only will prevail . > > > > > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ?? > > > > Am i in wrong grp ?? > > > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was > mother of > > all sciences ?? > > > > > > > > regrds prashanth . > > > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( not > grp > > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all > discussions > > and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on fear of > > failing or loosing . > > > > Other wise this can prolong like " egg or chicken first " debate . > > > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct experts > or > > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine . > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2008 Report Share Posted November 12, 2008 dear Harish ji namaskar Thanks for ur post . i think u can also post it in nadi grps as it is for public use .can u do it for benefit of all memebrs ??And i think shri rayudu ji is also a silent memebr in all nadi forums .Now dont know wheter his health allowing him to read and participate . thanks for ur suggestions ,hope u will take in positiv sense . also i request u to participate in all discussions going on here with ur comments and suggestions as any opinions will b guiding force for ppl like us and so many ppl brain storming will giv us more clear ideas to under stand this complex science .U can giv ur specific problems u r seeing in unravelling a subjuct ,or can share any informations ,or any ideas come to u out of ur creativ thinking or share some ideas presnted by others or frm ur exprnce .etc etc forget abt the restrictions and restrainments u ppl face here . This is a request to all memebrs who ever may b reading this messge too regrds prashanth , Astro S <harishastro wrote:>> > Dear Prashant Nair Ji,> > Why don't post your Naadi articles in Naadi astrology ? The information will be very much useful for the naadi members.> > regards,> > harish> > > > : prashanthnair999: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:46:03 +0000 Re: Nadi predictions and my posts> > > > > > raspected sanat ji > Namaskar > yes ,i am waiting for ur response on each mails to u along with other cut and paste posts .Even u can try on others un attented mails which is lying for long time in this grp .As i will lov to hear ur opinions .> > offcource u can brand me according ur perceptions and intelliegnce ( which is normal with any one's mindset) .I hav no problems ,if it will serv any purpose .Other wise i was not looking for defending or offending mails rather a clear .clean honest own exprnces,suggestions queries etc ( like in Nadi astrology grp they r not pro or anti but rather trying to help nativs to know waht is nadi and allowing others to form their own opinions without censoring or interfering or branding ).> > But sure u need not change ur stand .> > happy to know that There is only 256 astrologers in this world and u can spoil their business .And they r waiting for ur mercy in this world having 5 or 6 billion population ( but u assured them and let us see if they r opening their mouths ) .Any way a small scanning on ur membership area dont reveal any business tycoons who endlessly waiting here .> > If K G ( kinter garden ) is the criteria for qualification for a getting a branding or certifications i wud like to enrol my son to NASA .WHy i shud loose this sudden opportunity ??> > i am looking for science of astrology not science in astrology nor astrology in science ( actualy contents in home page is misleading also pls add this loosing of business part there too ) Hope u will correct ur wording s. So not interested to answer ur file section messges ,so i am not even bothered now at presnt abt its applicability as easy ways of knowing truth are there .where as some other files i find good for my quest and down loaded it .May b i hav a low intellect so bear with me and avoid me frm ur interrogations .Also pls save me frm some hit and run mails too which may appear in future .> > > same time if u find answers to ur own questions u can share with us in future .I will b also sharing what ever i come across within my limited luck and resources .> > Also pls post contents of ur books in serealised way as u r eger to stop frads in this world .So poor ppl like me will get benefitted too .May b some more memebrs will come forward to answer their exprnce or knowldge .> > any way thanks for ur time ,sure i can wait for ur responses .> > regrds prashanth > > ps -actualy u forget to answer on moderater part .> > , "sanat2221" sanatkumar_jain@ wrote:>> Resp. Prashant Ji,> Namaskar,> Thanks for your detailed msg about Nadi in 5 parts. I am sorry as I > am not responding on that msg., because I have not yet gone through > the details due to some very busy schedule. But do not worry I am > definitely going to respond on that msg. and I hope you will support > the content of that article. Previously I was waiting for Sh Deshmukh > Ji for writing some thing on Nadi before I proceed to analyze it. > Because I am of the opinion that there must be some one for defending > the stand for proper discussion. Otherwise there is no use of writing > unilaterally. > > I think there is no fence sitter in the forum. As it is not a chat > group. This forum was created for proper discussion on astrological > principles. Hence your view > >>>>> simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game> ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or anti > abt> those posts i done .<<<<<<<> is not correct. Because in my opinion every member is astrologer > (learner or expert), otherwise what he is doing in this group. But > problem is this that they think that if they answer they will have to > face the subsequent question and ultimately they will have no answer > to support their stand, and this situation will destroy their > business. Hence it is better to observe silence even on very simple > questions, which you may refer in my msg No. 1, various SOA_____ > files in file section and even in various msg. And there you will > find the answer of your point >>>>where is discussion abt science of > astrology here ? which was mother of> all sciences ??<<<<<<> > I hope you will like to answer on various questions. > > Please wait for a day or so on my observation on Nadi (as msg is in 5 > parts and I will like to go through each and every line before > answering). I am not in the habit of answering any msg. without > understanding the content; hence I am always late in answering. So > please wait. > > Thanks,> Yours truly,> Sanat> > > PS: Ms Dipika ji, I am reading your msg., which is self explanatory > about the bogus business of Nadi. If some one come forward then I > will offer my comments. Pl wait for my comments on the msg of Sh > prashant ji. > > I am waiting for comments on my various msg. from the learner or > expert astrologers. I can assure that their business will not be > destroyed if the continue to answer on various points, and I am also > not writing in other forums, where their ignorant and innocent > clients are waiting.> > > > , "prashanthnair999" > prashanthnair999@ wrote:> >> > > > > > > > dear grp> > > > > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru posts > only> > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all other> > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r > interacting ,but> > yes without belittling others .> > > > > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as > sanat ji> > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game> > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > anti abt> > those posts i done .> > > > > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like i > only hav> > brain )> > > > > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy any > thing> > ,as truth only will prevail .> > > > > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ??> > > > Am i in wrong grp ??> > > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was > mother of> > all sciences ??> > > > > > > > regrds prashanth .> > > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( not > grp> > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all > discussions > > and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on fear of> > failing or loosing .> > > > Other wise this can prolong like "egg or chicken first "debate .> > > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct experts > or> > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine .> >>> > > > > > > _______________> Movies, sports & news! Get your daily entertainment fix, only on live.com> http://www.live.com/?scope=video & form=MICOAL> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2008 Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 Resp sanat ji Namasakar Thanks for ur reply but still other replys r waiting frm ur side and u selected this post leaving many mails b4 posted by me and many other memebrs .no wonder .May b u r too busy or choosy . Whether I support Nadies or nadi reading is out of context question and irrelevent .Unless i got some interest in it ( forget supporting part ) i will not post that messges in this group . NOw u told me abt finger prints technology or Thumb impression was never b4 the invention of Microscopes .So pls answer me . so can u tell me ur idea How the modern ppl r using it ,and how they categorise in a 25 crore populated nation imagining the state is taking finger prints of all ppl to maintain records and help in controlling crimes (many modern nations r doing it ) .U can take help frm police or IB or ID .I want simple answer only ,is the state is maintaining 25 crore files or they categorise it ??How they were doing it b4 the use of computers ?? also wat is this hand reading or samudrika lakshana sastra .When u blv it is dvlpd and which country and ppl originated it and purpose and scope .also tell me how we imported it .I am not asking abt its utility part or prediction part as u dont know it and i sincerely regret that i cannot giv u a chance of another rishies bashing .Our ignorence is our ignorence only not a license to bash or trash . sorry to say ,but i got enough grovelling ,gutless,spineless,goof up replies frm u to me and group and i am thinking atleast i may get real reply of a real truth seeker this time .Than countering with some not so relevent questions . i will tell my opinions later if u can giv me satisfactory answers .because u choose that way . regrds prashanth , "sanat2221" <sanatkumar_jain wrote:>> Resp Prahant ji,> Namaskar,> Now I have gone through your msgs about Nadi in 5 parts. From these > msgs I came to know that it is not your observation but copy of an > article. Now I do not know as to whether you are supporting Nadi or > denying it. If you are denying the Nadi then there is no discussion. > If you support Nadi then you have to answer the questions it self > written in the article. I am not able to understand as to what you > want to say. > > Just to start the discussion from the beginning I will like to know > as to why thumb impression was taken. Whereas, matching the thumb > impression and knowledge that every thumb has different pattern of > lines was not known to our sages. It is a very new technique devised > after the construction of microscope. Moreover matching thumb > impression is not a child job. It requires a perfect skill and > training. Whereas Nadi reader was neither so literate nor they have > any microscope in their centre with matching thumb impression on the > socalled Index bundle. This practice is only used to take advantage > of the mindset of the clients, who knows that thumb impression of > every person is different; hence he is going to find a Nadi totally > individualized for him. Whereas it is not so. Lighter side of this > practice may be that Master at HQ of such Nadi centre may laugh as to > how many illiterate (mentally) persons (thumb impression is used by > illiterates) they have traced so far. Hi. Hi. Many mentally > illiterate persons are always around us (majority at the doors of > astrologers).> > I am waiting for your answer for further digging.> > Yours truly,> Sanat> > , "sanat2221" > sanatkumar_jain@ wrote:> >> > Resp. Prashant Ji,> > Namaskar,> > Thanks for your detailed msg about Nadi in 5 parts. I am sorry as I > > am not responding on that msg., because I have not yet gone through > > the details due to some very busy schedule. But do not worry I am > > definitely going to respond on that msg. and I hope you will > support > > the content of that article. Previously I was waiting for Sh > Deshmukh > > Ji for writing some thing on Nadi before I proceed to analyze it. > > Because I am of the opinion that there must be some one for > defending > > the stand for proper discussion. Otherwise there is no use of > writing > > unilaterally. > > > > I think there is no fence sitter in the forum. As it is not a chat > > group. This forum was created for proper discussion on > astrological > > principles. Hence your view > > >>>>> simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game> > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > anti > > abt> > those posts i done .<<<<<<<> > is not correct. Because in my opinion every member is astrologer > > (learner or expert), otherwise what he is doing in this group. But > > problem is this that they think that if they answer they will have > to > > face the subsequent question and ultimately they will have no > answer > > to support their stand, and this situation will destroy their > > business. Hence it is better to observe silence even on very simple > > questions, which you may refer in my msg No. 1, various SOA_____ > > files in file section and even in various msg. And there you will > > find the answer of your point >>>>where is discussion abt science > of > > astrology here ? which was mother of> > all sciences ??<<<<<<> > > > I hope you will like to answer on various questions. > > > > Please wait for a day or so on my observation on Nadi (as msg is in > 5 > > parts and I will like to go through each and every line before > > answering). I am not in the habit of answering any msg. without > > understanding the content; hence I am always late in answering. So > > please wait. > > > > Thanks,> > Yours truly,> > Sanat> > > > > > PS: Ms Dipika ji, I am reading your msg., which is self explanatory > > about the bogus business of Nadi. If some one come forward then I > > will offer my comments. Pl wait for my comments on the msg of Sh > > prashant ji. > > > > I am waiting for comments on my various msg. from the learner or > > expert astrologers. I can assure that their business will not be > > destroyed if the continue to answer on various points, and I am > also > > not writing in other forums, where their ignorant and innocent > > clients are waiting.> > > > > > > > , "prashanthnair999" > > <prashanthnair999@> wrote:> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > dear grp> > > > > > > > > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru posts > > only> > > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all > other> > > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r > > interacting ,but> > > yes without belittling others .> > > > > > > > > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as > > sanat ji> > > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game> > > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > > anti abt> > > those posts i done .> > > > > > > > > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like i > > only hav> > > brain )> > > > > > > > > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy any > > thing> > > ,as truth only will prevail .> > > > > > > > > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ??> > > > > > Am i in wrong grp ??> > > > > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was > > mother of> > > all sciences ??> > > > > > > > > > > > regrds prashanth .> > > > > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( > not > > grp> > > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all > > discussions > > > and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on fear > of> > > failing or loosing .> > > > > > Other wise this can prolong like "egg or chicken first "debate .> > > > > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct > experts > > or> > > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine .> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2008 Report Share Posted November 14, 2008 Dear Prashant ji, --- prashanthnair999 <prashanthnair999 wrote: > > > > dear grp > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud > talk tru posts only > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter > there ) ,all other > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl > r interacting ,but > yes without belittling others . > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are > astrologers ??( as sanat ji > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to > watch some game > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving > comments pro or anti abt > those posts i done . > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont > appreciate ( like i only hav > brain ) > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect > /destroy any thing > ,as truth only will prevail . > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ?? > > Am i in wrong grp ?? > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? > which was mother of > all sciences ?? > > > > regrds prashanth . > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one > moderater ( not grp > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in > all discussions > and at times it is human to not to stick to > discussions on fear of > failing or loosing . > > Other wise this can prolong like " egg or chicken > first " debate . > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some > subjuct experts or > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer > mine . > > > > Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta! Go to http://in.messenger./win/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2008 Report Share Posted November 17, 2008 Resp Prashant ji, Namaskar, Thanks for your many msg during the week. I could not reply immediately as I my comp. was creating some problem due to bouncing of emails. I don't know whether it is still Ok or not. Now I want to clear my way of answering. 1. If you will continue to jump from one stream to another then I will have to wait and see as to which msg must be answered. (you have jumped from thumb impression for Nadi to palmistry etc.) 2. If you will cut paste some msg of the other forum then I am not going to reply because there is no one who can answer subsequent interaction. Hence there is no use in writing unilaterally. (you have msg from Ms Bhagwathi, Sh Sreenadh etc.) 3. If any msg has no matter to answer except your views unilaterally then there is no question of answer. (As your msg to Ms Dipika dated 10-11-08 etc.) After eliminating msg related to above categories, remaining points are as follows 1 - Regarding Nadi you have stated that >>>>> Whether I support Nadies or nadi reading is out of context question and irrelevent .Unless i got some interest in it <<<<<Hence if you have no interest then there is no point in exchange of views. As I have already mentioned that until unless there is some one to support his stand till then there is no use of exchange of views. However, regarding thumb impression, perhaps you are not aware as to how they are matched and from which record. Moreover there is no point in discussion as to how police is doing this job. We are analyzing the thumb impression for Nadi on which point you are silent. Hence I am also observing silence. 2 Regarding >>>>>> i am looking for science of astrology not science in astrology nor astrology in science ( actualy contents in home page is misleading also pls add this loosing of business part there too ) Hope u will correct ur wording s.<<<<<<<< I will like to say that I am asking with many astrologers as to how every basic principles were formulated but not a single astrologer is coming forward to say that so and so procedure was adopted on so and so information to formulate so and so principle. This is science or astrology. Even in absence of any reply recently I have again posted the basic information on which principles of sign lord was formulated. (refer " message to all (part i) " dated 5-11-08.) So how you can say that name of the forum is wrong. Actually astrologers are neither aware nor want to dig a matter to find the truth. 3 >>>>>> There is only 256 astrologers in this world and u can spoil their business .<<<<<<< I have never stated like this. I said that astrologers of the forum are not replying for fear of loosing their business if they admit some mistake in astrology and so on. Otherwise why astrologers are not sharing their views on various points. Senior members may be aware as to how they left / observe silence on a very systematic discussion (pointwise). As I am not in the habit of throwing some sentences here and there on diversified subject to loose the main point. Except above points your msg do not have any personal observation hence I am not answering them till the concerning writer of the msg may be member of the forum for sharing further views or some member may specifically raise those points as his own stand or if I will have spare time then I can also answer so that some member may pick up further discussion. I hope I have answered your points. Thanks, Yours truly, Sanat , " prashanthnair999 " <prashanthnair999 wrote: > > > > > Resp sanat ji > > Namasakar > > > > Thanks for ur reply but still other replys r waiting frm ur side and u > selected this post leaving many mails b4 posted by me and many other > memebrs .no wonder .May b u r too busy or choosy . > > > > Whether I support Nadies or nadi reading is out of context question and > irrelevent .Unless i got some interest in it ( forget supporting part ) > i will not post that messges in this group . > > > > NOw u told me abt finger prints technology or Thumb impression was never > b4 the invention of Microscopes .So pls answer me . > > > > so can u tell me ur idea How the modern ppl r using it ,and how they > categorise in a 25 crore populated nation imagining the state is taking > finger prints of all ppl to maintain records and help in controlling > crimes (many modern nations r doing it ) .U can take help frm police or > IB or ID .I want simple answer only ,is the state is maintaining 25 > crore files or they categorise it ??How they were doing it b4 the use of > computers ?? > > > > also wat is this hand reading or samudrika lakshana sastra .When u blv > it is dvlpd and which country and ppl originated it and purpose and > scope .also tell me how we imported it .I am not asking abt its utility > part or prediction part as u dont know it and i sincerely regret that i > cannot giv u a chance of another rishies bashing .Our ignorence is our > ignorence only not a license to bash or trash . > > > > sorry to say ,but i got enough grovelling ,gutless,spineless,goof up > replies frm u to me and group and i am thinking atleast i may get real > reply of a real truth seeker this time .Than countering with some not so > relevent questions . > > > > i will tell my opinions later if u can giv me satisfactory answers > .because u choose that way . > > > > regrds prashanth > > > , " sanat2221 " > <sanatkumar_jain@> wrote: > > > > Resp Prahant ji, > > Namaskar, > > Now I have gone through your msgs about Nadi in 5 parts. From these > > msgs I came to know that it is not your observation but copy of an > > article. Now I do not know as to whether you are supporting Nadi or > > denying it. If you are denying the Nadi then there is no discussion. > > If you support Nadi then you have to answer the questions it self > > written in the article. I am not able to understand as to what you > > want to say. > > > > Just to start the discussion from the beginning I will like to know > > as to why thumb impression was taken. Whereas, matching the thumb > > impression and knowledge that every thumb has different pattern of > > lines was not known to our sages. It is a very new technique devised > > after the construction of microscope. Moreover matching thumb > > impression is not a child job. It requires a perfect skill and > > training. Whereas Nadi reader was neither so literate nor they have > > any microscope in their centre with matching thumb impression on the > > socalled Index bundle. This practice is only used to take advantage > > of the mindset of the clients, who knows that thumb impression of > > every person is different; hence he is going to find a Nadi totally > > individualized for him. Whereas it is not so. Lighter side of this > > practice may be that Master at HQ of such Nadi centre may laugh as to > > how many illiterate (mentally) persons (thumb impression is used by > > illiterates) they have traced so far. Hi. Hi. Many mentally > > illiterate persons are always around us (majority at the doors of > > astrologers). > > > > I am waiting for your answer for further digging. > > > > Yours truly, > > Sanat > > > > , " sanat2221 " > > sanatkumar_jain@ wrote: > > > > > > Resp. Prashant Ji, > > > Namaskar, > > > Thanks for your detailed msg about Nadi in 5 parts. I am sorry as I > > > am not responding on that msg., because I have not yet gone through > > > the details due to some very busy schedule. But do not worry I am > > > definitely going to respond on that msg. and I hope you will > > support > > > the content of that article. Previously I was waiting for Sh > > Deshmukh > > > Ji for writing some thing on Nadi before I proceed to analyze it. > > > Because I am of the opinion that there must be some one for > > defending > > > the stand for proper discussion. Otherwise there is no use of > > writing > > > unilaterally. > > > > > > I think there is no fence sitter in the forum. As it is not a chat > > > group. This forum was created for proper discussion on > > astrological > > > principles. Hence your view > > > >>>>> simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game > > > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > > anti > > > abt > > > those posts i done .<<<<<<< > > > is not correct. Because in my opinion every member is astrologer > > > (learner or expert), otherwise what he is doing in this group. But > > > problem is this that they think that if they answer they will have > > to > > > face the subsequent question and ultimately they will have no > > answer > > > to support their stand, and this situation will destroy their > > > business. Hence it is better to observe silence even on very simple > > > questions, which you may refer in my msg No. 1, various SOA_____ > > > files in file section and even in various msg. And there you will > > > find the answer of your point >>>>where is discussion abt science > > of > > > astrology here ? which was mother of > > > all sciences ??<<<<<< > > > > > > I hope you will like to answer on various questions. > > > > > > Please wait for a day or so on my observation on Nadi (as msg is in > > 5 > > > parts and I will like to go through each and every line before > > > answering). I am not in the habit of answering any msg. without > > > understanding the content; hence I am always late in answering. So > > > please wait. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Yours truly, > > > Sanat > > > > > > > > > PS: Ms Dipika ji, I am reading your msg., which is self explanatory > > > about the bogus business of Nadi. If some one come forward then I > > > will offer my comments. Pl wait for my comments on the msg of Sh > > > prashant ji. > > > > > > I am waiting for comments on my various msg. from the learner or > > > expert astrologers. I can assure that their business will not be > > > destroyed if the continue to answer on various points, and I am > > also > > > not writing in other forums, where their ignorant and innocent > > > clients are waiting. > > > > > > > > > > > > , " prashanthnair999 " > > > <prashanthnair999@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dear grp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru posts > > > only > > > > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all > > other > > > > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r > > > interacting ,but > > > > yes without belittling others . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as > > > sanat ji > > > > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game > > > > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > > > anti abt > > > > those posts i done . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like i > > > only hav > > > > brain ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy any > > > thing > > > > ,as truth only will prevail . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ?? > > > > > > > > Am i in wrong grp ?? > > > > > > > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was > > > mother of > > > > all sciences ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regrds prashanth . > > > > > > > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( > > not > > > grp > > > > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all > > > discussions > > > > and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on fear > > of > > > > failing or loosing . > > > > > > > > Other wise this can prolong like " egg or chicken first " debate . > > > > > > > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct > > experts > > > or > > > > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine . > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2008 Report Share Posted November 17, 2008 dear sanat ji Namaskar thanks for this mail but i answerd u in prvt mail which u sent me prvtly the very same mail . if u dont know abt the questions i asked then tell us u dont know ,other wise same way Nadi ppl also indexing it and if u dont know nadi means they r not illiterates u r illiterate in nadi i humbly pointed out many time b4 too , " if u dont know chinese language means it does not mean that chinese laungage dont exist " It is western concept of the discovered america and said to its nativs " i discovered u " yes Mindset (frozen ) if u r talkng abt sreet ppl i dont hav much exprnce with them in any predictiv branch .As i find u r taking abt ur exprnce with too much illiterate ppl .in 1911 the europeans found kerala pundits are illiterate as they cannot read or write english ,gr8 is it not ?? this is the idea we must borrow . also as regrds to my posts and forwarded mails all my posts r reflcting my interest in the subjuct and i am willing to explore further tho at times i dont fully agree with the content but i hav no option other wise all mahabharatha i cannot type and i can save my time too ,why i shud re type when it is readily avilable ??? next time if u cant answer it just ignore it ,but dont say it is not astrology or this and that . also thanks for teaching me that palm dont hav thumb ( its is known as scientific thumb rule theory ) or thumb is not a part of palm . hope ur computer is back to normalcy .( it is rejecting/bouncing mails ) regrds prashanth , " sanat2221 " <sanatkumar_jain wrote: > > Resp Prashant ji, > Namaskar, > Thanks for your many msg during the week. I could not reply > immediately as I my comp. was creating some problem due to bouncing > of emails. I don't know whether it is still Ok or not. > Now I want to clear my way of answering. > 1. If you will continue to jump from one stream to another then > I will have to wait and see as to which msg must be answered. (you > have jumped from thumb impression for Nadi to palmistry etc.) > 2. If you will cut paste some msg of the other forum then I am > not going to reply because there is no one who can answer subsequent > interaction. Hence there is no use in writing unilaterally. (you have > msg from Ms Bhagwathi, Sh Sreenadh etc.) > 3. If any msg has no matter to answer except your views > unilaterally then there is no question of answer. (As your msg to Ms > Dipika dated 10-11-08 etc.) > > After eliminating msg related to above categories, remaining points > are as follows > > 1 - Regarding Nadi you have stated that >>>>> Whether I support > Nadies or nadi reading is out of context question and > irrelevent .Unless i got some interest in it <<<<<Hence if you have > no interest then there is no point in exchange of views. As I have > already mentioned that until unless there is some one to support his > stand till then there is no use of exchange of views. > > However, regarding thumb impression, perhaps you are not aware as to > how they are matched and from which record. Moreover there is no > point in discussion as to how police is doing this job. We are > analyzing the thumb impression for Nadi on which point you are > silent. Hence I am also observing silence. > > 2 Regarding >>>>>> i am looking for science of astrology not science > in astrology nor astrology in science ( actualy contents in home page > is misleading also pls add this loosing of business part there too ) > Hope u will correct ur wording s.<<<<<<<< I will like to say that I > am asking with many astrologers as to how every basic principles were > formulated but not a single astrologer is coming forward to say that > so and so procedure was adopted on so and so information to formulate > so and so principle. This is science or astrology. Even in absence > of any reply recently I have again posted the basic information on > which principles of sign lord was formulated. (refer " message to all > (part i) " dated 5-11-08.) So how you can say that name of the forum > is wrong. Actually astrologers are neither aware nor want to dig a > matter to find the truth. > > 3 >>>>>> There is only 256 astrologers in this world and u can spoil > their business .<<<<<<< I have never stated like this. I said that > astrologers of the forum are not replying for fear of loosing their > business if they admit some mistake in astrology and so on. Otherwise > why astrologers are not sharing their views on various points. Senior > members may be aware as to how they left / observe silence on a very > systematic discussion (pointwise). As I am not in the habit of > throwing some sentences here and there on diversified subject to > loose the main point. > > Except above points your msg do not have any personal observation > hence I am not answering them till the concerning writer of the msg > may be member of the forum for sharing further views or some member > may specifically raise those points as his own stand or if I will > have spare time then I can also answer so that some member may pick > up further discussion. > > I hope I have answered your points. > Thanks, > Yours truly, > Sanat > > > > > , " prashanthnair999 " > prashanthnair999@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Resp sanat ji > > > > Namasakar > > > > > > > > Thanks for ur reply but still other replys r waiting frm ur side > and u > > selected this post leaving many mails b4 posted by me and many other > > memebrs .no wonder .May b u r too busy or choosy . > > > > > > > > Whether I support Nadies or nadi reading is out of context question > and > > irrelevent .Unless i got some interest in it ( forget supporting > part ) > > i will not post that messges in this group . > > > > > > > > NOw u told me abt finger prints technology or Thumb impression was > never > > b4 the invention of Microscopes .So pls answer me . > > > > > > > > so can u tell me ur idea How the modern ppl r using it ,and how they > > categorise in a 25 crore populated nation imagining the state is > taking > > finger prints of all ppl to maintain records and help in controlling > > crimes (many modern nations r doing it ) .U can take help frm > police or > > IB or ID .I want simple answer only ,is the state is maintaining 25 > > crore files or they categorise it ??How they were doing it b4 the > use of > > computers ?? > > > > > > > > also wat is this hand reading or samudrika lakshana sastra .When u > blv > > it is dvlpd and which country and ppl originated it and purpose and > > scope .also tell me how we imported it .I am not asking abt its > utility > > part or prediction part as u dont know it and i sincerely regret > that i > > cannot giv u a chance of another rishies bashing .Our ignorence is > our > > ignorence only not a license to bash or trash . > > > > > > > > sorry to say ,but i got enough grovelling ,gutless,spineless,goof up > > replies frm u to me and group and i am thinking atleast i may get > real > > reply of a real truth seeker this time .Than countering with some > not so > > relevent questions . > > > > > > > > i will tell my opinions later if u can giv me satisfactory answers > > .because u choose that way . > > > > > > > > regrds prashanth > > > > > > , " sanat2221 " > > <sanatkumar_jain@> wrote: > > > > > > Resp Prahant ji, > > > Namaskar, > > > Now I have gone through your msgs about Nadi in 5 parts. From > these > > > msgs I came to know that it is not your observation but copy of an > > > article. Now I do not know as to whether you are supporting Nadi > or > > > denying it. If you are denying the Nadi then there is no > discussion. > > > If you support Nadi then you have to answer the questions it self > > > written in the article. I am not able to understand as to what you > > > want to say. > > > > > > Just to start the discussion from the beginning I will like to > know > > > as to why thumb impression was taken. Whereas, matching the thumb > > > impression and knowledge that every thumb has different pattern of > > > lines was not known to our sages. It is a very new technique > devised > > > after the construction of microscope. Moreover matching thumb > > > impression is not a child job. It requires a perfect skill and > > > training. Whereas Nadi reader was neither so literate nor they > have > > > any microscope in their centre with matching thumb impression on > the > > > socalled Index bundle. This practice is only used to take > advantage > > > of the mindset of the clients, who knows that thumb impression of > > > every person is different; hence he is going to find a Nadi > totally > > > individualized for him. Whereas it is not so. Lighter side of this > > > practice may be that Master at HQ of such Nadi centre may laugh > as to > > > how many illiterate (mentally) persons (thumb impression is used > by > > > illiterates) they have traced so far. Hi. Hi. Many mentally > > > illiterate persons are always around us (majority at the doors of > > > astrologers). > > > > > > I am waiting for your answer for further digging. > > > > > > Yours truly, > > > Sanat > > > > > > , " sanat2221 " > > > sanatkumar_jain@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Resp. Prashant Ji, > > > > Namaskar, > > > > Thanks for your detailed msg about Nadi in 5 parts. I am sorry > as I > > > > am not responding on that msg., because I have not yet gone > through > > > > the details due to some very busy schedule. But do not worry I > am > > > > definitely going to respond on that msg. and I hope you will > > > support > > > > the content of that article. Previously I was waiting for Sh > > > Deshmukh > > > > Ji for writing some thing on Nadi before I proceed to analyze > it. > > > > Because I am of the opinion that there must be some one for > > > defending > > > > the stand for proper discussion. Otherwise there is no use of > > > writing > > > > unilaterally. > > > > > > > > I think there is no fence sitter in the forum. As it is not a > chat > > > > group. This forum was created for proper discussion on > > > astrological > > > > principles. Hence your view > > > > >>>>> simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some game > > > > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro or > > > anti > > > > abt > > > > those posts i done .<<<<<<< > > > > is not correct. Because in my opinion every member is astrologer > > > > (learner or expert), otherwise what he is doing in this group. > But > > > > problem is this that they think that if they answer they will > have > > > to > > > > face the subsequent question and ultimately they will have no > > > answer > > > > to support their stand, and this situation will destroy their > > > > business. Hence it is better to observe silence even on very > simple > > > > questions, which you may refer in my msg No. 1, various SOA_____ > > > > files in file section and even in various msg. And there you > will > > > > find the answer of your point >>>>where is discussion abt > science > > > of > > > > astrology here ? which was mother of > > > > all sciences ??<<<<<< > > > > > > > > I hope you will like to answer on various questions. > > > > > > > > Please wait for a day or so on my observation on Nadi (as msg > is in > > > 5 > > > > parts and I will like to go through each and every line before > > > > answering). I am not in the habit of answering any msg. without > > > > understanding the content; hence I am always late in answering. > So > > > > please wait. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Yours truly, > > > > Sanat > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: Ms Dipika ji, I am reading your msg., which is self > explanatory > > > > about the bogus business of Nadi. If some one come forward then > I > > > > will offer my comments. Pl wait for my comments on the msg of Sh > > > > prashant ji. > > > > > > > > I am waiting for comments on my various msg. from the learner or > > > > expert astrologers. I can assure that their business will not be > > > > destroyed if the continue to answer on various points, and I am > > > also > > > > not writing in other forums, where their ignorant and innocent > > > > clients are waiting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " prashanthnair999 " > > > > <prashanthnair999@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dear grp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > why no on responding ,is it customery that we shud talk tru > posts > > > > only > > > > > by one to one basis ??( means others can't enter there ) ,all > > > other > > > > > grps even if abt satan worship there is lot of ppl r > > > > interacting ,but > > > > > yes without belittling others . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sounds funny [] .Is all grp memebrs are astrologers ??( as > > > > sanat ji > > > > > claims ) or simple fence sitters ,sitting there to watch some > game > > > > > ?,even activ memebrs dont seems to b not giving comments pro > or > > > > anti abt > > > > > those posts i done . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Offcource holier than tho mails i also dont appreciate ( like > i > > > > only hav > > > > > brain ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pls speak up,no body can tell 1000 lies to protect /destroy > any > > > > thing > > > > > ,as truth only will prevail . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or R u r afaid of some body ?? > > > > > > > > > > Am i in wrong grp ?? > > > > > > > > > > where is discussion abt science of astrology here ? which was > > > > mother of > > > > > all sciences ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regrds prashanth . > > > > > > > > > > ps --sanat ji generaly any debate there shud b one moderater ( > > > not > > > > grp > > > > > moderater ) ,so what u say ?? since u r one party in all > > > > discussions > > > > > and at times it is human to not to stick to discussions on > fear > > > of > > > > > failing or loosing . > > > > > > > > > > Other wise this can prolong like " egg or chicken > first " debate . > > > > > > > > > > i will answer to ur posts soon after contcting some subjuct > > > experts > > > > or > > > > > after some Material reading .Mean time u can answer mine . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.