Science of astrology

July 12, 2008

Dear Mishra ji,

Namaskar,

Thanks for your mail.

Your email may not be posted to “Scienceofastrology” forum until you may be member of the forum by clicking and filling in your email address etc. hence you can just walk in. However I am appending your mail so that it may be available to the members of the forum and they may think / share their views.

First, I fully support your concluding line >>>>>> I am free to express my views being one of a free soul of UNIVERSE.<<<<<<<<< and hope you will continue to express your views for discussion. Our discussion is not personal but it is only academical.

It is good that >>>>>>>> By integrating LIGHT ENERGY OF PHYSICS and one of the paragraph of " LAL KITAB " , i have tried and it has help me and my family members to minimize our negative emotions.<<<<<<<<< but on the other hand you stated that >>>>>>> one can't find it in any HINDU scripture or any other scripture to quote.<<<<<<. It means you have solved psychological problems with some sort of psychological relief that too with your own creation of rules and principles, because negative emotion is a psychological affect which may vary from person to person and situation to situation. So your rules or experience can neither be linked with astrology nor with science. And before any sort of linking it must be analyzed.

>>>>>>>ASTROLOGY is based on the mathematical laws which is more absolute than the SUBJECTIVE LAWS. Therefore it has to be SCIENCE because all scientific laws are mathemetical.<<<<<<<< Astrology, which we are discussing is predictive astrology and it is different from astronomy (though it was known as astrology in ancient time). So you may say that ASTROnOmY is based on the mathematical laws which is more absolute than the SUBJECTIVE LAWS. Therefore it has to be SCIENCE because all scientific laws are mathemetical. And if you want to say that predictive astrology is science then you have to find out as to how astrological principles were formulated and whether they need some correction or not in view of modern scientific development. It makes no difference as to >>>>>>>> Scientist have already called ASTROLOGY as a pseudoscience and ignored to develop its scientific base.<<<<<<< because if predictive astrology is science and principle are scientific then it is science then why scientist or anybody will try to say it as pseudoscience.

I am not agree with your statement >>>>>>>>>>>>Unfortunetelly the predictive ASTROLOGY is based on subjectives explanation which varry ASTROLOGER to ASTROLOGER.<<<<<< because predictive astrology is not based on subjective explanations as every original principle formulated by sages and so on have no subjective explanation, but definite prediction. As if so and so planet is placed in so and so house will offer so and so result and so on with different combination of rules with definite result. It was just like mathematical equations but only astrologers have turned it to subjective explanation in view of failure of predictive principles. Thus explanation varies from astrologer to astrologer. And when one explanation turns to be true like result derived on head and tail of tossing a coin, then he start to shout from rooftop about his prediction but without supporting principle. So how such random explanation may be classified to science. You are right >>>>>> MATHMATICAL LAWS (Absolute LAWS) never varry from place to place Scientist to scintist therefore in true sence the ASTROLOGY though it is based on ABSOLUTE numbers <<<<<<<< but again astrology is not based on absolute numbers but astronomy is based on absolute information.

Yes >>>>>>> all scientific development and laws were developped and applied to NON-LIVING MATTER but same were not develloped and applied on the LIVING MATTERS.<<<<<<<<< but predictive astrology is being applied on living matters and that too only for human-being and not to other living animals. So if it is science for disclosing the future of human-being only then what is the harm in analyzing it and to disclose that these principles were formulated on the basis of primitive information that Earth is stationary, Sun is nearer than Moon,. Constellations are nearer then Mercury and so on………….. Because no astrological book will like to disclose it otherwise, who fool will like to support such knowledge in 21st century. Contrary to this every astrological book, media, astrologer and so on are trying to say that it is science or Vedic so that they may exploit the ignorance of public and encash the popularity of Science and faith on Ved. That’s why every book has statistical information and so on taken from NASA and fusing it with the predictive astrology.

Because principle of predictive astrology are not correct that’s why >>>>>>>> I have applied THE NEWTON'S LAW of MOTION (ONE OF THE SCIENTIFIC LAW of PHYSICS on human emotions and got the answer to my questions.<<<<<<<. But again it can provide some psychological relief without any scientific/ mathematical rule / principle etc. Thus everybody has to search his own remedy and there is nothing which can be applied for decoding any problem /future or remedy.

So at this point will you like to analyze any basic principle of predictive astrology?

Thanks for your vibrant views

Yours truly,

Sanat

12-7-08

Dear Mr Jain

It is not scriptured any where in the WORLD. I have tried to get the answer my self whether ASTROLOGY is a Science or not. I got the answer that it is a Science. By integrating LIGHT ENERGY OF PHYSICS and one of the paragraph of " LAL KITAB " , i have tried and it has help me and my family members to minimize our negative emotions.

I have said that I have perceived therefore meaning of that one can't find it in any HINDU scripture or any other scripture to quote. However every one is free to find the answer to satisfy his curiosity of solving the mystery of human behavior and so called fate. Whether is it manageable? One should be a KARMA ORIENTED or FATE ORIENTED.

HINDU SCRIPTURE does say that a man should be KARMA oriented to change even his fate. BUT HOW? I have to tried to find the answer to my this question.

Scientist have already called ASTROLOGY as a pseudoscience and ignored to develop its scientific base. ASTROLOGY is based on the mathematical laws which is more absolute than the SUBJECTIVE LAWS. Therefore it has to be SCIENCE because all scientific laws are mathemetical.

Unfortunetelly the predictive ASTROLOGY is based on subjectives explanation which varry ASTROLOGER to ASTROLOGER.

MATHMATICAL LAWS (Absolute LAWS) never varry from place to place Scientist to scintist therefore in true sence the ASTROLOGY though it is based on ABSOLUTE numbers but it laws never became absolute and vary from ASTROLOGER TO ASTROLOGER. WHY?

IT is because all scientific development and laws were developped and applied to NON-LIVING MATTER but same were not develloped and applied on the LIVING MATTERS.

I have applied THE NEWTON'S LAW of MOTION (ONE OF THE SCIENTIFIC LAW of PHYSICS on human emotions and got the answer to my questions.

I am not imposing my view on any one and have no intention that every one should agree with me but this is an other dimension people may like to think in this direction.

I think it clarify my position. It is only a thought provoking note. I am free to express my views being one of a free soul of UNIVERSE.

With regards

Mishra OP