Guest guest Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 I was thinking that skeptics try to debunk astrology by saying that, say, Neptune, has a magnetic or energetic field that affects people on earth to such a small degree that Neptune could not have an effect on a person's actions on earth or in their natal chart. In nature, sometimes a SMALLER quantity of something is more potent, as demonstrated in homeopathy. So, perhaps the planets do affect us, and our physical and energetic systems do detect the energies from the planets and the signs that they're in, even though science cannot explain how or why at the current moment. The astrology that I've taught myself has emphasized how powerful Pluto is - but it's the smallest planet and the farthest away from earth! So smaller doesn't mean less powerful, and less in homeopathy, at least from my understanding, doesn't mean less potent. I know this is going to start a familiar debate, but I have often thought that science in its arrogance dismisses what it cannot yet explain, yet refuses to acknowledge that it's not sophisticated enough to explain what is happening to a person's system via the planets, for example. Rupert Sheldrake and other alternative authors are must reads. Best wishes, econ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.