Guest guest Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 >>. It was on the advice of Vasishtha Muni that Dasharatha decided to anoint Rama as the Yuvraja the very next day, as it was "Tishya" i.e. Pushya nakshata then. From this anecdote, it is clear that either Vasishtha Muni did not know as to what was going to happen to Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as a crown-prince or Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately since he did not want to interfere in the divine dispensation!<<From Avtarjis file that you have uploaded sanatji,its obvious ancient bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light years away.In fact Lord Rama as an avataar showed humanity about righteous living and in particular eka patni dharma.Becoz guys were being polygamist.Astronomical position of the sun and moon were used to calculate thithis and all of the relevant material for panchangam aka almanac.Its cool in retrospective to comment or critique after the event is over,but successful people all the time use all the resources for success in life.Astrology is one such tool,to be ahead in life and clever people take the advice as directional trend or clues what might happen.Becoz heart of heart everyone know,only god knows it all.That is the ultimate science of god.sb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 Resp. SB Ji, Namaskar, Thanks for recharging your active participation, I have selected some points from your msg for offering my comments. Though actually we have diverted from analyzing the astrology (predictive) to religion. And certainly religion is a matter of faith hence no question. Astrology (predictive) is only being questioned because you (not you personally but astrologers) claiming it as a science hence only that portion is being examined in the forum. Regarding your comments " my inability to make sanatji understand ,that sanathana dharma teaching were infused with religious precepts.And by default astrology is religion,a wing of sanathana dharma. " I have already commented earlier and the question is not whether you are able to convince me or not. Question is whether astrology is science or not. You are again and again linking astrology with religion whereas it is not correct because in which religion it was stated that ask astrologer for any prediction so that he may be religious. I think you are not able to disassociate astrology (predictive) from astronomy. I am not questioning astronomy which was known as astrology in primitive age. By your comment " By analysing a chart,a astrologer is supposed to help a jivatma,to come closer to god and thereby finally realise the paramatma. Why not look at astrologers as an active agent,who is actually making a jiva come close to god. " you want to say that astrologer are actually self-appointed agent of God, who will cheat others in the name of planets and when individual is completely exhausted due to his non-functioning on the advise of astrologers then definitely he will search some ways and he will go to temple, which is the aim of the God. At least I am not convinced. At one end you are saying that " Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately since he did not want to interfere in the divine dispensation " and on the other hand you are pleading astrologer to disclose destiny that too wrongly that too without any solid principle that too when you know …………… Again your comments is wrong in view of your earlier stand " its obvious ancient bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light years away. " . I will like to know where it is written that nakshatras are lightyearss away. Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge with the knowledge of sages. I have incorporated many points raised by you one after another (refer SOA________ in file section). But you yourself can find that how badly you have mixed your concept of predictive astrology with religion and using science in support of your stand though it may be against the concept of sages. But anyway you may continue and members will like to reply, learn as they please. Waiting for your more observations Thanks Sanat 25-4-08 , " sureshbalaraman " <sureshbalaraman wrote: > > >>. It was on the advice of Vasishtha Muni > that Dasharatha decided to anoint Rama as the Yuvraja the very next > day, as it was " Tishya " i.e. Pushya nakshata then. From this > anecdote, it is clear that either Vasishtha Muni did not know as to > what was going to happen to Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as a > crown-prince or Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately since he did not > want to interfere in the divine dispensation!<< > > From Avtarjis file that you have uploaded sanatji,its obvious ancient > bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light years away.In fact Lord > Rama as an avataar showed humanity about righteous living and in > particular eka patni dharma.Becoz guys were being > polygamist.Astronomical position of the sun and moon were used to > calculate thithis and all of the relevant material for panchangam aka > almanac.Its cool in retrospective to comment or critique after the event > is over,but successful people all the time use all the resources for > success in life.Astrology is one such tool,to be ahead in life and > clever people take the advice as directional trend or clues what might > happen.Becoz heart of heart everyone know,only god knows it all.That is > the ultimate science of god. > > sb > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 >>Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge with the knowledge of sages.<< Sanatji,i am not sure who is not getting the picture here?On the one hand you are questioning sages like Varahamihira,Parashara,Maitreya,Saravali,Bharadwaja etc accountable to scientific enquiry when they are dead and gone or probably re-incarnated as SB,Sanatji or...who ever...to their exemplary classics whic is viable in todays hectic life.These are inter-linked to religion.They form part of the Panchanga.Now if panchanga itself is not science,i better lock myself up,in a lunatic asylum hee hee. You are constantly bombarding about fake astrologer making use of peoples gullibility..that is definitely bad.Better to have Jyotish degree in under-graduate studies,Master,Phd..then they are certified..and people should approach only certified,licensed astrologer would be the way out !! There absolutely gems in south india who predict thru jyotisham.They are dedicated lot. sb , " sanat2221 " <sanatkumar_jain wrote: > > Resp. SB Ji, > Namaskar, > Thanks for recharging your active participation, > I have selected some points from your msg for offering my comments. > Though actually we have diverted from analyzing the astrology > (predictive) to religion. And certainly religion is a matter of faith > hence no question. Astrology (predictive) is only being questioned > because you (not you personally but astrologers) claiming it as a > science hence only that portion is being examined in the forum. > > Regarding your comments " my inability to make sanatji > understand ,that sanathana dharma teaching were infused with religious > precepts.And by default astrology is religion,a wing of sanathana > dharma. " I have already commented earlier and the question is not > whether you are able to convince me or not. Question is whether > astrology is science or not. You are again and again linking > astrology with religion whereas it is not correct because in which > religion it was stated that ask astrologer for any prediction so that > he may be religious. I think you are not able to disassociate > astrology (predictive) from astronomy. I am not questioning astronomy > which was known as astrology in primitive age. > > By your comment " By analysing a chart,a astrologer is supposed to > help a jivatma,to come closer to god and thereby finally realise the > paramatma. > Why not look at astrologers as an active agent,who is actually > making a jiva come close to god. " you want to say that astrologer are > actually self-appointed agent of God, who will cheat others in the > name of planets and when individual is completely exhausted due to > his non-functioning on the advise of astrologers then definitely he > will search some ways and he will go to temple, which is the aim of > the God. At least I am not convinced. > > At one end you are saying that " Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately > since he did not > want to interfere in the divine dispensation " and on the other hand > you are pleading astrologer to disclose destiny that too wrongly that > too without any solid principle that too when you know …………… > > Again your comments is wrong in view of your earlier stand " its > obvious ancient bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light > years away. " . I will like to know where it is written that nakshatras > are lightyearss away. Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge > with the knowledge of sages. > > I have incorporated many points raised by you one after another > (refer SOA________ in file section). But you yourself can find that > how badly you have mixed your concept of predictive astrology with > religion and using science in support of your stand though it may be > against the concept of sages. > > But anyway you may continue and members will like to reply, learn as > they please. > > Waiting for your more observations > Thanks > Sanat > 25-4-08 > > > > , " sureshbalaraman " > sureshbalaraman@ wrote: > > > > >>. It was on the advice of Vasishtha Muni > > that Dasharatha decided to anoint Rama as the Yuvraja the very next > > day, as it was " Tishya " i.e. Pushya nakshata then. From this > > anecdote, it is clear that either Vasishtha Muni did not know as to > > what was going to happen to Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as > a > > crown-prince or Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately since he did not > > want to interfere in the divine dispensation!<< > > > > From Avtarjis file that you have uploaded sanatji,its obvious > ancient > > bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light years away.In fact > Lord > > Rama as an avataar showed humanity about righteous living and in > > particular eka patni dharma.Becoz guys were being > > polygamist.Astronomical position of the sun and moon were used to > > calculate thithis and all of the relevant material for panchangam > aka > > almanac.Its cool in retrospective to comment or critique after the > event > > is over,but successful people all the time use all the resources for > > success in life.Astrology is one such tool,to be ahead in life and > > clever people take the advice as directional trend or clues what > might > > happen.Becoz heart of heart everyone know,only god knows it > all.That is > > the ultimate science of god. > > > > sb > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 >>At one end you are saying that " Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately since he did not want to interfere in the divine dispensation " and on the other hand you are pleading astrologer to disclose destiny that too wrongly that too without any solid principle that too when you know ……………<< I quoted from Avtarjis article that you have uploaded in the file section.Try not to mis-represent,and somehow i am not having a good connection,as your motive to know whether astrology is a predictive science or not,is genuine.For one you are a jain by religion,what business you have interfering with hinduism jyotisham?In other words you are being dis-reputable to Hindus.Why dont you read jains teaching and keep quiet,hee hee...i dunno if jains have jyotish and if they do have who is the author?do jains have calendars?do jains have remedies for bad grahas?I am feeling you are upto no good here,trying to ridicule hindus using jyotisham..correct me if i am wrong hi hi.. sb , " sanat2221 " <sanatkumar_jain wrote: > > Resp. SB Ji, > Namaskar, > Thanks for recharging your active participation, > I have selected some points from your msg for offering my comments. > Though actually we have diverted from analyzing the astrology > (predictive) to religion. And certainly religion is a matter of faith > hence no question. Astrology (predictive) is only being questioned > because you (not you personally but astrologers) claiming it as a > science hence only that portion is being examined in the forum. > > Regarding your comments " my inability to make sanatji > understand ,that sanathana dharma teaching were infused with religious > precepts.And by default astrology is religion,a wing of sanathana > dharma. " I have already commented earlier and the question is not > whether you are able to convince me or not. Question is whether > astrology is science or not. You are again and again linking > astrology with religion whereas it is not correct because in which > religion it was stated that ask astrologer for any prediction so that > he may be religious. I think you are not able to disassociate > astrology (predictive) from astronomy. I am not questioning astronomy > which was known as astrology in primitive age. > > By your comment " By analysing a chart,a astrologer is supposed to > help a jivatma,to come closer to god and thereby finally realise the > paramatma. > Why not look at astrologers as an active agent,who is actually > making a jiva come close to god. " you want to say that astrologer are > actually self-appointed agent of God, who will cheat others in the > name of planets and when individual is completely exhausted due to > his non-functioning on the advise of astrologers then definitely he > will search some ways and he will go to temple, which is the aim of > the God. At least I am not convinced. > > At one end you are saying that " Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately > since he did not > want to interfere in the divine dispensation " and on the other hand > you are pleading astrologer to disclose destiny that too wrongly that > too without any solid principle that too when you know …………… > > Again your comments is wrong in view of your earlier stand " its > obvious ancient bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light > years away. " . I will like to know where it is written that nakshatras > are lightyearss away. Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge > with the knowledge of sages. > > I have incorporated many points raised by you one after another > (refer SOA________ in file section). But you yourself can find that > how badly you have mixed your concept of predictive astrology with > religion and using science in support of your stand though it may be > against the concept of sages. > > But anyway you may continue and members will like to reply, learn as > they please. > > Waiting for your more observations > Thanks > Sanat > 25-4-08 > > > > , " sureshbalaraman " > sureshbalaraman@ wrote: > > > > >>. It was on the advice of Vasishtha Muni > > that Dasharatha decided to anoint Rama as the Yuvraja the very next > > day, as it was " Tishya " i.e. Pushya nakshata then. From this > > anecdote, it is clear that either Vasishtha Muni did not know as to > > what was going to happen to Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as > a > > crown-prince or Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately since he did not > > want to interfere in the divine dispensation!<< > > > > From Avtarjis file that you have uploaded sanatji,its obvious > ancient > > bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light years away.In fact > Lord > > Rama as an avataar showed humanity about righteous living and in > > particular eka patni dharma.Becoz guys were being > > polygamist.Astronomical position of the sun and moon were used to > > calculate thithis and all of the relevant material for panchangam > aka > > almanac.Its cool in retrospective to comment or critique after the > event > > is over,but successful people all the time use all the resources for > > success in life.Astrology is one such tool,to be ahead in life and > > clever people take the advice as directional trend or clues what > might > > happen.Becoz heart of heart everyone know,only god knows it > all.That is > > the ultimate science of god. > > > > sb > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 Resp SB, Thanks for your many msgs but without any concrete discussion on predictive astrology except religious faith. Hence I am not commenting on your various msgs regarding colour of mars, affect of sun, Jainism, shankaracharya etc. except following clarification. >>Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge with the knowledge of sages.<< I want to say that do not put modern scientific knowledge in the mouth of our ancient sages. Whatever our ancient sages concluded is well written in scriptures and followed since then. It is our heritage. If modern concept were known or explained in scriptures then VM, or aryabhatt and so on would have clarified it. And there was no need of modern sages to come out with new scientific explanation. Now I find no use in exchanging our views so long you have faith on predictive astrology like religion. Other members may continue to exchange their views but please maintain healthy atmosphere and keep it within analysis of predictive astrology ie. (science of astrology). Thanks, Yours sanat 27-4-08 PS : I find that some msgs are mixing with the forum of " Hindu calendar " . I will like to request to members that please avoid intermixing by stopping multiple posting. Because if the originator of the thread is not in our forum then how we can interact with him. I know that Hindu calendar forum is mainly related to correction of calendar. Hence it would be better to invite the concerning member in this forum for proper discussion on science of predictive astrology , " sureshbalaraman " <sureshbalaraman wrote: > > > >>Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge with the knowledge of > sages.<< > > Sanatji,i am not sure who is not getting the picture here?On the one > hand you are questioning sages like > Varahamihira,Parashara,Maitreya,Saravali,Bharadwaja etc accountable to > scientific enquiry when they are dead and gone or probably re- incarnated > as SB,Sanatji or...who ever...to their exemplary classics whic is viable > in todays hectic life.These are inter-linked to religion.They form part > of the Panchanga.Now if panchanga itself is not science,i better lock > myself up,in a lunatic asylum hee hee. > > You are constantly bombarding about fake astrologer making use of > peoples gullibility..that is definitely bad.Better to have Jyotish > degree in under-graduate studies,Master,Phd..then they are > certified..and people should approach only certified,licensed astrologer > would be the way out !! > > There absolutely gems in south india who predict thru jyotisham.They are > dedicated lot. > > sb > > > > , " sanat2221 " > <sanatkumar_jain@> wrote: > > > > Resp. SB Ji, > > Namaskar, > > Thanks for recharging your active participation, > > I have selected some points from your msg for offering my comments. > > Though actually we have diverted from analyzing the astrology > > (predictive) to religion. And certainly religion is a matter of faith > > hence no question. Astrology (predictive) is only being questioned > > because you (not you personally but astrologers) claiming it as a > > science hence only that portion is being examined in the forum. > > > > Regarding your comments " my inability to make sanatji > > understand ,that sanathana dharma teaching were infused with religious > > precepts.And by default astrology is religion,a wing of sanathana > > dharma. " I have already commented earlier and the question is not > > whether you are able to convince me or not. Question is whether > > astrology is science or not. You are again and again linking > > astrology with religion whereas it is not correct because in which > > religion it was stated that ask astrologer for any prediction so that > > he may be religious. I think you are not able to disassociate > > astrology (predictive) from astronomy. I am not questioning astronomy > > which was known as astrology in primitive age. > > > > By your comment " By analysing a chart,a astrologer is supposed to > > help a jivatma,to come closer to god and thereby finally realise the > > paramatma. > > Why not look at astrologers as an active agent,who is actually > > making a jiva come close to god. " you want to say that astrologer are > > actually self-appointed agent of God, who will cheat others in the > > name of planets and when individual is completely exhausted due to > > his non-functioning on the advise of astrologers then definitely he > > will search some ways and he will go to temple, which is the aim of > > the God. At least I am not convinced. > > > > At one end you are saying that " Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately > > since he did not > > want to interfere in the divine dispensation " and on the other hand > > you are pleading astrologer to disclose destiny that too wrongly that > > too without any solid principle that too when you know …………… > > > > Again your comments is wrong in view of your earlier stand " its > > obvious ancient bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light > > years away. " . I will like to know where it is written that nakshatras > > are lightyearss away. Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge > > with the knowledge of sages. > > > > I have incorporated many points raised by you one after another > > (refer SOA________ in file section). But you yourself can find that > > how badly you have mixed your concept of predictive astrology with > > religion and using science in support of your stand though it may be > > against the concept of sages. > > > > But anyway you may continue and members will like to reply, learn as > > they please. > > > > Waiting for your more observations > > Thanks > > Sanat > > 25-4-08 > > > > > > > > , " sureshbalaraman " > > sureshbalaraman@ wrote: > > > > > > >>. It was on the advice of Vasishtha Muni > > > that Dasharatha decided to anoint Rama as the Yuvraja the very next > > > day, as it was " Tishya " i.e. Pushya nakshata then. From this > > > anecdote, it is clear that either Vasishtha Muni did not know as to > > > what was going to happen to Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan Rama as > > a > > > crown-prince or Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately since he did not > > > want to interfere in the divine dispensation!<< > > > > > > From Avtarjis file that you have uploaded sanatji,its obvious > > ancient > > > bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light years away.In fact > > Lord > > > Rama as an avataar showed humanity about righteous living and in > > > particular eka patni dharma.Becoz guys were being > > > polygamist.Astronomical position of the sun and moon were used to > > > calculate thithis and all of the relevant material for panchangam > > aka > > > almanac.Its cool in retrospective to comment or critique after the > > event > > > is over,but successful people all the time use all the resources for > > > success in life.Astrology is one such tool,to be ahead in life and > > > clever people take the advice as directional trend or clues what > > might > > > happen.Becoz heart of heart everyone know,only god knows it > > all.That is > > > the ultimate science of god. > > > > > > sb > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 >>Thanks for your many msgs but without any concrete discussion on predictive astrology except religious faith. Hence I am not commenting on your various msgs regarding colour of mars, affect of sun, Jainism, shankaracharya etc. except following clarification.<< What is there to predict?You are questioning the authority of sages like Varahamihira,Parashara,...etc..They gave solutions to people who were vexed with their situations and who wanted to success and relief.The laws formulated by them is relevant because,ultimately they make you yield to gods supremacy and power and there lies the predictions. {{>>Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge with the knowledge of sages.<< I want to say that do not put modern scientific knowledge in the mouth of our ancient sages. Whatever our ancient sages concluded is well written in scriptures and followed since then. It is our heritage. If modern concept were known or explained in scriptures then VM, or aryabhatt and so on would have clarified it. And there was no need of modern sages to come out with new scientific explanation. Now I find no use in exchanging our views so long you have faith on predictive astrology like religion.}} Fair enough.Jyotisham is part of my religion,and i will defend it to the core.Because its my faith.I am not questiong the predicatability of Jain Tirthankars,who have also written treatises about jyotisham,gola shastra etc. >>Other members may continue to exchange their views but please maintain healthy atmosphere and keep it within analysis of predictive astrology ie. (science of astrology).<< Its been nice to know you Jain.Byeeeeeeee. sb , " sanat2221 " <sanatkumar_jain wrote: > > > Resp SB, > Thanks for your many msgs but without any concrete discussion on > predictive astrology except religious faith. Hence I am not > commenting on your various msgs regarding colour of mars, affect of > sun, Jainism, shankaracharya etc. except following clarification. > > >>Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge with the knowledge > of sages.<< > > I want to say that do not put modern scientific knowledge in the > mouth of our ancient sages. Whatever our ancient sages concluded is > well written in scriptures and followed since then. It is our > heritage. If modern concept were known or explained in scriptures > then VM, or aryabhatt and so on would have clarified it. And there > was no need of modern sages to come out with new scientific > explanation. > > Now I find no use in exchanging our views so long you have faith on > predictive astrology like religion. > > Other members may continue to exchange their views but please > maintain healthy atmosphere and keep it within analysis of predictive > astrology ie. (science of astrology). > > Thanks, > Yours > > sanat > 27-4-08 > > > PS : I find that some msgs are mixing with the forum of " Hindu > calendar " . I will like to request to members that please avoid > intermixing by stopping multiple posting. Because if the originator > of the thread is not in our forum then how we can interact with him. > I know that Hindu calendar forum is mainly related to correction of > calendar. Hence it would be better to invite the concerning member in > this forum for proper discussion on science of predictive astrology > > > > > > , " sureshbalaraman " > sureshbalaraman@ wrote: > > > > > > >>Please do not intermingle scientific knowledge with the knowledge > of > > sages.<< > > > > Sanatji,i am not sure who is not getting the picture here?On the one > > hand you are questioning sages like > > Varahamihira,Parashara,Maitreya,Saravali,Bharadwaja etc accountable > to > > scientific enquiry when they are dead and gone or probably re- > incarnated > > as SB,Sanatji or...who ever...to their exemplary classics whic is > viable > > in todays hectic life.These are inter-linked to religion.They form > part > > of the Panchanga.Now if panchanga itself is not science,i better > lock > > myself up,in a lunatic asylum hee hee. > > > > You are constantly bombarding about fake astrologer making use of > > peoples gullibility..that is definitely bad.Better to have Jyotish > > degree in under-graduate studies,Master,Phd..then they are > > certified..and people should approach only certified,licensed > astrologer > > would be the way out !! > > > > There absolutely gems in south india who predict thru > jyotisham.They are > > dedicated lot. > > > > sb > > > > > > > > , " sanat2221 " > > <sanatkumar_jain@> wrote: > > > > > > Resp. SB Ji, > > > Namaskar, > > > Thanks for recharging your active participation, > > > I have selected some points from your msg for offering my > comments. > > > Though actually we have diverted from analyzing the astrology > > > (predictive) to religion. And certainly religion is a matter of > faith > > > hence no question. Astrology (predictive) is only being questioned > > > because you (not you personally but astrologers) claiming it as a > > > science hence only that portion is being examined in the forum. > > > > > > Regarding your comments " my inability to make sanatji > > > understand ,that sanathana dharma teaching were infused with > religious > > > precepts.And by default astrology is religion,a wing of sanathana > > > dharma. " I have already commented earlier and the question is not > > > whether you are able to convince me or not. Question is whether > > > astrology is science or not. You are again and again linking > > > astrology with religion whereas it is not correct because in which > > > religion it was stated that ask astrologer for any prediction so > that > > > he may be religious. I think you are not able to disassociate > > > astrology (predictive) from astronomy. I am not questioning > astronomy > > > which was known as astrology in primitive age. > > > > > > By your comment " By analysing a chart,a astrologer is supposed to > > > help a jivatma,to come closer to god and thereby finally realise > the > > > paramatma. > > > Why not look at astrologers as an active agent,who is actually > > > making a jiva come close to god. " you want to say that astrologer > are > > > actually self-appointed agent of God, who will cheat others in the > > > name of planets and when individual is completely exhausted due to > > > his non-functioning on the advise of astrologers then definitely > he > > > will search some ways and he will go to temple, which is the aim > of > > > the God. At least I am not convinced. > > > > > > At one end you are saying that " Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately > > > since he did not > > > want to interfere in the divine dispensation " and on the other > hand > > > you are pleading astrologer to disclose destiny that too wrongly > that > > > too without any solid principle that too when you know …………… > > > > > > Again your comments is wrong in view of your earlier stand " its > > > obvious ancient bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light > > > years away. " . I will like to know where it is written that > nakshatras > > > are lightyearss away. Please do not intermingle scientific > knowledge > > > with the knowledge of sages. > > > > > > I have incorporated many points raised by you one after another > > > (refer SOA________ in file section). But you yourself can find > that > > > how badly you have mixed your concept of predictive astrology with > > > religion and using science in support of your stand though it may > be > > > against the concept of sages. > > > > > > But anyway you may continue and members will like to reply, learn > as > > > they please. > > > > > > Waiting for your more observations > > > Thanks > > > Sanat > > > 25-4-08 > > > > > > > > > > > > , " sureshbalaraman " > > > sureshbalaraman@ wrote: > > > > > > > > >>. It was on the advice of Vasishtha Muni > > > > that Dasharatha decided to anoint Rama as the Yuvraja the very > next > > > > day, as it was " Tishya " i.e. Pushya nakshata then. From this > > > > anecdote, it is clear that either Vasishtha Muni did not know > as to > > > > what was going to happen to Dasharatha by declaring Bhagwan > Rama as > > > a > > > > crown-prince or Vasishtha kept quiet deliberately since he did > not > > > > want to interfere in the divine dispensation!<< > > > > > > > > From Avtarjis file that you have uploaded sanatji,its obvious > > > ancient > > > > bharathians did use nakshatramas,which are light years away.In > fact > > > Lord > > > > Rama as an avataar showed humanity about righteous living and in > > > > particular eka patni dharma.Becoz guys were being > > > > polygamist.Astronomical position of the sun and moon were used > to > > > > calculate thithis and all of the relevant material for > panchangam > > > aka > > > > almanac.Its cool in retrospective to comment or critique after > the > > > event > > > > is over,but successful people all the time use all the > resources for > > > > success in life.Astrology is one such tool,to be ahead in life > and > > > > clever people take the advice as directional trend or clues what > > > might > > > > happen.Becoz heart of heart everyone know,only god knows it > > > all.That is > > > > the ultimate science of god. > > > > > > > > sb > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.