Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 Resp. SB, Namaskar, Now I am taking new point from your msg. as a new thread. You have referred a predictive principle from horosara 1- " Death by hanging is indicated, if Surya is in Yuvati Bhava (7th bhav) along with Rahu, or Ketu, while Sukra is in Randhr Bhava. " Where in I have included another principle wherein it is also written that - if Rahu is in randra bhav (8th) then death will be caused by hanging. I want to emphasize that there is no other sub-rule, modification, correction, elimination, explanation etc. attached with this rule and likewise with many rules too. You may be well aware with the birth clock or you can see with the rate of birth that in every 20 sec. there is a birth in India and every 3 sec. there is a birth in the world. Whereas our horoscope is fixed for about 2 hours (ie same ascendant) I am just analyzing the position of a year for your 1st principle and you can find it almost every year. During 16-5-2002 to 10-6-2002 Sun was with Rahu in Taurus sign (Vrash) and Venus was in Gemini sign (mithun). Thus any child born during this period at about noon will have same combination, which may be thousands in numbers. So do you think that all childrens will be hanged. If you want I can give you data of some other years. So far 2nd principle is concerned then you can see that every day for two hours Rahu may be in 8th house. So almost 1 out 12 person would have been hanged since writing of horasara. Is it logical, feasible, realistic, science etc. and is hanging so popular in the world that 10% persons may be hanged. Unfortunately, I am neither agreeing with you nor with the principles of Horasara. Try to think differently, logically as I am not imposing my views nor it is a game of fighting in which some one will lose if he starts to think afresh. Members may also write for opinion of other members too. Thanks for your new thread and I will summarize it in SOA______. Yours truly, sanat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 The Goal of Jyotishas is to first,bring the person to believe in God, and 2nd to bring them closer to God.Here god could mean the different avataars including religions which claim their god is the only god and the rest are not.That is the true sanathana dharma followed and instructed us to follow by our fore fathers/mothers.HOW DOES MOVEMENT OF PLANETS AFFECT OUR LIVES?? As per Maha Rishi Parasara Chapter 2, Sloka 3. Avtara{ynekain ýjSy prmaTmn>,jIvana< kmR)ldae ¢hépI jnadRn>avat˜r˜õyanek˜ni hyajasya param˜tmana×|jŸv˜n˜Õ karmaphalado graharupŸ jan˜rdana× Translated it says; The Supersoul/Unborn Lord(Paramatma) has many incarnations.He has incarnated as the planets, to bestow the fruits of Karma on the livingbeings. He is the lifegiver of the universe (Janardana) WHY ONLY THE NINE GRAHAS?? Rather the question is; why only the 2 luminaries, 5 planets, and the 2 nodes ofthe Moon. Excluding the 2 nodes as they have no physical form, we are left withthe 5 planets and 2 luminaries. Now if we read Bhagavad Purana or VishnuPurana, etc, then we are met with the story of the 7 Dweepas(islands) which aresurrounded by 7 oceans/raasa. These Islands excede only until the Loka-Lokamountains, where no light goes beyond, hence allthough we acknowledge celestialbodies beyond that point, they aren't of any use to influence the jeevas. WHAT ARE RAHU AND KETU?? These are Nodes of the Moon. When the Moon travels around the Earth, it has awobble. This wobble has an upper and lower limit. The topmost upper/northenlimit is called the North Node, or Rahu, whilst the south node is called Ketu.This is used to time eclipses, when the Sun and Moon join at the North node.WHAT IS GULIKAN?? It is not a satelite, but a point calculated on the basis of the Kalas of a day.Gulika is the child of Saturn and is used to see the sins we have performed. Italso has vital use in calculating Conception charts. You will need a reference to understand the calculations of variousUpa-/aprakesh - Grahas. http://www.srimadbhagavatam.org sb , "sanat2221" <sanatkumar_jain wrote:>> Resp. SB,> Namaskar,> Now I am taking new point from your msg. as a new thread.> You have referred a predictive principle from horosara> > 1- "Death by hanging is indicated, if Surya is in Yuvati Bhava (7th > bhav) along with Rahu, or Ketu, while Sukra is in Randhr Bhava."> > Where in I have included another principle wherein it is also written > that > > - if Rahu is in randra bhav (8th) then death will be caused by > hanging. > > I want to emphasize that there is no other sub-rule, modification, > correction, elimination, explanation etc. attached with this rule and > likewise with many rules too.> You may be well aware with the birth clock or you can see with the > rate of birth that in every 20 sec. there is a birth in India and > every 3 sec. there is a birth in the world. Whereas our horoscope is > fixed for about 2 hours (ie same ascendant)> > I am just analyzing the position of a year for your 1st principle and > you can find it almost every year. > During 16-5-2002 to 10-6-2002 Sun was with Rahu in Taurus sign > (Vrash) and Venus was in Gemini sign (mithun). Thus any child born > during this period at about noon will have same combination, which > may be thousands in numbers. So do you think that all childrens will > be hanged. If you want I can give you data of some other years.> So far 2nd principle is concerned then you can see that every day for > two hours Rahu may be in 8th house. So almost 1 out 12 person would > have been hanged since writing of horasara. Is it logical, feasible, > realistic, science etc. and is hanging so popular in the world that > 10% persons may be hanged. Unfortunately, I am neither agreeing with > you nor with the principles of Horasara.> > Try to think differently, logically as I am not imposing my views nor > it is a game of fighting in which some one will lose if he starts to > think afresh. Members may also write for opinion of other members too.> > Thanks for your new thread and I will summarize it in SOA______.> > Yours truly,> sanat> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2008 Report Share Posted April 13, 2008 Resp. SB, Namaskar, >>>>I do not want to take credit for something that i have not personally experianced or endorsed .<<<< Don't worry I am not charging you that it is your principle or you are supporting it. My opinion is same for all arguments which you are giving in support of some stand. Because you have not created any principle hence there is no question of any credit or debit. HiHi.. Even if you say that you have experienced any principle as correct, even then I will never charge. I only like to examine the principle and not a person. So you can continue. We are only expressing and exchanging our views that too without any personal illwill, and there is no problem if we have some difference of opinion. Because difference of opinion leads to explore a situation, which is the core requirement for improvement of knowledge. In entire history of development of human skill or knowledge, we can see that if there would have not been any difference of opinion then we would have living in forest and so on. So continue to raise your difference, which leads me to explore new horizon. Otherwise I would have been any one in any forum. Will you like to ask your other friends to share their views in this forum. Rest assure I like interaction with you. Thanks, Sanat PS : Are Sh. Krishnamurtyji and Balas hearing. If you are there then raise some voice for attending your thread, if you want more opinions. Generally members like to read the msg. instead of raising their voice. So all members including most new member Sh. Praveen Ji may raise some points, which will be attended by learned members like SB Ji, Krishnamurty ji, Ravi Ji, Suresh Ji , Dr Bhashyam ji, ChandraHari Ji…………. , " sureshbalaraman " <sureshbalaraman wrote: > > > Sanatji,i have given the link from where i obtained which is > incorrect.The link is in Jyotishvidya and Mrs.Wendy posted > the timing of death.I do not want to take credit for something that i > have not personally experianced or endorsed . > > sb > , " sanat2221 " > <sanatkumar_jain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Resp members, > > Sh SB has intimated a predictive principle for death by hanging as > > per horasara with the opinion that death comes to us all...when and > > how is determined the day we're born (ie astrologically we may know > > our cause of death) > > > > " Death by hanging is indicated, if Surya is in Yuvati Bhava (7th > > bhav) along with Rahu, or Ketu, while Sukra is in Randhr Bhava. " > > > > It is also written that if Rahu is in randra bhav (8th) then death > > will be caused by hanging. > > > > I will like to comment on these principles. But it is more fitting to > > say that > > all silent members are requested to offer their opinion about this > > principle including s/Sh Bala, Dr N Bhashyam, Krishnamurthy > > Seetharama, Ravichandran and Sushil Dikshit Ji who are active but > > silent nowadays. > > > > All members are also requested to post copy of maximum horoscopes, > > (about whom you know in details (dead or alive), including family > > members relatives, friends etc, if you want; but keep a copy with you > > with individual identification), which may be available with you, so > > that we may have a good data bank for analysis of any principle. If > > members do not want to disclose the identity of individual horoscope, > > even then bare horoscope may be posted to my email > > sanatkumar_jain@ I will compile them without > > individual identity (even if names intimated) so that we may confirm > > the applicability of any principle as and when desire. I hope members > > will have no objection. > > > > In future we will analyze only those principles which may have their > > definite result and free from any psychological conclusion. Such > > result may relates to Death, marriage, birth of son, birth of > > daughter, very high status, alarming prediction etc. > > > > We may keep the format as follows > > > > Date of birth, Planet in first house and sign, Planet in 2nd house > > and so on, name of sender, {identification of horoscope (name etc) > > and other information is optional.} > > > > Remember we are not going to analyze or predict about any individual > > horoscope. It is only an academic exercise. Members may also continue > > to suggest their ideas and intimate their friends/forum to join this > > open platform. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > sanat > > , " sureshbalaraman " > > sureshbalaraman@ wrote: > > > > > > Sanatji,i am confused with what exactly you are trying to say.I am > > > living in 2008 gregorian calendar.Its natural for me to link to my > > > present situation instead of contemplating why and how the sages and > > > seers perceived knowledge and to give the exact methodology.Its > > truly > > > beyond me.I can only make inferences,deductions and therefore > > conclude > > > as circumstantial evidential truth.Who is to say with absolute > > > authority,what happened.The Bhagavath gita as well many jain > > scriptures > > > collated messages of so many tirthankars,can only be listened to, by > > > us.If we have any doubts,we need to proceed to authoritative > > gurus,who > > > are well versed in spirituality. > > > > > > I am a commoner with a philosophical bent of mind.It suits my > > thinking > > > and i am happy. > > > > > > >>But it was not said any where.<< > > > > > > So many of our books were stolen,burnt,plundered looted by barbaric > > > mughals,mongols,brits,and as well as indian kings amongst > > themselves in > > > the past.The brits stole ship loads of palm leaves scriptures from > > > india,maybe you ought to go to UK and start finding all > > those.Because > > > whats left in India,is just a meagre amount of old palm leaves > > > knowledge.Many of them in sanksrit.One pundit will say one > > > interpretation another will say another interpretation and it goes > > on.I > > > like Srila Prabhupadas translation and i am sticking to it.I am not > > > asking anyone else to follow.Each can choose their own ishta > > > translations. > > > > > > Astrology was used for panchangam purposes only with seasonal > > > indicators,for performance of rituals in our dharma.That > > enthusiastic > > > scholars chose to predict mundane things to people thereby gain > > > recongnition,fame,money is all together another issue. > > > > > > Lord krishna explains in gita,that he is the boss of everything.. i > > mean > > > everything...even what i have written is his potency.. i am > > nobody.I am > > > only a reflection of the supreme...shining in reflected glory of the > > > Lord.In the universe,i constitute just a speck..a nano sub > > > particle..which is existing its lifecycle and one day in a kshana > > just > > > go back to lord..astrology in proper perspective gives us a > > directional > > > light..as to how the laws were postulated...it will take brahmaji to > > > incarnate again and explain... :) > > > > > > Suresh Balaraman. > > > , " sanat2221 " > > > <sanatkumar_jain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Res. SB Ji, > > > > No I have not replied like > > > > .>> " I enter each planet, and by my energy they stay in their > > orbits, I > > > > become the moon and thereby supply the juice of life to all > > herbs " << > > > > It is your msg of 4-4-08, on which I have replied. (you may check > > as > > > > I always attach a portion of previous link). > > > > > > > > I also disagree with your following inference. > > > > " By inference one may deduce.Plant life is dependant on the moon > > > > rays.Light from the sun gets reflected to moon and from moon to > > > > earth.With out sun ,moon is zero.zilch.shunya. " > > > > Because you yourself are drawing any inference which suit you in > > > > modern concept without looking in to the fact as to what was said > > in > > > > what context. In which Ved, Puran or Greek or Varahmihir etc. told > > > > and accepted that Moon get the light from the Sun and without Sun; > > > > Moon is zero. It is only your translation in view of modern > > > > knowledge. But it was not said any where. > > > > > > > > Yes " vahana can mean a rath then and now a bmw " but you cant say > > that > > > > Krishna was moving on BMW. What I mean to say that if you do the > > > > translation of " Vahan " like BMW and try to infuse in the mind of > > > > general public that Krishna was traveling on BMW then what will > > > > happen. The same thing is happening with astrology. As no body > > try to > > > > look as to if you continue to join Krishna with BMW then you have > > to > > > > answer so many questions related to BMW, which will never > > available > > > > in Ved puran. Thus either you blame that I am not believing Ved or > > > > knowledge of sages etc or continue to support your stand with > > > > distorted translation, which is being done by almost all > > astrologers. > > > > > > > > Thus if Brahmand was eternal then how we can conclude that tide is > > > > creation of Moon (do not apply present knowledge) from this view. > > > > Thus if in primitive time our sages have formulated some > > principles > > > > then you have to find and answer in the then perspective and then > > you > > > > have to check as to that contention was correct in view of modern > > > > knowledge or not. But you can not support primitive concept with > > > > modern interpretation or with modern knowledge. > > > > > > > > Thus so far you are not able to answer your stand that high & low > > > > tides based on position of Moon from earth.Human body constitutes > > of > > > > fluids,so therefore there are subtle effects on the human body " > > and > > > > connection of inimical element of planet and sign. " > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Sanat > > > > 8-4-2008 > > > > > > > > Re: Science of astrology -1 > > > > Posted by: " sureshbalaraman " sureshbalaraman@ > > > > sureshbalaraman > > > > Sun Apr 6, 2008 2:56 pm (PDT) > > > > > > > > You have intelligently replied to your own query,sanatji.>> " I > > enter > > > > each > > > > planet, and by my energy they stay in their orbits, I > > > > become the moon and thereby supply the juice of life to all herbs " > > > > << > > > > > > > > By inference one may deduce.Plant life is dependant on the moon > > > > rays.Light from the sun gets reflected to moon and from moon to > > > > earth.With out sun ,moon is zero.zilch.shunya.What krishna says > > or at > > > > least visualised and interpreted to dritashtra,is said : > > everything is > > > > brahman.that brahman name is given as krishna.as he was the > > present > > > > avatar at that time.just like vahana can mean a rath then and now > > a > > > > bmw.therefore brahman existed then ,now,and future.all this futile > > > > contemplation is of no use to anybody.chant the gods name and > > obtain > > > > moksha,is what shankara says,let us do that.hara shankara jaya > > jaya > > > > shankara > > > > > > > > sb > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Resp. SB, Namaskar In my msg of 1-4-08 I wrote like this " Thus any child born during this period at about noon will have same combination " under Principle of Horasara. The correct sentence is " Thus any child born during this period at about sunset will have same combination " . (Read sunset instead of noon) " The Goal of Jyotishas is to first,bring the person to believe in God " . NO, Jyotish has nothing to do with belief in God. Rather it is against the God, Because by applying astrological principles, astrologers try to leak the destiny (like paper out before examination). Thus you want to say that by applying and socalled forecast of hanging (horasara) Varahmihir etc. were promoting God. And by wearing a gem costing Rs. 5000 or more sold by an astrologer just to befool an individual, astrologers are promoting religion. What a good joke. But it seems true that you are defending predictive astrology (unfortunately which has nothing to do with Ved etc.) to save age old practice of befooling with a fear complex of erosion of religion. Now you are again referring Vishnu Puran. Your point of 7 lok (jambudweep etc.) is not clear to me as to what you want to say. But I can say that when our sages had such concept about the flat earth then where is the question of orbit or motion of the Earth. Where it is written in the Puran that Rahu Ketu are node (intersection point of orbit) refer it and certainly with correct translation (pl do not link BMW with Krishna) (We have jumped to new point What are Rahu Ketu.) Please do not take any comment personal. Thanks, Sanat , " sureshbalaraman " <sureshbalaraman wrote: > > > The Goal of Jyotishas is to first,bring the person to believe in God, > and 2nd to bring them closer to God.Here god could mean the different > avataars including religions which claim their god is the only god and > the rest are not.That is the true sanathana dharma followed and > instructed us to follow by our fore fathers/mothers. > > HOW DOES MOVEMENT OF PLANETS AFFECT OUR LIVES?? > > As per Maha Rishi Parasara Chapter 2, Sloka 3. > > > Avtara{ynekain ýjSy prmaTmn>, > jIvana< kmR)ldae ¢hépI jnadRn> > avat˜r˜õyanek˜ni hyajasya param˜tmana×| > jŸv˜n˜Õ karmaphalado graharupŸ jan˜rdana× > > > Translated it says; > The Supersoul/Unborn Lord(Paramatma) has many incarnations. > He has incarnated as the planets, to bestow the fruits of Karma on the > living > beings. He is the lifegiver of the universe (Janardana) > > > WHY ONLY THE NINE GRAHAS?? > > > Rather the question is; why only the 2 luminaries, 5 planets, and the 2 > nodes of > the Moon. Excluding the 2 nodes as they have no physical form, we are > left with > the 5 planets and 2 luminaries. Now if we read Bhagavad Purana or Vishnu > Purana, etc, then we are met with the story of the 7 Dweepas (islands) > which are > surrounded by 7 oceans/raasa. These Islands excede only until the > Loka-Loka > mountains, where no light goes beyond, hence allthough we acknowledge > celestial > bodies beyond that point, they aren't of any use to influence the > jeevas. > > WHAT ARE RAHU AND KETU?? > > These are Nodes of the Moon. When the Moon travels around the Earth, it > has a > wobble. This wobble has an upper and lower limit. The topmost > upper/northen > limit is called the North Node, or Rahu, whilst the south node is called > Ketu. > This is used to time eclipses, when the Sun and Moon join at the North > node. > > WHAT IS GULIKAN?? > > It is not a satelite, but a point calculated on the basis of the Kalas > of a day. > Gulika is the child of Saturn and is used to see the sins we have > performed. It > also has vital use in calculating Conception charts. > > > You will need a reference to understand the calculations of various > Upa-/aprakesh - Grahas. > > http://www.srimadbhagavatam.org <http://www.srimadbhagavatam.org> > > sb > , " sanat2221 " > <sanatkumar_jain@> wrote: > > > > Resp. SB, > > Namaskar, > > Now I am taking new point from your msg. as a new thread. > > You have referred a predictive principle from horosara > > > > 1- " Death by hanging is indicated, if Surya is in Yuvati Bhava (7th > > bhav) along with Rahu, or Ketu, while Sukra is in Randhr Bhava. " > > > > Where in I have included another principle wherein it is also written > > that > > > > - if Rahu is in randra bhav (8th) then death will be caused by > > hanging. > > > > I want to emphasize that there is no other sub-rule, modification, > > correction, elimination, explanation etc. attached with this rule and > > likewise with many rules too. > > You may be well aware with the birth clock or you can see with the > > rate of birth that in every 20 sec. there is a birth in India and > > every 3 sec. there is a birth in the world. Whereas our horoscope is > > fixed for about 2 hours (ie same ascendant) > > > > I am just analyzing the position of a year for your 1st principle and > > you can find it almost every year. > > During 16-5-2002 to 10-6-2002 Sun was with Rahu in Taurus sign > > (Vrash) and Venus was in Gemini sign (mithun). Thus any child born > > during this period at about noon will have same combination, which > > may be thousands in numbers. So do you think that all childrens will > > be hanged. If you want I can give you data of some other years. > > So far 2nd principle is concerned then you can see that every day for > > two hours Rahu may be in 8th house. So almost 1 out 12 person would > > have been hanged since writing of horasara. Is it logical, feasible, > > realistic, science etc. and is hanging so popular in the world that > > 10% persons may be hanged. Unfortunately, I am neither agreeing with > > you nor with the principles of Horasara. > > > > Try to think differently, logically as I am not imposing my views nor > > it is a game of fighting in which some one will lose if he starts to > > think afresh. Members may also write for opinion of other members too. > > > > Thanks for your new thread and I will summarize it in SOA______. > > > > Yours truly, > > sanat > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.