Science of astrology - 1

[Guest guest]

Res. Krishnamurthy Ji,

Thanks for your msg and sorry for delay, because your msg was hanging

as a spam, and it was cleared when I found that. So please be careful

so that msg. may not blocked.

 

How you have drawn a conclusion that I am not genuinely interested in

finding logical explanation to various assumptions in Astrology,

otherwise why I would have invited you. Secondly, finding out logical

explanation does mean that we have to only support any prevailing

misconception. What you say. If everybody would have been finding out

the logical support for flat Earth in the centre then how Galileo

would have find revolutionary concept of solar system. Thus if

findings of Galileo was classified as maligning to Church, then what

can be done. So here we are neither maligning nor supporting. Because

knowledge is the treasure of human civilization. It has nothing to do

as to which civilization or religion has +ve or –ve thought with

scientific knowledge. This forum is meant for finding out the truth

in right perspective and totally academic. It has nothing to do with

the business activities of astrologers and so on.

 

I am not agree with your view that " if your original intention is to

malign Astrology in the name of research, I will be the first one to

quit this group. " . Though it is not so and it any findings is against

the astrological myth then we must either have courage to accept it

or oppose it with new logical arguments. But quitting the scene is

not a solution. Any one may be wrong or right but it is not a matter

of concern. Main thing is we must have open mind. Have look on our

tradition, our sages have accepted the knowledge of Greek

civilization instead of categorizing it as against to Indian concept.

So forget to quit the group. I am always with your wisdom. Beside

this there may also be many members like me who will like to have

your views.

 

I have raised a question abt the elements. I am sorry that I have not

gone through your reply. So please be kind enough and repost it. I am

partially agreed with your statement " If people cannot asnwer such

questions, it does not mean astrology is fake. It only means we have

not understood the secrets yet " . I am of the opinion that many

astrologers may not be able to give answers but some one like you can

give some answers. I wrote two books about this and not a single

astrologer or so has come forward to say that findings are wrong. I

have lot of personal interaction with many astrologers. But I am

sorry to say that all astrologers are mum. Astrology is fake or not

can only be decided by you when you will continue to explore the

basic of foundation of astrological principles. There is no secret in

it, as were being propagated by a section of the society and other

sections were debarred.

 

Waiting for fruitful interaction. Come forward and enjoy the

interaction instead of posing displeasure and appeasement. Hi Hi

 

Yours truly,

Sanat

6-4-2008

 

 

 

 

 

Re: Wellcome to your forum

Posted by: " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " krishna_1998

krishna_1998

Fri Apr 4, 2008 11:13 am (PDT)

Dear Sanat Kumar ji,

[Guest guest]

Dear Santi ji, What made you to conclude that I have drawan a conclusion that you are not genuinely intersted in finding logical explanation to various assumptions in astrology? The very fact that I have accepted your invitation indicates that I have not drawn such conclusions :-) However, my statements were based on the reaction from different members to your mail on the other forum. In fact, I don't know anything about you or the books you have written. I have joined your forum respecting your words on their face value. And, I hope to enjoy fruitful interaction here. Please let me know what special care I should take so that my mails don't get the tag of spam? I am writing in this forum as I write in few other forums. I don't seem to have this problem in other forums. Any tips are welcome. Quitting the forum is a perfect solution for me if the

forum owner has a secretive hidden agenda. Hence, I was making it clear in advance. I am very happy to know that there is no such agenda. I was expecting your valuable comments on my write-up as it tries to give some logic for some of the assumptions in astrology. That is what this forum really wants to explore. Hope you will time later to comment on the same. Regards, Krishna sanat2221 <sanatkumar_jain wrote: Res. Krishnamurthy

Ji,Thanks for your msg and sorry for delay, because your msg was hanging as a spam, and it was cleared when I found that. So please be careful so that msg. may not blocked.How you have drawn a conclusion that I am not genuinely interested in finding logical explanation to various assumptions in Astrology, otherwise why I would have invited you. Secondly, finding out logical explanation does mean that we have to only support any prevailing misconception. What you say. If everybody would have been finding out the logical support for flat Earth in the centre then how Galileo would have find revolutionary concept of solar system. Thus if findings of Galileo was classified as maligning to Church, then what can be done. So here we are neither maligning nor supporting. Because knowledge is the treasure of human civilization. It has nothing to do as to which civilization or religion has +ve or –ve thought with

scientific knowledge. This forum is meant for finding out the truth in right perspective and totally academic. It has nothing to do with the business activities of astrologers and so on.I am not agree with your view that "if your original intention is to malign Astrology in the name of research, I will be the first one to quit this group.". Though it is not so and it any findings is against the astrological myth then we must either have courage to accept it or oppose it with new logical arguments. But quitting the scene is not a solution. Any one may be wrong or right but it is not a matter of concern. Main thing is we must have open mind. Have look on our tradition, our sages have accepted the knowledge of Greek civilization instead of categorizing it as against to Indian concept. So forget to quit the group. I am always with your wisdom. Beside this there may also be many members like me who will like to have

your views.I have raised a question abt the elements. I am sorry that I have not gone through your reply. So please be kind enough and repost it. I am partially agreed with your statement "If people cannot asnwer such questions, it does not mean astrology is fake. It only means we have not understood the secrets yet". I am of the opinion that many astrologers may not be able to give answers but some one like you can give some answers. I wrote two books about this and not a single astrologer or so has come forward to say that findings are wrong. I have lot of personal interaction with many astrologers. But I am sorry to say that all astrologers are mum. Astrology is fake or not can only be decided by you when you will continue to explore the basic of foundation of astrological principles. There is no secret in it, as were being propagated by a section of the society and other sections were debarred.

Waiting for fruitful interaction. Come forward and enjoy the interaction instead of posing displeasure and appeasement. Hi HiYours truly,Sanat6-4-2008Re: Wellcome to your forum Posted by: "Krishnamurthy Seetharama" krishna_1998 krishna_1998 Fri Apr 4, 2008 11:13 am (PDT) Dear Sanat Kumar ji,

You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.

[Guest guest]

Resp. Krishna Ji,

I think I am seriously taking the interaction of the forum.

Moderators of other forums have their hidden agenda hence they permit

those members who are dancing in their own interest. But this forum

is yours hence everybody has free entry and free to express their

academic views regarding astrology without using filthy language.

 

Members are free to express their views if I am not just.

 

This time your mail was not hanged so follow the same method. As I

have already informed the members that I am slow. So in this

situation your mail may continue to hang as spam and we will lose

your timely comments. This is the tip to a software engineer from a

layman. Hi. Hi.

 

Members will offer their comments on your writeup. Perhaps I am

missing your writeup. If it is. Because reflex of my mind say that so

far I am appeasing you to take active part in interaction. Hi, Hi. So

until you are comfortable in the forum and free from the hangover of

other forums, how can I push my views when there is no msg from your

side, which may differ from my views.

 

I hope now you will come out with some concrete views on astrology on

various points and advice your other friends to join this forum.

 

Yours truly,

Sanat

 

 

 

, Krishnamurthy Seetharama

<krishna_1998 wrote:

>

> Dear Santi ji,

>

> What made you to conclude that I have drawan a conclusion that

you are not genuinely intersted in finding logical explanation to

various assumptions in astrology? The very fact that I have accepted

your invitation indicates that I have not drawn such conclusions :-)

However, my statements were based on the reaction from different

members to your mail on the other forum. In fact, I don't know

anything about you or the books you have written. I have joined your

forum respecting your words on their face value. And, I hope to enjoy

fruitful interaction here.

>

> Please let me know what special care I should take so that my

mails don't get the tag of spam? I am writing in this forum as I

write in few other forums. I don't seem to have this problem in other

forums. Any tips are welcome.

>

> Quitting the forum is a perfect solution for me if the forum

owner has a secretive hidden agenda. Hence, I was making it clear in

advance. I am very happy to know that there is no such agenda.

>

> I was expecting your valuable comments on my write-up as it tries

to give some logic for some of the assumptions in astrology. That is

what this forum really wants to explore. Hope you will time later to

comment on the same.

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> sanat2221 <sanatkumar_jain wrote:

> Res. Krishnamurthy Ji,

> Thanks for your msg and sorry for delay, because your msg was

hanging

> as a spam, and it was cleared when I found that. So please be

careful

> so that msg. may not blocked.

>

> How you have drawn a conclusion that I am not genuinely interested

in

> finding logical explanation to various assumptions in Astrology,

> otherwise why I would have invited you. Secondly, finding out

logical

> explanation does mean that we have to only support any prevailing

> misconception. What you say. If everybody would have been finding

out

> the logical support for flat Earth in the centre then how Galileo

> would have find revolutionary concept of solar system. Thus if

> findings of Galileo was classified as maligning to Church, then

what

> can be done. So here we are neither maligning nor supporting.

Because

> knowledge is the treasure of human civilization. It has nothing to

do

> as to which civilization or religion has +ve or –ve thought with

> scientific knowledge. This forum is meant for finding out the truth

> in right perspective and totally academic. It has nothing to do

with

> the business activities of astrologers and so on.

>

> I am not agree with your view that " if your original intention is

to

> malign Astrology in the name of research, I will be the first one

to

> quit this group. " . Though it is not so and it any findings is

against

> the astrological myth then we must either have courage to accept it

> or oppose it with new logical arguments. But quitting the scene is

> not a solution. Any one may be wrong or right but it is not a

matter

> of concern. Main thing is we must have open mind. Have look on our

> tradition, our sages have accepted the knowledge of Greek

> civilization instead of categorizing it as against to Indian

concept.

> So forget to quit the group. I am always with your wisdom. Beside

> this there may also be many members like me who will like to have

> your views.

>

> I have raised a question abt the elements. I am sorry that I have

not

> gone through your reply. So please be kind enough and repost it. I

am

> partially agreed with your statement " If people cannot asnwer such

> questions, it does not mean astrology is fake. It only means we

have

> not understood the secrets yet " . I am of the opinion that many

> astrologers may not be able to give answers but some one like you

can

> give some answers. I wrote two books about this and not a single

> astrologer or so has come forward to say that findings are wrong. I

> have lot of personal interaction with many astrologers. But I am

> sorry to say that all astrologers are mum. Astrology is fake or not

> can only be decided by you when you will continue to explore the

> basic of foundation of astrological principles. There is no secret

in

> it, as were being propagated by a section of the society and other

> sections were debarred.

>

> Waiting for fruitful interaction. Come forward and enjoy the

> interaction instead of posing displeasure and appeasement. Hi Hi

>

> Yours truly,

> Sanat

> 6-4-2008

>

> Re: Wellcome to your forum

> Posted by: " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " krishna_1998

> krishna_1998

> Fri Apr 4, 2008 11:13 am (PDT)

> Dear Sanat Kumar ji,

 

> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of

Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.

>