Guest guest Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Respected all, Today i downloaded the feb 09 issue of saptarishi magazine from http://www.saptarishisastrology.com/ Here Shri Ravinder Bhandhariji in the article title 'The Mystic Redbook' at page number 226 has shown horoscope and the Makan Kundli relation. Secondly the most important factor he has corrected in the palmistry concept that he clearly says that In phalanges of finger twelve rashi are represented whereas at palm twelve 'KHANAS' are represented (not rashis). This again proves the relation of 36 years rashi dasa of LK and its relation with phalanges of fingers as i wrote earlier. This difference in 'Khana and Rashi' in palm as he has clearly quoted is still not available, even in all the authentic translation made available till now. Regards, Vijay Goel Jaipur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Dear Vijay Ji, This difference in 'Khana and Rashi' in palm as he has clearly quoted is still not available, even in all the authentic translation made available till now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Vinay ji, totally agreed no new concept it is very clear there in transliterated books. Regards. Kulbir. On 3/9/09, Vinay kumar <v4vedic wrote: > Dear Vijay Ji, > * > > This difference in 'Khana and Rashi' in palm as he has clearly quoted is > still not available, even in all the authentic translation made available > till now. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Dear Vinayji, Actually i have gone through english traslation of Pt, Beni Madhav Goswami 1952. Pg. 16, where he has mentioned only Rashi not Khana. This is a mistake by the writer. In the second book i have is Arun sanhita (has many printing errors)of Hare Krishna trust chandigarh. on page 58 this palm print is explained but it mentioned Khana but not Rashi in phalanges, again confusing. Another translation by Pt. Beni Madhav 1939, at page 366, it is mentioned in more clearity but i was not able to decipher it. In this article it was very easy for me to understand the difference. HAPPY HOLI !! ) Thankyou, Regards, Vijay Goel Jaipur , Vinay kumar <v4vedic wrote: > > Dear Vijay Ji, > * > > This difference in 'Khana and Rashi' in palm as he has clearly quoted is > still not available, even in all the authentic translation made available > till now. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 Namashkar Vijay Ji, In the Feb 2009 ANNUAL ISSUE of Saptarishis Astrology Magazine, there is one more mention by me based on LAL KITAB, in GURU NADI - 1, Article No. 21, in VISHNU REKHA, appendix on page 179 - 180. Plz. also read that. with regards...rabinder bhandari On 10/03/2009, Vijay Goel <goyalvj wrote: Dear Vinayji,Actually i have gone through english traslation of Pt, Beni Madhav Goswami 1952. Pg. 16, where he has mentioned only Rashi not Khana. This is a mistake by the writer.In the second book i have is Arun sanhita (has many printing errors)of Hare Krishna trust chandigarh. on page 58 this palm print is explained but it mentioned Khana but not Rashi in phalanges, again confusing.Another translation by Pt. Beni Madhav 1939, at page 366, it is mentioned in more clearity but i was not able to decipher it. In this article it was very easy for me to understand the difference.HAPPY HOLI !! )Thankyou,Regards,Vijay GoelJaipur , Vinay kumar <v4vedic wrote: >> Dear Vijay Ji,> * > > This difference in 'Khana and Rashi' in palm as he has clearly quoted is> still not available, even in all the authentic translation made available> till now.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.