Lal Kitab Discussion Group Lagan Sarni Further task

[Guest guest]

Nirmal ji, if that is true, it will be a pleasant surprise for all.

kulbir , NKB <nirbhar wrote:

>

> Dear Members,

> It appears neither of the persons who gave

> calculation for foriegn birth as well as Indian Birth read the

> instruction of sarni. Please read

> again.I could not find where it is written to use the converted

time

> to find the ascendent. All of you including Bhatia Ji has

> misunderstood theese instructions

> which results the all misinformation regarding Sarni.

> Dear Varun Ji, you are not the new to do this mistake in

calculation . Most

> of the astrologers do this wrong method.I think Mr. Kalsi might be

knowing

> the use of this erronous practice that is why he had played a

great trick to

> give same date and same time for different location, in my views,

to give a

> lesson to all those who do this wrong practice. You might not

perused the

> results in haste otherwise you may catch that trick. Any how this

is Mr.

> Kalsi has to see. For me I have done all the calcullations and

found that

> sarni is very near to correct except the birth in southern

hemisphere which

> i have to cross check again. These will be submitted to Mr. Kalsi.

> In fact sarni is not the culprit, it is the persons who donot

know how to

> use a sarni.

> Regarding your misunderstanding that the sarni made in India

cannot be used

> in foriegn Birth, you are mistaken. Sarni made with respect to any

standard

> Time location can be used all over the world.Your mathemetical

ability is

> very good but not at right directions.

> Let us see what the Mr. Kalsi has to say.

> Regards

> Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj

>

>

>

>

> On 11/7/07, varun_trvd <varun_trvd wrote:

> >

> > Respected Nirmal Kumar ji,

> >

> > It appears you haven't read the instructions in the Sarini. Read

the

> > article of Bhatia ji on calculating the ascendant for foreign

births

> > from the files of the Lal Kitab group. You would know how the

time of

> > birth has to be worked out.

> >

> > Talking about the protocol, then a Sarini calculated at Indian

> > Longitude and latitude should under no circumstances be used to

> > calculate an ascendant for foreign births. Therefore we should

not be

> > talking about these things.

> >

> > We as a group are very well aware of the protocols to be

followed when

> > calculating the Ascendants. You might have assessed the

mathematical

> > ability of our group which is capable of working out these

ascendants

> > within minutes, be it through the Table of ascendants of Lahiri

or

> > through the Lal Kitab sarini.

> >

> > Nirmal ji, we are no longer interested in the Sarini. For us it

is not

> > even worth the paper it is printed on. I am sorry for having to

use

> > these strong words.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Varun Trivedi

> >

> > <%

40>,

> > NKB <nirbhar@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Friends,

> > > I was going through the procedure used by you to calculate

ascendent

> > > for foriegn birth as well as indian birth. while

> > > calculating the foriegn birthascendent, all of you have

converted the

> > time

> > > of foriegn birth to Indian time and then checked the ascendent

from

> > sarni.

> > > It is strange and unconventional protocol.

> > > I may not be knowing , please guide me that under which

principle of

> > > astrology you have coverted the time to Indian time for

calculation of

> > > ascendent. As far as I remember there is no such principle in

> > > astrology.

> > > Regards

> > > Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>