I enjoyed my short stay in the group

[Guest guest]

Respected Nirbhar jee

and YogRaj jee,

 

I would like to know :

 

Would you agree that there is a misprint?

Have I used any Vedic concept in proving what I had said ?

YogRaj ji , without waiting for my write up , was your out burst

justified ?

Nirbhar ji, You charged me for using 'parashari' concepts without

even reading what I had to say?

 

This is not how an academic discussion is conducted. There could be

all kinds of opinion , you may or may not agree. But in a discussion

they are heard and debated.

 

How ever I have decided not to participate in this group any more.

 

Thanks for being nice to me.

 

With naman to all gurujan,

 

Varun Trivedi.

 

Ps : Yograj ji, Bhuwan is my cousin and both of us are learning Lal

Kitab from the same Guru ji. He got married and is very busy in his

job. Hardly takes any interest in the Jyotish Group activities.

[Guest guest]

Dear Varun Ji,

The point wise reply is under

Would you agree that there is a misprint?

NOT CONCLUDED YET AS YOU HAVE JUST POINTED OUT YESTERDAY.

 

Have I used any Vedic concept in proving what I had said ?

YOU HAVE CLARIFIED ABOUT YOUR POINT,THE MISCONCEPTION HAS BEEN CREATED

BY YOU BY NOT CLEARLY POINTING OUT WHAT TO SAY. RATHER YOU TRIED TO

CREATE CONFUSION. AS FAR AS I JUDGED FROM YOUR REPLY YOU HAVE NOT READ

THE GRAMMER COMPLETELY.REGARDING VEDIC POINT THE REPLY BY ME TO YOUR

POINT IN OTHER MAIL MAY CLARIFY

 

YogRaj ji , without waiting for my write up , was your out burst

justified ?

I MAY ALSO DO THE SAME IF ANY MORE REPLY IN THE SAME MANNER COMES FROM

YOU. YOU HAVE WASTED TWO DAYS TO CLARIFY YOUR POINT JUST TO SHOW YOUR

PRESENSE IN THE GROUP.

 

Nirbhar ji, You charged me for using 'parashari' concepts without even

reading what I had to say?

MY CHARGE IS TILL THEIR. AS YOU HAVE NOT GIVEN FULL LOGICS BEHIND YOUR

CONCLUSION. YOU LEFT TOOMANY POINTS IN YOUR MAIL THAT WILL BE TAKEN UP

SEPERATELY

 

This is not how an academic discussion is conducted. There could be

all kinds of opinion , you may or may not agree. But in a discussion

they are heard and debated.

YOU ARE RIGHT THE ACADEMIC DISCUSSION ARE NOT CONDUCTED IN THIS WAY.

THE RIGHT WAY IS TO PUT YOU POINT CLEARLY RATHER THAN MAKING

'PAHELIS'. THIS IS NOT A PLAY GROUND TO SHOW ONE'S EXCELLENCE.

 

How ever I have decided not to participate in this group any more.

THE GROUP IS A OPEN FORUM FOR THE MEMBERS WHO WANT TO TAKE PART IN

DISCUSSIONS. THE OTHER MEMBERSHIP HAS BEEN GRANTED ON YOUR REQUEST AND

THE MEMBERS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR DECISION EITHER TO JOIN OR TO

LEAVE THE GROUP.

 

Thanks for being nice to me.

YOU ARE WELCOME.

Ps : Yograj ji, Bhuwan is my cousin and both of us are learning Lal

Kitab from the same Guru ji. He got married and is very busy in his

job. Hardly takes any interest in the Jyotish Group activities.

 

MY NAMAN TO THE BOOK,SURAJ KE AAGE BUDH KO APNA BHED ZAHIR HEE KARNA

PADTA HAI.

 

Regards

Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj

 

 

, " varun_trvd " <varun_trvd>

wrote:

>

> Respected Nirbhar jee

> and YogRaj jee,

>

> I would like to know :

>

> Would you agree that there is a misprint?

> Have I used any Vedic concept in proving what I had said ?

> YogRaj ji , without waiting for my write up , was your out burst

> justified ?

> Nirbhar ji, You charged me for using 'parashari' concepts without

> even reading what I had to say?

>

> This is not how an academic discussion is conducted. There could be

> all kinds of opinion , you may or may not agree. But in a discussion

> they are heard and debated.

>

> How ever I have decided not to participate in this group any more.

>

> Thanks for being nice to me.

>

> With naman to all gurujan,

>

> Varun Trivedi.

>

> Ps : Yograj ji, Bhuwan is my cousin and both of us are learning Lal

> Kitab from the same Guru ji. He got married and is very busy in his

> job. Hardly takes any interest in the Jyotish Group activities.

>