aspects and orbs

January 3, 2008

Dear MembersAs per the terms explained in the last few pages of Reader 3ASPECTS : "Angular distance between planets and cusps or between planets themselves"ORB : "The distance in longitude within which the inluence of a planet or aspect will operate..."The orb will be on eithier side of the exact apect/degree of the planet.For example a trine aspect(exact 120 degree) with ord of 8 degrees is effective from 112 deg to 128 degrees. Western astrology.In Hindoo method the aspects are from sign to sign/house to house etc. No orbs are mentioned, accept by Varahmir, who takes the ord as 30 degrees.(i cannot give the reference)good luckSubhash <subhash_ektare wrote: Respected members and Gurus 1. As far as knowledge of astrology is concerned, I am a KG Student as compared to stalwarts like Raichur ji, Lajmi ji, Gondhalekar ji and of course Tin Win ji. Since all of them are my Gurus I cannot address them as friends. Further I cannot catagorize their knowledge as " our limited knowledge" as mentioned by Mr. Tin Win ji. My main aim in joining the Group/Forum is to learn technics of prediction, through the valuable experince of these Gurus, which are otherwise hidden between the lines. I am fortunate to get vast knowledge but I am not in a position to digest the valuable inputs coming from the members. 2. Aspect is one of the basic parameters of astrology. And I am last person to

to say that Mr.Tin Win ji doesn't know about aspects. I think most of the members will also concur with me. How can Mr.Tin Win ji calculate the orb exactly, as I calculated, without knowing what the "Third Aspect" is? Therefore I really fail to understand his intentions behind asking such clarification. 3. Respected Tin Win ji, I am using AstroKundali Software of Dr. Karekar, though I have KPAstro 2.5 with me. I am not using KPAstro for (a) I am not at all satisfied with its performance (b) and callous attitude of the developer towards end users and their problems. Of course this is my personal opinion which may be wrong according to you. With regards Subhash Ektare , "tw853" <tw853 wrote: > > Dear Freiends, > > 1. First of all, thank you much for your kind

input in this learning > exercise of prediction, which may be right or wrong but on the > principles of astrological methods as per our limited knowledge. > > 2. Before presenting the summing up of this exercise, I've a quick > question to Subhash Ektare ji regarding Saturn's aspect on Moon and > a sincere request to Yoga believing friends for their input how > Gajakesari Yoga, Raja-Lakshmi yoga, Budha-Adita Yoga etc in Lalu's > chart can help her in the case of marriage under these a little bit > worried circumstances with a father in poor health and a younger > sister (no more mothern), and to the effective significators > initiating friends for their input in the current case because this > is the only way we can learn practically. > > 3. Dear Subhash Ektare ji, it's mentioned in your previous > mail, "Saturn in Lagna and aspecting Moon…" and in

the current > mail, "Saturn in 1, aspecting 7th house and also aspecting Moon by > 3rd aspect( orb 4 Deg 14 Min 48 Sec)". Regarding aspect of Saturn > in Gem 28:51:57 on Moon in Vir 03:06:45 (exactly the same orb of > 4:14:48 you've got, implying the SW you're using is also KPAstro of > any version), I'm confused like K.P. Nadu ji, in clockwise direction > or opposite direction due to my practice of using two opposite types > of charts. I've also checked this aspect by changing the orb from > the default 3.3333 deg. to 5 deg. and also Western aspect in KPAstro > 3.0 but such aspect is not found. Could you clarify what kind > of "3rd aspect" you're saying. > > Thanks and regards, > > tw > > > , "Subhash" <subhash_ektare@>

> wrote: > > > > Dear Swamiji > > > > As per my software Rahu Mahadasha is from 19-08-1995 till 18-08- > 2013. > > It means it runs from the age of 20 to 38, which is considered as > > marriageable age. Rahu is in the star and sub of Saturn which is > in > > 1 and is lord of 8 (since there are no planets in 8) and 9. > > Therefore Rahu signifies house 8 (supporting house for marriage). > > Further in 4 step theory, the star of sub of a planet is taken > into > > cosideration. This is 4th step normally termed as "Step of > Success". > > In this case, the sub is Saturn in the star of Jupiter. Jupiter > being > > in 10 and lord of 7 (no planets in 7)and 10 strongly signifies > house > > 7. Thus on this 4th step Rahu gets the signification of main house > of > >

marriage i.e. 7 Thus Rahu qualifies for giving marriage in its > > Mahadasha. > > > > > > Your another question was "Why bhuktis passed in Rahu so far did > > not give marriage.?" .....the answer for this is... > > (a)Since the question has come up now, I did not do the post- > mortem > > of earlier bhukties. > > (b)Saturn in 1, aspecting 7th house and also aspecting Moon by 3rd > > aspect( orb 4 Deg 14 Min 48 Sec)/ and Moon being in the sub of > Saturn > > forms Poonarphoo Yoga. Because of this, marriage is considered to > be > > delayed till the age of 30/32. So the question of checking earlier > > bhukties, for giving marriage, should not arise. > > > > Ketu Bhukti was already over in March 2007 and Venus Bhukti is now > > running till 7th March 2010. Venus itself is

deposited in 2nd > house > > and is in the star of Ketu in 11. Venus is in the sub of saturn > > which in turn being in the star of Jupiter gets strong > signification > > of houses 7 and 10 as in the case of Rahu. Thus Venus signifying > (2, > > 7, 8 and 11) qualifies for giving marriage. > > > > You have disqualified Venus and Ketu to give marriage as per Sub > Lord > > Theory, because they are in the sub of Saturn. Here Moon, Jupiter, > > Venus, Rahu and Ketu are all in the sub of Saturn. If they are > > disqualified then current Mahadashaswami Rahu and next > mahadashaswami > > Jupiter will not give her marriage. Thus she may not get married > till > > age of 54.....or to say will remain unmarried. In fact, according > to > > 4 step theory, actually Rahu and Venus have qualified

just because > > they are in the sub of Saturn. > > > > Rahu (7,8)and Venus (2, 7, 8, and 11) have completed the DBA chain > of > > primary houses for marriage. Now she is running Moon antara. Moon > is > > the significator of 7 and 8 only. Normally in 4 step theory we > choose > > immediate next antara having signification to maximum houses in > case > > the DBA chain is already complete. Next antara is of Mars > signifying > > (2, 7, 8 and 11). So that is my natural choice. According to me, > Rahu > > antara did not fulfil this crieteria. > > > > This is my personal opinion, which is open to correction if > learned > > members of the group express their views and throw light on the > > shortcomings, if any. > > > > With regards, > >

> > Subhash Ektare > > > > > > > > > > > > , <swami@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > II Om Gurave Namah II > > > Hari om , > > > > > > Dear Sarvashree Subash and Tinwin ji, > > > > > > I am trying to follow prediction/readings made here on KP > > analysis part, at the moment. > > > > > > I have some answers to seek. > > > > > > Rahu is taken as Mahadasa Lord to qualify ; that it will give > > marriage. Native is more then 32y 4 month old. Why bhuktis > passed > > in Rahu so far did not give marriage.? > > > > > > Sri Subhash ji has chosen Mars antra( before 3 april 2008) he

> > declares marriage. > > > > > > Sri Tinwin ji has chosen Rahu antra(3-4-2008 to 15.9.2008) > quoting > > experience of Sri Shanmugam. > > > > > > As per Sub lord ,theory VENUS BHUKTI did not give marriage It > was > > in SUB of Saturn. > > > > > > First of all How KETU BHUKTI will give marriage, It is also in > SUB > > of Saturn. > > > > > > I urge that How Rahu as Mahadasa Lord and Ketu as Bhukti lord > is > > qualified to give marriage be exhibited? > > > > > > May be I am missing some important point that is too obvious to > all. > > > > > > With regards. > > > > > > OM TATSAT > > > ------------------------

> > > swami_rcs > > > ------------------------ > > > Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy > > > radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy > > > our sins, and guide us in the right direction! > > > > > > > > > - > > > Subhash Ektare > > > > > > Monday, December 31, 2007 2:33 PM > > > Re: Can any please predict and tell me > when > > will I get married - I am already 32 yea > > > > > > > > > > > > Ms. S Lalitha > > > > > > According to me, Saturn in Lagna and aspecting Moon has

> already > > delayed your marriage. > > > Current Dasha/Bhukti of Rahu/Venus is favorable for marriage. > > The ruling planets at the time of judgment have clearly indicated > > that your bad time is over. > > > > > > Your marriage will be fixed before the end of Jan2008 and will > be > > celebrated in Mars antara > > > i.e. before 3rd April 2008. Alliance will be from the North- > West > > of the place of your residence. > > > > > > Wish you very happy and prosperous New Year. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Subhash Ektare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

------------------------- - > --- > > ---------- > > > Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. > > > > > > raichur anant www.jaxtr.com\anantachar

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.