Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

KP & TRADITIONAL

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Friends,

 

1. Three pillars of KP are: (i) the constellational Zodiac of Hindu

Astrology; (ii) the idea of dividing the constellation in the

mysterious unequal Vimsottari proportion; and (iii) the Western

Placidian cusps. However, Guruji KSK thoroughly revolutionized the

predictive portion (Phalabhaga) in his Padhdhati (Msg#993 <point 9 &

10> of this Group)

 

2. Satyasamhita, Satya jatakam: basics of Dhruva nadi by Sage

Satyacharya, the forerunner of Dhruva nadi, said to have lived about

2000 years ago, is found to be the source of idea regarding Starlord

and Ruling Planets. (Msg#9359, point 7.3; B.V. Raman: " My

Experiences in Astrology " , Reprint 2001, page 86;

http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id48.htm )

 

3. Guruji carried out the research with the able assistance of 2

colleagues since 1939 and found out the method of applying Sub Lord

in 1951 by Devine Grace. (Guruji's self written biography dated June

30, 1969 in R. Eshwara Manu's " Astrological Tables for All " ;

Msg#9359, point 4.2 & 4.4) Even critics have praised Guruji for

inventing KP on the basis of research. Many like KP because of its

simple rules with rationale of cause and effect.

 

4. Krishnamurti Padhdhati in 2 volumes was published in 1966 by

Sagar Publications, with T.V. Viswanatha Aiyar's preface dated Jan

17, 1966.

 

5. As a matter of fact when our GREATR GURUJI invented his Theory,

the great Mr.B.V.Raman himself ridiculed our GREAT GURUJI through

his writings in his ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZENE which our GREATR GURUJI

reciprocated with calmness and expalained and this war went on for

more than 15 years and finally Mr.B.V.Raman, had to concede that our

GREAT GURUJI has really invented a new System and wished him

success. These have all now become history and only people

like me and Mr.Raichurji, may some others who were watching this at

that time, have complete knowledge in this matter. SO WITHOUT ANY

HESITATION AND WORRY, GO AHEAD AND SUCCESS WILL BE OURS. REMEMBER

WHAT LORD KRISHNA HAS TOLD TO ARJUN IN THE BATTLE FIELD - I quote -

" OH ARJUN, DO YOUR DUTY AND LEAVE THE RESULT TO ME " unquote. To put

it in Sanskrit - KARMANYEVA ADHIKARASTHE MA PALESHU KADACHANA " . ROME

WAS NOT BUILT IN A DAY. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi's remark

encouraging research on KP rules)

 

6. What we want is search for truth… Open mind to investigate…Let

them (students) carry out further research…It is for you …. to

further study and make (KP) more useful, more simple. (Guruji KSK,

Astrology and Athrishta, Sept 1967, page 7)

 

7. Exaltation and Debilitation has already been extensively

discussed in this forum. (Msg#3963/ 4013 and related thread). The

same is with Navamsa. (Msg#3308/ 6823/ 6919/ 6937/ 8613 and related

thread) The issue of Yogas has not been the case to discuss here.

 

8. I am sorry to note that we still talk of Debilitation and

Exaltation whereas our GREAT GURUJI JYOTISH MARTHAND, JYOTISH MANNAN

PROF: LATE SRI K.S.KRISHNAMURTHIJI, has emphatically stated in his

lectures and writings that such factors have no bearinvg in KP

System. Then why these are being brought into account now. (Shri

K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi)

 

8. Guruji's detailed explanation of Navamsa in Reader I and showing

the Navamsa chart side by side with his Rasi chart in Original

Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2nd Vol, page 321 as well as Reader III,

without criticizing or applying Navamsa anywhere, might be his

expression of gratitude to Navamsa for getting the idea of further

division of 9 subs, but not equal like in Navamsa.

 

9. Such postings of just saying anything which is not known to one

(eg. terminology of interception) is not KP, to forget traditional

astrology or to have mind of clean of any knowledge learned before

in learning KP, to read KP literature thoroughly without studying

oneself enough, demanding to do something more from someone

presenting a practical case without giving any comment what is wrong

or right in the posting or without presenting anything practically

oneself and responding the learners asking about the KP issues in

discouraging manner are not helpful to learn KP here.

 

10. There are so many other factors about which lot of discussions

and research requires to be undertaken by those who have full grasp

of the TRRADITIONAL SYSTEM AND ALSO K.P.SYSTEM and are open to

accept any criticism or additional knowledge from whatever quarters

they may come from. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi)

 

11. Any practically useful and applicable rule can be tested on AA

rated charts of Astrodatabank 4.0 or astropro.com. To make or break

a rule, a study or one's experience of `at least' 100 cases with

around 70-75% favorable results is supposed to be a standard

requirement.

 

12. The bottom line is to follow the rules of the game and here we

are to learn KP.

 

Regards,

 

tw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear TinwinVERY good posting on the subject.Happy New Yeargood lucktw853 <tw853 wrote: Dear Friends, 1. Three pillars of KP are: (i) the constellational Zodiac of Hindu Astrology; (ii) the idea of dividing the constellation in the mysterious unequal Vimsottari proportion; and (iii) the Western Placidian cusps. However, Guruji KSK thoroughly revolutionized the predictive portion (Phalabhaga) in his Padhdhati (Msg#993 <point 9 & 10> of this Group) 2. Satyasamhita, Satya jatakam: basics

of Dhruva nadi by Sage Satyacharya, the forerunner of Dhruva nadi, said to have lived about 2000 years ago, is found to be the source of idea regarding Starlord and Ruling Planets. (Msg#9359, point 7.3; B.V. Raman: "My Experiences in Astrology", Reprint 2001, page 86; http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id48.htm ) 3. Guruji carried out the research with the able assistance of 2 colleagues since 1939 and found out the method of applying Sub Lord in 1951 by Devine Grace. (Guruji's self written biography dated June 30, 1969 in R. Eshwara Manu's "Astrological Tables for All"; Msg#9359, point 4.2 & 4.4) Even critics have praised Guruji for inventing KP on the basis of research. Many like KP because of its simple rules with rationale of cause and effect. 4. Krishnamurti Padhdhati in 2 volumes was published in 1966 by

Sagar Publications, with T.V. Viswanatha Aiyar's preface dated Jan 17, 1966. 5. As a matter of fact when our GREATR GURUJI invented his Theory, the great Mr.B.V.Raman himself ridiculed our GREAT GURUJI through his writings in his ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZENE which our GREATR GURUJI reciprocated with calmness and expalained and this war went on for more than 15 years and finally Mr.B.V.Raman, had to concede that our GREAT GURUJI has really invented a new System and wished him success. These have all now become history and only people like me and Mr.Raichurji, may some others who were watching this at that time, have complete knowledge in this matter. SO WITHOUT ANY HESITATION AND WORRY, GO AHEAD AND SUCCESS WILL BE OURS. REMEMBER WHAT LORD KRISHNA HAS TOLD TO ARJUN IN THE BATTLE FIELD - I quote - "OH ARJUN, DO YOUR DUTY AND LEAVE THE RESULT TO ME" unquote. To put it in Sanskrit - KARMANYEVA ADHIKARASTHE MA

PALESHU KADACHANA". ROME WAS NOT BUILT IN A DAY. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi's remark encouraging research on KP rules) 6. What we want is search for truth… Open mind to investigate…Let them (students) carry out further research…It is for you …. to further study and make (KP) more useful, more simple. (Guruji KSK, Astrology and Athrishta, Sept 1967, page 7) 7. Exaltation and Debilitation has already been extensively discussed in this forum. (Msg#3963/ 4013 and related thread). The same is with Navamsa. (Msg#3308/ 6823/ 6919/ 6937/ 8613 and related thread) The issue of Yogas has not been the case to discuss here. 8. I am sorry to note that we still talk of Debilitation and Exaltation whereas our GREAT GURUJI JYOTISH MARTHAND, JYOTISH MANNAN PROF: LATE SRI K.S.KRISHNAMURTHIJI, has emphatically stated in his lectures and writings that such factors have no bearinvg in KP System.

Then why these are being brought into account now. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi) 8. Guruji's detailed explanation of Navamsa in Reader I and showing the Navamsa chart side by side with his Rasi chart in Original Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2nd Vol, page 321 as well as Reader III, without criticizing or applying Navamsa anywhere, might be his expression of gratitude to Navamsa for getting the idea of further division of 9 subs, but not equal like in Navamsa. 9. Such postings of just saying anything which is not known to one (eg. terminology of interception) is not KP, to forget traditional astrology or to have mind of clean of any knowledge learned before in learning KP, to read KP literature thoroughly without studying oneself enough, demanding to do something more from someone presenting a practical case without giving any comment what is wrong or right in the posting or without presenting anything

practically oneself and responding the learners asking about the KP issues in discouraging manner are not helpful to learn KP here. 10. There are so many other factors about which lot of discussions and research requires to be undertaken by those who have full grasp of the TRRADITIONAL SYSTEM AND ALSO K.P.SYSTEM and are open to accept any criticism or additional knowledge from whatever quarters they may come from. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi) 11. Any practically useful and applicable rule can be tested on AA rated charts of Astrodatabank 4.0 or astropro.com. To make or break a rule, a study or one's experience of `at least' 100 cases with around 70-75% favorable results is supposed to be a standard requirement. 12. The bottom line is to follow the rules of the game and here we are to learn KP. Regards, tw raichur anant www.jaxtr.com\anantachar

Never miss a thing. Make your homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Shri Raichur,

 

Thank you for your kind words.

 

Happy New Year!

 

With best wishes and regards,

 

Tin Win

 

 

 

, Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

>

> Dear Tinwin

> VERY good posting on the subject.

> Happy New Year

> good luck

>

> tw853 <tw853 wrote: Dear

Friends,

>

> 1. Three pillars of KP are: (i) the constellational Zodiac of

Hindu

> Astrology; (ii) the idea of dividing the constellation in the

> mysterious unequal Vimsottari proportion; and (iii) the Western

> Placidian cusps. However, Guruji KSK thoroughly revolutionized

the

> predictive portion (Phalabhaga) in his Padhdhati (Msg#993 <point

9 &

> 10> of this Group)

>

> 2. Satyasamhita, Satya jatakam: basics of Dhruva nadi by Sage

> Satyacharya, the forerunner of Dhruva nadi, said to have lived

about

> 2000 years ago, is found to be the source of idea regarding

Starlord

> and Ruling Planets. (Msg#9359, point 7.3; B.V. Raman: " My

> Experiences in Astrology " , Reprint 2001, page 86;

> http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id48.htm )

>

> 3. Guruji carried out the research with the able assistance of 2

> colleagues since 1939 and found out the method of applying Sub

Lord

> in 1951 by Devine Grace. (Guruji's self written biography dated

June

> 30, 1969 in R. Eshwara Manu's " Astrological Tables for All " ;

> Msg#9359, point 4.2 & 4.4) Even critics have praised Guruji for

> inventing KP on the basis of research. Many like KP because of

its

> simple rules with rationale of cause and effect.

>

> 4. Krishnamurti Padhdhati in 2 volumes was published in 1966 by

> Sagar Publications, with T.V. Viswanatha Aiyar's preface dated

Jan

> 17, 1966.

>

> 5. As a matter of fact when our GREATR GURUJI invented his

Theory,

> the great Mr.B.V.Raman himself ridiculed our GREAT GURUJI through

> his writings in his ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZENE which our GREATR GURUJI

> reciprocated with calmness and expalained and this war went on

for

> more than 15 years and finally Mr.B.V.Raman, had to concede that

our

> GREAT GURUJI has really invented a new System and wished him

> success. These have all now become history and only people

> like me and Mr.Raichurji, may some others who were watching this

at

> that time, have complete knowledge in this matter. SO WITHOUT ANY

> HESITATION AND WORRY, GO AHEAD AND SUCCESS WILL BE OURS. REMEMBER

> WHAT LORD KRISHNA HAS TOLD TO ARJUN IN THE BATTLE FIELD - I

quote -

> " OH ARJUN, DO YOUR DUTY AND LEAVE THE RESULT TO ME " unquote. To

put

> it in Sanskrit - KARMANYEVA ADHIKARASTHE MA PALESHU KADACHANA " .

ROME

> WAS NOT BUILT IN A DAY. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi's remark

> encouraging research on KP rules)

>

> 6. What we want is search for truth… Open mind to investigate…Let

> them (students) carry out further research…It is for you …. to

> further study and make (KP) more useful, more simple. (Guruji

KSK,

> Astrology and Athrishta, Sept 1967, page 7)

>

> 7. Exaltation and Debilitation has already been extensively

> discussed in this forum. (Msg#3963/ 4013 and related thread). The

> same is with Navamsa. (Msg#3308/ 6823/ 6919/ 6937/ 8613 and

related

> thread) The issue of Yogas has not been the case to discuss here.

>

> 8. I am sorry to note that we still talk of Debilitation and

> Exaltation whereas our GREAT GURUJI JYOTISH MARTHAND, JYOTISH

MANNAN

> PROF: LATE SRI K.S.KRISHNAMURTHIJI, has emphatically stated in

his

> lectures and writings that such factors have no bearinvg in KP

> System. Then why these are being brought into account now. (Shri

> K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi)

>

> 8. Guruji's detailed explanation of Navamsa in Reader I and

showing

> the Navamsa chart side by side with his Rasi chart in Original

> Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2nd Vol, page 321 as well as Reader III,

> without criticizing or applying Navamsa anywhere, might be his

> expression of gratitude to Navamsa for getting the idea of

further

> division of 9 subs, but not equal like in Navamsa.

>

> 9. Such postings of just saying anything which is not known to

one

> (eg. terminology of interception) is not KP, to forget

traditional

> astrology or to have mind of clean of any knowledge learned

before

> in learning KP, to read KP literature thoroughly without studying

> oneself enough, demanding to do something more from someone

> presenting a practical case without giving any comment what is

wrong

> or right in the posting or without presenting anything

practically

> oneself and responding the learners asking about the KP issues

in

> discouraging manner are not helpful to learn KP here.

>

> 10. There are so many other factors about which lot of

discussions

> and research requires to be undertaken by those who have full

grasp

> of the TRRADITIONAL SYSTEM AND ALSO K.P.SYSTEM and are open to

> accept any criticism or additional knowledge from whatever

quarters

> they may come from. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi)

>

> 11. Any practically useful and applicable rule can be tested on

AA

> rated charts of Astrodatabank 4.0 or astropro.com. To make or

break

> a rule, a study or one's experience of `at least' 100 cases with

> around 70-75% favorable results is supposed to be a standard

> requirement.

>

> 12. The bottom line is to follow the rules of the game and here

we

> are to learn KP.

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

raichur anant

> www.jaxtr.com\anantachar

>

>

>

> Never miss a thing. Make your homepage.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shri Tinwinji,

 

I appreciate extremely, your mail, and the

sentiments mentioned therein.

 

It is because of the presence of You seniors

that we have the impudence and audacity to ask

queries which otherwise we would not know where

to go and get the answers. Thankfully your

view is very much broad based and engulfing

even those who are searching for knowledge

apart from the KP corridors. This respect to

each and all, is what is solicited.

 

Personally I treat Traditional and KP

as Father and Mother in Astrology respectively,

but always ready to learn insights from the other

available sources like Nadi and Progressions(Western)

(Would take 2 years to finish my research vis

a vis KP), which can be corroborated to match

the results derived through KP or the missing links

in transits and timings of important events or

the Major incidents in Life. This would not mean

that I disregard either Kp or the Traditional

but would only mean that am keeping open mind

and flexibility in approaches.Ultimately we know

that the best predictions are only Nakshatra based

through the way shown by KP.

 

Thanks and hoping to learn more from your educative

Messages.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " tw853 " <tw853 wrote:

>

> Dear Friends,

>

> 1. Three pillars of KP are: (i) the constellational Zodiac of

Hindu

> Astrology; (ii) the idea of dividing the constellation in the

> mysterious unequal Vimsottari proportion; and (iii) the Western

> Placidian cusps. However, Guruji KSK thoroughly revolutionized the

> predictive portion (Phalabhaga) in his Padhdhati (Msg#993 <point 9

&

> 10> of this Group)

>

> 2. Satyasamhita, Satya jatakam: basics of Dhruva nadi by Sage

> Satyacharya, the forerunner of Dhruva nadi, said to have lived

about

> 2000 years ago, is found to be the source of idea regarding

Starlord

> and Ruling Planets. (Msg#9359, point 7.3; B.V. Raman: " My

> Experiences in Astrology " , Reprint 2001, page 86;

> http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id48.htm )

>

> 3. Guruji carried out the research with the able assistance of 2

> colleagues since 1939 and found out the method of applying Sub

Lord

> in 1951 by Devine Grace. (Guruji's self written biography dated

June

> 30, 1969 in R. Eshwara Manu's " Astrological Tables for All " ;

> Msg#9359, point 4.2 & 4.4) Even critics have praised Guruji for

> inventing KP on the basis of research. Many like KP because of its

> simple rules with rationale of cause and effect.

>

> 4. Krishnamurti Padhdhati in 2 volumes was published in 1966 by

> Sagar Publications, with T.V. Viswanatha Aiyar's preface dated Jan

> 17, 1966.

>

> 5. As a matter of fact when our GREATR GURUJI invented his Theory,

> the great Mr.B.V.Raman himself ridiculed our GREAT GURUJI through

> his writings in his ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZENE which our GREATR GURUJI

> reciprocated with calmness and expalained and this war went on for

> more than 15 years and finally Mr.B.V.Raman, had to concede that

our

> GREAT GURUJI has really invented a new System and wished him

> success. These have all now become history and only people

> like me and Mr.Raichurji, may some others who were watching this

at

> that time, have complete knowledge in this matter. SO WITHOUT ANY

> HESITATION AND WORRY, GO AHEAD AND SUCCESS WILL BE OURS. REMEMBER

> WHAT LORD KRISHNA HAS TOLD TO ARJUN IN THE BATTLE FIELD - I quote -

> " OH ARJUN, DO YOUR DUTY AND LEAVE THE RESULT TO ME " unquote. To

put

> it in Sanskrit - KARMANYEVA ADHIKARASTHE MA PALESHU KADACHANA " .

ROME

> WAS NOT BUILT IN A DAY. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi's remark

> encouraging research on KP rules)

>

> 6. What we want is search for truth… Open mind to investigate…Let

> them (students) carry out further research…It is for you …. to

> further study and make (KP) more useful, more simple. (Guruji

KSK,

> Astrology and Athrishta, Sept 1967, page 7)

>

> 7. Exaltation and Debilitation has already been extensively

> discussed in this forum. (Msg#3963/ 4013 and related thread). The

> same is with Navamsa. (Msg#3308/ 6823/ 6919/ 6937/ 8613 and

related

> thread) The issue of Yogas has not been the case to discuss here.

>

> 8. I am sorry to note that we still talk of Debilitation and

> Exaltation whereas our GREAT GURUJI JYOTISH MARTHAND, JYOTISH

MANNAN

> PROF: LATE SRI K.S.KRISHNAMURTHIJI, has emphatically stated in his

> lectures and writings that such factors have no bearinvg in KP

> System. Then why these are being brought into account now. (Shri

> K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi)

>

> 8. Guruji's detailed explanation of Navamsa in Reader I and

showing

> the Navamsa chart side by side with his Rasi chart in Original

> Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2nd Vol, page 321 as well as Reader III,

> without criticizing or applying Navamsa anywhere, might be his

> expression of gratitude to Navamsa for getting the idea of further

> division of 9 subs, but not equal like in Navamsa.

>

> 9. Such postings of just saying anything which is not known to one

> (eg. terminology of interception) is not KP, to forget

traditional

> astrology or to have mind of clean of any knowledge learned before

> in learning KP, to read KP literature thoroughly without studying

> oneself enough, demanding to do something more from someone

> presenting a practical case without giving any comment what is

wrong

> or right in the posting or without presenting anything practically

> oneself and responding the learners asking about the KP issues in

> discouraging manner are not helpful to learn KP here.

>

> 10. There are so many other factors about which lot of discussions

> and research requires to be undertaken by those who have full

grasp

> of the TRRADITIONAL SYSTEM AND ALSO K.P.SYSTEM and are open to

> accept any criticism or additional knowledge from whatever

quarters

> they may come from. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi)

>

> 11. Any practically useful and applicable rule can be tested on AA

> rated charts of Astrodatabank 4.0 or astropro.com. To make or

break

> a rule, a study or one's experience of `at least' 100 cases with

> around 70-75% favorable results is supposed to be a standard

> requirement.

>

> 12. The bottom line is to follow the rules of the game and here we

> are to learn KP.

>

> Regards,

>

> tw

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear tinwinji your eassy is very brief and in the same time detailed about Traditional and kp system thankyou for the information and wish you all a happy new year regards santa boorla Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: Dear TinwinVERY good posting on the subject.Happy New Yeargood lucktw853 <tw853 > wrote: Dear Friends,1. Three pillars of KP are: (i) the constellational Zodiac of Hindu Astrology; (ii) the idea of dividing the constellation in the mysterious unequal Vimsottari proportion; and (iii) the Western Placidian cusps. However, Guruji KSK thoroughly revolutionized the predictive portion (Phalabhaga) in his Padhdhati (Msg#993 <point 9 & 10> of this Group)2. Satyasamhita, Satya jatakam: basics of Dhruva nadi by Sage Satyacharya, the forerunner of Dhruva nadi, said to have lived about 2000 years ago, is found to be the source of idea regarding Starlord and Ruling Planets. (Msg#9359, point 7.3; B.V. Raman: "My Experiences in Astrology", Reprint 2001, page 86; http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags/id48.htm )3. Guruji carried out the research with the able assistance of 2 colleagues since 1939 and found out the method of applying Sub Lord in 1951 by Devine Grace. (Guruji's self written biography dated June 30, 1969 in R. Eshwara Manu's "Astrological Tables for All"; Msg#9359, point 4.2 & 4.4) Even critics have praised Guruji for inventing KP on the basis of research. Many like KP because of its simple rules with rationale of cause and effect.4. Krishnamurti Padhdhati in 2 volumes was published in 1966 by Sagar Publications, with T.V. Viswanatha Aiyar's preface dated Jan 17, 1966. 5. As a matter of fact when our GREATR GURUJI invented his Theory, the great Mr.B.V.Raman himself ridiculed our GREAT GURUJI through his writings in his ASTROLOGICAL MAGAZENE which our GREATR GURUJI

reciprocated with calmness and expalained and this war went on for more than 15 years and finally Mr.B.V.Raman, had to concede that our GREAT GURUJI has really invented a new System and wished him success. These have all now become history and only peoplelike me and Mr.Raichurji, may some others who were watching this at that time, have complete knowledge in this matter. SO WITHOUT ANY HESITATION AND WORRY, GO AHEAD AND SUCCESS WILL BE OURS. REMEMBER WHAT LORD KRISHNA HAS TOLD TO ARJUN IN THE BATTLE FIELD - I quote -"OH ARJUN, DO YOUR DUTY AND LEAVE THE RESULT TO ME" unquote. To put it in Sanskrit - KARMANYEVA ADHIKARASTHE MA PALESHU KADACHANA". ROME WAS NOT BUILT IN A DAY. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi's remark encouraging research on KP rules) 6. What we want is search for truth… Open mind to investigate…Let them (students) carry out further research…It is for you …. to further study and make (KP) more useful,

more simple. (Guruji KSK, Astrology and Athrishta, Sept 1967, page 7) 7. Exaltation and Debilitation has already been extensively discussed in this forum. (Msg#3963/ 4013 and related thread). The same is with Navamsa. (Msg#3308/ 6823/ 6919/ 6937/ 8613 and related thread) The issue of Yogas has not been the case to discuss here.8. I am sorry to note that we still talk of Debilitation and Exaltation whereas our GREAT GURUJI JYOTISH MARTHAND, JYOTISH MANNAN PROF: LATE SRI K.S.KRISHNAMURTHIJI, has emphatically stated in his lectures and writings that such factors have no bearinvg in KP System. Then why these are being brought into account now. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi)8. Guruji's detailed explanation of Navamsa in Reader I and showing the Navamsa chart side by side with his Rasi chart in Original Krishnamurti Padhdhati 2nd Vol, page 321 as well as Reader III, without criticizing or applying Navamsa

anywhere, might be his expression of gratitude to Navamsa for getting the idea of further division of 9 subs, but not equal like in Navamsa. 9. Such postings of just saying anything which is not known to one (eg. terminology of interception) is not KP, to forget traditional astrology or to have mind of clean of any knowledge learned before in learning KP, to read KP literature thoroughly without studying oneself enough, demanding to do something more from someone presenting a practical case without giving any comment what is wrong or right in the posting or without presenting anything practically oneself and responding the learners asking about the KP issues in discouraging manner are not helpful to learn KP here.10. There are so many other factors about which lot of discussions and research requires to be undertaken by those who have full grasp of the TRRADITIONAL SYSTEM AND ALSO K.P.SYSTEM and are open to

accept any criticism or additional knowledge from whatever quarters they may come from. (Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi) 11. Any practically useful and applicable rule can be tested on AA rated charts of Astrodatabank 4.0 or astropro.com. To make or break a rule, a study or one's experience of `at least' 100 cases with around 70-75% favorable results is supposed to be a standard requirement.12. The bottom line is to follow the rules of the game and here we are to learn KP.Regards,tw raichur anant www.jaxtr.com\anantachar Never miss a thing. Make your homepage.

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...