Guest guest Posted October 22, 2007 Report Share Posted October 22, 2007 Respected Raichurji, Sir; If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet? Kindly clarify and oblige. Regards, sujatkaram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2007 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 Dear Sujatkaram, In every case,follow K.P. rules of the order of strength of the significators... This "order of strength" is universally applicable... You therefore now know,I'm sure, the order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? Apply it accordingly... A systematic application of K.P. rules,which are very clear,allow for no confusion...of any kind... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote: Respected Raichurji,Sir;If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet?Kindly clarify and oblige.Regards,sujatkaram Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2007 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 dear sujatkaram, definately,it will offer the results for ketu also -sunil gondhalekar On 10/22/07, sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote: Respected Raichurji,Sir;If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet? Kindly clarify and oblige.Regards,sujatkaram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2007 Report Share Posted October 23, 2007 Dear Sujatraram Your inference is logical. But it is not proved correct. Only conjunction is considered, not the opposition.sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote: Respected Raichurji,Sir;If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet?Kindly clarify and oblige.Regards,sujatkaram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Dear Sujatkaram, This is very good question,In this case you have to check that Significance of Rahu/Ketu.If both are the sub lord of evil houses then they will give the negative result. , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: > > Dear Sujatkaram, > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the order of strength of the significators... > This " order of strength " is universally applicable... > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? Apply it accordingly... > A systematic application of K.P. rules,which are very clear,allow for no confusion...of any kind... > With best wishes, > L.Y.Rao. > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote: > Respected Raichurji, > Sir; > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet? > Kindly clarify and oblige. > Regards, > sujatkaram > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Dear sujatkaram I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt but still I think conjuction of any planet with node and aspect of any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in the answer . As far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather specific " may a single planet which is represented by a node due to conjuction is logical to be represented by another node also due to mere aspect which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and ketu. " I would like to see some clearification on this by Lajmi jee and others . With Regards AMIT , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: > > Dear Sujatkaram, > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the order of strength of the significators... > This " order of strength " is universally applicable... > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? Apply it accordingly... > A systematic application of K.P. rules,which are very clear,allow for no confusion...of any kind... > With best wishes, > L.Y.Rao. > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote: > Respected Raichurji, > Sir; > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet? > Kindly clarify and oblige. > Regards, > sujatkaram > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 I do not entirely agree that one shd take the opposition aspect into account. When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we take that it signifies the House to which it applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the cusp which is oppossite. In other words, "Is it logical to infer that a Planet can/will signify opposite houses at the same time ?" Can a planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors") When considering the results of matches we take 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly repesents the sixth. At the same time it will be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This may lead to anamolies in results. This is my personal opinion, and others are free to agree/or disagree, and put forth their views and experiences. dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar wrote: Dear sujatkaram I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt but still I think conjuction of any planet with node and aspect of any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in the answer . As far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather specific" may a single planet which is represented by a node due to conjuction is logical to be represented by another node also due to mere aspect which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and ketu."I would like to see some clearification on this by Lajmi jee and others .With RegardsAMIT , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:>> Dear Sujatkaram,> In every case,follow K.P. rules of the order of strength of the significators...> This "order of strength" is universally applicable...> You therefore now know,I'm sure, the order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? Apply it accordingly...> A systematic application of K.P. rules,which are very clear,allow for no confusion...of any kind...> With best wishes,> L.Y.Rao.> > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote:> Respected Raichurji,> Sir;> If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet?> Kindly clarify and oblige.> Regards,> sujatkaram> > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how.>raichur anant www.jaxtr.com\anantachar Do You ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 Dear Raichurji Take it this way.We have in the 4th house planets Rahu, Moon and Sun and in the 10th we have ketu, and saturn.Now as a result of conjunction rahu will take on the signification denoted by both moon and sun. Now since ketu is in opposition will ketu also take on the signification of moon and sun and vice-versa will also rahu take on the signification of sani since it aspects it by its 7th aspect.If yes then we really have a complicated situation. Since conjunction is more powerful than aspect we should in such cases ignore aspect and give priority to conjunction.Please clarify. with regards Yours sincerely jayant giri --- Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: > I do not entirely agree that one shd take the > opposition aspect into account. > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we > take that it signifies the House to which it > applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the > planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the > cusp which is oppossite. In other words, " Is it > logical to infer that a Planet can/will > signify opposite houses at the same time ? " Can a > planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st > house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors " ) > > When considering the results of matches we take > 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is > conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly > repesents the sixth. At the same time it will > be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it > strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This > may lead to anamolies in results. > > This is my personal opinion, and others are free > to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > views and experiences. > > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar wrote: > Dear sujatkaram > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > but still I think conjuction of any planet with node > and aspect of > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in > the answer . As > far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather > specific " may a > single planet which is represented by a node due to > conjuction is > logical to be represented by another node also due > to mere aspect > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and > ketu. " > I would like to see some clearification on this > by Lajmi jee and others . > With Regards > AMIT > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi > <lyrastro1 > wrote: > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > order of strength of the significators... > > This " order of strength " is universally > applicable... > > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? > Apply it > accordingly... > > A systematic application of K.P. > rules,which are very clear,allow for no > confusion...of any kind... > > With best wishes, > > L.Y.Rao. > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote: > > Respected Raichurji, > > Sir; > > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it > gives results of > that > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, > Ketu > automatically > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give > results of that > planet? > > Kindly clarify and oblige. > > Regards, > > sujatkaram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. > Click here to > know how. > > raichur anant > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection around > Jayant Giri Share files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos./groups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 Here I agree with the interpretation and reasoning given by Mr.Lajmee jee. In such cases also aspects must be taken into consideration. But its strength of signification (for these opposite houses) will be different. While predicting in such cases due weightage should be given to the strength of signification. As far as the signification of the opposite houses by the SAME planet is concerned it is the possibility even in planetory positions other than this. Of course,this is my personal openion. Guidance and comments from veteran astrologers are requested. Subhash Ektare , Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: > > I do not entirely agree that one shd take the opposition aspect into account. > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we take that it signifies the House to which it applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the cusp which is oppossite. In other words, " Is it logical to infer that a Planet can/will > signify opposite houses at the same time ? " Can a planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors " ) > > When considering the results of matches we take 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is > conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly repesents the sixth. At the same time it will > be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This > may lead to anamolies in results. > > This is my personal opinion, and others are free to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > views and experiences. > > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar wrote: > Dear sujatkaram > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > but still I think conjuction of any planet with node and aspect of > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in the answer . As > far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather specific " may a > single planet which is represented by a node due to conjuction is > logical to be represented by another node also due to mere aspect > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and ketu. " > I would like to see some clearification on this > by Lajmi jee and others . > With Regards > AMIT > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > order of strength of the significators... > > This " order of strength " is universally > applicable... > > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? Apply it > accordingly... > > A systematic application of K.P. > rules,which are very clear,allow for no confusion...of any kind... > > With best wishes, > > L.Y.Rao. > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@> wrote: > > Respected Raichurji, > > Sir; > > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of > that > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu > automatically > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that > planet? > > Kindly clarify and oblige. > > Regards, > > sujatkaram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to > know how. > > raichur anant > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 Dear Amit, The K.P. rules are very clearly mentioned in the K.P. Readers,they are also very simply explained... (see strength of significators),but I am amazed at the number of queries,many a time,quite needless,in my humble opinion, and already well-explained,by KSK,are being repeatedly asked...and what's more, being tirelessly answered by stalwarts like Mr.A.R. Raichur and others... ! I request members to first check the K.P. Readers,or Astrosecrets & K.P.,by K.Subramaniam,and if they do not find answers to their queries...the may feel free to ask them in the forum...else they will all be mere repititions of what has already been said... in these books...and in my humble opinion,a punishment meted out to the stalwarts for your not having read the books carefully...in the first place...! ! Answers to most of the queries including the one above,are clearly given already... and, in a simple and unambiguous manner.... With kind regards and best wishes, L.Y.Rao.Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: I do not entirely agree that one shd take the opposition aspect into account. When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we take that it signifies the House to which it applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the cusp which is oppossite. In other words, "Is it logical to infer that a Planet can/will signify opposite houses at the same time ?" Can a planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors") When considering the results of matches we take 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly repesents the sixth. At the same time it will be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This may lead to anamolies in results. This is my personal opinion, and others are free to agree/or disagree, and put forth their views and experiences. dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar > wrote: Dear sujatkaram I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt but still I think conjuction of any planet with node and aspect of any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in the answer . As far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather specific" may a single planet which is represented by a node due to conjuction is logical to be represented by another node also due to mere aspect which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and ketu."I would like to see some clearification on this by Lajmi jee and others .With RegardsAMIT , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote:>> Dear Sujatkaram,> In every case,follow K.P. rules of the order of strength of the significators...> This "order of strength" is universally applicable...> You therefore now know,I'm sure, the order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? Apply it accordingly...> A systematic application of K.P. rules,which are very clear,allow for no confusion...of any kind...> With best wishes,> L.Y.Rao.> > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote:> Respected Raichurji,> Sir;> If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet?> Kindly clarify and oblige.> Regards,> sujatkaram> > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how.> raichur anant www.jaxtr.com\anantachar Forgot the famous last words? Access your message archive online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 as per expierience of shanmugam,ra is more powerful to give the results of a planet in conj./aspect with either of themdubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar Sent: Wednesday, 24 October, 2007 8:23:10 PM Re: Signification properties of Rahu/Ketu Dear sujatkaram I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt but still I think conjuction of any planet with node and aspect of any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in the answer . As far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather specific" may a single planet which is represented by a node due to conjuction is logical to be represented by another node also due to mere aspect which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and ketu." I would like to see some clearification on this by Lajmi jee and others . With Regards AMIT @gro ups.com, Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Sujatkaram, > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the order of strength of the significators. .. > This "order of strength" is universally applicable.. . > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? Apply it accordingly. .. > A systematic application of K.P. rules,which are very clear,allow for no confusion... of any kind... > With best wishes, > L.Y.Rao. > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@ ...> wrote: > Respected Raichurji, > Sir; > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it gives results of that > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, Ketu automatically > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give results of that planet? > Kindly clarify and oblige. > Regards, > sujatkaram > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how. > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 dear jayant giri I have already clarified my belief, and practice, of considering only the conjunction, and not the inevitable opposition. jayant giri <jdgiri2001 wrote: Dear RaichurjiTake it this way.We have in the 4th house planetsRahu, Moon and Sun and in the 10th we have ketu, andsaturn.Now as a result of conjunction rahu will takeon the signification denoted by both moon and sun. Nowsince ketu is in opposition will ketu also take on thesignification of moon and sun and vice-versa will alsorahu take on the signification of sani since itaspects it by its 7th aspect.If yes then we reallyhave a complicated situation. Since conjunction ismore powerful than aspect we should in such casesignore aspect and give priority to conjunction.Pleaseclarify.with regardsYours sincerelyjayant giri--- Raichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote:> I do not entirely agree that one shd take the> opposition aspect into account. > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we> take that it signifies the House to which it> applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the> planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the> cusp which is oppossite. In other words, "Is it> logical to infer that a Planet can/will> signify opposite houses at the same time ?" Can a> planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st> house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors")> > When considering the results of matches we take> 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is> conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly> repesents the sixth. At the same time it will> be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it> strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This> may lead to anamolies in results. > > This is my personal opinion, and others are free> to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > views and experiences.> > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar > wrote:> Dear sujatkaram > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > but still I think conjuction of any planet with node> and aspect of > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in> the answer . As > far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather> specific" may a > single planet which is represented by a node due to> conjuction is > logical to be represented by another node also due> to mere aspect > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and> ketu."> I would like to see some clearification on this > by Lajmi jee and others .> With Regards> AMIT> > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi> <lyrastro1 > wrote:> >> > Dear Sujatkaram,> > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > order of strength of the significators...> > This "order of strength" is universally > applicable...> > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > order at which the strength due to aspect stands ?> Apply it > accordingly...> > A systematic application of K.P. > rules,which are very clear,allow for no> confusion...of any kind...> > With best wishes,> > L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote:> > Respected Raichurji,> > Sir;> > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it> gives results of > that > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances,> Ketu > automatically > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give> results of that > planet?> > Kindly clarify and oblige.> > Regards,> > sujatkaram> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger.> Click here to > know how.> >> > > > > > > raichur anant> www.jaxtr.com\anantachar> > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam> protection around > Jayant GiriShare files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos./groupsraichur anant www.jaxtr.com\anantachar Do You ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 Namaste, Perhaps it would be more reasonable to consider conjunction only in case of nodes as aspects (of nodes) are always debatable. Then as far as 7th house aspect is concerned (of planets), would it be not implied that the aspecting planets holds the potential to influence the results that would be otherwise independently given out by the planet placement? In the specific combination stated by Giri, rather can be assumed that Sun-Moon-rahu combination is influenced by the Saturnine forces which blend the results with more remorse effects. mh. - Raichur-a-r Saturday, October 27, 2007 11:57 AM Re: Re: Signification properties of Rahu/Ketu dear jayant giri I have already clarified my belief, and practice, of considering only the conjunction, and not the inevitable opposition. jayant giri <jdgiri2001 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear RaichurjiTake it this way.We have in the 4th house planetsRahu, Moon and Sun and in the 10th we have ketu, andsaturn.Now as a result of conjunction rahu will takeon the signification denoted by both moon and sun. Nowsince ketu is in opposition will ketu also take on thesignification of moon and sun and vice-versa will alsorahu take on the signification of sani since itaspects it by its 7th aspect.If yes then we reallyhave a complicated situation. Since conjunction ismore powerful than aspect we should in such casesignore aspect and give priority to conjunction.Pleaseclarify.with regardsYours sincerelyjayant giri--- Raichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote:> I do not entirely agree that one shd take the> opposition aspect into account. > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we> take that it signifies the House to which it> applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the> planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the> cusp which is oppossite. In other words, "Is it> logical to infer that a Planet can/will> signify opposite houses at the same time ?" Can a> planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st> house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors")> > When considering the results of matches we take> 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is> conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly> repesents the sixth. At the same time it will> be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it> strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This> may lead to anamolies in results. > > This is my personal opinion, and others are free> to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > views and experiences.> > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar > wrote:> Dear sujatkaram > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > but still I think conjuction of any planet with node> and aspect of > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in> the answer . As > far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather> specific" may a > single planet which is represented by a node due to> conjuction is > logical to be represented by another node also due> to mere aspect > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and> ketu."> I would like to see some clearification on this > by Lajmi jee and others .> With Regards> AMIT> > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi> <lyrastro1 > wrote:> >> > Dear Sujatkaram,> > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > order of strength of the significators...> > This "order of strength" is universally > applicable...> > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > order at which the strength due to aspect stands ?> Apply it > accordingly...> > A systematic application of K.P. > rules,which are very clear,allow for no> confusion...of any kind...> > With best wishes,> > L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote:> > Respected Raichurji,> > Sir;> > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it> gives results of > that > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances,> Ketu > automatically > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give> results of that > planet?> > Kindly clarify and oblige.> > Regards,> > sujatkaram> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger.> Click here to > know how.> >> > > > > > > raichur anant> www.jaxtr.com\anantachar> > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam> protection around > Jayant GiriShare files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos./groups raichur anant www.jaxtr.com\anantachar Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.14.8/1064 - Release 11/10/2007 15:09 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Dear Jayant, You take the cake for " manufacturing " ficticious and complex issues,but the firstly,what you say is very hypothetical indeed,and for the problem you have " manufactured " ,please apply very systematically K.P. rules for listing down the significators in the order of their strength faithfully...This order is very clearly and prominently given in K.P. Readers...or Astrosecrets & K.P., by K.Subramaniam...and by almost everybody who has written on the K.P. System. You are therefore requested to follow the order of strength given in K.P., and you will get the answer to your query... Wherever you have Rahu in a house,the exact opposite house will have Kethu in it...and viceversa...and this was anticipated by our revered Guruji Jyotish Marthand Shri K.S.Krishnamrthiji...and rules have been framed with this in mind... Now that you know how to arrange the significators in the order of their strength...I think you've got your answer... If not,then find out in what sub Rahu and Kethu are posited...and the one posited in a sub of the Karaka planet...select that...as the more powerful one... L.Y.Rao. > > Dear Raichurji > Take it this way.We have in the 4th house planets > Rahu, Moon and Sun and in the 10th we have ketu, and > saturn.Now as a result of conjunction rahu will take > on the signification denoted by both moon and sun. Now > since ketu is in opposition will ketu also take on the > signification of moon and sun and vice-versa will also > rahu take on the signification of sani since it > aspects it by its 7th aspect.If yes then we really > have a complicated situation. Since conjunction is > more powerful than aspect we should in such cases > ignore aspect and give priority to conjunction.Please > clarify. > with regards > Yours sincerely > jayant giri > --- Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: > > > I do not entirely agree that one shd take the > > opposition aspect into account. > > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we > > take that it signifies the House to which it > > applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the > > planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the > > cusp which is oppossite. In other words, " Is it > > logical to infer that a Planet can/will > > signify opposite houses at the same time ? " Can a > > planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st > > house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors " ) > > > > When considering the results of matches we take > > 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is > > conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly > > repesents the sixth. At the same time it will > > be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it > > strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This > > may lead to anamolies in results. > > > > This is my personal opinion, and others are free > > to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > > views and experiences. > > > > > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar wrote: > > Dear sujatkaram > > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > > but still I think conjuction of any planet with node > > and aspect of > > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in > > the answer . As > > far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather > > specific " may a > > single planet which is represented by a node due to > > conjuction is > > logical to be represented by another node also due > > to mere aspect > > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and > > ketu. " > > I would like to see some clearification on this > > by Lajmi jee and others . > > With Regards > > AMIT > > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi > > <lyrastro1@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > > order of strength of the significators... > > > This " order of strength " is universally > > applicable... > > > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > > order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? > > Apply it > > accordingly... > > > A systematic application of K.P. > > rules,which are very clear,allow for no > > confusion...of any kind... > > > With best wishes, > > > L.Y.Rao. > > > > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@> wrote: > > > Respected Raichurji, > > > Sir; > > > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it > > gives results of > > that > > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, > > Ketu > > automatically > > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give > > results of that > > planet? > > > Kindly clarify and oblige. > > > Regards, > > > sujatkaram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. > > Click here to > > know how. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raichur anant > > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > > > Jayant Giri > > > Share files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos./groups > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2007 Report Share Posted October 30, 2007 Respected Raichurji,Lajmiji and Sunilji, Sir, It appears to me that, in general, you donot consider it proper to take into consideration opposition aspect of a planet to determine its signification properties.You have also given reasoning behind this view. I came across this problem while examining a horary chart for remarriage and also the natal chart of the same jataka. I asked the querrent, my son, to give me a KP number to ascertain whether he has a second marriage in store for him. He gave me number 153. I examined the querry on 23rd Oct. 07 at 22.16 hrs. at mumbai. He was born on 20th Sep. 1971 at 21.45 hrs. at kalyan. To my surprise, I found many points of linkage between his natal chart and the horary chart.You have to see them yourself to understand them. For example, because the querry is regarding the 7th house i. e. marriage, the 7th cusp in the natal has become Lagna in the horary.Similarly, there is also a link between the number 153 and the moon,s position in the chart.The moon,s starlord is in house no. 1,the moon in no.5 and the moon itself is the starlord of the 3rd house! I think this is how KP astrology speaks! I would like to have your judgement on the horary,sir, howsoever infavourable it might be. with regards, sujatkaram , Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: > > dear jayant giri > I have already clarified my belief, and practice, of considering only the conjunction, and not the inevitable opposition. > > > jayant giri <jdgiri2001 wrote: > Dear Raichurji > Take it this way.We have in the 4th house planets > Rahu, Moon and Sun and in the 10th we have ketu, and > saturn.Now as a result of conjunction rahu will take > on the signification denoted by both moon and sun. Now > since ketu is in opposition will ketu also take on the > signification of moon and sun and vice-versa will also > rahu take on the signification of sani since it > aspects it by its 7th aspect.If yes then we really > have a complicated situation. Since conjunction is > more powerful than aspect we should in such cases > ignore aspect and give priority to conjunction.Please > clarify. > with regards > Yours sincerely > jayant giri > --- Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: > > > I do not entirely agree that one shd take the > > opposition aspect into account. > > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we > > take that it signifies the House to which it > > applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the > > planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the > > cusp which is oppossite. In other words, " Is it > > logical to infer that a Planet can/will > > signify opposite houses at the same time ? " Can a > > planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st > > house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors " ) > > > > When considering the results of matches we take > > 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is > > conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly > > repesents the sixth. At the same time it will > > be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it > > strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This > > may lead to anamolies in results. > > > > This is my personal opinion, and others are free > > to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > > views and experiences. > > > > > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar wrote: > > Dear sujatkaram > > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > > but still I think conjuction of any planet with node > > and aspect of > > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in > > the answer . As > > far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather > > specific " may a > > single planet which is represented by a node due to > > conjuction is > > logical to be represented by another node also due > > to mere aspect > > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and > > ketu. " > > I would like to see some clearification on this > > by Lajmi jee and others . > > With Regards > > AMIT > > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi > > <lyrastro1@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > > order of strength of the significators... > > > This " order of strength " is universally > > applicable... > > > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > > order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? > > Apply it > > accordingly... > > > A systematic application of K.P. > > rules,which are very clear,allow for no > > confusion...of any kind... > > > With best wishes, > > > L.Y.Rao. > > > > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@> wrote: > > > Respected Raichurji, > > > Sir; > > > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it > > gives results of > > that > > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, > > Ketu > > automatically > > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give > > results of that > > planet? > > > Kindly clarify and oblige. > > > Regards, > > > sujatkaram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. > > Click here to > > know how. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raichur anant > > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > > Jayant Giri > > Share files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos./groups > > > > > > raichur anant > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2007 Report Share Posted October 31, 2007 Dear Mr Rao Thank you for your mail.Unfortunately the situation that you have termed as fictious or manufactured is not so and in fact such a situation has arisen as a result of a question put with regard to birth of a child. The number quoted was 150 and some days back I had erected the horoscope with the quoted number. I have given my opinion as per my knowledge.Since some learned member had put the question about Rahu and Ketu I just thought of trying to explain with the example available with me.I with humility accept your learned obeservation and feel indeed priviliged to have joined this group. I am sure interaction with learned people like you,and others with more experience will help me to understand this important system of astrology for the good of all.Thanks once more for your kind observation With regards Yours sincerely Jayant Giri --- " L.Y.Rao. " <lyrastro1 wrote: > Dear Jayant, > You take the cake for " manufacturing " > ficticious and > complex issues,but the firstly,what you say is very > hypothetical > indeed,and for the problem you have > " manufactured " ,please apply very > systematically K.P. rules for listing down the > significators in the > order of their strength faithfully...This order is > very clearly and > prominently given in K.P. Readers...or Astrosecrets > & K.P., by > K.Subramaniam...and by almost everybody who has > written on the K.P. > System. > You are therefore requested to follow the > order of > strength given in K.P., and you will get the answer > to your query... > Wherever you have Rahu in a house,the > exact opposite house > will have Kethu in it...and viceversa...and this was > anticipated by > our revered Guruji Jyotish Marthand Shri > K.S.Krishnamrthiji...and > rules have been framed with this in mind... > Now that you know how to arrange the > significators in the > order of their strength...I think you've got your > answer... > If not,then find out in what sub Rahu and > Kethu are > posited...and the one posited in a sub of the Karaka > planet...select > that...as the more powerful one... > L.Y.Rao. > > > > Dear Raichurji > > Take it this way.We have in the 4th house planets > > Rahu, Moon and Sun and in the 10th we have ketu, > and > > saturn.Now as a result of conjunction rahu will > take > > on the signification denoted by both moon and sun. > Now > > since ketu is in opposition will ketu also take on > the > > signification of moon and sun and vice-versa will > also > > rahu take on the signification of sani since it > > aspects it by its 7th aspect.If yes then we really > > have a complicated situation. Since conjunction is > > more powerful than aspect we should in such cases > > ignore aspect and give priority to > conjunction.Please > > clarify. > > with regards > > Yours sincerely > > jayant giri > > --- Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: > > > > > I do not entirely agree that one shd take the > > > opposition aspect into account. > > > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp > we > > > take that it signifies the House to which it > > > applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the > > > planet will be forming an opposition aspect with > the > > > cusp which is oppossite. In other words, " Is it > > > logical to infer that a Planet can/will > > > signify opposite houses at the same time ? " > Can a > > > planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st > > > house(self) and also the 7th house (your > competors " ) > > > > > > When considering the results of matches we > take > > > 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is > > > conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly > > > repesents the sixth. At the same time it will > > > be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it > > > strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This > > > may lead to anamolies in results. > > > > > > This is my personal opinion, and others are > free > > > to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > > > views and experiences. > > > > > > > > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar wrote: > > > Dear sujatkaram > > > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > > > but still I think conjuction of any planet with > node > > > and aspect of > > > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee > in > > > the answer . As > > > far as I could undersatnd the question it is > rather > > > specific " may a > > > single planet which is represented by a node due > to > > > conjuction is > > > logical to be represented by another node also > due > > > to mere aspect > > > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu > and > > > ketu. " > > > I would like to see some clearification on this > > > by Lajmi jee and others . > > > With Regards > > > AMIT > > > > > > , Yogesh Rao > Lajmi > > > <lyrastro1@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > > > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > > > order of strength of the significators... > > > > This " order of strength " is universally > > > applicable... > > > > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > > > order at which the strength due to aspect stands > ? > > > Apply it > > > accordingly... > > > > A systematic application of K.P. > > > rules,which are very clear,allow for no > > > confusion...of any kind... > > > > With best wishes, > > > > L.Y.Rao. > > > > > > > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@> wrote: > > > > Respected Raichurji, > > > > Sir; > > > > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain > planet,it > > > gives results of > > > that > > > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such > circumstances, > > > Ketu > > > automatically > > > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also > give > > > results of that > > > planet? > > > > Kindly clarify and oblige. > > > > Regards, > > > > sujatkaram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading > messenger. > > > Click here to > > > know how. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raichur anant > > > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > > > > > > Jayant Giri > > > > > > Share files, take polls, and discuss your > passions - all > under one roof. Go to > http://in.promos./groups > > > > > Jayant Giri Chat on a cool, new interface. No download required. Go to http://in.messenger./webmessengerpromo.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2007 Report Share Posted October 31, 2007 Dear Sujata You are a KP student. You are in Mumbai, and know its spread. Please remember to mention the suburb of Mumbai, whenever you refer to mumbai. I cast your son's chart. The 7th sub is also 6th sub. So marriage and divorce can be easily foreseen. The 2nd Sub is Sat. This is connected to the 11th so 2nd marriage is forseen. By 4 step method his 2nd marriage is forseen between 22,5,2008 and 30,7,2008. I have not checked with 153 number. good lucksujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote: Respected Raichurji,Lajmiji and Sunilji,Sir,It appears to me that, in general, you donot consider it proper to take into consideration opposition aspect of a planet to determine its signification properties.You have also given reasoning behind this view.I came across this problem while examining a horary chart for remarriage and also the natal chart of the same jataka. I asked the querrent, my son, to give me a KP number to ascertain whether he has a second marriage in store for him. He gave me number 153. I examined the querry on 23rd Oct. 07 at 22.16 hrs. at mumbai.He was born on 20th Sep. 1971 at 21.45 hrs. at kalyan. To my surprise, I found many points of linkage between his natal chart and the horary chart.You have to see them yourself to understand them. For example, because the querry is regarding the 7th house i. e. marriage, the 7th cusp in the natal has become Lagna in the horary.Similarly, there is also a link between the number 153 and the moon,s position in the chart.The moon,s starlord is in house no. 1,the moon in no.5 and the moon itself is the starlord of the 3rd house!I think this is how KP astrology speaks!I would like to have your judgement on the horary,sir, howsoever infavourable it might be.with regards,sujatkaram , Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:>> dear jayant giri> I have already clarified my belief, and practice, of considering only the conjunction, and not the inevitable opposition.> > > jayant giri <jdgiri2001 wrote:> Dear Raichurji> Take it this way.We have in the 4th house planets> Rahu, Moon and Sun and in the 10th we have ketu, and> saturn.Now as a result of conjunction rahu will take> on the signification denoted by both moon and sun. Now> since ketu is in opposition will ketu also take on the> signification of moon and sun and vice-versa will also> rahu take on the signification of sani since it> aspects it by its 7th aspect.If yes then we really> have a complicated situation. Since conjunction is> more powerful than aspect we should in such cases> ignore aspect and give priority to conjunction.Please> clarify.> with regards> Yours sincerely> jayant giri> --- Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:> > > I do not entirely agree that one shd take the> > opposition aspect into account. > > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we> > take that it signifies the House to which it> > applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the> > planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the> > cusp which is oppossite. In other words, "Is it> > logical to infer that a Planet can/will> > signify opposite houses at the same time ?" Can a> > planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st> > house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors")> > > > When considering the results of matches we take> > 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is> > conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly> > repesents the sixth. At the same time it will> > be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it> > strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This> > may lead to anamolies in results. > > > > This is my personal opinion, and others are free> > to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > > views and experiences.> > > > > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar wrote:> > Dear sujatkaram > > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > > but still I think conjuction of any planet with node> > and aspect of > > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in> > the answer . As > > far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather> > specific" may a > > single planet which is represented by a node due to> > conjuction is > > logical to be represented by another node also due> > to mere aspect > > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and> > ketu."> > I would like to see some clearification on this > > by Lajmi jee and others .> > With Regards> > AMIT> > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi> > <lyrastro1@> > > wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sujatkaram,> > > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > > order of strength of the significators...> > > This "order of strength" is universally > > applicable...> > > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > > order at which the strength due to aspect stands ?> > Apply it > > accordingly...> > > A systematic application of K.P. > > rules,which are very clear,allow for no> > confusion...of any kind...> > > With best wishes,> > > L.Y.Rao.> > > > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@> wrote:> > > Respected Raichurji,> > > Sir;> > > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it> > gives results of > > that > > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances,> > Ketu > > automatically > > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give> > results of that > > planet?> > > Kindly clarify and oblige.> > > Regards,> > > sujatkaram> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger.> > Click here to > > know how.> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > raichur anant> > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar> > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam> > protection around > > > > Jayant Giri> > Share files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos./groups> > > > > > raichur anant> www.jaxtr.com\anantachar> > > > > >raichur anant www.jaxtr.com\anantachar Do You ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2007 Report Share Posted October 31, 2007 Respected Raichurji, Sir, Thanks for bringing to my notice my ignorance.I am at Dadar. The software that generated my horary chart has taken Latitude as 18.58N and longitude as 72.50E. With regards, sujatkaram , Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: > > Dear Sujata > You are a KP student. You are in Mumbai, and know its spread. Please remember to mention the suburb of Mumbai, whenever you refer to mumbai. > I cast your son's chart. > The 7th sub is also 6th sub. So marriage and divorce can be easily foreseen. > The 2nd Sub is Sat. This is connected to the 11th so 2nd marriage is forseen. > > By 4 step method his 2nd marriage is forseen between 22,5,2008 and 30,7,2008. > > I have not checked with 153 number. > > good luck > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram wrote: > Respected Raichurji,Lajmiji and Sunilji, > Sir, > It appears to me that, in general, you donot consider it proper to > take into consideration opposition aspect of a planet to determine > its signification properties.You have also given reasoning behind > this view. > I came across this problem while examining a horary chart for > remarriage and also the natal chart of the same jataka. I asked the > querrent, my son, to give me a KP number to ascertain whether he has > a second marriage in store for him. He gave me number 153. I examined > the querry on 23rd Oct. 07 at 22.16 hrs. at mumbai. > He was born on 20th Sep. 1971 at 21.45 hrs. at kalyan. To my > surprise, I found many points of linkage between his natal chart and > the horary chart.You have to see them yourself to understand them. > For example, because the querry is regarding the 7th house i. e. > marriage, the 7th cusp in the natal has become Lagna in the > horary.Similarly, there is also a link between the number 153 and the > moon,s position in the chart.The moon,s starlord is in house no. > 1,the moon in no.5 and the moon itself is the starlord of the 3rd > house! > I think this is how KP astrology speaks! > I would like to have your judgement on the horary,sir, howsoever > infavourable it might be. > with regards, > sujatkaram > , Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> > wrote: > > > > dear jayant giri > > I have already clarified my belief, and practice, of considering > only the conjunction, and not the inevitable opposition. > > > > > > jayant giri <jdgiri2001@> wrote: > > Dear Raichurji > > Take it this way.We have in the 4th house planets > > Rahu, Moon and Sun and in the 10th we have ketu, and > > saturn.Now as a result of conjunction rahu will take > > on the signification denoted by both moon and sun. Now > > since ketu is in opposition will ketu also take on the > > signification of moon and sun and vice-versa will also > > rahu take on the signification of sani since it > > aspects it by its 7th aspect.If yes then we really > > have a complicated situation. Since conjunction is > > more powerful than aspect we should in such cases > > ignore aspect and give priority to conjunction.Please > > clarify. > > with regards > > Yours sincerely > > jayant giri > > --- Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote: > > > > > I do not entirely agree that one shd take the > > > opposition aspect into account. > > > When a planet is within 3 deg 20 min of a cusp we > > > take that it signifies the House to which it > > > applies, by conjunction. At the same time, the > > > planet will be forming an opposition aspect with the > > > cusp which is oppossite. In other words, " Is it > > > logical to infer that a Planet can/will > > > signify opposite houses at the same time ? " Can a > > > planet conjunct with 1st house, signfy the 1st > > > house(self) and also the 7th house (your competors " ) > > > > > > When considering the results of matches we take > > > 6th cusp into consideration. If a planet is > > > conjunct with the 6th cusp, we say it strongly > > > repesents the sixth. At the same time it will > > > be opposing the 12th cusp. So can we say it > > > strongly represents also the 12th. ?. This > > > may lead to anamolies in results. > > > > > > This is my personal opinion, and others are free > > > to agree/or disagree, and put forth their > > > views and experiences. > > > > > > > > > dubeyamitkumar <dubeyamitkumar@> wrote: > > > Dear sujatkaram > > > I think Mr. lajmi jee had cleared your doubt > > > but still I think conjuction of any planet with node > > > and aspect of > > > any planet on node is generalised by lajmi jee in > > > the answer . As > > > far as I could undersatnd the question it is rather > > > specific " may a > > > single planet which is represented by a node due to > > > conjuction is > > > logical to be represented by another node also due > > > to mere aspect > > > which comes due to natural opposition of rahu and > > > ketu. " > > > I would like to see some clearification on this > > > by Lajmi jee and others . > > > With Regards > > > AMIT > > > > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi > > > <lyrastro1@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sujatkaram, > > > > In every case,follow K.P. rules of the > > > order of strength of the significators... > > > > This " order of strength " is universally > > > applicable... > > > > You therefore now know,I'm sure, the > > > order at which the strength due to aspect stands ? > > > Apply it > > > accordingly... > > > > A systematic application of K.P. > > > rules,which are very clear,allow for no > > > confusion...of any kind... > > > > With best wishes, > > > > L.Y.Rao. > > > > > > > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@> wrote: > > > > Respected Raichurji, > > > > Sir; > > > > If Rahu is in conjuction with a certain planet,it > > > gives results of > > > that > > > > planet, as per KP rules.Under such circumstances, > > > Ketu > > > automatically > > > > gets aspected by that planet.Will Ketu also give > > > results of that > > > planet? > > > > Kindly clarify and oblige. > > > > Regards, > > > > sujatkaram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now you can chat without downloading messenger. > > > Click here to > > > know how. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raichur anant > > > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > > > protection around > > > > > > > Jayant Giri > > > > Share files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one > roof. Go to http://in.promos./groups > > > > > > > > > > > > raichur anant > > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > > > > > > > > > raichur anant > www.jaxtr.com\anantachar > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.