Guest guest Posted April 9, 2007 Report Share Posted April 9, 2007 > hello sir would u please explain what this theory is all about and how helpful it is for learners? > > regards SAGAR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2007 Report Share Posted April 10, 2007 Dear Sagar, This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th step)This theory gives good and accurate results. Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of this theory.I learnt from him only. He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE. Sunil D.Joshi. --- " sagar.astro " <sagar.astro wrote: > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory > is all about and > how helpful it is for learners? > > > > > regards > SAGAR > > ______________________________\ ____ Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2007 Report Share Posted April 10, 2007 Dear Sagar Read the file section, and you will get a fair idea of this system. Read also KPezine FEB,MARCh,APril, where the system is described. "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro wrote: > hello sir would u please explain what this theory is all about andhow helpful it is for learners?>>regards SAGARGood LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609Do not use anant_1608 @.cm Iam closing that account The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Search Marketing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2007 Report Share Posted April 10, 2007 Sir, I would be purchasing this book shortly within a fortnight written by Shri Sunilji, which I am interested in, whenever I have spare money. In the meanwhile I wish to know ,is this not what we are already doing when we check the marriage or children queries, for example in a nativity ? We check normally the 7th Cusp Sub-Lord, then we next check what the Starlord of the Sub Lord signifies . Is the 4 step theory different than this or same way of approach ? The above was for cusps . For Planets,after we check the starLord of the sublord,if we go further to check the starlord of this sublord ,then there could be a mistake in this approach I feel personally. At the most we should restrict the checking of the sublord to the house where it is placed and Lords of.If this confirms what the Star Lord signifies, then it is good enough. If You see the star Lord of the sublord for Planets then I feel its going to create confusions.But I hope the book of Shri Sunilji has enough examples to prove me otherwise. But this a personal opinion, as not a authority on Kp or developments thereof. regards, Bhaskar. , Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80 wrote: > > Dear Sagar, > This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a > Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub > LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th > step)This theory gives good and accurate results. > Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of > this theory.I learnt from him only. > He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted > to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE. > Sunil D.Joshi. > > > --- " sagar.astro " <sagar.astro wrote: > > > > > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory > > is all about and > > how helpful it is for learners? > > > > > > > > regards > > SAGAR > > > > > > > > > ____________________ ______________ > Finding fabulous fares is fun. > Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. > http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2007 Report Share Posted April 11, 2007 Mr baskar sir good morning frm sairaman after long time i am writing to y i am enjoying yr msgs now y have been discussing the 4 step theory i will be thankful if y can explain same with a specfic example the most powerful significator the planet in the star of occupant next the occupant if any planet in the star of the occupant and nother planet in its star or house i think it should be the best significator Sir that how i understood same pls clarify me where i am wrong theory with example will be helpful with specific incidents thank y sir Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: Sir, I would be purchasing this book shortly within a fortnight written by Shri Sunilji, which I am interested in, whenever I have spare money. In the meanwhile I wish to know ,is this not what we are already doing when we check the marriage or children queries, for example in a nativity ? We check normally the 7th Cusp Sub-Lord, then we next check what the Starlord of the Sub Lord signifies . Is the 4 step theory different than this or same way of approach ? The above was for cusps . For Planets,after we check the starLord of the sublord,if we go further to check the starlord of this sublord ,then there could be a mistake in this approach I feel personally. At the most we should restrict the checking of the sublord to the house where it is placed and Lords of.If this confirms what the Star Lord signifies, then it is good enough. If You see the star Lord of the sublord for Planets then I feel its going to create confusions.But I hope the book of Shri Sunilji has enough examples to prove me otherwise. But this a personal opinion, as not a authority on Kp or developments thereof. regards, Bhaskar. , Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80 wrote: > > Dear Sagar, > This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a > Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub > LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th > step)This theory gives good and accurate results. > Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of > this theory.I learnt from him only. > He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted > to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE. > Sunil D.Joshi. > > > --- "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro wrote: > > > > > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory > > is all about and > > how helpful it is for learners? > > > > > > > > regards > > SAGAR > > > > > > > > > ________ ______________ > Finding fabulous fares is fun. > Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. > http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 > Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.Try the Mail Beta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2007 Report Share Posted April 11, 2007 Dear Bhaskarji, Sri Sunil Gondhalekar, well known in Marathi Circles introduced 4 step theory and popularised it among the astrologers knowing Marathi. About 2 years ago ,I had read the Marathi magazine where there were articles on the subject.Thereafter, I brought this subject into this group,Sri Raichur was kind enough to translate the concept into English and is now available in the Files. At the same time, I requested Sri Sunil Gondhalekar to give us the English Verison,so I presume this book should be the version,we are looking for.Thank you Sunil. As far as the efficacy is concerned you would observe Sri Raichur has affirmed his predictions are largely based on 4 step theory. This should set your mind at rest. There is nothing like the saying, proof of the pudding is in the eating,so please try it out. Regards, Satish , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Sir, > > I would be purchasing this book shortly within a > fortnight written by Shri Sunilji, which I > am interested in, whenever I have spare money. > In the meanwhile I wish to know ,is this not what > we are already doing when we check the marriage > or children queries, for example in a nativity ? > We check normally the 7th Cusp Sub-Lord, then we > next check what the Starlord of the Sub Lord > signifies . Is the 4 step theory different > than this or same way of approach ? > The above was for cusps . > > For Planets,after we check the starLord of > the sublord,if we go further to check the > starlord of this sublord ,then there could be > a mistake in this approach I feel personally. > At the most we should restrict the checking > of the sublord to the house where it is > placed and Lords of.If this confirms what the > Star Lord signifies, then it is good > enough. If You see the star Lord > of the sublord for Planets then I feel its > going to create confusions.But I hope > the book of Shri Sunilji has enough examples > to prove me otherwise. > > But this a personal opinion, as not a authority > on Kp or developments thereof. > > regards, > Bhaskar. , Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Sagar, > > This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a > > Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub > > LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th > > step)This theory gives good and accurate results. > > Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of > > this theory.I learnt from him only. > > He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted > > to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE. > > Sunil D.Joshi. > > > > > > --- " sagar.astro " <sagar.astro@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory > > > is all about and > > > how helpful it is for learners? > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > SAGAR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________ _ > ______________ > > Finding fabulous fares is fun. > > Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find > flight and hotel bargains. > > http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2007 Report Share Posted April 11, 2007 Shree Sunil Gondhalekar's English version of 4 step theory is now availble. Please read the announcements in the postings R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote: Dear Bhaskarji,Sri Sunil Gondhalekar, well known in Marathi Circles introduced 4 step theory and popularised it among the astrologers knowing Marathi.About 2 years ago ,I had read the Marathi magazine where there were articles on the subject.Thereafter, I brought this subject into this group,Sri Raichur was kind enough to translate the concept into English and is now available in the Files.At the same time, I requested Sri Sunil Gondhalekar to give us the English Verison,so I presume this book should be the version,we are looking for.Thank you Sunil.As far as the efficacy is concerned you would observe Sri Raichur has affirmed his predictions are largely based on 4 step theory. This should set your mind at rest.There is nothing like the saying, proof of the pudding is in the eating,so please try it out.Regards,Satish , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> Sir,> > I would be purchasing this book shortly within a > fortnight written by Shri Sunilji, which I> am interested in, whenever I have spare money.> In the meanwhile I wish to know ,is this not what> we are already doing when we check the marriage> or children queries, for example in a nativity ?> We check normally the 7th Cusp Sub-Lord, then we> next check what the Starlord of the Sub Lord> signifies . Is the 4 step theory different> than this or same way of approach ?> The above was for cusps .> > For Planets,after we check the starLord of > the sublord,if we go further to check the> starlord of this sublord ,then there could be> a mistake in this approach I feel personally.> At the most we should restrict the checking> of the sublord to the house where it is> placed and Lords of.If this confirms what the> Star Lord signifies, then it is good> enough. If You see the star Lord> of the sublord for Planets then I feel its> going to create confusions.But I hope> the book of Shri Sunilji has enough examples> to prove me otherwise.> > But this a personal opinion, as not a authority> on Kp or developments thereof.> > regards,> Bhaskar.> > > > > > > , Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80@> > wrote:> >> > Dear Sagar,> > This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a> > Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub> > LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th> > step)This theory gives good and accurate results.> > Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of> > this theory.I learnt from him only.> > He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted> > to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE.> > Sunil D.Joshi.> > > > > > --- "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory> > > is all about and> > > how helpful it is for learners?> > > >> > > >> > > regards > > > SAGAR> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________> ______________> > Finding fabulous fares is fun. > > Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find > flight and hotel bargains.> > http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097> >>Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609Do not use anant_1608 @.cm Iam closing that account Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.Try the Mail Beta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2007 Report Share Posted April 11, 2007 Dear Members IN KP we find the significators of the House, and having tabulated that we get the houses signified by the planet. In 4 step method we are directly finding the Houses strongly signified by the Planet, and not vice versa. Please read the note on this in the file section, and also KPEzine Feb 2007 sairam nat <sairaman53 wrote: Mr baskar sir good morning frm sairaman after long time i am writing to y i am enjoying yr msgs now y have been discussing the 4 step theory i will be thankful if y can explain same with a specfic example the most powerful significator the planet in the star of occupant next the occupant if any planet in the star of the occupant and nother planet in its star or house i think it should be the best significator Sir that how i understood same pls clarify me where i am wrong theory with example will be helpful with specific incidents thank y sir Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Sir,I would be purchasing this book shortly within a fortnight written by Shri Sunilji, which Iam interested in, whenever I have spare money.In the meanwhile I wish to know ,is this not whatwe are already doing when we check the marriageor children queries, for example in a nativity ?We check normally the 7th Cusp Sub-Lord, then wenext check what the Starlord of the Sub Lordsignifies . Is the 4 step theory differentthan this or same way of approach ?The above was for cusps .For Planets,after we check the starLord of the sublord,if we go further to check thestarlord of this sublord ,then there could bea mistake in this approach I feel personally.At the most we should restrict the checkingof the sublord to the house where it isplaced and Lords of.If this confirms what theStar Lord signifies, then it is goodenough. If You see the star Lordof the sublord for Planets then I feel itsgoing to create confusions.But I hopethe book of Shri Sunilji has enough examplesto prove me otherwise.But this a personal opinion, as not a authorityon Kp or developments thereof.regards,Bhaskar. , Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80 wrote:>> Dear Sagar,> This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a> Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub> LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th> step)This theory gives good and accurate results.> Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of> this theory.I learnt from him only.> He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted> to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE.> Sunil D.Joshi.> > > --- "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro wrote:> > > > > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory> > is all about and> > how helpful it is for learners?> > >> > >> > regards > > SAGAR> > > > > > > > > ______________________> Finding fabulous fares is fun. > Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.> http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.Try the Mail Beta. Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609Do not use anant_1608 @.cm Iam closing that account Don't be flakey. Get Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2007 Report Share Posted April 11, 2007 dear satish, thanks for the compliments on 4 step theory.(yes it is english version given hands by raichur) actually i have taken all the rules told by krishnamurthy he has mentioned to see the sub of planet/cuspal sublord and mentioned that it should be significator for that house,thats why i am using planet/starlord/sub/and sub star this gives correct results.if we consider only 2 levels or 3 levels of planet certain cases gives opposite results.i have written so many aticles in marathi for prooving this theory i request all of you to study this theory and fulfill the dream of krishnamurthy thanks -sunil gondhalekarR Satish <rsatish1942 wrote: Dear Bhaskarji,Sri Sunil Gondhalekar, well known in Marathi Circles introduced 4 step theory and popularised it among the astrologers knowing Marathi.About 2 years ago ,I had read the Marathi magazine where there were articles on the subject.Thereafter, I brought this subject into this group,Sri Raichur was kind enough to translate the concept into English and is now available in the Files.At the same time, I requested Sri Sunil Gondhalekar to give us the English Verison,so I presume this book should be the version,we are looking for.Thank you Sunil.As far as the efficacy is concerned you would observe Sri Raichur has affirmed his predictions are largely based on 4 step theory. This should set your mind at rest.There is nothing like the saying, proof of the pudding is in the eating,so please try it out.Regards,Satish , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> Sir,> > I would be purchasing this book shortly within a > fortnight written by Shri Sunilji, which I> am interested in, whenever I have spare money.> In the meanwhile I wish to know ,is this not what> we are already doing when we check the marriage> or children queries, for example in a nativity ?> We check normally the 7th Cusp Sub-Lord, then we> next check what the Starlord of the Sub Lord> signifies . Is the 4 step theory different> than this or same way of approach ?> The above was for cusps .> > For Planets,after we check the starLord of > the sublord,if we go further to check the> starlord of this sublord ,then there could be> a mistake in this approach I feel personally.> At the most we should restrict the checking> of the sublord to the house where it is> placed and Lords of.If this confirms what the> Star Lord signifies, then it is good> enough. If You see the star Lord> of the sublord for Planets then I feel its> going to create confusions.But I hope> the book of Shri Sunilji has enough examples> to prove me otherwise.> > But this a personal opinion, as not a authority> on Kp or developments thereof.> > regards,> Bhaskar.> > > > > > > , Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80@> > wrote:> >> > Dear Sagar,> > This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a> > Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub> > LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th> > step)This theory gives good and accurate results.> > Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of> > this theory.I learnt from him only.> > He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted> > to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE.> > Sunil D.Joshi.> > > > > > --- "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory> > > is all about and> > > how helpful it is for learners?> > > >> > > >> > > regards > > > SAGAR> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________> ______________> > Finding fabulous fares is fun. > > Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find > flight and hotel bargains.> > http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097> >> Need Mail bonding?Go to the Mail Q&A for great tips from Answers users. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2007 Report Share Posted April 11, 2007 Dear Sunil,How is it different from Dr. Kar's MST theory?Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80 wrote: Dear Sagar, This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th step)This theory gives good and accurate results. Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of this theory.I learnt from him only. He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE. Sunil D.Joshi. --- "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory > is all about and > how helpful it is for learners? > > > > > regards > SAGAR > > ________ Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 Dear Sh Sunil, Are your books available in english and can they be obtained from VPP ? If yes, address/contact number please. Thanks, Vijay kumar - sunil gondhalekar Wednesday, April 11, 2007 11:41 PM Re: Re: 4 step theory dear satish, thanks for the compliments on 4 step theory.(yes it is english version given hands by raichur) actually i have taken all the rules told by krishnamurthy he has mentioned to see the sub of planet/cuspal sublord and mentioned that it should be significator for that house,thats why i am using planet/starlord/sub/and sub star this gives correct results.if we consider only 2 levels or 3 levels of planet certain cases gives opposite results.i have written so many aticles in marathi for prooving this theory i request all of you to study this theory and fulfill the dream of krishnamurthy thanks -sunil gondhalekarR Satish <rsatish1942 > wrote: Dear Bhaskarji,Sri Sun! il Gondhalekar, well known in Marathi Circles introduced 4 step theory and popularised it among the astrologers knowing Marathi.About 2 years ago ,I had read the Marathi magazine where there were articles on the subject.Thereafter, I brought this subject into this group,Sri Raichur was kind enough to translate the concept into English and is now available in the Files.At the same time, I requested Sri Sunil Gondhalekar to give us the English Verison,so I presume this book should be the version,we are looking for.Thank you Sunil.As far as the efficacy is concerned you would observe Sri Raichur has affirmed his predictions are largely based on 4 step theory. This should set your mind at rest.There is nothing like the saying, proof of the pudding is in the eating,so please try it out.Regards,Satish , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> Sir,> > I would be purchasing this book shortly within a > fortnight written by Shri Sunilji, which I> am interested in, whenever I have spare money.> In the meanwhile I wish to know ,is this not what> we are already doing when we check the marriage> or children queries, for example in a nativity ?> We check normally the 7th Cusp Sub-Lord, then we> next check what the Starlord of the Sub Lord> signifies . Is the 4 step theory different> than this or same way of approach ?> The above was for cusps .> > For Planets,after we check the starLord of > the sublord,if we go further to check the> starlord of this sublord ,then there could be> a mistake in this approach I feel personally.> At the most we should restrict the checking> of the sublord to the house where it is> placed and Lords of.If this confirms what the> Star Lord signifies, then it is good> enough. If You see the star Lord> of the sublord for Planets then I feel its> going to create confusions.But I hope> the book of Shri Sunilji has enough examples> to prove me otherwise.> > But this a personal opinion, as not a authority> on Kp or developments thereof.> > regards,> Bhaskar.> > > > > > > , Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80@> > wrote:> >> > Dear Sagar,> > This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a> > Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub> > LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4th> > step)This theory gives good and accurate results.> > Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of> > this theory.I learnt from him only.> > He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devoted> > to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE.> > Sunil D.Joshi.> > > > > > --- "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory> > > is all about and> > > how helpful it is for learners?> > > >> > > >> > > regards > > > SAGAR> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________> ______________> > Finding fabulous fares is fun. > > Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find > flight and hotel bargains.> > http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097> >> Need Mail bonding?Go to the Mail Q & A for great tips from Answers users. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 I am not fully aware Dr.Kar's theory. --- sujata das <sujatadash1 wrote: > Dear Sunil, > How is it different from Dr. Kar's MST theory? > > Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80 wrote: > Dear Sagar, > This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of a > Planet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's sub > LORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub > LORD(4th > step)This theory gives good and accurate results. > Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect of > this theory.I learnt from him only. > He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine > devoted > to KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE. > Sunil D.Joshi. > > --- " sagar.astro " <sagar.astro wrote: > > > > > > > > hello sir would u please explain what this > theory > > is all about and > > how helpful it is for learners? > > > > > > > > regards > > SAGAR > > > > > > > ________ > Finding fabulous fares is fun. > Let FareChase search your favorite travel > sites to find flight and hotel bargains. > http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on > Messenger ______________________________\ ____ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search./shortcuts/#loc_weather Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 dear sujata, it is different theory from dr.kar`s theory.i dont use sub-sub in my theory but i use star lord of the sub.the detailed theory is explained in my course.pl.follow that -sunil gondhalekarsujata das <sujatadash1 wrote: Dear Sunil,How is it different from Dr. Kar's MST theory?Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80 > wrote: Dear Sagar,This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of aPlanet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's subLORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4thstep)This theory gives good and accurate results.Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect ofthis theory.I learnt from him only.He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devotedto KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE.Sunil D.Joshi.--- "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:> > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory> is all about and> how helpful it is for learners?> >> >> regards > SAGAR> > ________Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Search Marketing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Dear Mr Sunil Gondhalekhar, Are there any KP classes in Borivli or Thane (especially on Sundays) Regards Dharmarajan Nsunil gondhalekar <sunilalaka wrote: dear sujata, it is different theory from dr.kar`s theory.i dont use sub-sub in my theory but i use star lord of the sub.the detailed theory is explained in my course.pl.follow that -sunil gondhalekarsujata das <sujatadash1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Sunil,How is it different from Dr. Kar's MST theory?Sunil Joshi <suniljoshi80 > wrote: Dear Sagar,This theory analyses ONLY STRONG SIGNIFICATORS of aPlanet(1st step),it's star LORD(2nd step),it's subLORD(3rd step) and the star LORD of this sub LORD(4thstep)This theory gives good and accurate results.Mr.Sunil Gondhalekar from Thane is the architect ofthis theory.I learnt from him only.He is the editor of Marathi monthly magazine devotedto KP astrology NAKSHATRACHE DENE.Sunil D.Joshi.--- "sagar.astro" <sagar.astro (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:> > > > hello sir would u please explain what this theory> is all about and> how helpful it is for learners?> >> >> regards > SAGAR> > ________Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.http://farechase./promo-generic-14795097 Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger The fish are biting.Get more visitors on your site using Search Marketing. Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check out new cars at Autos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 Dear Shri. Sunil Gondhalekar and Friends, After my last posting in this forum a few days ago, I notice there have been a few bitter exchanges spurred on by Tin Win's case studies. One reason I do not participate in this forum regularly is that for some strange reason my postings either do not appear or appear after a few days. That is a frustrating experience. Going back to my " hypothetical " question, I have already expressed my regrets. As someone responded to my posting saying that perhaps I do not know astronomy, I confess I am not good at it (nor even in Astrology). But what appears silly is to harp on it, bypassing the essence of the question. I feel that even if the situation I outlined is an impossibility astronomically, Shri Raichur or Shri Gondhalekar could have answered by either sticking to the chart as I gave it, or by suitably modifying it to explain the correct behaviour. After all, I wasn't asking if someone could marry, or could get children. There was no need for the chart to be correct to answer my question because I had a doubt about 4 Step rules, not about the outcome in terms of real world experience. I repeat, I made a mistake, so I am not skirting around that issue. Since I am trying to support the theory in my software, I conjured up a " test case " . I feel that is not a crime. Unfortunately, some people saw it otherwise. Let us forget that. I will try to be more careful in future. My appeal to Shri Gondhalekar is not to feel slighted by " challenges " posed by members. Tin Win participates regularly in many KP forums and we all know him to be quite systematic, and authentic in the information he presents. We have great regard for his knowledge. I am sure he did not mean to denigrade 4 Step Theory. As to whether the 4 Step Theory is " proved " or not, you are the best judge. When a new idea is proposed, it is common to expect strong and adverse criticisms. A good theory will survive that. In fact, it is a good opportunity for the inventor to improve the system where possible. So, Shri Gondhalekar, I request you to spend time (I know you must be extremely busy) clarifying issues, however silly those might be. I am sure Shri.KSK had faced many hurdles during his lifetime. From my limited understanding of the system based on your book and the artciles by Shri.Raichur, I see promise in the system in arriving at fruitful significators. I must also admit that I found it quite difficult to understand. One of the points, as Tin Win tried to indicate, is that your book implicitly allows 7th aspect, but Shri Raichur votes against it. I think this calls for clarification, don't you agree? Regards, Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 dear rangarajan, the postings in this forum was really irritating for me also. i have spread this theory in maharashtra and willing to spread to forum also. no doubt it is not easy to follow in one readings,but if followed properly,it gives fair results,not100%.and will come to know the simplicity of theory. i am not worried about it's proofness but worried that many are not accepting that this is a KP method,they still feels that it is sunil gondhalekar's method. -sunil gondhalekar On 9/16/07, Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: Dear Shri. Sunil Gondhalekar and Friends,After my last posting in this forum a few days ago, I notice there have been a few bitter exchanges spurred on by Tin Win's case studies. One reason I do not participate in this forum regularly is that for some strange reason my postings either do not appear or appear after a few days. That is a frustrating experience. Going back to my " hypothetical " question, I have already expressed my regrets. As someone responded to my posting saying that perhaps I do not know astronomy, I confess I am not good at it (nor even in Astrology). But what appears silly is to harp on it, bypassing the essence of the question. I feel that even if the situation I outlined is an impossibility astronomically, Shri Raichur or Shri Gondhalekar could have answered by either sticking to the chart as I gave it, or by suitably modifying it to explain the correct behaviour. After all, I wasn't asking if someone could marry, or could get children. There was no need for the chart to be correct to answer my question because I had a doubt about 4 Step rules, not about the outcome in terms of real world experience. I repeat, I made a mistake, so I am not skirting around that issue. Since I am trying to support the theory in my software, I conjured up a " test case " . I feel that is not a crime. Unfortunately, some people saw it otherwise.Let us forget that. I will try to be more careful in future. My appeal to Shri Gondhalekar is not to feel slighted by " challenges " posed by members. Tin Win participates regularly in many KP forums and we all know him to be quite systematic, and authentic in the information he presents. We have great regard for his knowledge. I am sure he did not mean to denigrade 4 Step Theory. As to whether the 4 Step Theory is " proved " or not, you are the best judge. When a new idea is proposed, it is common to expect strong and adverse criticisms. A good theory will survive that. In fact, it is a good opportunity for the inventor to improve the system where possible.So, Shri Gondhalekar, I request you to spend time (I know you must be extremely busy) clarifying issues, however silly those might be. I am sure Shri.KSK had faced many hurdles during his lifetime.From my limited understanding of the system based on your book and the artciles by Shri.Raichur, I see promise in the system in arriving at fruitful significators. I must also admit that I found it quite difficult to understand. One of the points, as Tin Win tried to indicate, is that your book implicitly allows 7th aspect, but Shri Raichur votes against it. I think this calls for clarification, don't you agree? Regards,Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 Dear Friends, After reading several exchanges of correspondence on 4 step theory, I can only sum up by saying: If Sri Raichur uses 4 step theory regularly-IT Must be good. Despite all " inadequacies " of the system, this is very popular with KP lovers in the Marathi speaking population. If Sunil has kept his brief, he cannot be compelled to express himself. Regards, Satish -- In , " sunil gondhalekar " <sunilalaka wrote: > > dear rangarajan, > the postings in this forum was really irritating for me also. > i have spread this theory in maharashtra and willing to spread to forum > also. > no doubt it is not easy to follow in one readings,but if followed > properly,it > gives fair results,not100%.and will come to know the simplicity of theory. > i am not worried about it's proofness but worried that many are not > accepting > that this is a KP method,they still feels that it is sunil gondhalekar's > method. > -sunil gondhalekar > > > On 9/16/07, Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga wrote: > > > > Dear Shri. Sunil Gondhalekar and Friends, > > After my last posting in this forum a few days ago, I notice there > > have been a few bitter exchanges spurred on by Tin Win's case > > studies. One reason I do not participate in this forum regularly is > > that for some strange reason my postings either do not appear or > > appear after a few days. That is a frustrating experience. Going > > back to my " hypothetical " question, I have already expressed my > > regrets. As someone responded to my posting saying that perhaps I do > > not know astronomy, I confess I am not good at it (nor even in > > Astrology). But what appears silly is to harp on it, bypassing the > > essence of the question. I feel that even if the situation I > > outlined is an impossibility astronomically, Shri Raichur or Shri > > Gondhalekar could have answered by either sticking to the chart as I > > gave it, or by suitably modifying it to explain the correct > > behaviour. After all, I wasn't asking if someone could marry, or > > could get children. There was no need for the chart to be correct to > > answer my question because I had a doubt about 4 Step rules, not > > about the outcome in terms of real world experience. I repeat, I > > made a mistake, so I am not skirting around that issue. Since I am > > trying to support the theory in my software, I conjured up a " test > > case " . I feel that is not a crime. Unfortunately, some people saw it > > otherwise. > > > > Let us forget that. I will try to be more careful in future. My > > appeal to Shri Gondhalekar is not to feel slighted by " challenges " > > posed by members. Tin Win participates regularly in many KP forums > > and we all know him to be quite systematic, and authentic in the > > information he presents. We have great regard for his knowledge. I > > am sure he did not mean to denigrade 4 Step Theory. > > > > As to whether the 4 Step Theory is " proved " or not, you are the best > > judge. When a new idea is proposed, it is common to expect strong > > and adverse criticisms. A good theory will survive that. In fact, it > > is a good opportunity for the inventor to improve the system where > > possible. > > > > So, Shri Gondhalekar, I request you to spend time (I know you must > > be extremely busy) clarifying issues, however silly those might be. > > I am sure Shri.KSK had faced many hurdles during his lifetime. > > > > From my limited understanding of the system based on your book and > > the artciles by Shri.Raichur, I see promise in the system in > > arriving at fruitful significators. I must also admit that I found > > it quite difficult to understand. One of the points, as Tin Win > > tried to indicate, is that your book implicitly allows 7th aspect, > > but Shri Raichur votes against it. I think this calls for > > clarification, don't you agree? > > > > Regards, > > Rangarajan > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2007 Report Share Posted September 20, 2007 Dear Friends, Further to my note, I would like to say 4 step theory helps in identifying primary significators.I use 4 step theory quite often. There are still open ended situations which need to be resolved, like conjunctions and aspects,orbs of influence. These aspects may be in conflict with some KP theorists.The subject is an evolving one and by no means final.Every system is inadequate for a specific situation,be it astrology or other sciences. We cannot throw the bathtub ,water and the baby all at one time. Sunilji,I would suggest,please remain in the system. I may not agree with you on every issue but will not be a sychophant either. Lastly please enjoy your Surat Seminar. Regards, Satish , " R Satish " <rsatish1942 wrote: > > > Dear Friends, > > After reading several exchanges of correspondence on > 4 step theory, I can only sum up by saying: > > If Sri Raichur uses 4 step theory regularly-IT Must be good. > Despite all " inadequacies " of the system, this is very popular with > KP lovers in the Marathi speaking population. > > If Sunil has kept his brief, he cannot be compelled to > express himself. > > Regards, > > Satish > > > > > -- In , " sunil gondhalekar " > <sunilalaka@> wrote: > > > > dear rangarajan, > > the postings in this forum was really irritating for me also. > > i have spread this theory in maharashtra and willing to spread to > forum > > also. > > no doubt it is not easy to follow in one readings,but if followed > > properly,it > > gives fair results,not100%.and will come to know the simplicity of > theory. > > i am not worried about it's proofness but worried that many are not > > accepting > > that this is a KP method,they still feels that it is sunil > gondhalekar's > > method. > > -sunil gondhalekar > > > > > > On 9/16/07, Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sunil Gondhalekar and Friends, > > > After my last posting in this forum a few days ago, I notice > there > > > have been a few bitter exchanges spurred on by Tin Win's case > > > studies. One reason I do not participate in this forum regularly > is > > > that for some strange reason my postings either do not appear or > > > appear after a few days. That is a frustrating experience. Going > > > back to my " hypothetical " question, I have already expressed my > > > regrets. As someone responded to my posting saying that perhaps > I do > > > not know astronomy, I confess I am not good at it (nor even in > > > Astrology). But what appears silly is to harp on it, bypassing > the > > > essence of the question. I feel that even if the situation I > > > outlined is an impossibility astronomically, Shri Raichur or Shri > > > Gondhalekar could have answered by either sticking to the chart > as I > > > gave it, or by suitably modifying it to explain the correct > > > behaviour. After all, I wasn't asking if someone could marry, or > > > could get children. There was no need for the chart to be > correct to > > > answer my question because I had a doubt about 4 Step rules, not > > > about the outcome in terms of real world experience. I repeat, I > > > made a mistake, so I am not skirting around that issue. Since I > am > > > trying to support the theory in my software, I conjured up > a " test > > > case " . I feel that is not a crime. Unfortunately, some people > saw it > > > otherwise. > > > > > > Let us forget that. I will try to be more careful in future. My > > > appeal to Shri Gondhalekar is not to feel slighted > by " challenges " > > > posed by members. Tin Win participates regularly in many KP > forums > > > and we all know him to be quite systematic, and authentic in the > > > information he presents. We have great regard for his knowledge. > I > > > am sure he did not mean to denigrade 4 Step Theory. > > > > > > As to whether the 4 Step Theory is " proved " or not, you are the > best > > > judge. When a new idea is proposed, it is common to expect strong > > > and adverse criticisms. A good theory will survive that. In > fact, it > > > is a good opportunity for the inventor to improve the system > where > > > possible. > > > > > > So, Shri Gondhalekar, I request you to spend time (I know you > must > > > be extremely busy) clarifying issues, however silly those might > be. > > > I am sure Shri.KSK had faced many hurdles during his lifetime. > > > > > > From my limited understanding of the system based on your book > and > > > the artciles by Shri.Raichur, I see promise in the system in > > > arriving at fruitful significators. I must also admit that I > found > > > it quite difficult to understand. One of the points, as Tin Win > > > tried to indicate, is that your book implicitly allows 7th > aspect, > > > but Shri Raichur votes against it. I think this calls for > > > clarification, don't you agree? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Rangarajan > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.