Question on 4 Step Theory

September 17, 2007

dear tinwin, your apprach is very systemtical and immpressive. i appreciate the questions which you raise in the forum. my date of birth is feb 28, 1958, time 5-20 pm IST, at ramgarh, near ranchi, (Bihar)- 85-31 E, 23-38 N married on oct.27,1991, birth of a son on 14-9-1992, came in govt job as lecturer -sept 10,1988. last time foreign visit 29 may 2007 to 5 july 2007. now my question is will i gain through foreign visits ? if yes then what would be possible time? now i am planning to go abroad in nov to end of december this year, will i gain monetarily? do you see any change in my professional status? regards hs nagitw853 <tw853 wrote: 1. Sujata, 05-05-1955, 18:20 PM, Delhi, 28N38, 77E17, New KPA 23-08-36, Asc Li 13-51-44, Mars Dasa Bal 0Y-5M-26DKP2. 7th Sbl Ve: 7-6-9-12-1-8 (Ve's Sbl is Ve.)Since the 7th Sbl Ve signifies 7th at order A and it is in its own star, marriage is promised.The signification of 6-12-1-8 may indicate eparation, disappointment and Mangla.3. (1) 7th Sbl Ve is in Pi (dual sign).Ve is in the star of Me (dual planet).(2) 2nd Sbl Ra: Asp by Ma(8-2-7); Stl Ke: Sgl Me(7-9-12), Stl Ma(8-2-7)No planet in the star of Ra+, which is the Sbl of 2 & 11.The 2nd Sbl signifies most importantly 7 and then 2-11.(3) 9th Sbl Me:7-7-11-9-12The 9th Sbl signifies 7-9-11.Thus the KP

Rule 1 & 2 and Kanak's supplementary Rule for more than one marriage are jointly met and so more than one marriage is strongly indicated.KUSPAL INTERLINK THEORY4. (1) Asc Ssl Ra+ maintains a relationship with 9th cusp through it Stl Ke: Me(7-9-12) and with cusp 5 and 7 through its Sbl and Ssl Ra+: Asp by Ma(8-2-7); Asp by Sa(1-4-5); Stl Ke: Me(7-9-12). Asc Ssl Ra+ also establishes link with the 9th cusp through its Sbl (Ra: Stl Ke (Me:7-9-12) when it is linked to 11th cusp through its Stl Ke: Stl Su(7-11).(2) 7th Ssl Mo does not have a link with the 9th cusp through its Stl Ma:2-7-8 but it has a link with the cusps 5 and 11 through Ssl Ra as above.(3) 9 h Ssl Ju Stl does not maintain a link with the 7th cusp through its Stl Ju: 9-3-6 but it maintains a link with 7th by its Sbl Mo+: 8-12-2-7-12 and Ssl Ve: 7-6-9-12-1-8.Thus the second marriage may be said to be possible.FOUR STEP

THEORY5. What can we say as per what is written in first para of page 37 and second para of page 38 of the Four Step book?6. For easy reference, the primary significators strictly according to this book are given under with the reservation whether some related to conj and aspect are right or wrong is an issue for discussion.PRIMARY SIGNIFICATORSEmpty houses: 3, 4, 5, 10, 11Planets with no planets in their stars (+): Mo, Sa, RaPlanets in own stars (*): Ma, JuVe conj 6Ve aspects 12Planet Ke:Starlord of Ke is Ma*: 8Sublord of Ke is Mo+: 12-10Starlord of Mo is Ma*: 8Planet Ve: Cnj 6Starlord of Ve is Me: 7Sublord of Ve is Ve: Cnj 6Starlord of Ve is Me: 7Planet Su:Starlord of Su is Ve: 6; Asp 12; Cnj 6Sublord of Su is Ju*: 9-3Starlord of Ju is Ju*: 9-3Planet Mo+: 12-10Starlord of Mo is Ma*: 8Sublord of Mo is Mo+:

12-10Starlord of Mo is Ma*: 8Planet Ma*: 8Starlord of Ma is Ma*: 8Sublord of Ma is Ma*: 8Starlord of Ma is Ma*: 8Planet Ra+: 2; Sgl Ju(9-3)Starlord of Ra is Ke: 8; Sgl Me(7); Stl Ma(8)Sublord of Ra is Ra+: 2; Sgl Ju(9-3)Starlord of Ra is Ke: 8; Sgl Me(7); Stl Ma(8)Planet Ju*: 9-3Starlord of Ju is Ju*: 9-3Sublord of Ju is Mo+: 12-10Starlord of Mo is Ma*: 8Planet Sa+: 1; 4-5Starlord of Sa is Ju*: 9-3Sublord of Sa is Me:Starlord of Me is Su: 7-11Planet Me:Starlord of Me is Su: 7-11Sublord of Me is Sa+: 1-4-5Starlord of Sa is Ju*: 9-3DASA13-04-1979 (Ju-Me-Ve) first marriage10-03-80 (Ju-Me-Ju) divorce19-08-1988 (Ju-Ra-Me) death of 2nd husbandKPJu: 9-9-3-6-3-6 (Sbl Mo:12-10)Me: 7-7-11-9-12 (Sbl Mo+: 12-10)Ve: 7-6-9-12-1-8 (Sbl Ve) Ra+: 8-2-7-9-12-11 (Sbl Ra)FOUR STEPJu: 9-3-12-10-8Me:

7-11-1-4-5-9-3Ve: 6-7-6-7Ra: 2-9-3-8-7-8-2-9-3-8-7-87. KP Dasa lord Ju doesn't indicate the marriage. DBA in the Four Step are favorable for marriage.8. Regarding the death of 2nd husband, Maraka, Badhaka and Moksha are 8-1-5-6, if 2nd house is taken for 2nd husband; 10-3-8, if 9th house is taken for 2nd husband.In the Four Step, which house is taken for the 2nd husband?TRANSIT9. On the day of marriage, 13-04-1979, Dasa lord Ju was transiting in the sub of Me, Bhukti lord Me in the star of Sa and Antara lord Ve in the star of Ju. In the first two steps, Me signifies 7-11 and Sa 5 but Ju does not signify any of 2-7-11 & 5-8. In addition Sa was in retrograde. The unfavorable transit didn't deny the marriage as said in the Four Step. , sujata das <sujatadash1

wrote:>> Dear TW> I was born at 6-20pm at Delhi on 5-5-55 The 7th sub ve is in mer star in 7th l,/9 12 Vve is in 6 in its own sub. It should have denied marriage.But I had two marriages The 1st marr. was on 13-4-79.I had a divorce on 10-3-80 as I was interested in getting marrted to another person.The marriage was also forced upon me by my parents. The person, concerned,proposed to me after I was engaged to another man after my divorce.I refused.The 2nd husband was killed by a terrorist on 19-8-88 Both husbads were IPS officers> Can we say that star lord gives marr. but sub nullifies it in the long run> Regards> sujata> > tw853 <tw853 wrote: Dear Jammalamadugu Rangan,> > 1. I'm sorry if I had got you wrong.> > 2. My point is any body can make a mistake and why you and some > members of this Group are making a big deal for a technical

mistake > (not a misleading mistake like in some articles I mentioned) in a > question with prior apology even after apologising for it in stead > of responding the currently relevant issue in the question.> > 3. Another thing is, as you're aware, nowadays any planetary > position is available from a NSA based Swiss ephemeris at finger tip > on the computer.> > Regards,> > tw > > , jammalamadugu rangan > <jammalamadugu_rangan@> wrote:> >> > Dear TW853> > Sir you have got me wrong.WhatI I meant was that a proper > grounding basic study is essential in astronomy for astrologers.> > I am sure you would agree with me.> > Thanks> > Jammalamadugu Rangan> > tw853 <tw853@> wrote:> >

Dear Jammalamadugu Rangan,> > > > Would you tell Varahamihira to learn astronmy for describing the > > effects of Mercury when it sits in the fourth, seventh or tenth > > houses from the Sun, positions which are astronomically impossible?> > > > Regards,> > > > tw> > > > , "tw853" <tw853@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear JammalamaduguRangan,> > > > > > What would you say about the inconsistency between the > > presentation > > > of 4 step method and charts details?> > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > tw> > > > > > > > > , jammalamadugu

rangan > > > <jammalamadugu_rangan@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Ranganrajan!> > > > > > > > The longitudinal distance between Venus Mrecury can not be > > more > > > than 45degrees and so there will not such a long distance.This > is > > > astronomical fact.> > > > Most of the astrologers start straight away with predictions > > > without having studied astronomy thougholy.> > > > Good luck> > > > JammalamaduguRangan > > > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@> wrote:> > > > Dear Sir,> > > > How can Venus be in the eigth house if Mercury is in the first > > > house?> > > > sujatkaram ,

Raichur-a-r > > > > <raichurar@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Rangarajan> > > > > I cannot solve hypothetical Cases.> > > > > In the example Ven cannot strongly signify 2, as Jup is > > > supposeed > > > > to be in that house.> > > > > So you must be careful, in marking empty houses, planets > which > > > are > > > > not star lords of others, and then add/amend for the Cup > > > conjunction > > > > and the aspects, in the correct sequence. > > > > > Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@> wrote:> > > > > Dear Sir,> > > > > Thank you very much. I suppose you mean:> > > > > Ju: 2, 9-12, Conj 2, Conj Me(1-3-6)> > > > > Me: 1, 3-6, Conj 2, Conj Ju(2-9-12)> > >

> > > > > > > I will make a slight change to the given scenario. In > addition > > > to > > > > > the earlier planetary configuration, we have the following:> > > > > Ve in 8, lord of 2, 7> > > > > No planets in stars of ve> > > > > Ve aspects Me, Ju> > > > > Me aspects 8> > > > > > > > > > If we write down the first step of the significators,> > > > > Ve: 8, 2-7> > > > > Ju: 2, 9-12, Conj 2, Conj Me(???), asp by Ve(8, 2-7)> > > > > Me: 1, 3-6, Conj 2, Conj Ju(???), asp by Ve(8, 2-7), asp 8> > > > > > > > > > Can you please fully expand the question marks and show the > > > > > replacement?> > > > > > > > > > I apologize if I appear

dumb.> > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > Rangarajan> > > > > > > > > > , Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Rangarajan> > > > > > When two planets are in conjunction, they give results of > > each > > > > > other in all steps. In the hypothetical case. Since both > Merc > > > and > > > > > Jupiter are STRONG, having no planets in their stars, you > can > > > > remove > > > > > the ??? marks and replace by the houses signified by Mercury > > in > > > 1st > > > > > case ,and jup in 2nd case. > > > > >

> good luck> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@> wrote:> > > > > > Friends and Shri.Sunil Gondhalekar,> > > > > > I have been reading up the 4 Step Theory for the past > couple > > > of > > > > > > weeks and find it interesting, although a little difficult > > to > > > > > > understand in parts.> > > > > > > > > > > > Here is one question: (Let us only consider the first step > > and > > > > > > ignore the rest for this question.)> > > > > > > > > > > > Consider a hypothetical chart with the following phenomena.> > > > > > Me in 1, lord of 3 and 6> > > > > > Me conj 2>

> > > > > Me conj Ju> > > > > > > > > > > > Ju in 2, lord of 9 and 12> > > > > > Ju conj 2> > > > > > Ju conj Me (because Me conj Ju above)> > > > > > > > > > > > No planets in stars of Me and Ju> > > > > > No planets in 3, 6, 9, and 12 houses> > > > > > > > > > > > Consider only the first step:> > > > > > Ju: 2, 9-12, Conj 2, Conj Me(???)> > > > > > Me: 1, 3-6, Conj 2, Conj Ju(???)> > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that since Me and Ju are in conjunction, there > > is > > > a > > > > > > cyclic dependency among themselves. So, what should appear > > in > > > the > > > > > >

places marked with question mark?> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > Rangarajan> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from > > > someone > > > > > who knows.> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Building a website is a piece of cake. > > > > > Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without > download.> >> > > > > > > >

Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.>

oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.

September 21, 2007

Dear TWji Thankyou for the excellent analysis. ra, jup's agent, signifies 2 8 11,so ju can give marriage as per 4-step theory The 'baraat' had come on 13-4-79 but actual ceremoney took place on 14-4-79 around 5am ra starday had commenced Regards sujatatw853 <tw853 wrote: 1. Sujata, 05-05-1955, 18:20 PM, Delhi, 28N38, 77E17, New KPA 23-08-36, Asc Li 13-51-44, Mars Dasa Bal 0Y-5M-26DKP2. 7th Sbl Ve: 7-6-9-12-1-8 (Ve's Sbl is Ve.)Since the 7th Sbl Ve

signifies 7th at order A and it is in its own star, marriage is promised.The signification of 6-12-1-8 may indicate eparation, disappointment and Mangla.3. (1) 7th Sbl Ve is in Pi (dual sign).Ve is in the star of Me (dual planet).(2) 2nd Sbl Ra: Asp by Ma(8-2-7); Stl Ke: Sgl Me(7-9-12), Stl Ma(8-2-7)No planet in the star of Ra+, which is the Sbl of 2 & 11.The 2nd Sbl signifies most importantly 7 and then 2-11.(3) 9th Sbl Me:7-7-11-9-12The 9th Sbl signifies 7-9-11.Thus the KP Rule 1 & 2 and Kanak's supplementary Rule for more than one marriage are jointly met and so more than one marriage is strongly indicated.KUSPAL INTERLINK THEORY4. (1) Asc Ssl Ra+ maintains a relationship with 9th cusp through it Stl Ke: Me(7-9-12) and with cusp 5 and 7 through its Sbl and Ssl Ra+: Asp by Ma(8-2-7); Asp by Sa(1-4-5); Stl Ke: Me(7-9-12). Asc Ssl Ra+ also

establishes link with the 9th cusp through its Sbl (Ra: Stl Ke (Me:7-9-12) when it is linked to 11th cusp through its Stl Ke: Stl Su(7-11).(2) 7th Ssl Mo does not have a link with the 9th cusp through its Stl Ma:2-7-8 but it has a link with the cusps 5 and 11 through Ssl Ra as above.(3) 9 h Ssl Ju Stl does not maintain a link with the 7th cusp through its Stl Ju: 9-3-6 but it maintains a link with 7th by its Sbl Mo+: 8-12-2-7-12 and Ssl Ve: 7-6-9-12-1-8.Thus the second marriage may be said to be possible.FOUR STEP THEORY5. What can we say as per what is written in first para of page 37 and second para of page 38 of the Four Step book?6. For easy reference, the primary significators strictly according to this book are given under with the reservation whether some related to conj and aspect are right or wrong is an issue for discussion.PRIMARY SIGNIFICATORSEmpty houses: 3,

4, 5, 10, 11Planets with no planets in their stars (+): Mo, Sa, RaPlanets in own stars (*): Ma, JuVe conj 6Ve aspects 12Planet Ke:Starlord of Ke is Ma*: 8Sublord of Ke is Mo+: 12-10Starlord of Mo is Ma*: 8Planet Ve: Cnj 6Starlord of Ve is Me: 7Sublord of Ve is Ve: Cnj 6Starlord of Ve is Me: 7Planet Su:Starlord of Su is Ve: 6; Asp 12; Cnj 6Sublord of Su is Ju*: 9-3Starlord of Ju is Ju*: 9-3Planet Mo+: 12-10Starlord of Mo is Ma*: 8Sublord of Mo is Mo+: 12-10Starlord of Mo is Ma*: 8Planet Ma*: 8Starlord of Ma is Ma*: 8Sublord of Ma is Ma*: 8Starlord of Ma is Ma*: 8Planet Ra+: 2; Sgl Ju(9-3)Starlord of Ra is Ke: 8; Sgl Me(7); Stl Ma(8)Sublord of Ra is Ra+: 2; Sgl Ju(9-3)Starlord of Ra is Ke: 8; Sgl Me(7); Stl Ma(8)Planet Ju*: 9-3Starlord of Ju is Ju*: 9-3Sublord of Ju is Mo+: 12-10Starlord of Mo is Ma*:

8Planet Sa+: 1; 4-5Starlord of Sa is Ju*: 9-3Sublord of Sa is Me:Starlord of Me is Su: 7-11Planet Me:Starlord of Me is Su: 7-11Sublord of Me is Sa+: 1-4-5Starlord of Sa is Ju*: 9-3DASA13-04-1979 (Ju-Me-Ve) first marriage10-03-80 (Ju-Me-Ju) divorce19-08-1988 (Ju-Ra-Me) death of 2nd husbandKPJu: 9-9-3-6-3-6 (Sbl Mo:12-10)Me: 7-7-11-9-12 (Sbl Mo+: 12-10)Ve: 7-6-9-12-1-8 (Sbl Ve) Ra+: 8-2-7-9-12-11 (Sbl Ra)FOUR STEPJu: 9-3-12-10-8Me: 7-11-1-4-5-9-3Ve: 6-7-6-7Ra: 2-9-3-8-7-8-2-9-3-8-7-87. KP Dasa lord Ju doesn't indicate the marriage. DBA in the Four Step are favorable for marriage.8. Regarding the death of 2nd husband, Maraka, Badhaka and Moksha are 8-1-5-6, if 2nd house is taken for 2nd husband; 10-3-8, if 9th house is taken for 2nd husband.In the Four Step, which house is taken for the 2nd

husband?TRANSIT9. On the day of marriage, 13-04-1979, Dasa lord Ju was transiting in the sub of Me, Bhukti lord Me in the star of Sa and Antara lord Ve in the star of Ju. In the first two steps, Me signifies 7-11 and Sa 5 but Ju does not signify any of 2-7-11 & 5-8. In addition Sa was in retrograde. The unfavorable transit didn't deny the marriage as said in the Four Step. , sujata das <sujatadash1 wrote:>> Dear TW> I was born at 6-20pm at Delhi on 5-5-55 The 7th sub ve is in mer star in 7th l,/9 12 Vve is in 6 in its own sub. It should have denied marriage.But I had two marriages The 1st marr. was on 13-4-79.I had a divorce on 10-3-80 as I was interested in getting marrted to another person.The marriage was also forced upon me by my parents. The person, concerned,proposed to

me after I was engaged to another man after my divorce.I refused.The 2nd husband was killed by a terrorist on 19-8-88 Both husbads were IPS officers> Can we say that star lord gives marr. but sub nullifies it in the long run> Regards> sujata> > tw853 <tw853 wrote: Dear Jammalamadugu Rangan,> > 1. I'm sorry if I had got you wrong.> > 2. My point is any body can make a mistake and why you and some > members of this Group are making a big deal for a technical mistake > (not a misleading mistake like in some articles I mentioned) in a > question with prior apology even after apologising for it in stead > of responding the currently relevant issue in the question.> > 3. Another thing is, as you're aware, nowadays any planetary > position is available from a NSA based Swiss ephemeris at finger tip > on the computer.>

> Regards,> > tw > > , jammalamadugu rangan > <jammalamadugu_rangan@> wrote:> >> > Dear TW853> > Sir you have got me wrong.WhatI I meant was that a proper > grounding basic study is essential in astronomy for astrologers.> > I am sure you would agree with me.> > Thanks> > Jammalamadugu Rangan> > tw853 <tw853@> wrote:> > Dear Jammalamadugu Rangan,> > > > Would you tell Varahamihira to learn astronmy for describing the > > effects of Mercury when it sits in the fourth, seventh or tenth > > houses from the Sun, positions which are astronomically impossible?> > > > Regards,> > > > tw> > > > , "tw853" <tw853@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear JammalamaduguRangan,> > > > > > What would you say about the inconsistency between the > > presentation > > > of 4 step method and charts details?> > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > tw> > > > > > > > > , jammalamadugu rangan > > > <jammalamadugu_rangan@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Ranganrajan!> > > > > > > > The longitudinal distance between Venus Mrecury can not be > > more > > > than 45degrees and so there will not such a long distance.This > is > > > astronomical

fact.> > > > Most of the astrologers start straight away with predictions > > > without having studied astronomy thougholy.> > > > Good luck> > > > JammalamaduguRangan > > > > > > > > sujatkaram <sujatkaram@> wrote:> > > > Dear Sir,> > > > How can Venus be in the eigth house if Mercury is in the first > > > house?> > > > sujatkaram , Raichur-a-r > > > > <raichurar@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Rangarajan> > > > > I cannot solve hypothetical Cases.> > > > > In the example Ven cannot strongly signify 2, as Jup is > > > supposeed > > > > to be in that house.> > > > > So

you must be careful, in marking empty houses, planets > which > > > are > > > > not star lords of others, and then add/amend for the Cup > > > conjunction > > > > and the aspects, in the correct sequence. > > > > > Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@> wrote:> > > > > Dear Sir,> > > > > Thank you very much. I suppose you mean:> > > > > Ju: 2, 9-12, Conj 2, Conj Me(1-3-6)> > > > > Me: 1, 3-6, Conj 2, Conj Ju(2-9-12)> > > > > > > > > > I will make a slight change to the given scenario. In > addition > > > to > > > > > the earlier planetary configuration, we have the following:> > > > > Ve in 8, lord of 2, 7> > > > > No planets in stars of ve> > > > > Ve aspects Me, Ju>

> > > > Me aspects 8> > > > > > > > > > If we write down the first step of the significators,> > > > > Ve: 8, 2-7> > > > > Ju: 2, 9-12, Conj 2, Conj Me(???), asp by Ve(8, 2-7)> > > > > Me: 1, 3-6, Conj 2, Conj Ju(???), asp by Ve(8, 2-7), asp 8> > > > > > > > > > Can you please fully expand the question marks and show the > > > > > replacement?> > > > > > > > > > I apologize if I appear dumb.> > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > Rangarajan> > > > > > > > > > , Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear

Rangarajan> > > > > > When two planets are in conjunction, they give results of > > each > > > > > other in all steps. In the hypothetical case. Since both > Merc > > > and > > > > > Jupiter are STRONG, having no planets in their stars, you > can > > > > remove > > > > > the ??? marks and replace by the houses signified by Mercury > > in > > > 1st > > > > > case ,and jup in 2nd case. > > > > > > good luck> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rangarajan Krishnamoorthy <ranga@> wrote:> > > > > > Friends and Shri.Sunil Gondhalekar,> > > > > > I have been reading up the 4 Step Theory for the past > couple > > > of > > > > >

> weeks and find it interesting, although a little difficult > > to > > > > > > understand in parts.> > > > > > > > > > > > Here is one question: (Let us only consider the first step > > and > > > > > > ignore the rest for this question.)> > > > > > > > > > > > Consider a hypothetical chart with the following phenomena.> > > > > > Me in 1, lord of 3 and 6> > > > > > Me conj 2> > > > > > Me conj Ju> > > > > > > > > > > > Ju in 2, lord of 9 and 12> > > > > > Ju conj 2> > > > > > Ju conj Me (because Me conj Ju above)> > > > > > > > > > > > No planets in stars of Me and Ju> > > > > > No planets in

3, 6, 9, and 12 houses> > > > > > > > > > > > Consider only the first step:> > > > > > Ju: 2, 9-12, Conj 2, Conj Me(???)> > > > > > Me: 1, 3-6, Conj 2, Conj Ju(???)> > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that since Me and Ju are in conjunction, there > > is > > > a > > > > > > cyclic dependency among themselves. So, what should appear > > in > > > the > > > > > > places marked with question mark?> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > Rangarajan> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from > > > someone > > > > > who knows.> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Building a website is a piece of cake. > > > > > Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without > download.> >> > > > > > > > Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.>

Flying to Bangalore or Bhopal? Search for tickets here.