Ruling Planets-Fundamental Confussion

[Guest guest]

hi all

can someone clear me.

I have a bit confusion about Ruling Planets.

Is it possible that there is no Ruling planet in the group of RPs after removing tempters.

 

Reference

KP Reader : As we know that Planets in the star or in the Sub of retrograde planets should be removed from RP group.

 

For your reference i am sending the latest live example enclosed with this mail.

04-Aug-2007 Time: 16:04:26 Location: Habshan, Abu Dhabi (Lat: 23N44 Long: 53E31 Time Zone: +04:00)

 

here the condition is following:

 

Asc Jup-Ket-Ven-Ven

Moon Jup-Jup-Mar-Mer

Day Jup

 

Jup Mar-Sat-Jup-Sun

Ven Sun-Ket-Jup-Ven

Ket Sun-Ven-Ven-Jup

 

so, RP are Jup, Ketu, Jup, Jup, Jup say Jup and Ketu

 

here Jup is in the Sub of Jupiter which is retrograde

and

Ketu is in Star and Sub of Venus which is also retrodrade

 

then we can say that there is no RP, becoz we have to remove the both

 

please help me and remove my confussion.

 

Regards

 

Dushyant Gautam

 

Habshan, Abu Dhabi, UAEPhone : +971 2 8842 352 / 366 Ext. 204Fax : +971 2 8842 353H/P : +971 5 06891460

[Guest guest]

dear dushyant ji, we will use ruling planets only when the matter is sure to be happen. this we calculate from the judgement of principle sub lord signification. but experience tells when all planets or majority are retrograde then take them all, spcially those in sun sign or in sun star or with in 30 degrees of sun as dr. kar suggested. but if there is a negation then dont go further. have i made it clear? hs nagiDushyant Gautam <dushyantgautam wrote: hi all can someone clear me. I have a bit confusion about Ruling Planets. Is it possible that there is no Ruling planet in the group of RPs after removing tempters. Reference KP Reader : As we know that Planets in the star or in the Sub of retrograde planets should be removed from RP group. For your reference i am sending the latest live example enclosed with this mail. 04-Aug-2007 Time: 16:04:26 Location: Habshan, Abu Dhabi (Lat: 23N44 Long: 53E31 Time Zone: +04:00) here the condition is following: Asc Jup-Ket-Ven-Ven Moon Jup-Jup-Mar-Mer Day Jup Jup Mar-Sat-Jup-Sun Ven Sun-Ket-Jup-Ven Ket Sun-Ven-Ven-Jup so, RP are Jup, Ketu, Jup, Jup, Jup say Jup and Ketu here Jup is in the Sub of Jupiter which is retrograde and Ketu is in

Star and Sub of Venus which is also retrodrade then we can say that there is no RP, becoz we have to remove the both please help me and remove my confussion. Regards Dushyant Gautam Habshan, Abu Dhabi, UAEPhone : +971 2 8842 352 / 366 Ext. 204Fax : +971 2 8842 353H/P : +971 5 06891460

Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Travel.

[Guest guest]

Dear Dushyant,

The very meaning/definition of Ruling Planets,means they are the planets that rule that particular moment..."removing 'tempters' can take place only when there are too many planets appearing among the RPs and you want to select the fruitful planets among them...then alone one resorts to rejecting "tempters"...especially when you want to 'time' the event...

One should not indulge in "Stretching logic to absurd limits" ?

Pl. read K.P. Treatises a little more carefully...and in greater depth...

With best wishes,

L.Y.Rao.

GOOD LUCK !

 

Dushyant Gautam <dushyantgautam Sent: Thursday, 2 August, 2007 5:59:10 PM Ruling Planets-Fundamental Confussion

 

 

hi all

can someone clear me.

I have a bit confusion about Ruling Planets.

Is it possible that there is no Ruling planet in the group of RPs after removing tempters.

 

Reference

KP Reader : As we know that Planets in the star or in the Sub of retrograde planets should be removed from RP group.

 

For your reference i am sending the latest live example enclosed with this mail.

04-Aug-2007 Time: 16:04:26 Location: Habshan, Abu Dhabi (Lat: 23N44 Long: 53E31 Time Zone: +04:00)

 

here the condition is following:

 

Asc Jup-Ket-Ven- Ven

Moon Jup-Jup-Mar- Mer

Day Jup

 

Jup Mar-Sat-Jup- Sun

Ven Sun-Ket-Jup- Ven

Ket Sun-Ven-Ven- Jup

 

so, RP are Jup, Ketu, Jup, Jup, Jup say Jup and Ketu

 

here Jup is in the Sub of Jupiter which is retrograde

and

Ketu is in Star and Sub of Venus which is also retrodrade

 

then we can say that there is no RP, becoz we have to remove the both

 

please help me and remove my confussion.

 

Regards

 

Dushyant Gautam

 

Habshan, Abu Dhabi, UAEPhone : +971 2 8842 352 / 366 Ext. 204Fax : +971 2 8842 353H/P : +971 5 06891460

5, 50, 500, 5000. Store N number of mails in your inbox.

[Guest guest]

derr Dushyant Gautum on Page 123, 6th Reader, Guruji has given the rules for Ruling Planets. He only says " Amongst these , these deposited in th constellation of a retrograde planet should be rejected...." He has not said anything of planets whose sub lord is Retrograde. So, I feel, you cannot neglect Jup, as it is not in the Stars of a Retrograde planet. Ketu will be dis qualified. So Jup alone remains the RP. I had a similar case recently, and accepted JUP as the RP. Comments from other members are requested. Dushyant Gautam <dushyantgautam wrote: hi all can someone clear me. I have a bit confusion about Ruling Planets. Is it possible that there is no Ruling planet in the group of RPs after removing tempters. Reference KP Reader : As we know that Planets in the star or in the Sub of retrograde planets should be removed from RP group. For your reference i am sending the latest live example enclosed with this mail. 04-Aug-2007 Time: 16:04:26

Location: Habshan, Abu Dhabi (Lat: 23N44 Long: 53E31 Time Zone: +04:00) here the condition is following: Asc Jup-Ket-Ven-Ven Moon Jup-Jup-Mar-Mer Day Jup Jup Mar-Sat-Jup-Sun Ven Sun-Ket-Jup-Ven Ket Sun-Ven-Ven-Jup so, RP are Jup, Ketu, Jup, Jup, Jup say Jup and Ketu here Jup is in

the Sub of Jupiter which is retrograde and Ketu is in Star and Sub of Venus which is also retrodrade then we can say that there is no RP, becoz we have to remove the both please help me and remove my confussion. Regards Dushyant Gautam Habshan, Abu Dhabi, UAEPhone : +971 2 8842 352 / 366 Ext. 204Fax : +971 2 8842 353H/P : +971 5 06891460

Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out.

[Guest guest]

Dear Dushyant,

 

If you accept the premise that Horary astrology is

divine and not premeditated, answers comes true.

 

Your mail is dated 2nd Aug and you are posing a

question as if you are already on 4th Aug, 07, i.e 2 days in advance.

 

There is something unuasual here, Please check and

revert.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

, " Dushyant Gautam "

<dushyantgautam wrote:

>

> hi all

> can someone clear me.

> I have a bit confusion about Ruling Planets.

> Is it possible that there is no Ruling planet in the group of RPs

after removing tempters.

>

> Reference

> KP Reader : As we know that Planets in the star or in the Sub

of retrograde planets should be removed from RP group.

>

> For your reference i am sending the latest live example enclosed

with this mail.

> 04-Aug-2007 Time: 16:04:26 Location: Habshan,

Abu Dhabi (Lat: 23N44 Long: 53E31 Time Zone: +04:00)

>

> here the condition is following:

>

> Asc Jup-Ket-Ven-Ven

> Moon Jup-Jup-Mar-Mer

> Day Jup

>

> Jup Mar-Sat-Jup-Sun

> Ven Sun-Ket-Jup-Ven

> Ket Sun-Ven-Ven-Jup

>

> so, RP are Jup, Ketu, Jup, Jup, Jup say Jup and Ketu

>

> here Jup is in the Sub of Jupiter which is retrograde

> and

> Ketu is in Star and Sub of Venus which is also retrodrade

>

> then we can say that there is no RP, becoz we have to remove the

both

>

> please help me and remove my confussion.

>

>

> Regards

>

> Dushyant Gautam

>

> Habshan, Abu Dhabi, UAE

> Phone : +971 2 8842 352 / 366 Ext. 204

> Fax : +971 2 8842 353

> H/P : +971 5 06891460

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks Mr.raichur for clearing my doubts.

 

Regards

 

Dushyant Gautam

 

Dy. Manager - PlanningOGD III & AGD II ProjectHabshan, Abu Dhabi, UAEPhone : +971 2 8842 352 / 366 Ext. 204Fax : +971 2 8842 353H/P : +971 5 06891460