Matching & incomplete Doc in file section.

[Guest guest]

*Om mahaganapataye namah*

Dear Raichurji, & Punit ji

Nameste,

SUB (Matching by SW and DOC on KPDP in file section being incomplete.)

Perhaps wrong impression reflected. In fact report given by your SW

contains consideration of mars dosa also.Your design of report interface is

fine and enough.

While comparing I detected there was some confusion .The report i got as

forward had ,as far as Boy is concerned data was was for 1 Feb1978. TOB was

for 21:15. I came to know today only that Actually kanak talked about a

native whose TOB was9:15 AM and Date was 1 Dec1978.I got report From both SW

from him.My check with another version of KPAstro yielded different

count.Obviously Auther of KPASTRO has modified award of marks in later

versions for some KPDP.

Again a comparison revealed KPDP No 6,7 and10 are different.

For your satisfaction I am repeating the data

Boy DOB 1 dec 1978 POB Mumbai 9:15AM

Girl DOB 24 dec 1982 POB SikandarabadAP tob12-00.

That is why I thought of manual check.

Please understand I have nothing to say as I am only a student trying to

learn.

Lastly , i may like to say three things, if i am permitted.

1.Report of your Software displays only nakshatra pada but name of nakshatra

is missing.

2. Award of matching point ( kpdp 6.7and 8 may need check by either Sw

writer)

3 I am curious to know in last of the report their are indication about

children.

As i do not have access to full document and teachings, on what basis this

output is based?

Is it based on santan thithi Or points called beeja sphuta and kshetra

sphuta?

In fact I am interested to seriously try the method OF KP as traditional

matching has large exceptions and riders.

If possible Please send report w.r.t matching of following Boy and girl.

During writing this mail I got request for it .

Boy DOB 17 March 1980 TOB 18:15 POB Lucknow.80E55 , 26N51

Girl DOB 11 Dec 1984 TOB 20:00 POB Mathura.80E03, 27N35.

..( The doc in file section is incomplete.Example data is missing,upto 7

point description goes)

Dear punit may like to update it.

OM TAT SAT

swami_rcs

-

Raichur-a-r

swami

Tuesday, May 29, 2007 11:11 AM

Re: Marriage Matching KP system

 

 

Dear Swami

The report shows the PLACE of BIRTH, from which one can make out the Lat

and Long.

These can also be added if some one needs it, but the person asking the

question, is not interested in the Lat and Long, he knows POB and he is

interested in the Results of matching.

If you want to test the SW against your manual calculations, you may send

me a hypothetical details of a couple, and I will run the prog. and send a

..doc file for you to]

check up.

 

good luck

 

 

swami wrote:

Dear Kanak ji,

Nameste,

Perhaps Matching report was sent as attachment by ShRaichurji or your

goodself after it was clarified that birth place of girl was

secunderabad.This report in the end had words cast by Kanakkumar.B.Bosmia

..It started with : JAY GADHECHI MA :

Yes it showed 67 in kpdp no 10.This report did not carry long & lat for

Place of birth for either Boy and Girl.

Mr B.Gourisankar pointed difference in lat & long as the reason.

I replied him

" Dear B.Gouri sankar ji,

Thanks for your observation.

To day again I checked. i have report Forwarded

It did not mention Latitude and longitude for place of Birth Of Boy and

Girl. Report is from Sh Raichur software.

I took for Boy 18N52 and 72E48.

For Girl I took 17N21 and 78E29.

Please let me know which data is wrong to enable me comparing once

again. "

Dear kanak overall % is wide 70.4and 50%

This is where I got confused.

Now i am planning to do few cases for which Mr Raichurs report is

available to do it manually as per principal of Sh Kuppu Ganpati to reach a

conclusion whose calculation should be relied.

I do not have 2.7 Version of KP astro.I have earlier version only sold

by him.

Thanks for your time and efforts.

PS : Dear Raichur Please forgive me, I am not trying to find fault with

your programming,It is part of my Habit I do not adopt any thing which does

not fall satisfactory to my understanding.Regarding use of sw also this

apply for programmers have also choices while writing their SW. i hope you

will bear my this shortcoming.

OM TAT SAT

Swami_rcs

 

-

Kanak Bosmia

Saturday, May 26, 2007 7:56 AM

Re: Marriage Matching KP system

 

 

Dear Srivastav ji,

 

I understand that you are talking about case which i discuss with Tin

Win ji, and you have mention about in your mail. but i check in my record

KPDP No: 10 is in both SW is 50 same but you have mention that in Raichur

software give you 67 and KPAstro give you 8.33 allover percentge are nearly

same and both show NO Match.

 

after you confermation i will send you agin both's report.

I dont know if any other then Raichur's and KPAStro2.7,who supporet

this KPDP Matching.

 

regards

Kanak Bosmia

 

swami wrote:

 

*Om mahaganapataye namah*

Dear Kanak ji

I was lookig matching example from Ootput you did send.

You had stated about this matching " Dear Tin Win ji,

 

A very good example of effectiveness of KPDP,

 

on 9/4/2007 one of my client,come with his friend for matching, they

consult

one astrologer befor come to me,astrologer says Yes, and for second

opinion

come to me.as per KPDP matching it was not good so i told him NO.

but they

do not believed bcose GUNAK are 26 as per Kutta matching.

 

Today just now i received phone from my client that this engagement

was

broken. "

Apparently From postings I learn MATCHING OF CHARTS for Marriage

As per KP Principles Based on articles by Kuppu Gnapathi of DELHI is

followed now a days.

I did not have access to his articles on matching.Here is just a

comparison

ofoutput from another Sw KP astro.Here are the differences in

matching.marks

DP 1 50 Raichur 50 byother Sw

DP2 75 Raichur 75 by others sw

DP 3 0 Raichur 0 others sw

DP 4 100 Raichur 50 by others sw

DP5 75 Raichur 100 by others sw

DP6 100 Raichur 0 by others sw

DP 7 85 Raichur 83.33 by others sw

DP 8 67 Raichur 100 by others sw

DP 9 85 Raichur 33.33 by others sw

DP10 67 Raichur 8.33by others sw

Prof KSK discussed 10 DP in his reader,

1..Can some one tell me why Such a wide difference is in

programming?.

2. Secondly Mr Raichurs Software says Above average Match and Mars

dosa in

one and not in oher leads to rejection, but there is mention that

Mangal

dosa in boy is miigated for Mars is in a good sign.Other SW does not

talk

about Mars Dosa.and declares undesriable match.

3. Did you reject match for DP 3 has Zero Bindus ? Or DP 9 and 10

are less

in marks.

4. Does Dp 1 to 10 Means Dina,Gana,Mahendra,Stree dheerga, Yoni,

Rasi,Rasyadhi pati, Vasyam,Rajju and Vedha.

Hope Some one else might have given trial to other softwares also

that has

implemented Matching according to KP.

Of course I do not know of others.

Can someone clarify.

 

Friends,For remedies and readings please visit

http://www.kaalvastu.com as

we have closed http://www.cosmograce.com

----------------------

R.C.Srivastava

--

Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy

radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy

our sins, and guide us in the right direction

 

 

 

 

 

 

" A person should not be too honest.

Straight trees are cut first

And Honest people are screwed first. "

Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC 75

BC)

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,For remedies and readings please visit

http://www.kaalvastu.com as we have closed http://www.cosmograce.com

----------------------

R.C.Srivastava

Consultation-Service

E-mail : swami_rcs

http://www.kaalvastu.com

http://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com

Ph 91-562- 2232323 and 4001223

Mob 9412268768

 

--

Oh Creator Of The Universe ! We meditate upon thy

radiant power that illuminate our intellects, destroy

our sins, and guide us in the right direction