Guest guest Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 Respected members, Pl solve my following query,this relates to one of my relatives,even after 5 yrs of marriage she is unable to conceive,medically there is some problem in tubes for which she has gone some minor surgery and some other treatments are on but no success, pl analyse her chart to know is there santan yog,will she ever be able to conceive and if yes what will be most fruitful period when there are chances that she will be able to have child?her details are : 13th april 1972,3:24 pm,Ratlam(M.P.), kindly help regards --- Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: > Dear Tin Win ji, > Nadi kutta matching is base on indian cast base > socity. With permnission to allow not KP writing in > this mail. > 1) in Camilla Parker Bowles's chart you have > mention Nadi dosha, but as per Kuta matching this > Nadi dosha is valid for Brahamin only, other cast > have not to worry about it. now we cnat judge cast > of Camilla Parker Bowles, this is not in western > society.also Adhya Nadi have No dosha. > 2)Varna dosha is for Kshtriya, other cast have not > to worry. > 3)Gana dosha is for Vaishya( Vanika) > 4)Yoni dosha is for Sudra. > > what you mention total Kuta scores is 20 but you > do not count what if Dosha is mitigated and Camilla > Parker got more 8 marks means 20+8( Adhya Nadi have > no dosha) =28.like this you never come to clear in > westerner's chart with Kuta matching system. > > for exmple bellow is couple who have NO Nadi dosha > but they have no child. > > BOY: Born on 22 - 11 - 1960 TIME 10 - 0 > PLACE BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT STAR P.Ashadha- > PADA -3 RASI : DHAN NADI: > MADHYA > > GIRL Born on 17 - 12 - 1963 TIME 7 - 00 > PLACE BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT STAR Moola- > PADA-4 RASI : DHAN NADI: > ADHYA > I will find out data form my database which have > nadi dosha but have child, but it will take some > time.(i have store all data as per kuta matching VS > KPDP but due to virus my many data deleted so i have > to check all again) > > regards > Kanak Bosmia tw853 <tw853 wrote: > Dear Satish, Kanak, > > 1. I'm afraid to say that they may go ahead without > the consent of > parents due to some negative significators. > > 2. It seems Nadi Kuta in Kuta Matching is crucial > like Criterion No. > 10 in KP Matching. > > 3. If Nadi Kuta was not excessive in Pittha, total > score would be > 36, cent percent, which would be very exceptional. > That is why > something should be missing not to be cent percent. > In the cases of > Charles & Diana and Charles & Camilla, total Kuta > scores are around > 16 & 20 only, with Nadi score 8 for Diana and zero > for Camilla. > Overall KP Matching scores are 75.83% (41.67% for > N0.10) for Diana > and 82.50% (58.33% for No. 10) for Camilla. It is > supposed to be > okay for Camilla with Nadi dosha (except too late to > get a child). > > 4. As per James Braha's expeience, Kuta system > doesn't work for > Westerners. In his opinion, it does not address > romance, passion, > and whether a couple can get along or not (Will they > fight, will > they argue, will they remain close?). (The Art and > Practice of > Ancient Hindu Astrology, page 364-6) > > Regarding Kuta and KP matching, how his your opinion > for Westerners > and modernized Indian new generation? > > Thanks and regards, > > tw > > , " R Satish " > <rsatish1942 > wrote: > > > > > > Dear TW ,Kanakbhai and friends, > > > > Many thanks to TW for details as per KP/4 step > theory,: and > > Kanakbhai for inputs. > > > > There was a prelimnary meeting,first time > yesterday.According > to > > Koota system due madhuyam nadi there was a > perceived objection( > > despite 28/36).Kp gave above average > rating.Practical approach is > > being followed in this case. > > > > I shall keep you posted in event of definitive > decisions. > > > > In the meantime, many thanks to all who have > contributed > towards > > this issue. > > > > Regards, > > > > Satish > > > > > > > > , Kanak Bosmia > <kanakbosmia@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Tin Win ji, > > > > > > Many thanks for mentioning bellow rule , I am > intrested in > this > > rule. > > > > > > ¡ " The rules and practice shown that the lord of > the house does > > not > > > become the significator of the house it > owns,when the house is > > empty, > > > (nO significators A or B) and there are no > planets in its stars. > > > Sig C blank, only D, the house owner remains as > significator in > > the > > > normal route. The rule on page 195 of Reader 4, > and the > practice, > > > says when there is only a significator of > Category D (A,B,C > > BLANK), > > > then do not accept it, but accept planets which > have the Sub as > D. > > > If there are no planets whose sublord is D, then > sub-lord of the > > > house itself becomes the significator. This is > logical, since > the > > > sub-lord of cusps is said to govern matters of > that house. The > > Lord > > > of the house becomes only a source of the > result. " ¨ > > > > > > is there any more exmples give in any reader? or > have you check > > this in any chart? please explaint more detiles on > this subject. > it > > will much eductive,may be open some secreat when i > found failore > and > > unexpected signficatore seen. > > > > > > regards > > > Kanak Bosmia > > > > > > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote: CHART DETAILS > > > > > > 1. Boy, 20-05-1980, Thur, 14-03 PM, Dadar, > Mumbai, KPAstro --> > > > 19N01, 72E51, Sid Time 01-16-31, New KPA > 23-29-26, Asc Cn 01-22- > > 09, > > > Moon Ar 26-17-06, Star Bharani, Pada 4, Ven Dasa > bal 0y-6m-26d > > > > > > 2. Girl, 12-08-1982, Thur, 14-24 PM, Vijayawada, > KPAstro --> > > 16N31, > > > 80E37, Sid Time 11-38-24, New KPA 23-31-27, Asc > Sc 24-52-43, > Moon > > > Ar 24-35-52, Star Bharani, Pada 4, Ven Dasa bal > 3y-1m-7d. > === message truncated === ______________________________\ ____ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents./mailbeta/newmail_tools.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Dear ashesh,Between 4-10-08-----28-12-08,he sould get a child To make doubly sure ask th relative to give a number. between 1-249.regardssujataAsheesh <ni_ash1 wrote: Respected members, Pl solve my following query,this relates to one of my relatives,even after 5 yrs of marriage she is unable to conceive,medically there is some problem in tubes for which she has gone some minor surgery and some other treatments are on but no success, pl analyse her chart to know is there santan yog,will she ever be able to conceive and if yes what will be most fruitful period when there are chances that she will be able to have child?her details are : 13th april 1972,3:24 pm,Ratlam(M.P.), kindly help regards --- Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: > Dear Tin Win ji, > Nadi kutta matching is base on indian cast base > socity. With permnission to allow not KP writing in > this mail. > 1) in Camilla Parker Bowles's chart you have > mention Nadi dosha, but as per Kuta matching this > Nadi dosha is valid for Brahamin only, other cast > have not to worry about it. now we cnat judge cast > of Camilla Parker Bowles, this is not in western > society.also Adhya Nadi have No dosha. > 2)Varna dosha is for Kshtriya, other cast have not > to worry. > 3)Gana dosha is for Vaishya( Vanika) > 4)Yoni dosha is for Sudra. > > what you mention total Kuta scores is 20 but you > do not count what if Dosha is mitigated and Camilla > Parker got more 8 marks means 20+8( Adhya Nadi have > no dosha) =28.like this you never come to clear in > westerner's chart with Kuta matching system. > > for exmple bellow is couple who have NO Nadi dosha > but they have no child. > > BOY: Born on 22 - 11 - 1960 TIME 10 - 0 > PLACE BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT STAR P.Ashadha- > PADA -3 RASI : DHAN NADI: > MADHYA > > GIRL Born on 17 - 12 - 1963 TIME 7 - 00 > PLACE BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT STAR Moola- > PADA-4 RASI : DHAN NADI: > ADHYA > I will find out data form my database which have > nadi dosha but have child, but it will take some > time.(i have store all data as per kuta matching VS > KPDP but due to virus my many data deleted so i have > to check all again) > > regards > Kanak Bosmia > > > > > > > tw853 <tw853 > wrote: > Dear Satish, Kanak, > > 1. I'm afraid to say that they may go ahead without > the consent of > parents due to some negative significators. > > 2. It seems Nadi Kuta in Kuta Matching is crucial > like Criterion No. > 10 in KP Matching. > > 3. If Nadi Kuta was not excessive in Pittha, total > score would be > 36, cent percent, which would be very exceptional. > That is why > something should be missing not to be cent percent. > In the cases of > Charles & Diana and Charles & Camilla, total Kuta > scores are around > 16 & 20 only, with Nadi score 8 for Diana and zero > for Camilla. > Overall KP Matching scores are 75.83% (41.67% for > N0.10) for Diana > and 82.50% (58.33% for No. 10) for Camilla. It is > supposed to be > okay for Camilla with Nadi dosha (except too late to > get a child). > > 4. As per James Braha's expeience, Kuta system > doesn't work for > Westerners. In his opinion, it does not address > romance, passion, > and whether a couple can get along or not (Will they > fight, will > they argue, will they remain close?). (The Art and > Practice of > Ancient Hindu Astrology, page 364-6) > > Regarding Kuta and KP matching, how his your opinion > for Westerners > and modernized Indian new generation? > > Thanks and regards, > > tw > > , "R Satish" > <rsatish1942 > wrote: > > > > > > Dear TW ,Kanakbhai and friends, > > > > Many thanks to TW for details as per KP/4 step > theory,: and > > Kanakbhai for inputs. > > > > There was a prelimnary meeting,first time > yesterday.According > to > > Koota system due madhuyam nadi there was a > perceived objection( > > despite 28/36).Kp gave above average > rating.Practical approach is > > being followed in this case. > > > > I shall keep you posted in event of definitive > decisions. > > > > In the meantime, many thanks to all who have > contributed > towards > > this issue. > > > > Regards, > > > > Satish > > > > > > > > , Kanak Bosmia > <kanakbosmia@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Tin Win ji, > > > > > > Many thanks for mentioning bellow rule , I am > intrested in > this > > rule. > > > > > > ¡"The rules and practice shown that the lord of > the house does > > not > > > become the significator of the house it > owns,when the house is > > empty, > > > (nO significators A or B) and there are no > planets in its stars. > > > Sig C blank, only D, the house owner remains as > significator in > > the > > > normal route. The rule on page 195 of Reader 4, > and the > practice, > > > says when there is only a significator of > Category D (A,B,C > > BLANK), > > > then do not accept it, but accept planets which > have the Sub as > D. > > > If there are no planets whose sublord is D, then > sub-lord of the > > > house itself becomes the significator. This is > logical, since > the > > > sub-lord of cusps is said to govern matters of > that house. The > > Lord > > > of the house becomes only a source of the > result."¨ > > > > > > is there any more exmples give in any reader? or > have you check > > this in any chart? please explaint more detiles on > this subject. > it > > will much eductive,may be open some secreat when i > found failore > and > > unexpected signficatore seen. > > > > > > regards > > > Kanak Bosmia > > > > > > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote: CHART DETAILS > > > > > > 1. Boy, 20-05-1980, Thur, 14-03 PM, Dadar, > Mumbai, KPAstro --> > > > 19N01, 72E51, Sid Time 01-16-31, New KPA > 23-29-26, Asc Cn 01-22- > > 09, > > > Moon Ar 26-17-06, Star Bharani, Pada 4, Ven Dasa > bal 0y-6m-26d > > > > > > 2. Girl, 12-08-1982, Thur, 14-24 PM, Vijayawada, > KPAstro --> > > 16N31, > > > 80E37, Sid Time 11-38-24, New KPA 23-31-27, Asc > Sc 24-52-43, > Moon > > > Ar 24-35-52, Star Bharani, Pada 4, Ven Dasa bal > 3y-1m-7d. > === message truncated === ________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents./mailbeta/newmail_tools.html Office firewalls, cyber cafes, college labs, don't allow you to download CHAT? Here's a solution! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 dear asheesh, i have errected the natal chart . there is realy some problem to carry a child for her. but a little chances r there. 1st issue will be miscarriage. but 2nd chance is sure. that time is after 28,2 2009. so tell her to consult with a physician. with best wishes. sampa mitraAsheesh <ni_ash1 wrote: Respected members,Pl solve my following query,this relates to one of myrelatives,even after 5 yrs of marriage she is unableto conceive,medically there is some problem in tubesfor which she has gone some minor surgery and someother treatments are on but no success, pl analyse herchart to know is there santan yog,will she ever beable to conceive and if yes what will be most fruitfulperiod when there are chances that she will be ableto have child?her details are :13th april 1972,3:24 pm,Ratlam(M.P.),kindly helpregards--- Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote:> Dear Tin Win ji,> Nadi kutta matching is base on indian cast base> socity. With permnission to allow not KP writing in> this mail.> 1) in Camilla Parker Bowles's chart you have> mention Nadi dosha, but as per Kuta matching this> Nadi dosha is valid for Brahamin only, other cast> have not to worry about it. now we cnat judge cast> of Camilla Parker Bowles, this is not in western> society.also Adhya Nadi have No dosha.> 2)Varna dosha is for Kshtriya, other cast have not> to worry.> 3)Gana dosha is for Vaishya( Vanika)> 4)Yoni dosha is for Sudra.> > what you mention total Kuta scores is 20 but you> do not count what if Dosha is mitigated and Camilla> Parker got more 8 marks means 20+8( Adhya Nadi have> no dosha) =28.like this you never come to clear in> westerner's chart with Kuta matching system.> > for exmple bellow is couple who have NO Nadi dosha> but they have no child.> > BOY: Born on 22 - 11 - 1960 TIME 10 - 0 > PLACE BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT STAR P.Ashadha- > PADA -3 RASI : DHAN NADI:> MADHYA> > GIRL Born on 17 - 12 - 1963 TIME 7 - 00> PLACE BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT STAR Moola- > PADA-4 RASI : DHAN NADI: > ADHYA> I will find out data form my database which have> nadi dosha but have child, but it will take some> time.(i have store all data as per kuta matching VS> KPDP but due to virus my many data deleted so i have> to check all again)> > regards> Kanak Bosmia> > > > > > > tw853 <tw853 > wrote:> Dear Satish, Kanak,> > 1. I'm afraid to say that they may go ahead without> the consent of > parents due to some negative significators.> > 2. It seems Nadi Kuta in Kuta Matching is crucial> like Criterion No. > 10 in KP Matching.> > 3. If Nadi Kuta was not excessive in Pittha, total> score would be > 36, cent percent, which would be very exceptional.> That is why > something should be missing not to be cent percent.> In the cases of > Charles & Diana and Charles & Camilla, total Kuta> scores are around > 16 & 20 only, with Nadi score 8 for Diana and zero> for Camilla. > Overall KP Matching scores are 75.83% (41.67% for> N0.10) for Diana > and 82.50% (58.33% for No. 10) for Camilla. It is> supposed to be > okay for Camilla with Nadi dosha (except too late to> get a child).> > 4. As per James Braha's expeience, Kuta system> doesn't work for > Westerners. In his opinion, it does not address> romance, passion, > and whether a couple can get along or not (Will they> fight, will > they argue, will they remain close?). (The Art and> Practice of > Ancient Hindu Astrology, page 364-6) > > Regarding Kuta and KP matching, how his your opinion> for Westerners > and modernized Indian new generation?> > Thanks and regards,> > tw> > , "R Satish"> <rsatish1942 > wrote:> >> > > > Dear TW ,Kanakbhai and friends,> > > > Many thanks to TW for details as per KP/4 step> theory,: and > > Kanakbhai for inputs.> > > > There was a prelimnary meeting,first time> yesterday.According > to > > Koota system due madhuyam nadi there was a> perceived objection( > > despite 28/36).Kp gave above average> rating.Practical approach is > > being followed in this case.> > > > I shall keep you posted in event of definitive> decisions.> > > > In the meantime, many thanks to all who have> contributed > towards > > this issue.> > > > Regards,> > > > Satish> > > > > > > > , Kanak Bosmia> <kanakbosmia@> > > wrote:> > >> > > Dear Tin Win ji,> > > > > > Many thanks for mentioning bellow rule , I am> intrested in > this > > rule.> > > > > > ¡"The rules and practice shown that the lord of> the house does > > not > > > become the significator of the house it> owns,when the house is > > empty,> > > (nO significators A or B) and there are no> planets in its stars. > > > Sig C blank, only D, the house owner remains as> significator in > > the > > > normal route. The rule on page 195 of Reader 4,> and the > practice, > > > says when there is only a significator of> Category D (A,B,C > > BLANK), > > > then do not accept it, but accept planets which> have the Sub as > D. > > > If there are no planets whose sublord is D, then> sub-lord of the > > > house itself becomes the significator. This is> logical, since > the > > > sub-lord of cusps is said to govern matters of> that house. The > > Lord > > > of the house becomes only a source of the> result."¨> > > > > > is there any more exmples give in any reader? or> have you check > > this in any chart? please explaint more detiles on> this subject. > it > > will much eductive,may be open some secreat when i> found failore > and > > unexpected signficatore seen.> > > > > > regards> > > Kanak Bosmia> > > > > > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote: CHART DETAILS> > > > > > 1. Boy, 20-05-1980, Thur, 14-03 PM, Dadar,> Mumbai, KPAstro --> > > > 19N01, 72E51, Sid Time 01-16-31, New KPA> 23-29-26, Asc Cn 01-22-> > 09, > > > Moon Ar 26-17-06, Star Bharani, Pada 4, Ven Dasa> bal 0y-6m-26d> > > > > > 2. Girl, 12-08-1982, Thur, 14-24 PM, Vijayawada,> KPAstro --> > > 16N31, > > > 80E37, Sid Time 11-38-24, New KPA 23-31-27, Asc> Sc 24-52-43, > Moon > > > Ar 24-35-52, Star Bharani, Pada 4, Ven Dasa bal> 3y-1m-7d.> === message truncated ===________Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Mail Beta.http://advision.webevents./mailbeta/newmail_tools.html Office firewalls, cyber cafes, college labs, don't allow you to download CHAT? Here's a solution! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2007 Report Share Posted May 23, 2007 Respected madam, Thanks for ur kind reply,the lady in question is about to visit my place within a week then i will ask her the required no,my question is shd i just ask her a no or should tell her about the matter then ask the no,should i note the time when she is telling the no? thanks and regards Asheesh --- sujata das <sujatadash1 wrote: > Dear ashesh, > Between 4-10-08-----28-12-08,he sould get a child To > make doubly sure ask th relative to give a number. > between 1-249. > regards > sujata > > Asheesh <ni_ash1 wrote: > Respected members, > > Pl solve my following query,this relates to one of > my > relatives,even after 5 yrs of marriage she is > unable > to conceive,medically there is some problem in > tubes > for which she has gone some minor surgery and some > other treatments are on but no success, pl analyse > her > chart to know is there santan yog,will she ever be > able to conceive and if yes what will be most > fruitful > period when there are chances that she will be > able > to have child?her details are : > 13th april 1972,3:24 pm,Ratlam(M.P.), > > kindly help > > regards > --- Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: > > > Dear Tin Win ji, > > Nadi kutta matching is base on indian cast base > > socity. With permnission to allow not KP writing > in > > this mail. > > 1) in Camilla Parker Bowles's chart you have > > mention Nadi dosha, but as per Kuta matching this > > Nadi dosha is valid for Brahamin only, other cast > > have not to worry about it. now we cnat judge > cast > > of Camilla Parker Bowles, this is not in western > > society.also Adhya Nadi have No dosha. > > 2)Varna dosha is for Kshtriya, other cast have > not > > to worry. > > 3)Gana dosha is for Vaishya( Vanika) > > 4)Yoni dosha is for Sudra. > > > > what you mention total Kuta scores is 20 but > you > > do not count what if Dosha is mitigated and > Camilla > > Parker got more 8 marks means 20+8( Adhya Nadi > have > > no dosha) =28.like this you never come to clear > in > > westerner's chart with Kuta matching system. > > > > for exmple bellow is couple who have NO Nadi > dosha > > but they have no child. > > > > BOY: Born on 22 - 11 - 1960 TIME 10 - > 0 > > PLACE BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT STAR P.Ashadha- > > > PADA -3 RASI : DHAN NADI: > > MADHYA > > > > GIRL Born on 17 - 12 - 1963 TIME 7 - > 00 > > PLACE BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT STAR Moola- > > > PADA-4 RASI : DHAN NADI: > > ADHYA > > I will find out data form my database which > have > > nadi dosha but have child, but it will take some > > time.(i have store all data as per kuta matching > VS > > KPDP but due to virus my many data deleted so i > have > > to check all again) > > > > regards > > Kanak Bosmia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw853 <tw853 wrote: > > Dear Satish, Kanak, > > > > 1. I'm afraid to say that they may go ahead > without > > the consent of > > parents due to some negative significators. > > > > 2. It seems Nadi Kuta in Kuta Matching is crucial > > like Criterion No. > > 10 in KP Matching. > > > > 3. If Nadi Kuta was not excessive in Pittha, > total > > score would be > > 36, cent percent, which would be very > exceptional. > > That is why > > something should be missing not to be cent > percent. > > In the cases of > > Charles & Diana and Charles & Camilla, total Kuta > > scores are around > > 16 & 20 only, with Nadi score 8 for Diana and > zero > > for Camilla. > > Overall KP Matching scores are 75.83% (41.67% for > > N0.10) for Diana > > and 82.50% (58.33% for No. 10) for Camilla. It is > > supposed to be > > okay for Camilla with Nadi dosha (except too late > to > > get a child). > > > > 4. As per James Braha's expeience, Kuta system > > doesn't work for > > Westerners. In his opinion, it does not address > > romance, passion, > > and whether a couple can get along or not (Will > they > > fight, will > > they argue, will they remain close?). (The Art > and > > Practice of > > Ancient Hindu Astrology, page 364-6) > > > > Regarding Kuta and KP matching, how his your > opinion > > for Westerners > > and modernized Indian new generation? > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > tw > > > > , " R Satish " > > <rsatish1942 > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear TW ,Kanakbhai and friends, > > > > > > Many thanks to TW for details as per KP/4 step > > theory,: and > > > Kanakbhai for inputs. > > > > > > There was a prelimnary meeting,first time > > yesterday.According > > to > > > Koota system due madhuyam nadi there was a > > perceived objection( > > > despite 28/36).Kp gave above average > > rating.Practical approach is > > > being followed in this case. > > > > > > I shall keep you posted in event of definitive > > decisions. > > > > > > In the meantime, many thanks to all who have > > contributed > > towards > > > this issue. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Satish > > > > > > > > > > > > , Kanak Bosmia > > <kanakbosmia@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Tin Win ji, > > > > > > > > Many thanks for mentioning bellow rule , I am > > intrested in > > this > > > rule. > > > > > > > > ¡ " The rules and practice shown that the lord > of > > the house does > > > not > > > > become the significator of the house it > > owns,when the house is > > > empty, > === message truncated === ______________________________\ ____Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Answers - Check it out. http://answers./dir/?link=list & sid=396545469 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.