Guest guest Posted January 29, 2007 Report Share Posted January 29, 2007 Dear Priya, My questions below are not about upayas but astrology.If you do not want to answer ,I will understand. I have been studying Astakavarga from the lessons you put in the file section. I was strongly surprised but the claims made therin that rasi does not affect the planets placed in them but each planet is weak/malefic or strong/benefic only because of its Astakavarga power. This power is connected with the position of a planet relativle with the other planets and has nothing to do with the signs. Do I understand this correct?Do you and Lal Kitab agree with this?Also, if we use this way to estimate each plannet's power, then there is no reason to search for aspects between the planets, as if a planet has more than 4 points it is strong regardless of any other aspect .Is this true?Last but not least, the Astakavarga lessons present it as if a benefic planet is equivalent toa strong planet and the same goes for "weak" and "malefic". I had the impressionsthat a planet can be weak with benefic effects or strong with bad effects as well. Am I wrong?Thanks for your understanding. Sincerely, Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.