Guest guest Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Dear Kulbir ji, My further thought on the agenda for this forum suggests that we should focus on the application of what is given in Lal Kitab and should not discuss what is written in Lal Kitab. I mean, we should take case studies & quizes are explain concepts of Lal Kitab based on that. I think, Internet has enough of fighting on what is written in Lal Kitab and remedy of X planet in Y house. We need to grow from there. You have a long association with Lal Kitab and would appreciate your opinion? Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > Dear Kulbir ji, > > I'll take your questions in three parts. First is the question why the > success percentage is not that high for most of the astrologers. My answer > is that most of the astrology students are dependent on theoretical study. > All classics like Brihat Jatak, Saravali, Sarvarth Chintamani, BPHS etc. are > almost without any examples. The crux had been documented but the > application was not documented. Traditionally application had been taught in > paramparas in India. Without any practical example, people are using their > own imagination to fill that gap. The same problem is there with Lal Kitab > as well. Examples are nearly non-existent which makes understanding > difficult. > > Your question is not limited to astrology, but it true for almost all kind > of knowledge. Why not all B.Sc. students can invent like Thomas Alva Edison > **? Answer is the same that they have just studied theory and not learnt > the application. Correct application of any science requires a lot of hard > work and efforts. Now all B.Sc. students can become Edison. Hard work, > focus, practical learning, effort, individual's understanding of application > are various criteria in the success of any subject. Astrology is no > different. > > Your second point is related to Nadis and Samhitas. This is now a well > known fact that there are two types of Nadis (called Samhita in North India) > - Tantra Nadis and Mantra Nadis. According to Prof. B. V. Raman, " Mantra > Nadi's are based on acquisition of control over what he called certain > " uchchishta " (profane) or Kshudra (mean or low) mantra. " Karna Pishachini is > one such method which is well documented in our Tantra texts like > Rudryamalam and Mantramahodadhi as far as I remember. Karna Pishachinis are > not astrologers. Those are good in tell you present and past, but the future > prediction has been left to astrologers alone. That is the reason we see > that most of the Nadis failed in future predictions. > > On the other side, Tantra Nadis are based on astrology. Those are the Nadis > that can predict even the future correctly. Texts like Deva Keralam, Bhrigu > Nandi, Nandi Nadi etc. come under 'Tantra Nadis'. There are many Nadis > available though not available to general public. Lal Kitab is also nothing > but another branch of Nadi which was prevailing in Northern India. Anyways, > we need to understand differences between Mantra Nadis and Tantra Nadis in > order to uncover the secret of astrology. > > Regarding your third question, I have no plans as of now. I'll wait and see > where future takes us. The good thing is that almost all five editions are > available to us and that gives us good material to learn and debate. I hope > that consistent discussion on Lal Kitab and filling missing links through > classical astrology will give us good clarity on this Lal Kitab system. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, kulbir bance <kulbirbancewrote: > >> Punit ji, ur apprehensions are not unfounded but the problem is >> majority of astrologers indulge in post mortem of events. Predictions >> about future are more or less a gamble. With odds weighing heavily >> against. I don't doubt the texts but with such treatises and >> generations studing them. Where does the fault lie and what do you say >> about bhrigu samhita charts in punjab and aagast naadi in south. I >> have seen the magic of bhrigu charts at hoshiarpur in punjab. The >> horoscope of native is there years before his birth. If u trust umesh >> ji u can confirm from him that i arranged a meeting of umesh ji and >> our common vip friend with a soothsayer. Both were dumb founded when >> he described 2 murders in the locality of our friend with full details >> like age appearance of the victim. What he asked was only thd address >> no horoscope no palm reading. May be it was some sort of hypnosis or >> mind reading. But he excells in that when it comes to future 95 >> predictions are wrong. In the end what exact solution do u have in >> mind for rarely do u enter a discussion without a concreate agenda. >> Regards. Kulbir >> >> >> On 2/19/09, Punit Pandey <punitp <punitp%40gmail.com>> wrote: >> > Dear Friends, >> > >> > If a period is good, one doesn't even require astrology to predict >> > correctly. Whatever you will say in your fruitful period will come out >> > correct. Beauty of astrology is to predict correctly all the time .. >> > consistently. Astrology is not a magic but a systematic method to >> predict >> > past, present and future. In my opinion, intuition and divine blessings >> are >> > the tools invented by astrologers to safe-guard themselves. Something >> should >> > be there to blame upon in case of incorrect predictions. Isn't it? >> > Astrologers should stop fooling themselves and the public by introducing >> all >> > these intuition factors. >> > >> > Astrology is a systematic method for developing predictive capabilities. >> It >> > takes time and efforts. An astrologer has to get into the skin of >> planets, >> > signs, nakshatras, bhavas etc. and feel them/ think like them in order >> to >> > predict correctly. All astrology texts teaches us how to apply knowledge >> > given in the texts. All astrology texts has given sound and systematic >> > methods. Those texts don't tell use to sit in padmasana and meditate to >> > learn astrology. If people call 'predictive ability' a 'diving >> blessings/ >> > intuiation', that is OK because then it is not a tool to fool yourself >> and >> > others. But this magical, undocumented, extra-terrestial meaning of >> > 'intuition/ divine blessings' is nothing but absurd in my opinion. These >> > words are big hindrance in the path of systematic development of >> astrology. >> > These are even bigger challenge for Lal Kitab, because some of the so >> called >> > Lal Kitab experts project this book as divine book and that stops >> further >> > research and development. >> > >> > Thanks & Regards, >> > >> > Punit Pandey >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Madhavan <chims45<chims45%40>> >> wrote: >> > >> >> -Dear all, >> >> I fully endorse the opinion of Ashish ji, >> >> If only the good time prevails for both native and astrolger, their >> >> wont be any effective prediction and parihars. >> >> The astroleger may be good - but for himself is surrounded by bad >> >> period, then his predictions may not be appreciated but disowned.He >> >> would have unfolded mystry, but the credits would be given to unknown >> >> person. Even a street passer's good wish of the occasion would be >> >> given weightage than the renowned astrolgers. >> >> thats why i used to say, if my time is good you will appreciate my >> >> prediction- if bad times, you will blame me or totally forget me for >> >> the occasion when you are enjoying the fruits. >> >> Regarding the Native's good time, even good astroleger could not right >> >> time and satan will play its role in misinterepting the right >> >> prediction.parihars not performed. >> >> Thats why the upasakas are more respected than astrolgers with just >> >> few calculations(computer like) >> >> >> >> regds >> >> madhavan >> >> >> >> -- In lalkitab <lalkitab%40> <lalkitab% >> 40>, " Asheesh >> >> >> Mathur " <asheesh.mathur >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Dear All, >> >> > Predictions are mystique and require meditation, intuition and above >> >> > all HIS Blessings for both Native and the Astrologer. >> >> > >> >> > Astrology / predictions are not mathematical or pure logical, they >> >> > are sprinkled with the astrologers experience and cosmic >> >> > fecilitation. Otherwise a smart computer program could predict. >> >> > >> >> > A native will visit a good astrologer, specifically a Lal Kitab one >> >> > only if he's destined to do get benefit. >> >> > >> >> > Native may listen to upayes, but may not perform them. May be nature >> >> > will prevent him from doing that. >> >> > >> >> > Lord Ram had to suffer for 14 years in exile. Same is the case with >> >> > Pandavas, they had access to best astrologers in their court. >> >> > >> >> > I know of one LK Expert, who transformed me 25 years back. I have >> >> > seen miracles with his remedies, but now despite my trials, am >> >> unable >> >> > to trace him. >> >> > >> >> > Remembers Astrologers predicting are revealing secrets of God , >> >> their >> >> > bosses. Which Boss would like his secretary or juniors who have >> >> > access to CR reveal it prematurely. >> >> > >> >> > Remember Ramayana, Rama was to be made King, big saints decided the >> >> > auspicious Muhurata, there were good Shaguns all around and at the >> >> > last moment tables turned upside down. >> >> > >> >> > Suggest we accept astrology/palmistry in light of above. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > This is a good lively forum with lots of gifted souls, intersting >> >> > threads, once again these are only my views and may not be correct >> >> or >> >> > appropriate. >> >> > >> >> > Please excuse me if I have hurt your feelings. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks >> >> > Asheesh >> >> > lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% >> 40>, Punit >> >> >> Pandey <punitp@> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > Dear Raveesh ji, >> >> > > >> >> > > This is the problem with the Lal Kitab. All are discussing what is >> >> > written >> >> > > in Lal Kitab and there in efforts to understand it. To me, it >> >> > really doesn't >> >> > > matter whether there is '2' or '5' in front of the row for 25th >> >> > year. What >> >> > > matters is to understand why that table is like that. Now it also >> >> > doesn't >> >> > > matter whether there were 10 disciples or 100 disciples. Whether >> >> > there were >> >> > > 10 books or 100 books. This is all gone and we should move forward >> >> > now. If >> >> > > we can not learn from 5 books, we can not learn from 50 books as >> >> > well. >> >> > > >> >> > > Most of the discussion that I have seen is on X planet in Y house >> >> > and what >> >> > > will be the remedy. To me, that not only is incorrent but also >> >> > doesn't >> >> > > matter. The matter is why those remedies are like that. There is >> >> no >> >> > efforts >> >> > > in that direction. I am watching Lal Kitab discussions on Internet >> >> > for so >> >> > > long but never seen even a one single discussion whether of >> >> > academic nature >> >> > > on the grammar of Lal Kitab. People will have to go beyond the >> >> > books and >> >> > > will have to use their reasoning to understand application of Lal >> >> > Kitab. And >> >> > > for doing that, I believe the knowledge of classical astrology is >> >> a >> >> > must >> >> > > because classical astrology can provide us the missing links. >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks & Regards, >> >> > > >> >> > > Punit Pandey >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, raveesh sethi <raveesh_13@> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > To All Members and moderator Puneet Ji >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Few things i have come to know . >> >> > > > >> >> > > > 1 Lalkitaab founder or the person who wrote this had 10 diciples >> >> > and 10 >> >> > > > books were published by him , according to few people who follow >> >> > lalkitaab >> >> > > > theory. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > 2. out of those 10 i think no one is alive now ., yes lal kitaab >> >> > is oen of >> >> > > > the most effective theory but if if it is practicsed with the >> >> > right >> >> > > > knowledge then it helps, but another group of astrologers say >> >> > that it has to >> >> > > > undergo changes in remedies as most of these remedies are based >> >> > on old >> >> > > > concepts and with new thinsg and environment , situations are >> >> > changing these >> >> > > > remmdies should also change, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Now i came to know of few things on which astrolgers have >> >> > different >> >> > > > opinions >> >> > > > >> >> > > > in 25th year if u see varshaphal sarini under 5th house the >> >> > number is 5 but >> >> > > > according to few experts and astrologers of lal kitaab it should >> >> > be no 2 not >> >> > > > 5 . >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Now question is if we get to know any pperson who has any copy >> >> of >> >> > those 10 >> >> > > > books published during that time then things will be much more >> >> > easier. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Raveesh >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > *Warm Regards >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Raveesh Kumar Sethi* >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > --- On *Wed, 2/18/09, Punit Pandey <punitp@>* wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> >> >> > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal >> >> Kitab >> >> > Group >> >> > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% >> 40> >> >> >> > > > Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 1:13 AM >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Dear Mohit ji, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I have documented response to Saini ji at >> >> > > > http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro >> >> > logy/,<http://www.astrocamp.com/Vedic Astrology/,>which can be an >> >> > online reference >> >> > > > >> >> > > > for knowing available books on Lal Kitab. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Truly speaking, I don't think that Lal Kitab can be taught in >> >> the >> >> > form of a >> >> > > > formal course at this point of time. Right now, Lal Kitab in >> >> > itself is in >> >> > > > research mode. Lal Kitab astrologers don't agree themselves on >> >> > the basic >> >> > > > principles of Lal Kitab. Publishing of all editions of Lal Kitab >> >> > in Hindi >> >> > > > is >> >> > > > under way. Origin and authorship of Lal Kitab is disputed. >> >> Unlike >> >> > classical >> >> > > > astrology, there is no supporting text available for Lal Kitab. >> >> > Not many >> >> > > > practical case studies have been given in Lal Kitab to >> >> understand >> >> > it >> >> > > > properly. This makes Lal Kitab at most a research material and >> >> > people who >> >> > > > want to devote a lot of time to research are only suited to Lal >> >> > Kitab at >> >> > > > this point of time. Lal Kitab is a comprehensive system which >> >> > talks about >> >> > > > palmistry, vastu, phrenology, astrology, remedies etc. and I >> >> have >> >> > not seen >> >> > > > even a single Lal Kitab astrologer who understand these fully. >> >> > Most of the >> >> > > > Lal Kitab astrologers, including myself, have limited knowledge >> >> > of Lal >> >> > > > Kitab. There are no gurus but all students. In my opinion, we >> >> are >> >> > still few >> >> > > > years fromt the time when we can systematically document Lal >> >> Kitab >> >> > > > knowledge >> >> > > > in easy to understand form. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Thanks & Regards, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Punit Pandey >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mohit Goel <mr_mohitg (AT) (DOT) >> >> > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=mr_mohitg% >> >> > 40>> >> >> > > > wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Dear Puneet ji >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > i would also like to join Mr Saini in requesting you about >> >> > details on >> >> > > > below >> >> > > > > questions. i am regular reader on this forum and since long i >> >> > have been >> >> > > > > wishing if someone could advise if some formal courses on lal >> >> > kitaab can >> >> > > > be >> >> > > > > conducted for learners and to start a school /platform where >> >> > learned >> >> > > > gurus >> >> > > > > of LK can enlightned the new comers >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > regards >> >> > > > > Mohit >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > " parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) >> >> > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% >> >> > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob >> >> > > > al.co.uk> " < >> >> > > > > parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) >> >> > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% >> >> > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob >> >> > > > al.co.uk> > >> >> > > > > lalkitab@ >> >> > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=lalkitab% >> >> > 40><lalkitab%40gr >> >> > > > oups.com> >> >> > > > > Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 4:31:13 AM >> >> > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal >> >> > Kitab Group >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Dear Puneet ji, >> >> > > > > Really appreciate your logical explanation to Parminders >> >> > concerns. I have >> >> > > > > always been inclined to Lap kitab for some unknown reason. >> >> This >> >> > mail us >> >> > > > to >> >> > > > > all Lal Kitab experts and is to seek your expert advise to >> >> > assist in >> >> > > > > exploring Lal Kitab to the deepest level possible. Concerns / >> >> > Questions >> >> > > > are >> >> > > > > : >> >> > > > > 1. Which is the best reference Lal Kitab and where visit >> >> > available. >> >> > > > > 2. Which is the authentic Lal Kitab software to make >> >> horoscope. >> >> > > > > 3. Contact details of reliable Lal Kitab expert to seek >> >> advise. >> >> > > > > 4. Any formal courses available on Lal Kitab remedies. >> >> > > > > Thanking you in anticipation for your kind favour >> >> > > > > Parm Saini >> >> > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) >> >> > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=punitp% >> >> > 40gmail.com><punitp%40gmail. com>> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:26:29 >> >> > > > > <lalkitab@ >> >> > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=lalkitab% >> >> > 40><lalkitab%40gr >> >> > > > oups.com> > >> >> > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal >> >> > Kitab Group >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Dear Parminder ji, >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > When you have written that " Right now where the planet of his >> >> > kundli will >> >> > > > > be >> >> > > > > placed after that remedy " , it shows incorrect understanding of >> >> > Lal Kitab >> >> > > > > which has been propagated by some of the Lal Kitab books. >> >> > Though I >> >> > > > believe >> >> > > > > that Pt. Krishna Ashant's book is a good book on Lal Kiab, but >> >> > the >> >> > > > > reasoning >> >> > > > > given in that book for remedies is *totally incorrect and >> >> > should not be >> >> > > > > followed*. In my opinon, most of so called Lal Kitab experts >> >> > don't >> >> > > > > understand the functioning of remedies and keep writing such >> >> > books due to >> >> > > > > ignorance or lack of understanding. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > One can not move planet from one house to another house. There >> >> > is no such >> >> > > > > magic given in Lal Kitab. Moving planet is not at all teaching >> >> > of Lal >> >> > > > > Kitab. >> >> > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned some methods like taking help from >> >> > another >> >> > > > planet, >> >> > > > > praying a planet, trying to reduce affect of some planet, and >> >> > removing >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > > mansui planet from the root of a planet etc. Working of Lal >> >> > Kitab >> >> > > > remedies >> >> > > > > has been explained clearly in Lal Kitab and we should stick to >> >> > what is >> >> > > > > writen in 5 editions of Lal Kitab. Though due to complex >> >> > language used in >> >> > > > > Lal Kitab, one needs to read Lal Kitab again and again to >> >> > understand it. >> >> > > > As >> >> > > > > we can not move planets, there is no need to worry about the >> >> > post-remedy >> >> > > > > placement of the planets and suggest remedies based on the >> >> > planetary >> >> > > > > positions in birth chart and year chart. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Thanks & Regards, >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Punit Pandey >> >> > > > > http://www.PunitAst rologer.com >> >> > <http://www.punitastrologer.com/> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:40 PM, parminder singh >> >> > <pammisaggu <http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? >> >> > to=pammisaggu%40><pammisaggu% >> >> > > > 40> >> >> > > > > >wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all member of LK group, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I just started to read LK (Arun Shita) also I have a LAL >> >> > kitab (Pt. >> >> > > > > Krishan >> >> > > > > > Asant), I want to know one thing that is if someone already >> >> > done some >> >> > > > > remedy >> >> > > > > > by diffrent LK pundits and after that He/she will come to me >> >> > or someone >> >> > > > > else >> >> > > > > > then howcome I will give him/her exact remedy bec. i don't >> >> > know that >> >> > > > how >> >> > > > > > much remedy he done and how my astrologer he changed to >> >> > improve his >> >> > > > > status. >> >> > > > > > Right now where the planet of his kundli will be placed >> >> after >> >> > that >> >> > > > > remedy. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > in wait of your reply >> >> > > > > > parminder saggu >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Dear punit ji, Good to see that a learned person like yourself believes in his own abilities and capabilities so much so that he does not see the need for any other help. Sir you don't care about the origin of lal kitab, YET want to follow/carry research on it. Perhaps that is why you despite of your best efforts and knowledge are still not able to " fill the gap " . no offence mate but i thought i have the right to express my feelings just like you do. By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition power/spiritual qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " today. Good on you Jitin Syal lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Dear Jitin ji, > > You got it right. I am exactly saying so. To reiterate, a good astrologer > DOES NOT need to have some sort of intuition power/divine blessing/spiritual > quality in order to assist him/her. > > This statement is related to the application of astrology and not origin of > astrology. I am not bothered whether spirituality/ intuition/ divine power > is required or not for the creation of such " grantha " like Lal Kitab. > Originiation is not my problem and we are not going to write a new Lal Kitab > in this forum. What I am bothered about is the application of the rules > which are already avaible in the " grantha " like Lal Kitab. And for that, I > will repeat again that there is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED of spirituality/ divine > blessings/ spirual power. I hope I am clear now. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:10 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82wrote: > > > Dear punit ji, > > Are you saying that a good astrologer doesn't need to have some sort > > of intution power/divine blessing/spritiual quality in order to > > assist him/her? > > > > Are you saying astrology is purely calculation and application? > > > > If yes, then would be kind enough to explain the origin of lal kitab > > or any other " granth " for that matter. > > > > regards > > jitin syal > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40>, Punit Pandey > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > If a period is good, one doesn't even require astrology to predict > > > correctly. Whatever you will say in your fruitful period will come > > out > > > correct. Beauty of astrology is to predict correctly all the time .. > > > consistently. Astrology is not a magic but a systematic method to > > predict > > > past, present and future. In my opinion, intuition and divine > > blessings are > > > the tools invented by astrologers to safe-guard themselves. > > Something should > > > be there to blame upon in case of incorrect predictions. Isn't it? > > > Astrologers should stop fooling themselves and the public by > > introducing all > > > these intuition factors. > > > > > > Astrology is a systematic method for developing predictive > > capabilities. It > > > takes time and efforts. An astrologer has to get into the skin of > > planets, > > > signs, nakshatras, bhavas etc. and feel them/ think like them in > > order to > > > predict correctly. All astrology texts teaches us how to apply > > knowledge > > > given in the texts. All astrology texts has given sound and > > systematic > > > methods. Those texts don't tell use to sit in padmasana and > > meditate to > > > learn astrology. If people call 'predictive ability' a 'diving > > blessings/ > > > intuiation', that is OK because then it is not a tool to fool > > yourself and > > > others. But this magical, undocumented, extra-terrestial meaning of > > > 'intuition/ divine blessings' is nothing but absurd in my opinion. > > These > > > words are big hindrance in the path of systematic development of > > astrology. > > > These are even bigger challenge for Lal Kitab, because some of the > > so called > > > Lal Kitab experts project this book as divine book and that stops > > further > > > research and development. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Madhavan <chims45@> wrote: > > > > > > > -Dear all, > > > > I fully endorse the opinion of Ashish ji, > > > > If only the good time prevails for both native and astrolger, > > their > > > > wont be any effective prediction and parihars. > > > > The astroleger may be good - but for himself is surrounded by bad > > > > period, then his predictions may not be appreciated but > > disowned.He > > > > would have unfolded mystry, but the credits would be given to > > unknown > > > > person. Even a street passer's good wish of the occasion would be > > > > given weightage than the renowned astrolgers. > > > > thats why i used to say, if my time is good you will appreciate my > > > > prediction- if bad times, you will blame me or totally forget me > > for > > > > the occasion when you are enjoying the fruits. > > > > Regarding the Native's good time, even good astroleger could not > > right > > > > time and satan will play its role in misinterepting the right > > > > prediction.parihars not performed. > > > > Thats why the upasakas are more respected than astrolgers with > > just > > > > few calculations(computer like) > > > > > > > > regds > > > > madhavan > > > > > > > > -- In lalkitab <lalkitab%40> <lalkitab% > > 40>, " Asheesh > > > > > > Mathur " <asheesh.mathur@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > Predictions are mystique and require meditation, intuition and > > above > > > > > all HIS Blessings for both Native and the Astrologer. > > > > > > > > > > Astrology / predictions are not mathematical or pure logical, > > they > > > > > are sprinkled with the astrologers experience and cosmic > > > > > fecilitation. Otherwise a smart computer program could predict. > > > > > > > > > > A native will visit a good astrologer, specifically a Lal Kitab > > one > > > > > only if he's destined to do get benefit. > > > > > > > > > > Native may listen to upayes, but may not perform them. May be > > nature > > > > > will prevent him from doing that. > > > > > > > > > > Lord Ram had to suffer for 14 years in exile. Same is the case > > with > > > > > Pandavas, they had access to best astrologers in their court. > > > > > > > > > > I know of one LK Expert, who transformed me 25 years back. I > > have > > > > > seen miracles with his remedies, but now despite my trials, am > > > > unable > > > > > to trace him. > > > > > > > > > > Remembers Astrologers predicting are revealing secrets of God , > > > > their > > > > > bosses. Which Boss would like his secretary or juniors who have > > > > > access to CR reveal it prematurely. > > > > > > > > > > Remember Ramayana, Rama was to be made King, big saints decided > > the > > > > > auspicious Muhurata, there were good Shaguns all around and at > > the > > > > > last moment tables turned upside down. > > > > > > > > > > Suggest we accept astrology/palmistry in light of above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a good lively forum with lots of gifted souls, > > intersting > > > > > threads, once again these are only my views and may not be > > correct > > > > or > > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > Please excuse me if I have hurt your feelings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Asheesh > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab% 40><lalkitab% > > 40>, > > Punit > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Raveesh ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the problem with the Lal Kitab. All are discussing > > what is > > > > > written > > > > > > in Lal Kitab and there in efforts to understand it. To me, it > > > > > really doesn't > > > > > > matter whether there is '2' or '5' in front of the row for > > 25th > > > > > year. What > > > > > > matters is to understand why that table is like that. Now it > > also > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > matter whether there were 10 disciples or 100 disciples. > > Whether > > > > > there were > > > > > > 10 books or 100 books. This is all gone and we should move > > forward > > > > > now. If > > > > > > we can not learn from 5 books, we can not learn from 50 books > > as > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the discussion that I have seen is on X planet in Y > > house > > > > > and what > > > > > > will be the remedy. To me, that not only is incorrent but also > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > matter. The matter is why those remedies are like that. There > > is > > > > no > > > > > efforts > > > > > > in that direction. I am watching Lal Kitab discussions on > > Internet > > > > > for so > > > > > > long but never seen even a one single discussion whether of > > > > > academic nature > > > > > > on the grammar of Lal Kitab. People will have to go beyond the > > > > > books and > > > > > > will have to use their reasoning to understand application of > > Lal > > > > > Kitab. And > > > > > > for doing that, I believe the knowledge of classical > > astrology is > > > > a > > > > > must > > > > > > because classical astrology can provide us the missing links. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, raveesh sethi <raveesh_13@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Members and moderator Puneet Ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Few things i have come to know . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Lalkitaab founder or the person who wrote this had 10 > > diciples > > > > > and 10 > > > > > > > books were published by him , according to few people who > > follow > > > > > lalkitaab > > > > > > > theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. out of those 10 i think no one is alive now ., yes lal > > kitaab > > > > > is oen of > > > > > > > the most effective theory but if if it is practicsed with > > the > > > > > right > > > > > > > knowledge then it helps, but another group of astrologers > > say > > > > > that it has to > > > > > > > undergo changes in remedies as most of these remedies are > > based > > > > > on old > > > > > > > concepts and with new thinsg and environment , situations > > are > > > > > changing these > > > > > > > remmdies should also change, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now i came to know of few things on which astrolgers have > > > > > different > > > > > > > opinions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 25th year if u see varshaphal sarini under 5th house the > > > > > number is 5 but > > > > > > > according to few experts and astrologers of lal kitaab it > > should > > > > > be no 2 not > > > > > > > 5 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now question is if we get to know any pperson who has any > > copy > > > > of > > > > > those 10 > > > > > > > books published during that time then things will be much > > more > > > > > easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Warm Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh Kumar Sethi* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Wed, 2/18/09, Punit Pandey <punitp@>* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal > > > > Kitab > > > > > Group > > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab% 40><lalkitab% > > 40> > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 1:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohit ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have documented response to Saini ji at > > > > > > > http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro > > > > > logy/,<http://www.astrocamp.com/Vedic Astrology/,>which can be an > > > > > online reference > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for knowing available books on Lal Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Truly speaking, I don't think that Lal Kitab can be taught > > in > > > > the > > > > > form of a > > > > > > > formal course at this point of time. Right now, Lal Kitab in > > > > > itself is in > > > > > > > research mode. Lal Kitab astrologers don't agree themselves > > on > > > > > the basic > > > > > > > principles of Lal Kitab. Publishing of all editions of Lal > > Kitab > > > > > in Hindi > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > under way. Origin and authorship of Lal Kitab is disputed. > > > > Unlike > > > > > classical > > > > > > > astrology, there is no supporting text available for Lal > > Kitab. > > > > > Not many > > > > > > > practical case studies have been given in Lal Kitab to > > > > understand > > > > > it > > > > > > > properly. This makes Lal Kitab at most a research material > > and > > > > > people who > > > > > > > want to devote a lot of time to research are only suited to > > Lal > > > > > Kitab at > > > > > > > this point of time. Lal Kitab is a comprehensive system > > which > > > > > talks about > > > > > > > palmistry, vastu, phrenology, astrology, remedies etc. and I > > > > have > > > > > not seen > > > > > > > even a single Lal Kitab astrologer who understand these > > fully. > > > > > Most of the > > > > > > > Lal Kitab astrologers, including myself, have limited > > knowledge > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > Kitab. There are no gurus but all students. In my opinion, > > we > > > > are > > > > > still few > > > > > > > years fromt the time when we can systematically document Lal > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > in easy to understand form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mohit Goel > > <mr_mohitg (AT) (DOT) > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=mr_mohitg% > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i would also like to join Mr Saini in requesting you about > > > > > details on > > > > > > > below > > > > > > > > questions. i am regular reader on this forum and since > > long i > > > > > have been > > > > > > > > wishing if someone could advise if some formal courses on > > lal > > > > > kitaab can > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > conducted for learners and to start a school /platform > > where > > > > > learned > > > > > > > gurus > > > > > > > > of LK can enlightned the new comers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > Mohit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% > > > > > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob > > > > > > > al.co.uk> " < > > > > > > > > parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% > > > > > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob > > > > > > > al.co.uk> > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=lalkitab% > > > > > 40><lalkitab%40gr > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 4:31:13 AM > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in > > Lal > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji, > > > > > > > > Really appreciate your logical explanation to Parminders > > > > > concerns. I have > > > > > > > > always been inclined to Lap kitab for some unknown reason. > > > > This > > > > > mail us > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > all Lal Kitab experts and is to seek your expert advise to > > > > > assist in > > > > > > > > exploring Lal Kitab to the deepest level possible. > > Concerns / > > > > > Questions > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > 1. Which is the best reference Lal Kitab and where visit > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > 2. Which is the authentic Lal Kitab software to make > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > 3. Contact details of reliable Lal Kitab expert to seek > > > > advise. > > > > > > > > 4. Any formal courses available on Lal Kitab remedies. > > > > > > > > Thanking you in anticipation for your kind favour > > > > > > > > Parm Saini > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=punitp% > > > > > 40gmail.com><punitp%40gmail. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:26:29 > > > > > > > > <lalkitab@ > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=lalkitab% > > > > > 40><lalkitab%40gr > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in > > Lal > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Parminder ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you have written that " Right now where the planet of > > his > > > > > kundli will > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > placed after that remedy " , it shows incorrect > > understanding of > > > > > Lal Kitab > > > > > > > > which has been propagated by some of the Lal Kitab books. > > > > > Though I > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > that Pt. Krishna Ashant's book is a good book on Lal > > Kiab, but > > > > > the > > > > > > > > reasoning > > > > > > > > given in that book for remedies is *totally incorrect and > > > > > should not be > > > > > > > > followed*. In my opinon, most of so called Lal Kitab > > experts > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > understand the functioning of remedies and keep writing > > such > > > > > books due to > > > > > > > > ignorance or lack of understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One can not move planet from one house to another house. > > There > > > > > is no such > > > > > > > > magic given in Lal Kitab. Moving planet is not at all > > teaching > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned some methods like taking help from > > > > > another > > > > > > > planet, > > > > > > > > praying a planet, trying to reduce affect of some planet, > > and > > > > > removing > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > mansui planet from the root of a planet etc. Working of > > Lal > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > has been explained clearly in Lal Kitab and we should > > stick to > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > writen in 5 editions of Lal Kitab. Though due to complex > > > > > language used in > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab, one needs to read Lal Kitab again and again to > > > > > understand it. > > > > > > > As > > > > > > > > we can not move planets, there is no need to worry about > > the > > > > > post-remedy > > > > > > > > placement of the planets and suggest remedies based on the > > > > > planetary > > > > > > > > positions in birth chart and year chart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > http://www.PunitAst rologer.com > > > > > <http://www.punitastrologer.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:40 PM, parminder singh > > > > > <pammisaggu (AT) (DOT) > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? > > > > > to=pammisaggu%40><pammisaggu% > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all member of LK group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just started to read LK (Arun Shita) also I have a LAL > > > > > kitab (Pt. > > > > > > > > Krishan > > > > > > > > > Asant), I want to know one thing that is if someone > > already > > > > > done some > > > > > > > > remedy > > > > > > > > > by diffrent LK pundits and after that He/she will come > > to me > > > > > or someone > > > > > > > > else > > > > > > > > > then howcome I will give him/her exact remedy bec. i > > don't > > > > > know that > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > much remedy he done and how my astrologer he changed to > > > > > improve his > > > > > > > > status. > > > > > > > > > Right now where the planet of his kundli will be placed > > > > after > > > > > that > > > > > > > > remedy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in wait of your reply > > > > > > > > > parminder saggu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Dear Jitin ji, *You again misinterpreted.* I didn't say that " I don't care about the origin of lal kitab " . What I said is that " I am not bothered whether spirituality/ intuition/ divine power is required or not for the creation of such 'grantha' like Lal Kitab. " I hope you understand the difference. Rest of your email is based on this misinterpretation and really not making any sense to me. Please don't make arguments for the sake of making arguments. You say that " By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition power/spiritual qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " today. Now I am claerly telling that " application " of astrology doesn't require divine blessing/ intuition/ spiritual poswer. Why are you relating this with " discussion " , sleeping, eating or any walking. I have not said anything whether diving blessing is required for discussion or not. We don't want to discuss miracles but want to discuss Lal Kitab application. Isn't it? I may be absolutely incorrect, but this is not the right place to discuss intuition, divine blessings, spiritual powers, jaadu, tona, magic and totaks. This is the place to discuss Lal Kitab application. *As I mentioned in my last email, things like intuition, divine blessings, spiritual powers are hindrance in the systematic learning of astrology. * Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82wrote: > Dear punit ji, > Good to see that a learned person like yourself believes in his own > abilities and capabilities so much so that he does not see the need > for any other help. > > Sir you don't care about the origin of lal kitab, YET want to > follow/carry research on it. Perhaps that is why you despite of your > best efforts and knowledge are still not able to " fill the gap " . > no offence mate but i thought i have the right to express my feelings > just like you do. > > By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition > power/spiritual qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " > today. > > Good on you > > Jitin Syal > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40>, Punit Pandey > <punitp wrote: > > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > > > You got it right. I am exactly saying so. To reiterate, a good > astrologer > > DOES NOT need to have some sort of intuition power/divine > blessing/spiritual > > quality in order to assist him/her. > > > > This statement is related to the application of astrology and not > origin of > > astrology. I am not bothered whether spirituality/ intuition/ > divine power > > is required or not for the creation of such " grantha " like Lal > Kitab. > > Originiation is not my problem and we are not going to write a new > Lal Kitab > > in this forum. What I am bothered about is the application of the > rules > > which are already avaible in the " grantha " like Lal Kitab. And for > that, I > > will repeat again that there is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED of spirituality/ > divine > > blessings/ spirual power. I hope I am clear now. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:10 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82wrote: > > > > > Dear punit ji, > > > Are you saying that a good astrologer doesn't need to have some > sort > > > of intution power/divine blessing/spritiual quality in order to > > > assist him/her? > > > > > > Are you saying astrology is purely calculation and application? > > > > > > If yes, then would be kind enough to explain the origin of lal > kitab > > > or any other " granth " for that matter. > > > > > > regards > > > jitin syal > > > > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40>, > Punit Pandey > > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > If a period is good, one doesn't even require astrology to > predict > > > > correctly. Whatever you will say in your fruitful period will > come > > > out > > > > correct. Beauty of astrology is to predict correctly all the > time .. > > > > consistently. Astrology is not a magic but a systematic method > to > > > predict > > > > past, present and future. In my opinion, intuition and divine > > > blessings are > > > > the tools invented by astrologers to safe-guard themselves. > > > Something should > > > > be there to blame upon in case of incorrect predictions. Isn't > it? > > > > Astrologers should stop fooling themselves and the public by > > > introducing all > > > > these intuition factors. > > > > > > > > Astrology is a systematic method for developing predictive > > > capabilities. It > > > > takes time and efforts. An astrologer has to get into the skin > of > > > planets, > > > > signs, nakshatras, bhavas etc. and feel them/ think like them in > > > order to > > > > predict correctly. All astrology texts teaches us how to apply > > > knowledge > > > > given in the texts. All astrology texts has given sound and > > > systematic > > > > methods. Those texts don't tell use to sit in padmasana and > > > meditate to > > > > learn astrology. If people call 'predictive ability' a 'diving > > > blessings/ > > > > intuiation', that is OK because then it is not a tool to fool > > > yourself and > > > > others. But this magical, undocumented, extra-terrestial > meaning of > > > > 'intuition/ divine blessings' is nothing but absurd in my > opinion. > > > These > > > > words are big hindrance in the path of systematic development of > > > astrology. > > > > These are even bigger challenge for Lal Kitab, because some of > the > > > so called > > > > Lal Kitab experts project this book as divine book and that > stops > > > further > > > > research and development. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Madhavan <chims45@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > -Dear all, > > > > > I fully endorse the opinion of Ashish ji, > > > > > If only the good time prevails for both native and astrolger, > > > their > > > > > wont be any effective prediction and parihars. > > > > > The astroleger may be good - but for himself is surrounded by > bad > > > > > period, then his predictions may not be appreciated but > > > disowned.He > > > > > would have unfolded mystry, but the credits would be given to > > > unknown > > > > > person. Even a street passer's good wish of the occasion > would be > > > > > given weightage than the renowned astrolgers. > > > > > thats why i used to say, if my time is good you will > appreciate my > > > > > prediction- if bad times, you will blame me or totally forget > me > > > for > > > > > the occasion when you are enjoying the fruits. > > > > > Regarding the Native's good time, even good astroleger could > not > > > right > > > > > time and satan will play its role in misinterepting the right > > > > > prediction.parihars not performed. > > > > > Thats why the upasakas are more respected than astrolgers with > > > just > > > > > few calculations(computer like) > > > > > > > > > > regds > > > > > madhavan > > > > > > > > > > -- In lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40> > <lalkitab% > > > 40>, " Asheesh > > > > > > > > Mathur " <asheesh.mathur@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > Predictions are mystique and require meditation, intuition > and > > > above > > > > > > all HIS Blessings for both Native and the Astrologer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology / predictions are not mathematical or pure > logical, > > > they > > > > > > are sprinkled with the astrologers experience and cosmic > > > > > > fecilitation. Otherwise a smart computer program could > predict. > > > > > > > > > > > > A native will visit a good astrologer, specifically a Lal > Kitab > > > one > > > > > > only if he's destined to do get benefit. > > > > > > > > > > > > Native may listen to upayes, but may not perform them. May > be > > > nature > > > > > > will prevent him from doing that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord Ram had to suffer for 14 years in exile. Same is the > case > > > with > > > > > > Pandavas, they had access to best astrologers in their > court. > > > > > > > > > > > > I know of one LK Expert, who transformed me 25 years back. I > > > have > > > > > > seen miracles with his remedies, but now despite my trials, > am > > > > > unable > > > > > > to trace him. > > > > > > > > > > > > Remembers Astrologers predicting are revealing secrets of > God , > > > > > their > > > > > > bosses. Which Boss would like his secretary or juniors who > have > > > > > > access to CR reveal it prematurely. > > > > > > > > > > > > Remember Ramayana, Rama was to be made King, big saints > decided > > > the > > > > > > auspicious Muhurata, there were good Shaguns all around and > at > > > the > > > > > > last moment tables turned upside down. > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggest we accept astrology/palmistry in light of above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a good lively forum with lots of gifted souls, > > > intersting > > > > > > threads, once again these are only my views and may not be > > > correct > > > > > or > > > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please excuse me if I have hurt your feelings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Asheesh > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40><lalkitab% > > > > 40>, > > > Punit > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Raveesh ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the problem with the Lal Kitab. All are discussing > > > what is > > > > > > written > > > > > > > in Lal Kitab and there in efforts to understand it. To > me, it > > > > > > really doesn't > > > > > > > matter whether there is '2' or '5' in front of the row for > > > 25th > > > > > > year. What > > > > > > > matters is to understand why that table is like that. Now > it > > > also > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > matter whether there were 10 disciples or 100 disciples. > > > Whether > > > > > > there were > > > > > > > 10 books or 100 books. This is all gone and we should move > > > forward > > > > > > now. If > > > > > > > we can not learn from 5 books, we can not learn from 50 > books > > > as > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the discussion that I have seen is on X planet in > Y > > > house > > > > > > and what > > > > > > > will be the remedy. To me, that not only is incorrent but > also > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > matter. The matter is why those remedies are like that. > There > > > is > > > > > no > > > > > > efforts > > > > > > > in that direction. I am watching Lal Kitab discussions on > > > Internet > > > > > > for so > > > > > > > long but never seen even a one single discussion whether > of > > > > > > academic nature > > > > > > > on the grammar of Lal Kitab. People will have to go > beyond the > > > > > > books and > > > > > > > will have to use their reasoning to understand > application of > > > Lal > > > > > > Kitab. And > > > > > > > for doing that, I believe the knowledge of classical > > > astrology is > > > > > a > > > > > > must > > > > > > > because classical astrology can provide us the missing > links. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, raveesh sethi > <raveesh_13@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Members and moderator Puneet Ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Few things i have come to know . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Lalkitaab founder or the person who wrote this had 10 > > > diciples > > > > > > and 10 > > > > > > > > books were published by him , according to few people > who > > > follow > > > > > > lalkitaab > > > > > > > > theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. out of those 10 i think no one is alive now ., yes > lal > > > kitaab > > > > > > is oen of > > > > > > > > the most effective theory but if if it is practicsed > with > > > the > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > knowledge then it helps, but another group of > astrologers > > > say > > > > > > that it has to > > > > > > > > undergo changes in remedies as most of these remedies > are > > > based > > > > > > on old > > > > > > > > concepts and with new thinsg and environment , > situations > > > are > > > > > > changing these > > > > > > > > remmdies should also change, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now i came to know of few things on which astrolgers > have > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > opinions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 25th year if u see varshaphal sarini under 5th house > the > > > > > > number is 5 but > > > > > > > > according to few experts and astrologers of lal kitaab > it > > > should > > > > > > be no 2 not > > > > > > > > 5 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now question is if we get to know any pperson who has > any > > > copy > > > > > of > > > > > > those 10 > > > > > > > > books published during that time then things will be > much > > > more > > > > > > easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Warm Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh Kumar Sethi* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Wed, 2/18/09, Punit Pandey <punitp@>* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in > Lal > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > Group > > > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40><lalkitab% > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 1:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohit ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have documented response to Saini ji at > > > > > > > > http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro > > > > > > logy/,<http://www.astrocamp.com/Vedic Astrology/,>which can > be an > > > > > > online reference > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for knowing available books on Lal Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Truly speaking, I don't think that Lal Kitab can be > taught > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > form of a > > > > > > > > formal course at this point of time. Right now, Lal > Kitab in > > > > > > itself is in > > > > > > > > research mode. Lal Kitab astrologers don't agree > themselves > > > on > > > > > > the basic > > > > > > > > principles of Lal Kitab. Publishing of all editions of > Lal > > > Kitab > > > > > > in Hindi > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > under way. Origin and authorship of Lal Kitab is > disputed. > > > > > Unlike > > > > > > classical > > > > > > > > astrology, there is no supporting text available for Lal > > > Kitab. > > > > > > Not many > > > > > > > > practical case studies have been given in Lal Kitab to > > > > > understand > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > properly. This makes Lal Kitab at most a research > material > > > and > > > > > > people who > > > > > > > > want to devote a lot of time to research are only > suited to > > > Lal > > > > > > Kitab at > > > > > > > > this point of time. Lal Kitab is a comprehensive system > > > which > > > > > > talks about > > > > > > > > palmistry, vastu, phrenology, astrology, remedies etc. > and I > > > > > have > > > > > > not seen > > > > > > > > even a single Lal Kitab astrologer who understand these > > > fully. > > > > > > Most of the > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab astrologers, including myself, have limited > > > knowledge > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab. There are no gurus but all students. In my > opinion, > > > we > > > > > are > > > > > > still few > > > > > > > > years fromt the time when we can systematically > document Lal > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > in easy to understand form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mohit Goel > > > <mr_mohitg (AT) (DOT) > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=mr_mohitg% > > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i would also like to join Mr Saini in requesting you > about > > > > > > details on > > > > > > > > below > > > > > > > > > questions. i am regular reader on this forum and since > > > long i > > > > > > have been > > > > > > > > > wishing if someone could advise if some formal > courses on > > > lal > > > > > > kitaab can > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > conducted for learners and to start a school /platform > > > where > > > > > > learned > > > > > > > > gurus > > > > > > > > > of LK can enlightned the new comers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > Mohit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% > > > > > > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> " < > > > > > > > > > parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% > > > > > > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=lalkitab% > > > > > > 40><lalkitab%40gr > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 4:31:13 AM > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone > in > > > Lal > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji, > > > > > > > > > Really appreciate your logical explanation to > Parminders > > > > > > concerns. I have > > > > > > > > > always been inclined to Lap kitab for some unknown > reason. > > > > > This > > > > > > mail us > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > all Lal Kitab experts and is to seek your expert > advise to > > > > > > assist in > > > > > > > > > exploring Lal Kitab to the deepest level possible. > > > Concerns / > > > > > > Questions > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > 1. Which is the best reference Lal Kitab and where > visit > > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > > 2. Which is the authentic Lal Kitab software to make > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > 3. Contact details of reliable Lal Kitab expert to > seek > > > > > advise. > > > > > > > > > 4. Any formal courses available on Lal Kitab remedies. > > > > > > > > > Thanking you in anticipation for your kind favour > > > > > > > > > Parm Saini > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=punitp% > > > > > > 40gmail.com><punitp%40gmail. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:26:29 > > > > > > > > > <lalkitab@ > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=lalkitab% > > > > > > 40><lalkitab%40gr > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone > in > > > Lal > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Parminder ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you have written that " Right now where the > planet of > > > his > > > > > > kundli will > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > placed after that remedy " , it shows incorrect > > > understanding of > > > > > > Lal Kitab > > > > > > > > > which has been propagated by some of the Lal Kitab > books. > > > > > > Though I > > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > > that Pt. Krishna Ashant's book is a good book on Lal > > > Kiab, but > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > reasoning > > > > > > > > > given in that book for remedies is *totally incorrect > and > > > > > > should not be > > > > > > > > > followed*. In my opinon, most of so called Lal Kitab > > > experts > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > understand the functioning of remedies and keep > writing > > > such > > > > > > books due to > > > > > > > > > ignorance or lack of understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One can not move planet from one house to another > house. > > > There > > > > > > is no such > > > > > > > > > magic given in Lal Kitab. Moving planet is not at all > > > teaching > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned some methods like taking help > from > > > > > > another > > > > > > > > planet, > > > > > > > > > praying a planet, trying to reduce affect of some > planet, > > > and > > > > > > removing > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > mansui planet from the root of a planet etc. Working > of > > > Lal > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > has been explained clearly in Lal Kitab and we should > > > stick to > > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > > writen in 5 editions of Lal Kitab. Though due to > complex > > > > > > language used in > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab, one needs to read Lal Kitab again and > again to > > > > > > understand it. > > > > > > > > As > > > > > > > > > we can not move planets, there is no need to worry > about > > > the > > > > > > post-remedy > > > > > > > > > placement of the planets and suggest remedies based > on the > > > > > > planetary > > > > > > > > > positions in birth chart and year chart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > http://www.PunitAst rologer.com > > > > > > <http://www.punitastrologer.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:40 PM, parminder singh > > > > > > <pammisaggu (AT) (DOT) > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? > > > > > > to=pammisaggu%40><pammisaggu% > > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all member of LK group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just started to read LK (Arun Shita) also I have > a LAL > > > > > > kitab (Pt. > > > > > > > > > Krishan > > > > > > > > > > Asant), I want to know one thing that is if someone > > > already > > > > > > done some > > > > > > > > > remedy > > > > > > > > > > by diffrent LK pundits and after that He/she will > come > > > to me > > > > > > or someone > > > > > > > > > else > > > > > > > > > > then howcome I will give him/her exact remedy bec. i > > > don't > > > > > > know that > > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > > much remedy he done and how my astrologer he > changed to > > > > > > improve his > > > > > > > > > status. > > > > > > > > > > Right now where the planet of his kundli will be > placed > > > > > after > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > remedy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in wait of your reply > > > > > > > > > > parminder saggu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Dear punit ji, saadar namaskaar, kindly suggest some upaaye 1.i got married in dec 2002,and got divorce in dec2008. 2. in between i lost my mother due to cancer,and my job also. 3.due to above reason my financial position is not well i need money as i own a old parentral house which has to b repaired time to time and it needs a big ammount. 4.i m also doing MBA but as i remain 2 busy in office i m unable to give enough time to studies. i also want to tell u i hav 2-3 bad habits...A: i take tobaco(pan masala),B. i also take drinks,C.i attracts towards sex(although i am not feeling proper errection for almost 3 years i.e after i departed from my 1st wife and daughter) >>sir by my heart i m very true..plz help me,i m writing this mail 3rd time with all my expectations to get some upaaye to upgrade my life. q1.My father's age is arround 80,shud i go for another marriage again.when it will happen? q2.I want to construct a big and good home can i do that before marriage? At present i m working with a small scale industry which manifacture steel drums My Date of Birth -22-dec-1975 Time of Birth -02:10am Place of Birth -Lucknow birth chart details as foll 1 house- ven,rah 2 house-empty 3 house-sun,mer 4 house-empty 5 house-empty 6 house-jup 7 house-ket 8 house-mars 9 house-empty 10 house-sat,moon 11 house-empty 12 house-empty Sir,plz ans me i m writing with all my expectations with u all learned persons. Regards V'jay V'jay ________________________________ Punit Pandey <punitp lalkitab Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:26:35 PM Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal Kitab Group Dear Kulbir ji, My further thought on the agenda for this forum suggests that we should focus on the application of what is given in Lal Kitab and should not discuss what is written in Lal Kitab. I mean, we should take case studies & quizes are explain concepts of Lal Kitab based on that. I think, Internet has enough of fighting on what is written in Lal Kitab and remedy of X planet in Y house. We need to grow from there. You have a long association with Lal Kitab and would appreciate your opinion? Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: > Dear Kulbir ji, > > I'll take your questions in three parts. First is the question why the > success percentage is not that high for most of the astrologers. My answer > is that most of the astrology students are dependent on theoretical study. > All classics like Brihat Jatak, Saravali, Sarvarth Chintamani, BPHS etc. are > almost without any examples. The crux had been documented but the > application was not documented. Traditionally application had been taught in > paramparas in India. Without any practical example, people are using their > own imagination to fill that gap. The same problem is there with Lal Kitab > as well. Examples are nearly non-existent which makes understanding > difficult. > > Your question is not limited to astrology, but it true for almost all kind > of knowledge. Why not all B.Sc. students can invent like Thomas Alva Edison > **? Answer is the same that they have just studied theory and not learnt > the application. Correct application of any science requires a lot of hard > work and efforts. Now all B.Sc. students can become Edison. Hard work, > focus, practical learning, effort, individual's understanding of application > are various criteria in the success of any subject. Astrology is no > different. > > Your second point is related to Nadis and Samhitas. This is now a well > known fact that there are two types of Nadis (called Samhita in North India) > - Tantra Nadis and Mantra Nadis. According to Prof. B. V. Raman, " Mantra > Nadi's are based on acquisition of control over what he called certain > " uchchishta " (profane) or Kshudra (mean or low) mantra. " Karna Pishachini is > one such method which is well documented in our Tantra texts like > Rudryamalam and Mantramahodadhi as far as I remember. Karna Pishachinis are > not astrologers. Those are good in tell you present and past, but the future > prediction has been left to astrologers alone. That is the reason we see > that most of the Nadis failed in future predictions. > > On the other side, Tantra Nadis are based on astrology. Those are the Nadis > that can predict even the future correctly. Texts like Deva Keralam, Bhrigu > Nandi, Nandi Nadi etc. come under 'Tantra Nadis'. There are many Nadis > available though not available to general public. Lal Kitab is also nothing > but another branch of Nadi which was prevailing in Northern India. Anyways, > we need to understand differences between Mantra Nadis and Tantra Nadis in > order to uncover the secret of astrology. > > Regarding your third question, I have no plans as of now. I'll wait and see > where future takes us. The good thing is that almost all five editions are > available to us and that gives us good material to learn and debate. I hope > that consistent discussion on Lal Kitab and filling missing links through > classical astrology will give us good clarity on this Lal Kitab system. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, kulbir bance <kulbirbance@ gmail.com>wrote: > >> Punit ji, ur apprehensions are not unfounded but the problem is >> majority of astrologers indulge in post mortem of events. Predictions >> about future are more or less a gamble. With odds weighing heavily >> against. I don't doubt the texts but with such treatises and >> generations studing them. Where does the fault lie and what do you say >> about bhrigu samhita charts in punjab and aagast naadi in south. I >> have seen the magic of bhrigu charts at hoshiarpur in punjab. The >> horoscope of native is there years before his birth. If u trust umesh >> ji u can confirm from him that i arranged a meeting of umesh ji and >> our common vip friend with a soothsayer. Both were dumb founded when >> he described 2 murders in the locality of our friend with full details >> like age appearance of the victim. What he asked was only thd address >> no horoscope no palm reading. May be it was some sort of hypnosis or >> mind reading. But he excells in that when it comes to future 95 >> predictions are wrong. In the end what exact solution do u have in >> mind for rarely do u enter a discussion without a concreate agenda. >> Regards. Kulbir >> >> >> On 2/19/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com <punitp%40gmail. com>> wrote: >> > Dear Friends, >> > >> > If a period is good, one doesn't even require astrology to predict >> > correctly. Whatever you will say in your fruitful period will come out >> > correct. Beauty of astrology is to predict correctly all the time .. >> > consistently. Astrology is not a magic but a systematic method to >> predict >> > past, present and future. In my opinion, intuition and divine blessings >> are >> > the tools invented by astrologers to safe-guard themselves. Something >> should >> > be there to blame upon in case of incorrect predictions. Isn't it? >> > Astrologers should stop fooling themselves and the public by introducing >> all >> > these intuition factors. >> > >> > Astrology is a systematic method for developing predictive capabilities. >> It >> > takes time and efforts. An astrologer has to get into the skin of >> planets, >> > signs, nakshatras, bhavas etc. and feel them/ think like them in order >> to >> > predict correctly. All astrology texts teaches us how to apply knowledge >> > given in the texts. All astrology texts has given sound and systematic >> > methods. Those texts don't tell use to sit in padmasana and meditate to >> > learn astrology. If people call 'predictive ability' a 'diving >> blessings/ >> > intuiation', that is OK because then it is not a tool to fool yourself >> and >> > others. But this magical, undocumented, extra-terrestial meaning of >> > 'intuition/ divine blessings' is nothing but absurd in my opinion. These >> > words are big hindrance in the path of systematic development of >> astrology. >> > These are even bigger challenge for Lal Kitab, because some of the so >> called >> > Lal Kitab experts project this book as divine book and that stops >> further >> > research and development. >> > >> > Thanks & Regards, >> > >> > Punit Pandey >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Madhavan <chims45 (AT) (DOT) com<chims45%40. com>> >> wrote: >> > >> >> -Dear all, >> >> I fully endorse the opinion of Ashish ji, >> >> If only the good time prevails for both native and astrolger, their >> >> wont be any effective prediction and parihars. >> >> The astroleger may be good - but for himself is surrounded by bad >> >> period, then his predictions may not be appreciated but disowned.He >> >> would have unfolded mystry, but the credits would be given to unknown >> >> person. Even a street passer's good wish of the occasion would be >> >> given weightage than the renowned astrolgers. >> >> thats why i used to say, if my time is good you will appreciate my >> >> prediction- if bad times, you will blame me or totally forget me for >> >> the occasion when you are enjoying the fruits. >> >> Regarding the Native's good time, even good astroleger could not right >> >> time and satan will play its role in misinterepting the right >> >> prediction.parihars not performed. >> >> Thats why the upasakas are more respected than astrolgers with just >> >> few calculations( computer like) >> >> >> >> regds >> >> madhavan >> >> >> >> -- In lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% >> 40. com>, " Asheesh >> >> >> Mathur " <asheesh.mathur@ ...> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Dear All, >> >> > Predictions are mystique and require meditation, intuition and above >> >> > all HIS Blessings for both Native and the Astrologer. >> >> > >> >> > Astrology / predictions are not mathematical or pure logical, they >> >> > are sprinkled with the astrologers experience and cosmic >> >> > fecilitation. Otherwise a smart computer program could predict. >> >> > >> >> > A native will visit a good astrologer, specifically a Lal Kitab one >> >> > only if he's destined to do get benefit. >> >> > >> >> > Native may listen to upayes, but may not perform them. May be nature >> >> > will prevent him from doing that. >> >> > >> >> > Lord Ram had to suffer for 14 years in exile. Same is the case with >> >> > Pandavas, they had access to best astrologers in their court. >> >> > >> >> > I know of one LK Expert, who transformed me 25 years back. I have >> >> > seen miracles with his remedies, but now despite my trials, am >> >> unable >> >> > to trace him. >> >> > >> >> > Remembers Astrologers predicting are revealing secrets of God , >> >> their >> >> > bosses. Which Boss would like his secretary or juniors who have >> >> > access to CR reveal it prematurely. >> >> > >> >> > Remember Ramayana, Rama was to be made King, big saints decided the >> >> > auspicious Muhurata, there were good Shaguns all around and at the >> >> > last moment tables turned upside down. >> >> > >> >> > Suggest we accept astrology/palmistry in light of above. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > This is a good lively forum with lots of gifted souls, intersting >> >> > threads, once again these are only my views and may not be correct >> >> or >> >> > appropriate. >> >> > >> >> > Please excuse me if I have hurt your feelings. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks >> >> > Asheesh >> >> > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% >> 40. com>, Punit >> >> >> Pandey <punitp@> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > Dear Raveesh ji, >> >> > > >> >> > > This is the problem with the Lal Kitab. All are discussing what is >> >> > written >> >> > > in Lal Kitab and there in efforts to understand it. To me, it >> >> > really doesn't >> >> > > matter whether there is '2' or '5' in front of the row for 25th >> >> > year. What >> >> > > matters is to understand why that table is like that. Now it also >> >> > doesn't >> >> > > matter whether there were 10 disciples or 100 disciples. Whether >> >> > there were >> >> > > 10 books or 100 books. This is all gone and we should move forward >> >> > now. If >> >> > > we can not learn from 5 books, we can not learn from 50 books as >> >> > well. >> >> > > >> >> > > Most of the discussion that I have seen is on X planet in Y house >> >> > and what >> >> > > will be the remedy. To me, that not only is incorrent but also >> >> > doesn't >> >> > > matter. The matter is why those remedies are like that. There is >> >> no >> >> > efforts >> >> > > in that direction. I am watching Lal Kitab discussions on Internet >> >> > for so >> >> > > long but never seen even a one single discussion whether of >> >> > academic nature >> >> > > on the grammar of Lal Kitab. People will have to go beyond the >> >> > books and >> >> > > will have to use their reasoning to understand application of Lal >> >> > Kitab. And >> >> > > for doing that, I believe the knowledge of classical astrology is >> >> a >> >> > must >> >> > > because classical astrology can provide us the missing links. >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks & Regards, >> >> > > >> >> > > Punit Pandey >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, raveesh sethi <raveesh_13@ > >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > To All Members and moderator Puneet Ji >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Few things i have come to know . >> >> > > > >> >> > > > 1 Lalkitaab founder or the person who wrote this had 10 diciples >> >> > and 10 >> >> > > > books were published by him , according to few people who follow >> >> > lalkitaab >> >> > > > theory. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > 2. out of those 10 i think no one is alive now ., yes lal kitaab >> >> > is oen of >> >> > > > the most effective theory but if if it is practicsed with the >> >> > right >> >> > > > knowledge then it helps, but another group of astrologers say >> >> > that it has to >> >> > > > undergo changes in remedies as most of these remedies are based >> >> > on old >> >> > > > concepts and with new thinsg and environment , situations are >> >> > changing these >> >> > > > remmdies should also change, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Now i came to know of few things on which astrolgers have >> >> > different >> >> > > > opinions >> >> > > > >> >> > > > in 25th year if u see varshaphal sarini under 5th house the >> >> > number is 5 but >> >> > > > according to few experts and astrologers of lal kitaab it should >> >> > be no 2 not >> >> > > > 5 . >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Now question is if we get to know any pperson who has any copy >> >> of >> >> > those 10 >> >> > > > books published during that time then things will be much more >> >> > easier. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Raveesh >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > *Warm Regards >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Raveesh Kumar Sethi* >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > --- On *Wed, 2/18/09, Punit Pandey <punitp@>* wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> >> >> > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal >> >> Kitab >> >> > Group >> >> > > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% >> 40. com> >> >> >> > > > Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 1:13 AM >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Dear Mohit ji, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I have documented response to Saini ji at >> >> > > > http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro >> >> > logy/,<http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro logy/,>which can be an >> >> > online reference >> >> > > > >> >> > > > for knowing available books on Lal Kitab. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Truly speaking, I don't think that Lal Kitab can be taught in >> >> the >> >> > form of a >> >> > > > formal course at this point of time. Right now, Lal Kitab in >> >> > itself is in >> >> > > > research mode. Lal Kitab astrologers don't agree themselves on >> >> > the basic >> >> > > > principles of Lal Kitab. Publishing of all editions of Lal Kitab >> >> > in Hindi >> >> > > > is >> >> > > > under way. Origin and authorship of Lal Kitab is disputed. >> >> Unlike >> >> > classical >> >> > > > astrology, there is no supporting text available for Lal Kitab. >> >> > Not many >> >> > > > practical case studies have been given in Lal Kitab to >> >> understand >> >> > it >> >> > > > properly. This makes Lal Kitab at most a research material and >> >> > people who >> >> > > > want to devote a lot of time to research are only suited to Lal >> >> > Kitab at >> >> > > > this point of time. Lal Kitab is a comprehensive system which >> >> > talks about >> >> > > > palmistry, vastu, phrenology, astrology, remedies etc. and I >> >> have >> >> > not seen >> >> > > > even a single Lal Kitab astrologer who understand these fully. >> >> > Most of the >> >> > > > Lal Kitab astrologers, including myself, have limited knowledge >> >> > of Lal >> >> > > > Kitab. There are no gurus but all students. In my opinion, we >> >> are >> >> > still few >> >> > > > years fromt the time when we can systematically document Lal >> >> Kitab >> >> > > > knowledge >> >> > > > in easy to understand form. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Thanks & Regards, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Punit Pandey >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mohit Goel <mr_mohitg (AT) (DOT) >> >> > com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=mr_mohitg% >> >> > 40> > >> >> > > > wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Dear Puneet ji >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > i would also like to join Mr Saini in requesting you about >> >> > details on >> >> > > > below >> >> > > > > questions. i am regular reader on this forum and since long i >> >> > have been >> >> > > > > wishing if someone could advise if some formal courses on lal >> >> > kitaab can >> >> > > > be >> >> > > > > conducted for learners and to start a school /platform where >> >> > learned >> >> > > > gurus >> >> > > > > of LK can enlightned the new comers >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > regards >> >> > > > > Mohit >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > " parm@citizenglobal . >> >> > co.uk<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=parm% >> >> > 40citizenglobal. co.uk><parm% 40citizenglob >> >> > > > al.co.uk> " < >> >> > > > > parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) >> >> > co.uk<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=parm% >> >> > 40citizenglobal. co.uk><parm% 40citizenglob >> >> > > > al.co.uk> > >> >> > > > > lalkitab@ >> >> > s.com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=lalkitab% >> >> > 40. com><lalkitab% 40gr >> >> > > > oups.com> >> >> > > > > Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 4:31:13 AM >> >> > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal >> >> > Kitab Group >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Dear Puneet ji, >> >> > > > > Really appreciate your logical explanation to Parminders >> >> > concerns. I have >> >> > > > > always been inclined to Lap kitab for some unknown reason. >> >> This >> >> > mail us >> >> > > > to >> >> > > > > all Lal Kitab experts and is to seek your expert advise to >> >> > assist in >> >> > > > > exploring Lal Kitab to the deepest level possible. Concerns / >> >> > Questions >> >> > > > are >> >> > > > > : >> >> > > > > 1. Which is the best reference Lal Kitab and where visit >> >> > available. >> >> > > > > 2. Which is the authentic Lal Kitab software to make >> >> horoscope. >> >> > > > > 3. Contact details of reliable Lal Kitab expert to seek >> >> advise. >> >> > > > > 4. Any formal courses available on Lal Kitab remedies. >> >> > > > > Thanking you in anticipation for your kind favour >> >> > > > > Parm Saini >> >> > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) >> >> > com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=punitp% >> >> > 40gmail.com> <punitp%40gmail. com>> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:26:29 >> >> > > > > <lalkitab@grou p >> >> > s.com<http://us.mc01g. mail... com/mc/compose? to=lalkitab% >> >> > 40. com><lalkitab% 40gr >> >> > > > oups.com> > >> >> > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal >> >> > Kitab Group >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Dear Parminder ji, >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > When you have written that " Right now where the planet of his >> >> > kundli will >> >> > > > > be >> >> > > > > placed after that remedy " , it shows incorrect understanding of >> >> > Lal Kitab >> >> > > > > which has been propagated by some of the Lal Kitab books. >> >> > Though I >> >> > > > believe >> >> > > > > that Pt. Krishna Ashant's book is a good book on Lal Kiab, but >> >> > the >> >> > > > > reasoning >> >> > > > > given in that book for remedies is *totally incorrect and >> >> > should not be >> >> > > > > followed*. In my opinon, most of so called Lal Kitab experts >> >> > don't >> >> > > > > understand the functioning of remedies and keep writing such >> >> > books due to >> >> > > > > ignorance or lack of understanding. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > One can not move planet from one house to another house. There >> >> > is no such >> >> > > > > magic given in Lal Kitab. Moving planet is not at all teaching >> >> > of Lal >> >> > > > > Kitab. >> >> > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned some methods like taking help from >> >> > another >> >> > > > planet, >> >> > > > > praying a planet, trying to reduce affect of some planet, and >> >> > removing >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > > mansui planet from the root of a planet etc. Working of Lal >> >> > Kitab >> >> > > > remedies >> >> > > > > has been explained clearly in Lal Kitab and we should stick to >> >> > what is >> >> > > > > writen in 5 editions of Lal Kitab. Though due to complex >> >> > language used in >> >> > > > > Lal Kitab, one needs to read Lal Kitab again and again to >> >> > understand it.. >> >> > > > As >> >> > > > > we can not move planets, there is no need to worry about the >> >> > post-remedy >> >> > > > > placement of the planets and suggest remedies based on the >> >> > planetary >> >> > > > > positions in birth chart and year chart. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Thanks & Regards, >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Punit Pandey >> >> > > > > http://www.PunitAst rologer.com >> >> > <http://www.punitast rologer.com/> >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:40 PM, parminder singh >> >> > <pammisaggu<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? >> >> > to=pammisaggu% 40> <pammisaggu% >> >> > > > 40> >> >> > > > > >wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Hi all member of LK group, >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > I just started to read LK (Arun Shita) also I have a LAL >> >> > kitab (Pt. >> >> > > > > Krishan >> >> > > > > > Asant), I want to know one thing that is if someone already >> >> > done some >> >> > > > > remedy >> >> > > > > > by diffrent LK pundits and after that He/she will come to me >> >> > or someone >> >> > > > > else >> >> > > > > > then howcome I will give him/her exact remedy bec. i don't >> >> > know that >> >> > > > how >> >> > > > > > much remedy he done and how my astrologer he changed to >> >> > improve his >> >> > > > > status. >> >> > > > > > Right now where the planet of his kundli will be placed >> >> after >> >> > that >> >> > > > > remedy. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > in wait of your reply >> >> > > > > > parminder saggu >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Dear punit ji, First of all please accept my apologies for making things " senseless " to you. May be i left a " gap to be filled " by yourself.By me saying that " if it wasn't for the divine blessing we wouldn't be having this discussion " meant that it was only because of some special divine blessing on a special person (Pt. roop chand ji) that we are now following/reading this granth and discussing it today. Secondly by all due respect sir i am not having an argument with a person like yourself, where my knowledge and experience stands no chance in front of yours. Last but not the least, things u call " hindrances " are very supportive tools in my opinion and i strongly believe that along with proper research, calculation and knowledge an astrologer is not complete without these tools or else half of india would be practising astrology. I do agree with you on one point though and that is, not to argue as it is endless and more so, noone can change the way other ppl think. Yours respectfuly Jitin Syal lalkitab , Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Dear Jitin ji, > > *You again misinterpreted.* I didn't say that " I don't care about the > origin of lal kitab " . What I said is that " I am not bothered whether > spirituality/ intuition/ divine power is required or not for the creation of > such 'grantha' like Lal Kitab. " I hope you understand the difference. Rest > of your email is based on this misinterpretation and really not making any > sense to me. > > Please don't make arguments for the sake of making arguments. You say that > " By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition power/spiritual > qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " today. Now I am claerly > telling that " application " of astrology doesn't require divine blessing/ > intuition/ spiritual poswer. Why are you relating this with " discussion " , > sleeping, eating or any walking. I have not said anything whether diving > blessing is required for discussion or not. We don't want to discuss > miracles but want to discuss Lal Kitab application. Isn't it? > > I may be absolutely incorrect, but this is not the right place to discuss > intuition, divine blessings, spiritual powers, jaadu, tona, magic and > totaks. This is the place to discuss Lal Kitab application. *As I mentioned > in my last email, things like intuition, divine blessings, spiritual powers > are hindrance in the systematic learning of astrology. * > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82wrote: > > > Dear punit ji, > > Good to see that a learned person like yourself believes in his own > > abilities and capabilities so much so that he does not see the need > > for any other help. > > > > Sir you don't care about the origin of lal kitab, YET want to > > follow/carry research on it. Perhaps that is why you despite of your > > best efforts and knowledge are still not able to " fill the gap " . > > no offence mate but i thought i have the right to express my feelings > > just like you do. > > > > By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition > > power/spiritual qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " > > today. > > > > Good on you > > > > Jitin Syal > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40>, Punit Pandey > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > > > > > You got it right. I am exactly saying so. To reiterate, a good > > astrologer > > > DOES NOT need to have some sort of intuition power/divine > > blessing/spiritual > > > quality in order to assist him/her. > > > > > > This statement is related to the application of astrology and not > > origin of > > > astrology. I am not bothered whether spirituality/ intuition/ > > divine power > > > is required or not for the creation of such " grantha " like Lal > > Kitab. > > > Originiation is not my problem and we are not going to write a new > > Lal Kitab > > > in this forum. What I am bothered about is the application of the > > rules > > > which are already avaible in the " grantha " like Lal Kitab. And for > > that, I > > > will repeat again that there is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED of spirituality/ > > divine > > > blessings/ spirual power. I hope I am clear now. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:10 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82@>wrote: > > > > > > > Dear punit ji, > > > > Are you saying that a good astrologer doesn't need to have some > > sort > > > > of intution power/divine blessing/spritiual quality in order to > > > > assist him/her? > > > > > > > > Are you saying astrology is purely calculation and application? > > > > > > > > If yes, then would be kind enough to explain the origin of lal > > kitab > > > > or any other " granth " for that matter. > > > > > > > > regards > > > > jitin syal > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab% 40><lalkitab% > > 40>, > > Punit Pandey > > > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > > > If a period is good, one doesn't even require astrology to > > predict > > > > > correctly. Whatever you will say in your fruitful period will > > come > > > > out > > > > > correct. Beauty of astrology is to predict correctly all the > > time .. > > > > > consistently. Astrology is not a magic but a systematic method > > to > > > > predict > > > > > past, present and future. In my opinion, intuition and divine > > > > blessings are > > > > > the tools invented by astrologers to safe-guard themselves. > > > > Something should > > > > > be there to blame upon in case of incorrect predictions. Isn't > > it? > > > > > Astrologers should stop fooling themselves and the public by > > > > introducing all > > > > > these intuition factors. > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a systematic method for developing predictive > > > > capabilities. It > > > > > takes time and efforts. An astrologer has to get into the skin > > of > > > > planets, > > > > > signs, nakshatras, bhavas etc. and feel them/ think like them in > > > > order to > > > > > predict correctly. All astrology texts teaches us how to apply > > > > knowledge > > > > > given in the texts. All astrology texts has given sound and > > > > systematic > > > > > methods. Those texts don't tell use to sit in padmasana and > > > > meditate to > > > > > learn astrology. If people call 'predictive ability' a 'diving > > > > blessings/ > > > > > intuiation', that is OK because then it is not a tool to fool > > > > yourself and > > > > > others. But this magical, undocumented, extra-terrestial > > meaning of > > > > > 'intuition/ divine blessings' is nothing but absurd in my > > opinion. > > > > These > > > > > words are big hindrance in the path of systematic development of > > > > astrology. > > > > > These are even bigger challenge for Lal Kitab, because some of > > the > > > > so called > > > > > Lal Kitab experts project this book as divine book and that > > stops > > > > further > > > > > research and development. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Madhavan <chims45@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > -Dear all, > > > > > > I fully endorse the opinion of Ashish ji, > > > > > > If only the good time prevails for both native and astrolger, > > > > their > > > > > > wont be any effective prediction and parihars. > > > > > > The astroleger may be good - but for himself is surrounded by > > bad > > > > > > period, then his predictions may not be appreciated but > > > > disowned.He > > > > > > would have unfolded mystry, but the credits would be given to > > > > unknown > > > > > > person. Even a street passer's good wish of the occasion > > would be > > > > > > given weightage than the renowned astrolgers. > > > > > > thats why i used to say, if my time is good you will > > appreciate my > > > > > > prediction- if bad times, you will blame me or totally forget > > me > > > > for > > > > > > the occasion when you are enjoying the fruits. > > > > > > Regarding the Native's good time, even good astroleger could > > not > > > > right > > > > > > time and satan will play its role in misinterepting the right > > > > > > prediction.parihars not performed. > > > > > > Thats why the upasakas are more respected than astrolgers with > > > > just > > > > > > few calculations(computer like) > > > > > > > > > > > > regds > > > > > > madhavan > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In lalkitab <lalkitab% 40><lalkitab% > > 40> > > <lalkitab% > > > > 40>, " Asheesh > > > > > > > > > > Mathur " <asheesh.mathur@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > Predictions are mystique and require meditation, intuition > > and > > > > above > > > > > > > all HIS Blessings for both Native and the Astrologer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology / predictions are not mathematical or pure > > logical, > > > > they > > > > > > > are sprinkled with the astrologers experience and cosmic > > > > > > > fecilitation. Otherwise a smart computer program could > > predict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A native will visit a good astrologer, specifically a Lal > > Kitab > > > > one > > > > > > > only if he's destined to do get benefit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Native may listen to upayes, but may not perform them. May > > be > > > > nature > > > > > > > will prevent him from doing that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord Ram had to suffer for 14 years in exile. Same is the > > case > > > > with > > > > > > > Pandavas, they had access to best astrologers in their > > court. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know of one LK Expert, who transformed me 25 years back. I > > > > have > > > > > > > seen miracles with his remedies, but now despite my trials, > > am > > > > > > unable > > > > > > > to trace him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remembers Astrologers predicting are revealing secrets of > > God , > > > > > > their > > > > > > > bosses. Which Boss would like his secretary or juniors who > > have > > > > > > > access to CR reveal it prematurely. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remember Ramayana, Rama was to be made King, big saints > > decided > > > > the > > > > > > > auspicious Muhurata, there were good Shaguns all around and > > at > > > > the > > > > > > > last moment tables turned upside down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggest we accept astrology/palmistry in light of above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a good lively forum with lots of gifted souls, > > > > intersting > > > > > > > threads, once again these are only my views and may not be > > > > correct > > > > > > or > > > > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please excuse me if I have hurt your feelings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Asheesh > > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab% 40><lalkitab% > > 40><lalkitab% > > > > > > 40>, > > > > Punit > > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Raveesh ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the problem with the Lal Kitab. All are discussing > > > > what is > > > > > > > written > > > > > > > > in Lal Kitab and there in efforts to understand it. To > > me, it > > > > > > > really doesn't > > > > > > > > matter whether there is '2' or '5' in front of the row for > > > > 25th > > > > > > > year. What > > > > > > > > matters is to understand why that table is like that. Now > > it > > > > also > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > matter whether there were 10 disciples or 100 disciples. > > > > Whether > > > > > > > there were > > > > > > > > 10 books or 100 books. This is all gone and we should move > > > > forward > > > > > > > now. If > > > > > > > > we can not learn from 5 books, we can not learn from 50 > > books > > > > as > > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the discussion that I have seen is on X planet in > > Y > > > > house > > > > > > > and what > > > > > > > > will be the remedy. To me, that not only is incorrent but > > also > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > matter. The matter is why those remedies are like that. > > There > > > > is > > > > > > no > > > > > > > efforts > > > > > > > > in that direction. I am watching Lal Kitab discussions on > > > > Internet > > > > > > > for so > > > > > > > > long but never seen even a one single discussion whether > > of > > > > > > > academic nature > > > > > > > > on the grammar of Lal Kitab. People will have to go > > beyond the > > > > > > > books and > > > > > > > > will have to use their reasoning to understand > > application of > > > > Lal > > > > > > > Kitab. And > > > > > > > > for doing that, I believe the knowledge of classical > > > > astrology is > > > > > > a > > > > > > > must > > > > > > > > because classical astrology can provide us the missing > > links. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, raveesh sethi > > <raveesh_13@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Members and moderator Puneet Ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Few things i have come to know . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Lalkitaab founder or the person who wrote this had 10 > > > > diciples > > > > > > > and 10 > > > > > > > > > books were published by him , according to few people > > who > > > > follow > > > > > > > lalkitaab > > > > > > > > > theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. out of those 10 i think no one is alive now ., yes > > lal > > > > kitaab > > > > > > > is oen of > > > > > > > > > the most effective theory but if if it is practicsed > > with > > > > the > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > knowledge then it helps, but another group of > > astrologers > > > > say > > > > > > > that it has to > > > > > > > > > undergo changes in remedies as most of these remedies > > are > > > > based > > > > > > > on old > > > > > > > > > concepts and with new thinsg and environment , > > situations > > > > are > > > > > > > changing these > > > > > > > > > remmdies should also change, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now i came to know of few things on which astrolgers > > have > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > opinions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 25th year if u see varshaphal sarini under 5th house > > the > > > > > > > number is 5 but > > > > > > > > > according to few experts and astrologers of lal kitaab > > it > > > > should > > > > > > > be no 2 not > > > > > > > > > 5 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now question is if we get to know any pperson who has > > any > > > > copy > > > > > > of > > > > > > > those 10 > > > > > > > > > books published during that time then things will be > > much > > > > more > > > > > > > easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Warm Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh Kumar Sethi* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Wed, 2/18/09, Punit Pandey <punitp@>* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in > > Lal > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > Group > > > > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab% 40><lalkitab% > > 40><lalkitab% > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 1:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohit ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have documented response to Saini ji at > > > > > > > > > http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro > > > > > > > logy/,<http://www.astrocamp.com/Vedic Astrology/,>which can > > be an > > > > > > > online reference > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for knowing available books on Lal Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Truly speaking, I don't think that Lal Kitab can be > > taught > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > form of a > > > > > > > > > formal course at this point of time. Right now, Lal > > Kitab in > > > > > > > itself is in > > > > > > > > > research mode. Lal Kitab astrologers don't agree > > themselves > > > > on > > > > > > > the basic > > > > > > > > > principles of Lal Kitab. Publishing of all editions of > > Lal > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > in Hindi > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > under way. Origin and authorship of Lal Kitab is > > disputed. > > > > > > Unlike > > > > > > > classical > > > > > > > > > astrology, there is no supporting text available for Lal > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > Not many > > > > > > > > > practical case studies have been given in Lal Kitab to > > > > > > understand > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > properly. This makes Lal Kitab at most a research > > material > > > > and > > > > > > > people who > > > > > > > > > want to devote a lot of time to research are only > > suited to > > > > Lal > > > > > > > Kitab at > > > > > > > > > this point of time. Lal Kitab is a comprehensive system > > > > which > > > > > > > talks about > > > > > > > > > palmistry, vastu, phrenology, astrology, remedies etc. > > and I > > > > > > have > > > > > > > not seen > > > > > > > > > even a single Lal Kitab astrologer who understand these > > > > fully. > > > > > > > Most of the > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab astrologers, including myself, have limited > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > Kitab. There are no gurus but all students. In my > > opinion, > > > > we > > > > > > are > > > > > > > still few > > > > > > > > > years fromt the time when we can systematically > > document Lal > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > > in easy to understand form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mohit Goel > > > > <mr_mohitg (AT) (DOT) > > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? to=mr_mohitg% > > > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i would also like to join Mr Saini in requesting you > > about > > > > > > > details on > > > > > > > > > below > > > > > > > > > > questions. i am regular reader on this forum and since > > > > long i > > > > > > > have been > > > > > > > > > > wishing if someone could advise if some formal > > courses on > > > > lal > > > > > > > kitaab can > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > conducted for learners and to start a school /platform > > > > where > > > > > > > learned > > > > > > > > > gurus > > > > > > > > > > of LK can enlightned the new comers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > Mohit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% > > > > > > > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob > > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> " < > > > > > > > > > > parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% > > > > > > > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob > > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ > > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? to=lalkitab% > > > > > > > 40><lalkitab%40gr > > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 4:31:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone > > in > > > > Lal > > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji, > > > > > > > > > > Really appreciate your logical explanation to > > Parminders > > > > > > > concerns. I have > > > > > > > > > > always been inclined to Lap kitab for some unknown > > reason. > > > > > > This > > > > > > > mail us > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > all Lal Kitab experts and is to seek your expert > > advise to > > > > > > > assist in > > > > > > > > > > exploring Lal Kitab to the deepest level possible. > > > > Concerns / > > > > > > > Questions > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > 1. Which is the best reference Lal Kitab and where > > visit > > > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > > > 2. Which is the authentic Lal Kitab software to make > > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > 3. Contact details of reliable Lal Kitab expert to > > seek > > > > > > advise. > > > > > > > > > > 4. Any formal courses available on Lal Kitab remedies. > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you in anticipation for your kind favour > > > > > > > > > > Parm Saini > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) > > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=punitp% > > > > > > > 40gmail.com><punitp%40gmail. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:26:29 > > > > > > > > > > <lalkitab@ > > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? to=lalkitab% > > > > > > > 40><lalkitab%40gr > > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone > > in > > > > Lal > > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Parminder ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you have written that " Right now where the > > planet of > > > > his > > > > > > > kundli will > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > placed after that remedy " , it shows incorrect > > > > understanding of > > > > > > > Lal Kitab > > > > > > > > > > which has been propagated by some of the Lal Kitab > > books. > > > > > > > Though I > > > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > > > that Pt. Krishna Ashant's book is a good book on Lal > > > > Kiab, but > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > reasoning > > > > > > > > > > given in that book for remedies is *totally incorrect > > and > > > > > > > should not be > > > > > > > > > > followed*. In my opinon, most of so called Lal Kitab > > > > experts > > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > > understand the functioning of remedies and keep > > writing > > > > such > > > > > > > books due to > > > > > > > > > > ignorance or lack of understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One can not move planet from one house to another > > house. > > > > There > > > > > > > is no such > > > > > > > > > > magic given in Lal Kitab. Moving planet is not at all > > > > teaching > > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned some methods like taking help > > from > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > > > planet, > > > > > > > > > > praying a planet, trying to reduce affect of some > > planet, > > > > and > > > > > > > removing > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > mansui planet from the root of a planet etc. Working > > of > > > > Lal > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > has been explained clearly in Lal Kitab and we should > > > > stick to > > > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > > > writen in 5 editions of Lal Kitab. Though due to > > complex > > > > > > > language used in > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab, one needs to read Lal Kitab again and > > again to > > > > > > > understand it. > > > > > > > > > As > > > > > > > > > > we can not move planets, there is no need to worry > > about > > > > the > > > > > > > post-remedy > > > > > > > > > > placement of the planets and suggest remedies based > > on the > > > > > > > planetary > > > > > > > > > > positions in birth chart and year chart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > http://www.PunitAst rologer.com > > > > > > > <http://www.punitastrologer.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:40 PM, parminder singh > > > > > > > <pammisaggu (AT) (DOT) > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? > > > > > > > to=pammisaggu%40><pammisaggu% > > > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all member of LK group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just started to read LK (Arun Shita) also I have > > a LAL > > > > > > > kitab (Pt. > > > > > > > > > > Krishan > > > > > > > > > > > Asant), I want to know one thing that is if someone > > > > already > > > > > > > done some > > > > > > > > > > remedy > > > > > > > > > > > by diffrent LK pundits and after that He/she will > > come > > > > to me > > > > > > > or someone > > > > > > > > > > else > > > > > > > > > > > then howcome I will give him/her exact remedy bec. i > > > > don't > > > > > > > know that > > > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > > > much remedy he done and how my astrologer he > > changed to > > > > > > > improve his > > > > > > > > > > status. > > > > > > > > > > > Right now where the planet of his kundli will be > > placed > > > > > > after > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > remedy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in wait of your reply > > > > > > > > > > > parminder saggu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to > > > > > > > > > > http://messenger. / > > > > > > > invite/<http://messenger./invite/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Dear Jitin ji, Astrology is not something developed by Pt. Roop Chand Joshi. He just collected and may be further developed something which was already available. Classical astrology is very very rich. Before Lal Kitab, astrology was not non-existent in India. I think it is dangerous associating 'divine' word with Lal Kitab. By labeling something 'divine', we make it non-questionable. We can not criticize it, we can not disagree. This is a big problem in the learning. Do you understand? Let me give you an example. KP System is the most accurate predictive astrological system known to me. It is also developed by a human. But that human never claimed himself to be divine. Also nobody labeled him as divine. Everybody kept it at 'human' level. Due to that, KP system has developed and matured as one of the finest astrological system available today. On the contrary, people have harmed Lal Kitab a lot by labeling it 'divine'. If you don't want other people to learn any subject, you can label as 'divine'. By labeling it as 'divine' we are creating a Taliban kind of society in which what is written in book is correct .. no arguments ... no questions ... no difference of opinion and hence no development. Don't you see that conspiracy? Development of astrology, like any other subject is just a normal knowledge development process and nothing 'divine'. It is very important to understand and without understanding this we can not progress. Like any science, astrology also has a process by which we can develop it. One need to follow that development process and whatever works need to be documented. Nothing divine about it. Till the time one doesn't understand the development process, s/he will think it is divine. This is natural for any junior astrology student to think it 'divine'. In fact, when I first studied 'Einstein's Theory of Relativity', I thought that this subject can not be developed by a human, because it was too complex for me to comprehend. Though once I understood the development process, I understood that this is also a work of human. Once I understood the development process, I understood that there is no 'divinity' here. You call them " supportive tools " but I am sure that you will not be having any proof for that. You just feel that way because you are taught that way ... you are told that way. You " strongly believe " that because you are programmed that way like most of us. Astrology is divine .. astrology is divine ... astrology is divine. People kept telling us that way and then we started believing it. It is normal psychology. It happens with everybody. But it is important to throw-away that 'divine' tag and try to learn the actual subject. *That is the only way we can learn it. *This is the point I strongly want to communicate to the Lal Kitab community, and that is the reason I spent so much time replying your email. I hope you will understand the reason of writing these emails and take it in positively. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82wrote: > Dear punit ji, > First of all please accept my apologies for making things " senseless " > to you. May be i left a " gap to be filled " by yourself.By me saying > that " if it wasn't for the divine blessing we wouldn't be having this > discussion " meant that it was only because of some special divine > blessing on a special person (Pt. roop chand ji) that we are now > following/reading this granth and discussing it today. > > Secondly by all due respect sir i am not having an argument with a > person like yourself, where my knowledge and experience stands no > chance in front of yours. > > Last but not the least, things u call " hindrances " are very > supportive tools in my opinion and i strongly believe that along with > proper research, calculation and knowledge an astrologer is not > complete without these tools or else half of india would be > practising astrology. > > I do agree with you on one point though and that is, not to argue as > it is endless and more so, noone can change the way other ppl think. > > Yours respectfuly > > Jitin Syal > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40>, Punit Pandey > <punitp wrote: > > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > > > *You again misinterpreted.* I didn't say that " I don't care about > the > > origin of lal kitab " . What I said is that " I am not bothered whether > > spirituality/ intuition/ divine power is required or not for the > creation of > > such 'grantha' like Lal Kitab. " I hope you understand the > difference. Rest > > of your email is based on this misinterpretation and really not > making any > > sense to me. > > > > Please don't make arguments for the sake of making arguments. You > say that > > " By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition > power/spiritual > > qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " today. Now I am > claerly > > telling that " application " of astrology doesn't require divine > blessing/ > > intuition/ spiritual poswer. Why are you relating this > with " discussion " , > > sleeping, eating or any walking. I have not said anything whether > diving > > blessing is required for discussion or not. We don't want to discuss > > miracles but want to discuss Lal Kitab application. Isn't it? > > > > I may be absolutely incorrect, but this is not the right place to > discuss > > intuition, divine blessings, spiritual powers, jaadu, tona, magic > and > > totaks. This is the place to discuss Lal Kitab application. *As I > mentioned > > in my last email, things like intuition, divine blessings, > spiritual powers > > are hindrance in the systematic learning of astrology. * > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82wrote: > > > > > Dear punit ji, > > > Good to see that a learned person like yourself believes in his > own > > > abilities and capabilities so much so that he does not see the > need > > > for any other help. > > > > > > Sir you don't care about the origin of lal kitab, YET want to > > > follow/carry research on it. Perhaps that is why you despite of > your > > > best efforts and knowledge are still not able to " fill the gap " . > > > no offence mate but i thought i have the right to express my > feelings > > > just like you do. > > > > > > By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition > > > power/spiritual qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " > > > today. > > > > > > Good on you > > > > > > Jitin Syal > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40>, > Punit Pandey > > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > > > > > > > You got it right. I am exactly saying so. To reiterate, a good > > > astrologer > > > > DOES NOT need to have some sort of intuition power/divine > > > blessing/spiritual > > > > quality in order to assist him/her. > > > > > > > > This statement is related to the application of astrology and > not > > > origin of > > > > astrology. I am not bothered whether spirituality/ intuition/ > > > divine power > > > > is required or not for the creation of such " grantha " like Lal > > > Kitab. > > > > Originiation is not my problem and we are not going to write a > new > > > Lal Kitab > > > > in this forum. What I am bothered about is the application of > the > > > rules > > > > which are already avaible in the " grantha " like Lal Kitab. And > for > > > that, I > > > > will repeat again that there is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED of > spirituality/ > > > divine > > > > blessings/ spirual power. I hope I am clear now. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:10 PM, jitinsyal82 > <jitinsyal82@>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear punit ji, > > > > > Are you saying that a good astrologer doesn't need to have > some > > > sort > > > > > of intution power/divine blessing/spritiual quality in order > to > > > > > assist him/her? > > > > > > > > > > Are you saying astrology is purely calculation and > application? > > > > > > > > > > If yes, then would be kind enough to explain the origin of lal > > > kitab > > > > > or any other " granth " for that matter. > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > jitin syal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40><lalkitab% > > > > 40>, > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > If a period is good, one doesn't even require astrology to > > > predict > > > > > > correctly. Whatever you will say in your fruitful period > will > > > come > > > > > out > > > > > > correct. Beauty of astrology is to predict correctly all the > > > time .. > > > > > > consistently. Astrology is not a magic but a systematic > method > > > to > > > > > predict > > > > > > past, present and future. In my opinion, intuition and > divine > > > > > blessings are > > > > > > the tools invented by astrologers to safe-guard themselves. > > > > > Something should > > > > > > be there to blame upon in case of incorrect predictions. > Isn't > > > it? > > > > > > Astrologers should stop fooling themselves and the public by > > > > > introducing all > > > > > > these intuition factors. > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a systematic method for developing predictive > > > > > capabilities. It > > > > > > takes time and efforts. An astrologer has to get into the > skin > > > of > > > > > planets, > > > > > > signs, nakshatras, bhavas etc. and feel them/ think like > them in > > > > > order to > > > > > > predict correctly. All astrology texts teaches us how to > apply > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > given in the texts. All astrology texts has given sound and > > > > > systematic > > > > > > methods. Those texts don't tell use to sit in padmasana and > > > > > meditate to > > > > > > learn astrology. If people call 'predictive ability' > a 'diving > > > > > blessings/ > > > > > > intuiation', that is OK because then it is not a tool to > fool > > > > > yourself and > > > > > > others. But this magical, undocumented, extra-terrestial > > > meaning of > > > > > > 'intuition/ divine blessings' is nothing but absurd in my > > > opinion. > > > > > These > > > > > > words are big hindrance in the path of systematic > development of > > > > > astrology. > > > > > > These are even bigger challenge for Lal Kitab, because some > of > > > the > > > > > so called > > > > > > Lal Kitab experts project this book as divine book and that > > > stops > > > > > further > > > > > > research and development. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Madhavan <chims45@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Dear all, > > > > > > > I fully endorse the opinion of Ashish ji, > > > > > > > If only the good time prevails for both native and > astrolger, > > > > > their > > > > > > > wont be any effective prediction and parihars. > > > > > > > The astroleger may be good - but for himself is > surrounded by > > > bad > > > > > > > period, then his predictions may not be appreciated but > > > > > disowned.He > > > > > > > would have unfolded mystry, but the credits would be > given to > > > > > unknown > > > > > > > person. Even a street passer's good wish of the occasion > > > would be > > > > > > > given weightage than the renowned astrolgers. > > > > > > > thats why i used to say, if my time is good you will > > > appreciate my > > > > > > > prediction- if bad times, you will blame me or totally > forget > > > me > > > > > for > > > > > > > the occasion when you are enjoying the fruits. > > > > > > > Regarding the Native's good time, even good astroleger > could > > > not > > > > > right > > > > > > > time and satan will play its role in misinterepting the > right > > > > > > > prediction.parihars not performed. > > > > > > > Thats why the upasakas are more respected than astrolgers > with > > > > > just > > > > > > > few calculations(computer like) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regds > > > > > > > madhavan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40><lalkitab% > > > 40> > > > <lalkitab% > > > > > 40>, " Asheesh > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathur " <asheesh.mathur@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > Predictions are mystique and require meditation, > intuition > > > and > > > > > above > > > > > > > > all HIS Blessings for both Native and the Astrologer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology / predictions are not mathematical or pure > > > logical, > > > > > they > > > > > > > > are sprinkled with the astrologers experience and cosmic > > > > > > > > fecilitation. Otherwise a smart computer program could > > > predict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A native will visit a good astrologer, specifically a > Lal > > > Kitab > > > > > one > > > > > > > > only if he's destined to do get benefit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Native may listen to upayes, but may not perform them. > May > > > be > > > > > nature > > > > > > > > will prevent him from doing that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord Ram had to suffer for 14 years in exile. Same is > the > > > case > > > > > with > > > > > > > > Pandavas, they had access to best astrologers in their > > > court. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know of one LK Expert, who transformed me 25 years > back. I > > > > > have > > > > > > > > seen miracles with his remedies, but now despite my > trials, > > > am > > > > > > > unable > > > > > > > > to trace him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remembers Astrologers predicting are revealing secrets > of > > > God , > > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > bosses. Which Boss would like his secretary or juniors > who > > > have > > > > > > > > access to CR reveal it prematurely. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remember Ramayana, Rama was to be made King, big saints > > > decided > > > > > the > > > > > > > > auspicious Muhurata, there were good Shaguns all around > and > > > at > > > > > the > > > > > > > > last moment tables turned upside down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggest we accept astrology/palmistry in light of above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a good lively forum with lots of gifted souls, > > > > > intersting > > > > > > > > threads, once again these are only my views and may not > be > > > > > correct > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please excuse me if I have hurt your feelings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Asheesh > > > > > > > > lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40><lalkitab% > > > 40><lalkitab% > > > > > > > > 40>, > > > > > Punit > > > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Raveesh ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the problem with the Lal Kitab. All are > discussing > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > written > > > > > > > > > in Lal Kitab and there in efforts to understand it. To > > > me, it > > > > > > > > really doesn't > > > > > > > > > matter whether there is '2' or '5' in front of the > row for > > > > > 25th > > > > > > > > year. What > > > > > > > > > matters is to understand why that table is like that. > Now > > > it > > > > > also > > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > > matter whether there were 10 disciples or 100 > disciples. > > > > > Whether > > > > > > > > there were > > > > > > > > > 10 books or 100 books. This is all gone and we should > move > > > > > forward > > > > > > > > now. If > > > > > > > > > we can not learn from 5 books, we can not learn from > 50 > > > books > > > > > as > > > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the discussion that I have seen is on X > planet in > > > Y > > > > > house > > > > > > > > and what > > > > > > > > > will be the remedy. To me, that not only is incorrent > but > > > also > > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > > matter. The matter is why those remedies are like > that. > > > There > > > > > is > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > efforts > > > > > > > > > in that direction. I am watching Lal Kitab > discussions on > > > > > Internet > > > > > > > > for so > > > > > > > > > long but never seen even a one single discussion > whether > > > of > > > > > > > > academic nature > > > > > > > > > on the grammar of Lal Kitab. People will have to go > > > beyond the > > > > > > > > books and > > > > > > > > > will have to use their reasoning to understand > > > application of > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab. And > > > > > > > > > for doing that, I believe the knowledge of classical > > > > > astrology is > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > must > > > > > > > > > because classical astrology can provide us the missing > > > links. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, raveesh sethi > > > <raveesh_13@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Members and moderator Puneet Ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Few things i have come to know . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Lalkitaab founder or the person who wrote this > had 10 > > > > > diciples > > > > > > > > and 10 > > > > > > > > > > books were published by him , according to few > people > > > who > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > lalkitaab > > > > > > > > > > theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. out of those 10 i think no one is alive now ., > yes > > > lal > > > > > kitaab > > > > > > > > is oen of > > > > > > > > > > the most effective theory but if if it is practicsed > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > knowledge then it helps, but another group of > > > astrologers > > > > > say > > > > > > > > that it has to > > > > > > > > > > undergo changes in remedies as most of these > remedies > > > are > > > > > based > > > > > > > > on old > > > > > > > > > > concepts and with new thinsg and environment , > > > situations > > > > > are > > > > > > > > changing these > > > > > > > > > > remmdies should also change, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now i came to know of few things on which astrolgers > > > have > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > opinions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 25th year if u see varshaphal sarini under 5th > house > > > the > > > > > > > > number is 5 but > > > > > > > > > > according to few experts and astrologers of lal > kitaab > > > it > > > > > should > > > > > > > > be no 2 not > > > > > > > > > > 5 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now question is if we get to know any pperson who > has > > > any > > > > > copy > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > those 10 > > > > > > > > > > books published during that time then things will be > > > much > > > > > more > > > > > > > > easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Warm Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh Kumar Sethi* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Wed, 2/18/09, Punit Pandey <punitp@>* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > anyone in > > > Lal > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > Group > > > > > > > > > > To: lalkitab <lalkitab%40><lalkitab% > 40><lalkitab% > > > 40><lalkitab% > > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 1:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohit ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have documented response to Saini ji at > > > > > > > > > > http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro > > > > > > > > logy/,<http://www.astrocamp.com/Vedic Astrology/,>which > can > > > be an > > > > > > > > online reference > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for knowing available books on Lal Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Truly speaking, I don't think that Lal Kitab can be > > > taught > > > > > in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > form of a > > > > > > > > > > formal course at this point of time. Right now, Lal > > > Kitab in > > > > > > > > itself is in > > > > > > > > > > research mode. Lal Kitab astrologers don't agree > > > themselves > > > > > on > > > > > > > > the basic > > > > > > > > > > principles of Lal Kitab. Publishing of all editions > of > > > Lal > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > in Hindi > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > under way. Origin and authorship of Lal Kitab is > > > disputed. > > > > > > > Unlike > > > > > > > > classical > > > > > > > > > > astrology, there is no supporting text available > for Lal > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > Not many > > > > > > > > > > practical case studies have been given in Lal Kitab > to > > > > > > > understand > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > properly. This makes Lal Kitab at most a research > > > material > > > > > and > > > > > > > > people who > > > > > > > > > > want to devote a lot of time to research are only > > > suited to > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab at > > > > > > > > > > this point of time. Lal Kitab is a comprehensive > system > > > > > which > > > > > > > > talks about > > > > > > > > > > palmistry, vastu, phrenology, astrology, remedies > etc. > > > and I > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > not seen > > > > > > > > > > even a single Lal Kitab astrologer who understand > these > > > > > fully. > > > > > > > > Most of the > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab astrologers, including myself, have > limited > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > > Kitab. There are no gurus but all students. In my > > > opinion, > > > > > we > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > still few > > > > > > > > > > years fromt the time when we can systematically > > > document Lal > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > > > in easy to understand form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mohit Goel > > > > > <mr_mohitg (AT) (DOT) > > > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? > to=mr_mohitg% > > > > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i would also like to join Mr Saini in requesting > you > > > about > > > > > > > > details on > > > > > > > > > > below > > > > > > > > > > > questions. i am regular reader on this forum and > since > > > > > long i > > > > > > > > have been > > > > > > > > > > > wishing if someone could advise if some formal > > > courses on > > > > > lal > > > > > > > > kitaab can > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > conducted for learners and to start a > school /platform > > > > > where > > > > > > > > learned > > > > > > > > > > gurus > > > > > > > > > > > of LK can enlightned the new comers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > Mohit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% > > > > > > > > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob > > > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> " < > > > > > > > > > > > parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=parm% > > > > > > > > 40citizenglobal.co.uk><parm%40citizenglob > > > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ > > > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? > to=lalkitab% > > > > > > > > 40><lalkitab%40gr > > > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 4:31:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > anyone > > > in > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji, > > > > > > > > > > > Really appreciate your logical explanation to > > > Parminders > > > > > > > > concerns. I have > > > > > > > > > > > always been inclined to Lap kitab for some unknown > > > reason. > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > mail us > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > all Lal Kitab experts and is to seek your expert > > > advise to > > > > > > > > assist in > > > > > > > > > > > exploring Lal Kitab to the deepest level possible. > > > > > Concerns / > > > > > > > > Questions > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Which is the best reference Lal Kitab and where > > > visit > > > > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Which is the authentic Lal Kitab software to > make > > > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Contact details of reliable Lal Kitab expert to > > > seek > > > > > > > advise. > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Any formal courses available on Lal Kitab > remedies. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you in anticipation for your kind favour > > > > > > > > > > > Parm Saini > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) > > > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose?to=punitp% > > > > > > > > 40gmail.com><punitp%40gmail. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:26:29 > > > > > > > > > > > <lalkitab@ > > > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? > to=lalkitab% > > > > > > > > 40><lalkitab%40gr > > > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > anyone > > > in > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Parminder ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you have written that " Right now where the > > > planet of > > > > > his > > > > > > > > kundli will > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > placed after that remedy " , it shows incorrect > > > > > understanding of > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab > > > > > > > > > > > which has been propagated by some of the Lal Kitab > > > books. > > > > > > > > Though I > > > > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > > > > that Pt. Krishna Ashant's book is a good book on > Lal > > > > > Kiab, but > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > reasoning > > > > > > > > > > > given in that book for remedies is *totally > incorrect > > > and > > > > > > > > should not be > > > > > > > > > > > followed*. In my opinon, most of so called Lal > Kitab > > > > > experts > > > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > > > understand the functioning of remedies and keep > > > writing > > > > > such > > > > > > > > books due to > > > > > > > > > > > ignorance or lack of understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One can not move planet from one house to another > > > house. > > > > > There > > > > > > > > is no such > > > > > > > > > > > magic given in Lal Kitab. Moving planet is not at > all > > > > > teaching > > > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned some methods like taking > help > > > from > > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > > > > planet, > > > > > > > > > > > praying a planet, trying to reduce affect of some > > > planet, > > > > > and > > > > > > > > removing > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > mansui planet from the root of a planet etc. > Working > > > of > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > has been explained clearly in Lal Kitab and we > should > > > > > stick to > > > > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > > > > writen in 5 editions of Lal Kitab. Though due to > > > complex > > > > > > > > language used in > > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab, one needs to read Lal Kitab again and > > > again to > > > > > > > > understand it. > > > > > > > > > > As > > > > > > > > > > > we can not move planets, there is no need to worry > > > about > > > > > the > > > > > > > > post-remedy > > > > > > > > > > > placement of the planets and suggest remedies > based > > > on the > > > > > > > > planetary > > > > > > > > > > > positions in birth chart and year chart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.PunitAst rologer.com > > > > > > > > <http://www.punitastrologer.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:40 PM, parminder singh > > > > > > > > <pammisaggu (AT) (DOT) > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g.mail./mc/compose? > > > > > > > > to=pammisaggu%40><pammisaggu% > > > > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all member of LK group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just started to read LK (Arun Shita) also I > have > > > a LAL > > > > > > > > kitab (Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > Krishan > > > > > > > > > > > > Asant), I want to know one thing that is if > someone > > > > > already > > > > > > > > done some > > > > > > > > > > > remedy > > > > > > > > > > > > by diffrent LK pundits and after that He/she > will > > > come > > > > > to me > > > > > > > > or someone > > > > > > > > > > > else > > > > > > > > > > > > then howcome I will give him/her exact remedy > bec. i > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > know that > > > > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > > > > much remedy he done and how my astrologer he > > > changed to > > > > > > > > improve his > > > > > > > > > > > status. > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now where the planet of his kundli will be > > > placed > > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > remedy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in wait of your reply > > > > > > > > > > > > parminder saggu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go > to > > > > > > > > > > > http://messenger. / > > > > > > > > invite/<http://messenger./invite/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Dear Punit ji, Whether LK written with intuition or without intution let us try to find the rules that prompted him to give opinion. If we are unable to find rules let us analyse the rules for its merit. let future of our forum unveil the mystry by rationality. that sat madhavan ________________________________ Punit Pandey <punitp lalkitab Thursday, 19 February, 2009 6:13:42 PM Re: Fwd: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal Kitab Group Dear Jitin ji, Astrology is not something developed by Pt.. Roop Chand Joshi. He just collected and may be further developed something which was already available. Classical astrology is very very rich. Before Lal Kitab, astrology was not non-existent in India. I think it is dangerous associating 'divine' word with Lal Kitab. By labeling something 'divine', we make it non-questionable. We can not criticize it, we can not disagree. This is a big problem in the learning. Do you understand? Let me give you an example. KP System is the most accurate predictive astrological system known to me. It is also developed by a human. But that human never claimed himself to be divine. Also nobody labeled him as divine. Everybody kept it at 'human' level. Due to that, KP system has developed and matured as one of the finest astrological system available today.. On the contrary, people have harmed Lal Kitab a lot by labeling it 'divine'. If you don't want other people to learn any subject, you can label as 'divine'. By labeling it as 'divine' we are creating a Taliban kind of society in which what is written in book is correct .. no arguments ... no questions ... no difference of opinion and hence no development. Don't you see that conspiracy? Development of astrology, like any other subject is just a normal knowledge development process and nothing 'divine'. It is very important to understand and without understanding this we can not progress. Like any science, astrology also has a process by which we can develop it. One need to follow that development process and whatever works need to be documented. Nothing divine about it. Till the time one doesn't understand the development process, s/he will think it is divine. This is natural for any junior astrology student to think it 'divine'. In fact, when I first studied 'Einstein's Theory of Relativity', I thought that this subject can not be developed by a human, because it was too complex for me to comprehend. Though once I understood the development process, I understood that this is also a work of human. Once I understood the development process, I understood that there is no 'divinity' here. You call them " supportive tools " but I am sure that you will not be having any proof for that. You just feel that way because you are taught that way ... you are told that way. You " strongly believe " that because you are programmed that way like most of us. Astrology is divine .. astrology is divine ... astrology is divine. People kept telling us that way and then we started believing it. It is normal psychology. It happens with everybody. But it is important to throw-away that 'divine' tag and try to learn the actual subject. *That is the only way we can learn it. *This is the point I strongly want to communicate to the Lal Kitab community, and that is the reason I spent so much time replying your email. I hope you will understand the reason of writing these emails and take it in positively. Thanks & Regards, Punit Pandey On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82@ .co. uk>wrote: > Dear punit ji, > First of all please accept my apologies for making things " senseless " > to you. May be i left a " gap to be filled " by yourself.By me saying > that " if it wasn't for the divine blessing we wouldn't be having this > discussion " meant that it was only because of some special divine > blessing on a special person (Pt. roop chand ji) that we are now > following/reading this granth and discussing it today. > > Secondly by all due respect sir i am not having an argument with a > person like yourself, where my knowledge and experience stands no > chance in front of yours. > > Last but not the least, things u call " hindrances " are very > supportive tools in my opinion and i strongly believe that along with > proper research, calculation and knowledge an astrologer is not > complete without these tools or else half of india would be > practising astrology. > > I do agree with you on one point though and that is, not to argue as > it is endless and more so, noone can change the way other ppl think. > > Yours respectfuly > > Jitin Syal > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> , Punit Pandey > <punitp wrote: > > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > > > *You again misinterpreted. * I didn't say that " I don't care about > the > > origin of lal kitab " . What I said is that " I am not bothered whether > > spirituality/ intuition/ divine power is required or not for the > creation of > > such 'grantha' like Lal Kitab. " I hope you understand the > difference. Rest > > of your email is based on this misinterpretation and really not > making any > > sense to me. > > > > Please don't make arguments for the sake of making arguments. You > say that > > " By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition > power/spiritual > > qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " today. Now I am > claerly > > telling that " application " of astrology doesn't require divine > blessing/ > > intuition/ spiritual poswer. Why are you relating this > with " discussion " , > > sleeping, eating or any walking. I have not said anything whether > diving > > blessing is required for discussion or not. We don't want to discuss > > miracles but want to discuss Lal Kitab application. Isn't it? > > > > I may be absolutely incorrect, but this is not the right place to > discuss > > intuition, divine blessings, spiritual powers, jaadu, tona, magic > and > > totaks. This is the place to discuss Lal Kitab application. *As I > mentioned > > in my last email, things like intuition, divine blessings, > spiritual powers > > are hindrance in the systematic learning of astrology. * > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82@ ...>wrote: > > > > > Dear punit ji, > > > Good to see that a learned person like yourself believes in his > own > > > abilities and capabilities so much so that he does not see the > need > > > for any other help. > > > > > > Sir you don't care about the origin of lal kitab, YET want to > > > follow/carry research on it. Perhaps that is why you despite of > your > > > best efforts and knowledge are still not able to " fill the gap " . > > > no offence mate but i thought i have the right to express my > feelings > > > just like you do. > > > > > > By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition > > > power/spiritual qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " > > > today. > > > > > > Good on you > > > > > > Jitin Syal > > > > > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > 40. com>, > Punit Pandey > > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > > > > > > > You got it right. I am exactly saying so. To reiterate, a good > > > astrologer > > > > DOES NOT need to have some sort of intuition power/divine > > > blessing/spiritual > > > > quality in order to assist him/her. > > > > > > > > This statement is related to the application of astrology and > not > > > origin of > > > > astrology. I am not bothered whether spirituality/ intuition/ > > > divine power > > > > is required or not for the creation of such " grantha " like Lal > > > Kitab. > > > > Originiation is not my problem and we are not going to write a > new > > > Lal Kitab > > > > in this forum. What I am bothered about is the application of > the > > > rules > > > > which are already avaible in the " grantha " like Lal Kitab. And > for > > > that, I > > > > will repeat again that there is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED of > spirituality/ > > > divine > > > > blessings/ spirual power. I hope I am clear now. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:10 PM, jitinsyal82 > <jitinsyal82@ >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear punit ji, > > > > > Are you saying that a good astrologer doesn't need to have > some > > > sort > > > > > of intution power/divine blessing/spritiual quality in order > to > > > > > assist him/her? > > > > > > > > > > Are you saying astrology is purely calculation and > application? > > > > > > > > > > If yes, then would be kind enough to explain the origin of lal > > > kitab > > > > > or any other " granth " for that matter. > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > jitin syal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > 40. com>, > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > If a period is good, one doesn't even require astrology to > > > predict > > > > > > correctly. Whatever you will say in your fruitful period > will > > > come > > > > > out > > > > > > correct. Beauty of astrology is to predict correctly all the > > > time .. > > > > > > consistently. Astrology is not a magic but a systematic > method > > > to > > > > > predict > > > > > > past, present and future. In my opinion, intuition and > divine > > > > > blessings are > > > > > > the tools invented by astrologers to safe-guard themselves. > > > > > Something should > > > > > > be there to blame upon in case of incorrect predictions. > Isn't > > > it? > > > > > > Astrologers should stop fooling themselves and the public by > > > > > introducing all > > > > > > these intuition factors. > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a systematic method for developing predictive > > > > > capabilities. It > > > > > > takes time and efforts. An astrologer has to get into the > skin > > > of > > > > > planets, > > > > > > signs, nakshatras, bhavas etc. and feel them/ think like > them in > > > > > order to > > > > > > predict correctly. All astrology texts teaches us how to > apply > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > given in the texts. All astrology texts has given sound and > > > > > systematic > > > > > > methods. Those texts don't tell use to sit in padmasana and > > > > > meditate to > > > > > > learn astrology. If people call 'predictive ability' > a 'diving > > > > > blessings/ > > > > > > intuiation', that is OK because then it is not a tool to > fool > > > > > yourself and > > > > > > others. But this magical, undocumented, extra-terrestial > > > meaning of > > > > > > 'intuition/ divine blessings' is nothing but absurd in my > > > opinion. > > > > > These > > > > > > words are big hindrance in the path of systematic > development of > > > > > astrology. > > > > > > These are even bigger challenge for Lal Kitab, because some > of > > > the > > > > > so called > > > > > > Lal Kitab experts project this book as divine book and that > > > stops > > > > > further > > > > > > research and development. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Madhavan <chims45@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Dear all, > > > > > > > I fully endorse the opinion of Ashish ji, > > > > > > > If only the good time prevails for both native and > astrolger, > > > > > their > > > > > > > wont be any effective prediction and parihars. > > > > > > > The astroleger may be good - but for himself is > surrounded by > > > bad > > > > > > > period, then his predictions may not be appreciated but > > > > > disowned.He > > > > > > > would have unfolded mystry, but the credits would be > given to > > > > > unknown > > > > > > > person. Even a street passer's good wish of the occasion > > > would be > > > > > > > given weightage than the renowned astrolgers. > > > > > > > thats why i used to say, if my time is good you will > > > appreciate my > > > > > > > prediction- if bad times, you will blame me or totally > forget > > > me > > > > > for > > > > > > > the occasion when you are enjoying the fruits. > > > > > > > Regarding the Native's good time, even good astroleger > could > > > not > > > > > right > > > > > > > time and satan will play its role in misinterepting the > right > > > > > > > prediction.parihars not performed. > > > > > > > Thats why the upasakas are more respected than astrolgers > with > > > > > just > > > > > > > few calculations( computer like) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regds > > > > > > > madhavan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > 40. com> > > > <lalkitab% > > > > > 40. com>, " Asheesh > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathur " <asheesh.mathur@ > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > Predictions are mystique and require meditation, > intuition > > > and > > > > > above > > > > > > > > all HIS Blessings for both Native and the Astrologer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology / predictions are not mathematical or pure > > > logical, > > > > > they > > > > > > > > are sprinkled with the astrologers experience and cosmic > > > > > > > > fecilitation. Otherwise a smart computer program could > > > predict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A native will visit a good astrologer, specifically a > Lal > > > Kitab > > > > > one > > > > > > > > only if he's destined to do get benefit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Native may listen to upayes, but may not perform them. > May > > > be > > > > > nature > > > > > > > > will prevent him from doing that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord Ram had to suffer for 14 years in exile. Same is > the > > > case > > > > > with > > > > > > > > Pandavas, they had access to best astrologers in their > > > court. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know of one LK Expert, who transformed me 25 years > back. I > > > > > have > > > > > > > > seen miracles with his remedies, but now despite my > trials, > > > am > > > > > > > unable > > > > > > > > to trace him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remembers Astrologers predicting are revealing secrets > of > > > God , > > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > bosses. Which Boss would like his secretary or juniors > who > > > have > > > > > > > > access to CR reveal it prematurely. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remember Ramayana, Rama was to be made King, big saints > > > decided > > > > > the > > > > > > > > auspicious Muhurata, there were good Shaguns all around > and > > > at > > > > > the > > > > > > > > last moment tables turned upside down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggest we accept astrology/palmistry in light of above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a good lively forum with lots of gifted souls, > > > > > intersting > > > > > > > > threads, once again these are only my views and may not > be > > > > > correct > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please excuse me if I have hurt your feelings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Asheesh > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > Punit > > > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Raveesh ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the problem with the Lal Kitab. All are > discussing > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > written > > > > > > > > > in Lal Kitab and there in efforts to understand it. To > > > me, it > > > > > > > > really doesn't > > > > > > > > > matter whether there is '2' or '5' in front of the > row for > > > > > 25th > > > > > > > > year. What > > > > > > > > > matters is to understand why that table is like that. > Now > > > it > > > > > also > > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > > matter whether there were 10 disciples or 100 > disciples. > > > > > Whether > > > > > > > > there were > > > > > > > > > 10 books or 100 books. This is all gone and we should > move > > > > > forward > > > > > > > > now. If > > > > > > > > > we can not learn from 5 books, we can not learn from > 50 > > > books > > > > > as > > > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the discussion that I have seen is on X > planet in > > > Y > > > > > house > > > > > > > > and what > > > > > > > > > will be the remedy. To me, that not only is incorrent > but > > > also > > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > > matter. The matter is why those remedies are like > that. > > > There > > > > > is > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > efforts > > > > > > > > > in that direction. I am watching Lal Kitab > discussions on > > > > > Internet > > > > > > > > for so > > > > > > > > > long but never seen even a one single discussion > whether > > > of > > > > > > > > academic nature > > > > > > > > > on the grammar of Lal Kitab. People will have to go > > > beyond the > > > > > > > > books and > > > > > > > > > will have to use their reasoning to understand > > > application of > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab. And > > > > > > > > > for doing that, I believe the knowledge of classical > > > > > astrology is > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > must > > > > > > > > > because classical astrology can provide us the missing > > > links. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, raveesh sethi > > > <raveesh_13@ > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Members and moderator Puneet Ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Few things i have come to know . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Lalkitaab founder or the person who wrote this > had 10 > > > > > diciples > > > > > > > > and 10 > > > > > > > > > > books were published by him , according to few > people > > > who > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > lalkitaab > > > > > > > > > > theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. out of those 10 i think no one is alive now ., > yes > > > lal > > > > > kitaab > > > > > > > > is oen of > > > > > > > > > > the most effective theory but if if it is practicsed > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > knowledge then it helps, but another group of > > > astrologers > > > > > say > > > > > > > > that it has to > > > > > > > > > > undergo changes in remedies as most of these > remedies > > > are > > > > > based > > > > > > > > on old > > > > > > > > > > concepts and with new thinsg and environment , > > > situations > > > > > are > > > > > > > > changing these > > > > > > > > > > remmdies should also change, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now i came to know of few things on which astrolgers > > > have > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > opinions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 25th year if u see varshaphal sarini under 5th > house > > > the > > > > > > > > number is 5 but > > > > > > > > > > according to few experts and astrologers of lal > kitaab > > > it > > > > > should > > > > > > > > be no 2 not > > > > > > > > > > 5 .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now question is if we get to know any pperson who > has > > > any > > > > > copy > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > those 10 > > > > > > > > > > books published during that time then things will be > > > much > > > > > more > > > > > > > > easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Warm Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh Kumar Sethi* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Wed, 2/18/09, Punit Pandey <punitp@>* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > anyone in > > > Lal > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > Group > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ s.com<lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > > > > > 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 1:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohit ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have documented response to Saini ji at > > > > > > > > > > http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro > > > > > > > > logy/,<http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro logy/,>which > can > > > be an > > > > > > > > online reference > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for knowing available books on Lal Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Truly speaking, I don't think that Lal Kitab can be > > > taught > > > > > in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > form of a > > > > > > > > > > formal course at this point of time. Right now, Lal > > > Kitab in > > > > > > > > itself is in > > > > > > > > > > research mode. Lal Kitab astrologers don't agree > > > themselves > > > > > on > > > > > > > > the basic > > > > > > > > > > principles of Lal Kitab. Publishing of all editions > of > > > Lal > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > in Hindi > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > under way. Origin and authorship of Lal Kitab is > > > disputed. > > > > > > > Unlike > > > > > > > > classical > > > > > > > > > > astrology, there is no supporting text available > for Lal > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > Not many > > > > > > > > > > practical case studies have been given in Lal Kitab > to > > > > > > > understand > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > properly. This makes Lal Kitab at most a research > > > material > > > > > and > > > > > > > > people who > > > > > > > > > > want to devote a lot of time to research are only > > > suited to > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab at > > > > > > > > > > this point of time. Lal Kitab is a comprehensive > system > > > > > which > > > > > > > > talks about > > > > > > > > > > palmistry, vastu, phrenology, astrology, remedies > etc. > > > and I > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > not seen > > > > > > > > > > even a single Lal Kitab astrologer who understand > these > > > > > fully. > > > > > > > > Most of the > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab astrologers, including myself, have > limited > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > > Kitab. There are no gurus but all students. In my > > > opinion, > > > > > we > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > still few > > > > > > > > > > years fromt the time when we can systematically > > > document Lal > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > > > in easy to understand form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mohit Goel > > > > > <mr_mohitg (AT) (DOT) > > > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? > to=mr_mohitg% > > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i would also like to join Mr Saini in requesting > you > > > about > > > > > > > > details on > > > > > > > > > > below > > > > > > > > > > > questions. i am regular reader on this forum and > since > > > > > long i > > > > > > > > have been > > > > > > > > > > > wishing if someone could advise if some formal > > > courses on > > > > > lal > > > > > > > > kitaab can > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > conducted for learners and to start a > school /platform > > > > > where > > > > > > > > learned > > > > > > > > > > gurus > > > > > > > > > > > of LK can enlightned the new comers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > Mohit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " parm@citizenglobal . > > > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=parm% > > > > > > > > 40citizenglobal. co.uk><parm% 40citizenglob > > > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> " < > > > > > > > > > > > parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=parm% > > > > > > > > 40citizenglobal. co.uk><parm% 40citizenglob > > > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ > > > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? > to=lalkitab% > > > > > > > > 40. com><lalkitab% 40gr > > > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 4:31:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > anyone > > > in > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji, > > > > > > > > > > > Really appreciate your logical explanation to > > > Parminders > > > > > > > > concerns. I have > > > > > > > > > > > always been inclined to Lap kitab for some unknown > > > reason. > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > mail us > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > all Lal Kitab experts and is to seek your expert > > > advise to > > > > > > > > assist in > > > > > > > > > > > exploring Lal Kitab to the deepest level possible. > > > > > Concerns / > > > > > > > > Questions > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Which is the best reference Lal Kitab and where > > > visit > > > > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Which is the authentic Lal Kitab software to > make > > > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Contact details of reliable Lal Kitab expert to > > > seek > > > > > > > advise. > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Any formal courses available on Lal Kitab > remedies. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you in anticipation for your kind favour > > > > > > > > > > > Parm Saini > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) > > > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=punitp% > > > > > > > > 40gmail.com> <punitp%40gmail. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:26:29 > > > > > > > > > > > <lalkitab@grou p > > > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? > to=lalkitab% > > > > > > > > 40. com><lalkitab% 40gr > > > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > anyone > > > in > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Parminder ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you have written that " Right now where the > > > planet of > > > > > his > > > > > > > > kundli will > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > placed after that remedy " , it shows incorrect > > > > > understanding of > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab > > > > > > > > > > > which has been propagated by some of the Lal Kitab > > > books. > > > > > > > > Though I > > > > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > > > > that Pt. Krishna Ashant's book is a good book on > Lal > > > > > Kiab, but > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > reasoning > > > > > > > > > > > given in that book for remedies is *totally > incorrect > > > and > > > > > > > > should not be > > > > > > > > > > > followed*. In my opinon, most of so called Lal > Kitab > > > > > experts > > > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > > > understand the functioning of remedies and keep > > > writing > > > > > such > > > > > > > > books due to > > > > > > > > > > > ignorance or lack of understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One can not move planet from one house to another > > > house. > > > > > There > > > > > > > > is no such > > > > > > > > > > > magic given in Lal Kitab. Moving planet is not at > all > > > > > teaching > > > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned some methods like taking > help > > > from > > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > > > > planet, > > > > > > > > > > > praying a planet, trying to reduce affect of some > > > planet, > > > > > and > > > > > > > > removing > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > mansui planet from the root of a planet etc. > Working > > > of > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > has been explained clearly in Lal Kitab and we > should > > > > > stick to > > > > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > > > > writen in 5 editions of Lal Kitab. Though due to > > > complex > > > > > > > > language used in > > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab, one needs to read Lal Kitab again and > > > again to > > > > > > > > understand it. > > > > > > > > > > As > > > > > > > > > > > we can not move planets, there is no need to worry > > > about > > > > > the > > > > > > > > post-remedy > > > > > > > > > > > placement of the planets and suggest remedies > based > > > on the > > > > > > > > planetary > > > > > > > > > > > positions in birth chart and year chart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.PunitAst rologer.com > > > > > > > > <http://www.punitast rologer.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:40 PM, parminder singh > > > > > > > > <pammisaggu@ . > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? > > > > > > > > to=pammisaggu% 40> <pammisaggu% > > > > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all member of LK group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just started to read LK (Arun Shita) also I > have > > > a LAL > > > > > > > > kitab (Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > Krishan > > > > > > > > > > > > Asant), I want to know one thing that is if > someone > > > > > already > > > > > > > > done some > > > > > > > > > > > remedy > > > > > > > > > > > > by diffrent LK pundits and after that He/she > will > > > come > > > > > to me > > > > > > > > or someone > > > > > > > > > > > else > > > > > > > > > > > > then howcome I will give him/her exact remedy > bec. i > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > know that > > > > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > > > > much remedy he done and how my astrologer he > > > changed to > > > > > > > > improve his > > > > > > > > > > > status. > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now where the planet of his kundli will be > > > placed > > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > remedy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in wait of your reply > > > > > > > > > > > > parminder saggu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go > to > > > > > > > > > > > http://messenger. / > > > > > > > > invite/<http://messenger. / invite/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2009 Report Share Posted March 9, 2009 dear all, i may be switching to very first question of this thread, as per my knowledge pandit ji had puslished (or it was written by nafees " old time job work writers " for him ) five books, the 1952 biggest edition had photograph of pandit girdharilal sharma ji (pandit ji,s nephew) as pandit ji was in govt job and the book cannot be published in his name or with his photograph) no he didnot have 10 diciples... too many people has visited him and have learned too many things from him, later they have become expert in their field, the two whome i know were pandit both were either relatives of pandit ji or living near to panditji's house in pharwala. (both (jaswant and jiva) are dead now) in his last days pandit ji was writing one more book which he named as sayaah kitab (black book) which was never gone in print as it was not completed,few photocopies of few chapters were avaialble with few peoples. the complete set last seen was with tehseeldar ji pandit ji had said once that this work is of ilhamm.he was in dharamshala secondly the work, this work is merely a calculation but when you become expert the people or u yourself understand it as a intution. this is like and mathamatic teacher solving problems of his pupils. the person at other end does not know the results but the teacher can explain or conclude to the results. one very simple example, one persons comes to you with bad budh, and it is still continiouing, than this person must be carring goods related to bad budh either in person or in his house like if budh is in 9th house (birth chart or vershphal)if situation has worsen for him then he must have taken some sort of tabeez from some where. if someone's married life is not very good due to budh shuker combination then the person must have married in the age of 25(shuker) or 28 (mangal)) even this can also be tried which is very effective, if some one come to you, dont ask him any question, make his vershphal, from veshphal make maah (month) kundli then divas (day) kundli then ghanta (hour) kundli then minat (minute) kundli. this fourth kundli will tell you what the person wants to ask and what would be the results and what are the remedies.. this all is given in lalkitab and it is very effective also. in other theory we call it prashan lagan, but in lal kitab it is prashan and uttar lagan with remedies. :-) regards, Leekha s. regards, leekha lalkitab , madhavan <chims45 wrote: > > Dear Punit ji, > Whether LK written with intuition or without intution let us try to find the rules that prompted him to give opinion. > If we are unable to find rules let us analyse the rules for its merit. let future of our forum unveil the mystry by rationality. > that sat > madhavan > > > > ________________________________ > Punit Pandey <punitp > lalkitab > Thursday, 19 February, 2009 6:13:42 PM > Re: Fwd: [lalkitab] please answer my mail anyone in Lal Kitab Group > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > Astrology is not something developed by Pt.. Roop Chand Joshi. He just > collected and may be further developed something which was already > available. Classical astrology is very very rich. Before Lal Kitab, > astrology was not non-existent in India. I think it is dangerous associating > 'divine' word with Lal Kitab. By labeling something 'divine', we make it > non-questionable. We can not criticize it, we can not disagree. This is a > big problem in the learning. Do you understand? > > Let me give you an example. KP System is the most accurate predictive > astrological system known to me. It is also developed by a human. But that > human never claimed himself to be divine. Also nobody labeled him as divine. > Everybody kept it at 'human' level. Due to that, KP system has developed and > matured as one of the finest astrological system available today.. On the > contrary, people have harmed Lal Kitab a lot by labeling it 'divine'. If you > don't want other people to learn any subject, you can label as 'divine'. By > labeling it as 'divine' we are creating a Taliban kind of society in which > what is written in book is correct .. no arguments ... no questions ... no > difference of opinion and hence no development. Don't you see that > conspiracy? > > Development of astrology, like any other subject is just a normal knowledge > development process and nothing 'divine'. It is very important to understand > and without understanding this we can not progress. Like any science, > astrology also has a process by which we can develop it. One need to follow > that development process and whatever works need to be documented. Nothing > divine about it. Till the time one doesn't understand the development > process, s/he will think it is divine. This is natural for any junior > astrology student to think it 'divine'. In fact, when I first studied > 'Einstein's Theory of Relativity', I thought that this subject can not be > developed by a human, because it was too complex for me to comprehend. > Though once I understood the development process, I understood that this is > also a work of human. Once I understood the development process, I > understood that there is no 'divinity' here. > > You call them " supportive tools " but I am sure that you will not be having > any proof for that. You just feel that way because you are taught that way > .. you are told that way. You " strongly believe " that because you are > programmed that way like most of us. Astrology is divine .. astrology is > divine ... astrology is divine. People kept telling us that way and then we > started believing it. It is normal psychology. It happens with everybody. > But it is important to throw-away that 'divine' tag and try to learn the > actual subject. *That is the only way we can learn it. *This is the point I > strongly want to communicate to the Lal Kitab community, and that is the > reason I spent so much time replying your email. I hope you will understand > the reason of writing these emails and take it in positively. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:51 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82@ .co. uk>wrote: > > > Dear punit ji, > > First of all please accept my apologies for making things " senseless " > > to you. May be i left a " gap to be filled " by yourself.By me saying > > that " if it wasn't for the divine blessing we wouldn't be having this > > discussion " meant that it was only because of some special divine > > blessing on a special person (Pt. roop chand ji) that we are now > > following/reading this granth and discussing it today. > > > > Secondly by all due respect sir i am not having an argument with a > > person like yourself, where my knowledge and experience stands no > > chance in front of yours. > > > > Last but not the least, things u call " hindrances " are very > > supportive tools in my opinion and i strongly believe that along with > > proper research, calculation and knowledge an astrologer is not > > complete without these tools or else half of india would be > > practising astrology. > > > > I do agree with you on one point though and that is, not to argue as > > it is endless and more so, noone can change the way other ppl think. > > > > Yours respectfuly > > > > Jitin Syal > > > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> , Punit Pandey > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > > > > > *You again misinterpreted. * I didn't say that " I don't care about > > the > > > origin of lal kitab " . What I said is that " I am not bothered whether > > > spirituality/ intuition/ divine power is required or not for the > > creation of > > > such 'grantha' like Lal Kitab. " I hope you understand the > > difference. Rest > > > of your email is based on this misinterpretation and really not > > making any > > > sense to me. > > > > > > Please don't make arguments for the sake of making arguments. You > > say that > > > " By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition > > power/spiritual > > > qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " today. Now I am > > claerly > > > telling that " application " of astrology doesn't require divine > > blessing/ > > > intuition/ spiritual poswer. Why are you relating this > > with " discussion " , > > > sleeping, eating or any walking. I have not said anything whether > > diving > > > blessing is required for discussion or not. We don't want to discuss > > > miracles but want to discuss Lal Kitab application. Isn't it? > > > > > > I may be absolutely incorrect, but this is not the right place to > > discuss > > > intuition, divine blessings, spiritual powers, jaadu, tona, magic > > and > > > totaks. This is the place to discuss Lal Kitab application. *As I > > mentioned > > > in my last email, things like intuition, divine blessings, > > spiritual powers > > > are hindrance in the systematic learning of astrology. * > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:11 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82@ ...>wrote: > > > > > > > Dear punit ji, > > > > Good to see that a learned person like yourself believes in his > > own > > > > abilities and capabilities so much so that he does not see the > > need > > > > for any other help. > > > > > > > > Sir you don't care about the origin of lal kitab, YET want to > > > > follow/carry research on it. Perhaps that is why you despite of > > your > > > > best efforts and knowledge are still not able to " fill the gap " . > > > > no offence mate but i thought i have the right to express my > > feelings > > > > just like you do. > > > > > > > > By the ways, if it wasn't for the divine blessing/intuition > > > > power/spiritual qualities we wouldn't be having this " discussion " > > > > today. > > > > > > > > Good on you > > > > > > > > Jitin Syal > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > > 40. com>, > > Punit Pandey > > > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jitin ji, > > > > > > > > > > You got it right. I am exactly saying so. To reiterate, a good > > > > astrologer > > > > > DOES NOT need to have some sort of intuition power/divine > > > > blessing/spiritual > > > > > quality in order to assist him/her. > > > > > > > > > > This statement is related to the application of astrology and > > not > > > > origin of > > > > > astrology. I am not bothered whether spirituality/ intuition/ > > > > divine power > > > > > is required or not for the creation of such " grantha " like Lal > > > > Kitab. > > > > > Originiation is not my problem and we are not going to write a > > new > > > > Lal Kitab > > > > > in this forum. What I am bothered about is the application of > > the > > > > rules > > > > > which are already avaible in the " grantha " like Lal Kitab. And > > for > > > > that, I > > > > > will repeat again that there is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED of > > spirituality/ > > > > divine > > > > > blessings/ spirual power. I hope I am clear now. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:10 PM, jitinsyal82 > > <jitinsyal82@ >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dear punit ji, > > > > > > Are you saying that a good astrologer doesn't need to have > > some > > > > sort > > > > > > of intution power/divine blessing/spritiual quality in order > > to > > > > > > assist him/her? > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you saying astrology is purely calculation and > > application? > > > > > > > > > > > > If yes, then would be kind enough to explain the origin of lal > > > > kitab > > > > > > or any other " granth " for that matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > jitin syal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If a period is good, one doesn't even require astrology to > > > > predict > > > > > > > correctly. Whatever you will say in your fruitful period > > will > > > > come > > > > > > out > > > > > > > correct. Beauty of astrology is to predict correctly all the > > > > time .. > > > > > > > consistently. Astrology is not a magic but a systematic > > method > > > > to > > > > > > predict > > > > > > > past, present and future. In my opinion, intuition and > > divine > > > > > > blessings are > > > > > > > the tools invented by astrologers to safe-guard themselves. > > > > > > Something should > > > > > > > be there to blame upon in case of incorrect predictions. > > Isn't > > > > it? > > > > > > > Astrologers should stop fooling themselves and the public by > > > > > > introducing all > > > > > > > these intuition factors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a systematic method for developing predictive > > > > > > capabilities. It > > > > > > > takes time and efforts. An astrologer has to get into the > > skin > > > > of > > > > > > planets, > > > > > > > signs, nakshatras, bhavas etc. and feel them/ think like > > them in > > > > > > order to > > > > > > > predict correctly. All astrology texts teaches us how to > > apply > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > given in the texts. All astrology texts has given sound and > > > > > > systematic > > > > > > > methods. Those texts don't tell use to sit in padmasana and > > > > > > meditate to > > > > > > > learn astrology. If people call 'predictive ability' > > a 'diving > > > > > > blessings/ > > > > > > > intuiation', that is OK because then it is not a tool to > > fool > > > > > > yourself and > > > > > > > others. But this magical, undocumented, extra-terrestial > > > > meaning of > > > > > > > 'intuition/ divine blessings' is nothing but absurd in my > > > > opinion. > > > > > > These > > > > > > > words are big hindrance in the path of systematic > > development of > > > > > > astrology. > > > > > > > These are even bigger challenge for Lal Kitab, because some > > of > > > > the > > > > > > so called > > > > > > > Lal Kitab experts project this book as divine book and that > > > > stops > > > > > > further > > > > > > > research and development. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Madhavan <chims45@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Dear all, > > > > > > > > I fully endorse the opinion of Ashish ji, > > > > > > > > If only the good time prevails for both native and > > astrolger, > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > wont be any effective prediction and parihars. > > > > > > > > The astroleger may be good - but for himself is > > surrounded by > > > > bad > > > > > > > > period, then his predictions may not be appreciated but > > > > > > disowned.He > > > > > > > > would have unfolded mystry, but the credits would be > > given to > > > > > > unknown > > > > > > > > person. Even a street passer's good wish of the occasion > > > > would be > > > > > > > > given weightage than the renowned astrolgers. > > > > > > > > thats why i used to say, if my time is good you will > > > > appreciate my > > > > > > > > prediction- if bad times, you will blame me or totally > > forget > > > > me > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > the occasion when you are enjoying the fruits. > > > > > > > > Regarding the Native's good time, even good astroleger > > could > > > > not > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > time and satan will play its role in misinterepting the > > right > > > > > > > > prediction.parihars not performed. > > > > > > > > Thats why the upasakas are more respected than astrolgers > > with > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > few calculations( computer like) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regds > > > > > > > > madhavan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- In lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > 40. com> > > > > <lalkitab% > > > > > > 40. com>, " Asheesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathur " <asheesh.mathur@ > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > Predictions are mystique and require meditation, > > intuition > > > > and > > > > > > above > > > > > > > > > all HIS Blessings for both Native and the Astrologer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology / predictions are not mathematical or pure > > > > logical, > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > are sprinkled with the astrologers experience and cosmic > > > > > > > > > fecilitation. Otherwise a smart computer program could > > > > predict. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A native will visit a good astrologer, specifically a > > Lal > > > > Kitab > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > only if he's destined to do get benefit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Native may listen to upayes, but may not perform them. > > May > > > > be > > > > > > nature > > > > > > > > > will prevent him from doing that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord Ram had to suffer for 14 years in exile. Same is > > the > > > > case > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > Pandavas, they had access to best astrologers in their > > > > court. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know of one LK Expert, who transformed me 25 years > > back. I > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > seen miracles with his remedies, but now despite my > > trials, > > > > am > > > > > > > > unable > > > > > > > > > to trace him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remembers Astrologers predicting are revealing secrets > > of > > > > God , > > > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > > bosses. Which Boss would like his secretary or juniors > > who > > > > have > > > > > > > > > access to CR reveal it prematurely. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Remember Ramayana, Rama was to be made King, big saints > > > > decided > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > auspicious Muhurata, there were good Shaguns all around > > and > > > > at > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > last moment tables turned upside down. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggest we accept astrology/palmistry in light of above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a good lively forum with lots of gifted souls, > > > > > > intersting > > > > > > > > > threads, once again these are only my views and may not > > be > > > > > > correct > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please excuse me if I have hurt your feelings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > Asheesh > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ s.com <lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > Punit > > > > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Raveesh ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the problem with the Lal Kitab. All are > > discussing > > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > > written > > > > > > > > > > in Lal Kitab and there in efforts to understand it. To > > > > me, it > > > > > > > > > really doesn't > > > > > > > > > > matter whether there is '2' or '5' in front of the > > row for > > > > > > 25th > > > > > > > > > year. What > > > > > > > > > > matters is to understand why that table is like that. > > Now > > > > it > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > > > matter whether there were 10 disciples or 100 > > disciples. > > > > > > Whether > > > > > > > > > there were > > > > > > > > > > 10 books or 100 books. This is all gone and we should > > move > > > > > > forward > > > > > > > > > now. If > > > > > > > > > > we can not learn from 5 books, we can not learn from > > 50 > > > > books > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the discussion that I have seen is on X > > planet in > > > > Y > > > > > > house > > > > > > > > > and what > > > > > > > > > > will be the remedy. To me, that not only is incorrent > > but > > > > also > > > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > > > matter. The matter is why those remedies are like > > that. > > > > There > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > efforts > > > > > > > > > > in that direction. I am watching Lal Kitab > > discussions on > > > > > > Internet > > > > > > > > > for so > > > > > > > > > > long but never seen even a one single discussion > > whether > > > > of > > > > > > > > > academic nature > > > > > > > > > > on the grammar of Lal Kitab. People will have to go > > > > beyond the > > > > > > > > > books and > > > > > > > > > > will have to use their reasoning to understand > > > > application of > > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > > Kitab. And > > > > > > > > > > for doing that, I believe the knowledge of classical > > > > > > astrology is > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > must > > > > > > > > > > because classical astrology can provide us the missing > > > > links. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:27 PM, raveesh sethi > > > > <raveesh_13@ > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Members and moderator Puneet Ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Few things i have come to know . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Lalkitaab founder or the person who wrote this > > had 10 > > > > > > diciples > > > > > > > > > and 10 > > > > > > > > > > > books were published by him , according to few > > people > > > > who > > > > > > follow > > > > > > > > > lalkitaab > > > > > > > > > > > theory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. out of those 10 i think no one is alive now ., > > yes > > > > lal > > > > > > kitaab > > > > > > > > > is oen of > > > > > > > > > > > the most effective theory but if if it is practicsed > > > > with > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge then it helps, but another group of > > > > astrologers > > > > > > say > > > > > > > > > that it has to > > > > > > > > > > > undergo changes in remedies as most of these > > remedies > > > > are > > > > > > based > > > > > > > > > on old > > > > > > > > > > > concepts and with new thinsg and environment , > > > > situations > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > changing these > > > > > > > > > > > remmdies should also change, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now i came to know of few things on which astrolgers > > > > have > > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > opinions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 25th year if u see varshaphal sarini under 5th > > house > > > > the > > > > > > > > > number is 5 but > > > > > > > > > > > according to few experts and astrologers of lal > > kitaab > > > > it > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > be no 2 not > > > > > > > > > > > 5 .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now question is if we get to know any pperson who > > has > > > > any > > > > > > copy > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > those 10 > > > > > > > > > > > books published during that time then things will be > > > > much > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > > easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Warm Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raveesh Kumar Sethi* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Wed, 2/18/09, Punit Pandey <punitp@>* wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > > anyone in > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > Group > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ s.com<lalkitab%40gr oups.com> <lalkitab% > > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > 40. com><lalkitab% > > > > > > > > > > 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 1:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohit ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have documented response to Saini ji at > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro > > > > > > > > > logy/,<http://www.astrocam p.com/vedicastro logy/,>which > > can > > > > be an > > > > > > > > > online reference > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for knowing available books on Lal Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Truly speaking, I don't think that Lal Kitab can be > > > > taught > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > form of a > > > > > > > > > > > formal course at this point of time. Right now, Lal > > > > Kitab in > > > > > > > > > itself is in > > > > > > > > > > > research mode. Lal Kitab astrologers don't agree > > > > themselves > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > the basic > > > > > > > > > > > principles of Lal Kitab. Publishing of all editions > > of > > > > Lal > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > in Hindi > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > under way. Origin and authorship of Lal Kitab is > > > > disputed. > > > > > > > > Unlike > > > > > > > > > classical > > > > > > > > > > > astrology, there is no supporting text available > > for Lal > > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > > Not many > > > > > > > > > > > practical case studies have been given in Lal Kitab > > to > > > > > > > > understand > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > properly. This makes Lal Kitab at most a research > > > > material > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > people who > > > > > > > > > > > want to devote a lot of time to research are only > > > > suited to > > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > > Kitab at > > > > > > > > > > > this point of time. Lal Kitab is a comprehensive > > system > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > talks about > > > > > > > > > > > palmistry, vastu, phrenology, astrology, remedies > > etc. > > > > and I > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > not seen > > > > > > > > > > > even a single Lal Kitab astrologer who understand > > these > > > > > > fully. > > > > > > > > > Most of the > > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab astrologers, including myself, have > > limited > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > > > Kitab. There are no gurus but all students. In my > > > > opinion, > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > still few > > > > > > > > > > > years fromt the time when we can systematically > > > > document Lal > > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > > > > in easy to understand form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Mohit Goel > > > > > > <mr_mohitg (AT) (DOT) > > > > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? > > to=mr_mohitg% > > > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i would also like to join Mr Saini in requesting > > you > > > > about > > > > > > > > > details on > > > > > > > > > > > below > > > > > > > > > > > > questions. i am regular reader on this forum and > > since > > > > > > long i > > > > > > > > > have been > > > > > > > > > > > > wishing if someone could advise if some formal > > > > courses on > > > > > > lal > > > > > > > > > kitaab can > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > conducted for learners and to start a > > school /platform > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > learned > > > > > > > > > > > gurus > > > > > > > > > > > > of LK can enlightned the new comers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " parm@citizenglobal . > > > > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=parm% > > > > > > > > > 40citizenglobal. co.uk><parm% 40citizenglob > > > > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> " < > > > > > > > > > > > > parm (AT) citizenglobal (DOT) > > > > > > > > > co.uk<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=parm% > > > > > > > > > 40citizenglobal. co.uk><parm% 40citizenglob > > > > > > > > > > > al.co.uk> > > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab@ > > > > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? > > to=lalkitab% > > > > > > > > > 40. com><lalkitab% 40gr > > > > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 4:31:13 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > > anyone > > > > in > > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Puneet ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Really appreciate your logical explanation to > > > > Parminders > > > > > > > > > concerns. I have > > > > > > > > > > > > always been inclined to Lap kitab for some unknown > > > > reason. > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > mail us > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > all Lal Kitab experts and is to seek your expert > > > > advise to > > > > > > > > > assist in > > > > > > > > > > > > exploring Lal Kitab to the deepest level possible. > > > > > > Concerns / > > > > > > > > > Questions > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Which is the best reference Lal Kitab and where > > > > visit > > > > > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Which is the authentic Lal Kitab software to > > make > > > > > > > > horoscope. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Contact details of reliable Lal Kitab expert to > > > > seek > > > > > > > > advise. > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Any formal courses available on Lal Kitab > > remedies. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you in anticipation for your kind favour > > > > > > > > > > > > Parm Saini > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) > > > > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? to=punitp% > > > > > > > > > 40gmail.com> <punitp%40gmail. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:26:29 > > > > > > > > > > > > <lalkitab@grou p > > > > > > > > > s.com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? > > to=lalkitab% > > > > > > > > > 40. com><lalkitab% 40gr > > > > > > > > > > > oups.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [lalkitab] please answer my mail > > anyone > > > > in > > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > > Kitab Group > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Parminder ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you have written that " Right now where the > > > > planet of > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > kundli will > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > placed after that remedy " , it shows incorrect > > > > > > understanding of > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab > > > > > > > > > > > > which has been propagated by some of the Lal Kitab > > > > books. > > > > > > > > > Though I > > > > > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > > > > > that Pt. Krishna Ashant's book is a good book on > > Lal > > > > > > Kiab, but > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > reasoning > > > > > > > > > > > > given in that book for remedies is *totally > > incorrect > > > > and > > > > > > > > > should not be > > > > > > > > > > > > followed*. In my opinon, most of so called Lal > > Kitab > > > > > > experts > > > > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > > > > understand the functioning of remedies and keep > > > > writing > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > books due to > > > > > > > > > > > > ignorance or lack of understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One can not move planet from one house to another > > > > house. > > > > > > There > > > > > > > > > is no such > > > > > > > > > > > > magic given in Lal Kitab. Moving planet is not at > > all > > > > > > teaching > > > > > > > > > of Lal > > > > > > > > > > > > Kitab. > > > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab has mentioned some methods like taking > > help > > > > from > > > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > > > > > planet, > > > > > > > > > > > > praying a planet, trying to reduce affect of some > > > > planet, > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > removing > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > mansui planet from the root of a planet etc. > > Working > > > > of > > > > > > Lal > > > > > > > > > Kitab > > > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > has been explained clearly in Lal Kitab and we > > should > > > > > > stick to > > > > > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > > > > > writen in 5 editions of Lal Kitab. Though due to > > > > complex > > > > > > > > > language used in > > > > > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab, one needs to read Lal Kitab again and > > > > again to > > > > > > > > > understand it. > > > > > > > > > > > As > > > > > > > > > > > > we can not move planets, there is no need to worry > > > > about > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > post-remedy > > > > > > > > > > > > placement of the planets and suggest remedies > > based > > > > on the > > > > > > > > > planetary > > > > > > > > > > > > positions in birth chart and year chart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.PunitAst rologer.com > > > > > > > > > <http://www.punitast rologer.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:40 PM, parminder singh > > > > > > > > > <pammisaggu@ . > > > > > > com<http://us.mc01g. mail.. com/mc/compose? > > > > > > > > > to=pammisaggu% 40> <pammisaggu% > > > > > > > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all member of LK group, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just started to read LK (Arun Shita) also I > > have > > > > a LAL > > > > > > > > > kitab (Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > > Krishan > > > > > > > > > > > > > Asant), I want to know one thing that is if > > someone > > > > > > already > > > > > > > > > done some > > > > > > > > > > > > remedy > > > > > > > > > > > > > by diffrent LK pundits and after that He/she > > will > > > > come > > > > > > to me > > > > > > > > > or someone > > > > > > > > > > > > else > > > > > > > > > > > > > then howcome I will give him/her exact remedy > > bec. i > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > know that > > > > > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > > > > > much remedy he done and how my astrologer he > > > > changed to > > > > > > > > > improve his > > > > > > > > > > > > status. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now where the planet of his kundli will be > > > > placed > > > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > remedy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in wait of your reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > parminder saggu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > http://messenger. / > > > > > > > > > invite/<http://messenger. / invite/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.