Guest guest Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 Respected sirs, For a couple of weeks now a query, in another Lal Kitab discussion group, has gone unanswered. Could some one here answer that for all of us, please. The query is : A few doubts regarding Brihaspati-Sanichar on Page 264 of 1942 line no 3. A unique condition come across for Guru-Shani in Khana No. 2 . It says that: 'Agar Chandar bhee saath ho yaa number 8 mein se aa dekhay tau chander nashta nahin laingay' As a routine reading it looks as a normal condition. But is it pointing towards that in case of combination of Guru-Shani, if chander meets them either by aspect or Mushtarqa in other houses, shall we consider it as chander nashta. I mean that why it is written that 'chander nashta nahin laingay'. Respectfully, KP Miglani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 Respected Miglani Ji as per u asking about the combination of guru shani, I can say that moon in 8th is neech ,normally Nasht & neech r used in somehow equal sense. But in other house it will be the subject of NEK or MANDAdepending on its placement & association with other planet/planets.Therefore whther the moon shud be taken as NASHT or not will depend on the context. With Regards Pt.Lalkitabee www.lalkitabee.com lalkitab , " kpmiglani " <kpmiglani wrote: > > Respected sirs, > > For a couple of weeks now a query, in another Lal Kitab discussion > group, has gone unanswered. Could some one here answer that for all > of us, please. > > The query is : > > A few doubts regarding Brihaspati-Sanichar on Page 264 of 1942 line > no 3. A unique condition come across for Guru-Shani in Khana No. 2 . > It says that: > 'Agar Chandar bhee saath ho yaa number 8 mein se aa dekhay tau > chander nashta nahin laingay' > > As a routine reading it looks as a normal condition. But is it > pointing towards that in case of combination of Guru-Shani, if > chander meets them either by aspect or Mushtarqa in other houses, > shall we consider it as chander nashta. I mean that why it is > written > that 'chander nashta nahin laingay'. > > Respectfully, > > KP Miglani > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.