Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 Dear Anil ji, Namaskar, Your comments are well recieved. Rest assured, I am not one to be offended by constructive criticism. Now, in order to address your points: 1. My analysis is not based on Lal Kitab as I have many times explicitely declared in the forum. My analysis is based on SA as well as other vedic sources combined. SA is a modification of Vedic Jyotish. Please feel free to send any comments/questions without worry in this regard. 2. When I do analysis, the predictive part is mostly left out. I only do a general natal analysis in the first go. Only the idea of natal indications and trends is given. If the querer has further questions, they are welcome to follow up. 3. I also do not want to just do the remedial part because this is an astrological forum and there may be people interested to know my reasons of coming to a conclusion. For their sake, I think a grammatical mention of analytical part is important. 4. Expressed world is subject to limitations of time/place and person. Vedic culture was widely pravalent in areas of eastern India (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Russia and some middle eastern countries) in the past. In fact, the Aryans came from ouside India. Vedic culture is infact, not indigenously Indian. It came from outside India. So, our friends from Pakistan have some offshoots of their root system in Vedic culture. Even if they may not know exactly about these practices at the moment, I believe these practices are doable and do not interfere with any religion. If anyone has any questions about the practice, they are welcome to ask questions. The remedies I suggest are well proven set of practices which I know work. Alternatives may not be equally effective. Hope I was able to address all your points. Best wishes, Anshev B. Bhardwejj lalkitab , " anilb_999 " <anilb_999> wrote: > Respected Anshev Ji, > All of us appreciate your addressing the querry in detail of our > friend from Pakistan. With due respect let me humbly remind that Lal > Kitab is an exemplary treatise in sugegsting the remedial measures > which are secular and not tied to just one faith. > > While suggesting remedies we should never overlook the three axis of > 'samai-desh-kaal' withinwhich the interpretation should fall. I have > my genuine doubts as to how mush the poor lady would have understood > of the analysis for it is full of vedic astrological terminology. > Because the question was not from an astrologer that too not from > India, a little care would have made the analysis more readable and > understandable. It would have been better if you could have come > straight to remedies. > > Secondly, just see how much could she really follow of suggestions > like..'Fasting on Ekadashis (twice a month)', 'Surya Namaskar (with > Mantra)', stone to be worn on 'good muhuruta'. These could well > create a dilemma in her mind with faith she follow and what she has > been told to do. > > Firstly, a remedy should always be suggested aligning the faith of > native as per 'samai desk kal'. And only IF it is not possible at all, > it should be explained why it is done and why it is suggested. There > are situations when if one could not do it somebody on his/her behalf > could do it. Otherwise people would do pick and choose and wait for > the best. > > I sincerely trust that this piece would be taken in good faith and not > unwarranted criticism. > > Warm regards > Anil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.