Chart Recification help and analysis for child birth

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Guru Omkar Ji, Bala and Members,

 

Based on my learning from Guru Omkar Ji, let me attempt to see the

accuracy of the given natal charts birth time.

 

1) The natal Chart details are:-

 

June 3rd 1970 at Calcutta India.

22N32 88E22 (Lake View Road)

Given time: 9.15 PM

 

2) The judgement chart details are :-

 

January 27, 2007

Time: 10:21:37 PM

Time Zone: 6:00:00 (West of GMT)

Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

 

3) Let me tabulate the following planets from

the above two Charts:-

 

=====================================

Planet /------->Sign--->Star--->Sub

Lagna---------->Lord--->Lord--->Lord

=====================================

Ascendant------>Sat---->Sun---->Jup

----

R.P's Moon----->Ven---->Moon--->Rahu

=====================================

 

4) The first check is the R.P-Moon's Sign lord is Ven, which is NOT

matching with Asc's Sign Lord of Sat. So now we have to see for any

connection between Ven and Sat in the Ruling Planet Chart.

 

In R.P Chart:-

a) Ven is in Aquarius with a Sign lord of Sat which is matching with

the Asc Sign lord of Sat. So this is good.

 

5) The second check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's Star

Lord is same as Asc's Star Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star

Lord is Sub. So now we have to see for any connection between Moon

and Sun in the Ruling Planet Chart.

 

In R.P Chart:-

a) Moon is in Taurus with a Sign lord of Ven, in the star of Moon

and in the Sub of Rahu.

 

b) Sun is in Capricorn with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Moon

and in the sub of Jup.

 

So there is a connection between both Star Lords, which is Moon.

Hence there is no rectification required at this second level of

Star Lord.

 

6) The third and last check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's

Sub Lord is same as Asc's Sub Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star

Lord is Jup and RP Star Lord is Rahu. So now we have to see for any

connection between Jup and Rahu in the Ruling Planet Chart.

 

In R.P Chart:-

a) Jup is in Scorpio with a Sign Lord of Mars, in the star of Mer

and in the Sub of Ven.

 

b) Rahu is in Aquarius with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Jup

and in the Sub of Jup.

 

So there is a connection between Star Lord and Sub Lord between

R.P's Moon and Asc of Jup. Hence the birth time rectification is not

needed at this third level of Sub Lord.

 

Summary is : There is no need for rectification as the reported

birth time 9:15 PM is correct.

 

Request Guru Omkar Ji and learned members to correct my analysis and

also verify whether the past events provided by the native is

matching with this birth time.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

 

 

Vedic_Science , " bsosale " <bsosale@> wrote:

 

Vedic_Science/message/116

 

Dear Swamiji and list members,

 

Here is a chart of a female for rectification.

 

June 3rd 1970 at Calcutta India. 22N32 88E22 (Lake View Road)

 

Given time: 9.15 PM

 

These are the events given by this lady.. The lagna is in the

begining of Cap.. with less than 10 mins it becomes sag lagna. She

is really worried about the child birth. She tried IVF for 3 times

already and planning for her 4th attempt in March 2007. She also

gave a horary # 18 for the same. Thanks- Bala

 

Here are some of her past events..

 

From Native in her own words.

 

I have 2 sisters, 1 elder to me and 1 younger. All of us did post

graduation. Father retd.as head master, mother housewife. Both my

sisters are gold medalists and university toppers.

 

I am average student(first class student but no distinction)

 

Completed M.Sc (Statictics) and P.G. Dip. in CS from India ( no

breaks in education).

Started working from Oct'1993 - first job as a computer instructor

for couple of months, then worked as admn. assistant for about

2.5years.

 

Oct'1996 - Got appointed as Comp. Programmer in a Public Sector

(Coal Mining industry), this job took me away from home for the

first time but for less than a year, then got transferred to the

hometown, which happened all of a sudden and without my asking I was

chosen to be transferred.

 

Feb 1999 - Landed in USA. No job stability in first 4 years of stay

in USA and was involved in couple of short term contract jobs (with

extreme stress from all corners). Jobless for almost 2.5 years of

this 4 years (did some odd jobs to survive)

 

Nov 1999 - Got married in India. From day one, marriage has been

full of arguments and conflicts

 

Apr 2002 - Bought house in USA

 

Feb 2003 - Got good paid job but different field though IT.

 

Sept 2004 - Got a good break in a law firm in IT dept with good pay

and recognition.

Tried for children thru artificial means first in India in Aug'2005-

19th Aug 2005

then second time in USA in June 2006 - 8th june egg retrieval and

11th june embryo transfer

third time again in USA in Nov 2006 - 24th egg retreival and 27th

Embryo transfer

each time results were negative.

 

--- End forwarded message ---

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunatha, Please give details of connection . which condition apply with word CONNECTION.in other word how connection established? please mention all type of connection rules. it will help me to learn your guruji's theory of rectification. regards Kanak Bosmia Raghunatha Rao Nemani <raon1008 wrote: Om Krishna GuruNamaste Guru Omkar Ji, Bala and Members,Based on my learning from Guru Omkar Ji, let me attempt to see the accuracy of the given natal charts birth time.1) The natal Chart details are:-June 3rd 1970 at Calcutta India. 22N32 88E22 (Lake View Road)Given time: 9.15 PM2) The judgement chart details are :-January 27, 2007Time: 10:21:37 PMTime Zone: 6:00:00 (West of GMT)Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"3) Let me tabulate the following planets from the above two Charts:-=====================================Planet /------->Sign--->Star--->SubLagna---------->Lord--->Lord--->Lord=====================================Ascendant------>Sat---->Sun---->Jup----R.P's

Moon----->Ven---->Moon--->Rahu=====================================4) The first check is the R.P-Moon's Sign lord is Ven, which is NOT matching with Asc's Sign Lord of Sat. So now we have to see for any connection between Ven and Sat in the Ruling Planet Chart.In R.P Chart:-a) Ven is in Aquarius with a Sign lord of Sat which is matching with the Asc Sign lord of Sat. So this is good.5) The second check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's Star Lord is same as Asc's Star Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star Lord is Sub. So now we have to see for any connection between Moon and Sun in the Ruling Planet Chart.In R.P Chart:-a) Moon is in Taurus with a Sign lord of Ven, in the star of Moon and in the Sub of Rahu.b) Sun is in Capricorn with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Moon and in the sub of Jup.So there is a connection between both Star

Lords, which is Moon. Hence there is no rectification required at this second level of Star Lord.6) The third and last check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's Sub Lord is same as Asc's Sub Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star Lord is Jup and RP Star Lord is Rahu. So now we have to see for any connection between Jup and Rahu in the Ruling Planet Chart.In R.P Chart:-a) Jup is in Scorpio with a Sign Lord of Mars, in the star of Mer and in the Sub of Ven.b) Rahu is in Aquarius with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Jup and in the Sub of Jup.So there is a connection between Star Lord and Sub Lord between R.P's Moon and Asc of Jup. Hence the birth time rectification is not needed at this third level of Sub Lord.Summary is : There is no need for rectification as the reported birth time 9:15 PM is correct.Request Guru Omkar Ji and learned members to correct my analysis and

also verify whether the past events provided by the native is matching with this birth time.RegardsRaghunatha RaoVedic_Science , "bsosale" <bsosale@> wrote:Vedic_Science/message/116Dear Swamiji and list members,Here is a chart of a female for rectification.June 3rd 1970 at Calcutta India. 22N32 88E22 (Lake View Road)Given time: 9.15 PMThese are the events given by this lady.. The lagna is in thebegining of Cap.. with less than 10 mins it becomes sag lagna. Sheis really worried about the child birth. She tried IVF for 3 timesalready and planning for her 4th attempt in March 2007. She alsogave a horary # 18 for the same. Thanks- BalaHere are some of her past

events..From Native in her own words.I have 2 sisters, 1 elder to me and 1 younger. All of us did postgraduation. Father retd.as head master, mother housewife. Both mysisters are gold medalists and university toppers.I am average student(first class student but no distinction)Completed M.Sc (Statictics) and P.G. Dip. in CS from India ( nobreaks in education).Started working from Oct'1993 - first job as a computer instructorfor couple of months, then worked as admn. assistant for about2.5years.Oct'1996 - Got appointed as Comp. Programmer in a Public Sector(Coal Mining industry), this job took me away from home for thefirst time but for less than a year, then got transferred to thehometown, which happened all of a sudden and without my asking I waschosen to be transferred.Feb 1999 - Landed in USA. No job stability in first 4 years of stayin USA and was involved in couple of short term

contract jobs (withextreme stress from all corners). Jobless for almost 2.5 years ofthis 4 years (did some odd jobs to survive)Nov 1999 - Got married in India. From day one, marriage has beenfull of arguments and conflictsApr 2002 - Bought house in USAFeb 2003 - Got good paid job but different field though IT.Sept 2004 - Got a good break in a law firm in IT dept with good payand recognition.Tried for children thru artificial means first in India in Aug'2005-19th Aug 2005then second time in USA in June 2006 - 8th june egg retrieval and11th june embryo transferthird time again in USA in Nov 2006 - 24th egg retreival and 27thEmbryo transfereach time results were negative.--- End forwarded message ---"A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first And Honest people are screwed first." Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC 75 BC)

Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Mail Beta.

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste All,

 

Few corrections to my anlaysis ws done by Swami Omkar Ji in the

following messages:-

 

Vedic_Science/message/121

 

Vedic_Science/message/125

 

Please go thru them, if you are academically interested to know.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

[Guest guest]

Thank you Raghunatha Rao Ji for your time and effort. Regards Bala

Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Mail Beta.

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Kanak Ji,

 

Thanks for the note. I thought I have already provided the

connection details already which you are asking in my original

analysis. But here is the extract from my earlier message again.

-------

5) The second check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's Star

Lord is same as Asc's Star Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star

Lord is Sub. So now we have to see for any connection between Moon

and Sun in the Ruling Planet Chart.

 

In R.P Chart:-

a) Moon is in Taurus with a Sign lord of Ven, in the star of Moon

and in the Sub of Rahu.

 

b) Sun is in Capricorn with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Moon

and in the sub of Jup.

 

So there is a connection between both Star Lords, which is Moon.

Hence there is no rectification required at this second level of

Star Lord.

-------

You can see few of my errors in my original analysis were corrected

by Guru Swami Omkar Ji in the following messages too. So in the

rectification exercise, we have to take only " Sub or Star wise "

connection only as described in the following messages. So please go

thru them, if you are academically interested.

 

Vedic_Science/message/121

Vedic_Science/message/125

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

 

, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

Dear Raghunatha,

 

Please give details of connection .

 

which condition apply with word CONNECTION.in other word how

connection established?

 

please mention all type of connection rules.

 

it will help me to learn your guruji's theory of rectification.

 

regards

Kanak Bosmia

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunatha, Still you are not clear on subject.i read carefully your mail and then only i request for more details. 1) what about planet are conj with RP? 2) what about aspected planet with RP? 3) What is about node?how they work? which connection we have to consider first? 4) Are you consider sub sub level as connection? Do not reply with URL of other group, it look you are try to force to look other group, and also this is one type of cross posting. regards Kanak BosmiaRaghunatha Rao Nemani <raon1008 wrote: Om Krishna GuruNamaste Kanak Ji,Thanks for the note. I thought I have already provided the connection details already which you are asking in my original analysis. But here is the extract from my earlier message again.-------5) The second check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's Star Lord is same as Asc's Star Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star Lord is Sub. So now we have to see for any connection between Moon and Sun in the Ruling Planet Chart.In R.P Chart:-a) Moon is in Taurus with a Sign lord of Ven, in the star of Moon and in the Sub of Rahu.b) Sun is in Capricorn with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Moon and in the sub of Jup.So there is a connection between both Star Lords, which is

Moon.Hence there is no rectification required at this second level ofStar Lord.-------You can see few of my errors in my original analysis were corrected by Guru Swami Omkar Ji in the following messages too. So in the rectification exercise, we have to take only "Sub or Star wise" connection only as described in the following messages. So please go thru them, if you are academically interested.Vedic_Science/message/121Vedic_Science/message/125RegardsRaghunatha Rao , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:Dear Raghunatha,Please give details of connection

..which condition apply with word CONNECTION.in other word how connection established? please mention all type of connection rules.it will help me to learn your guruji's theory of rectification.regardsKanak Bosmia"A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first And Honest people are screwed first." Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC 75 BC)

8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Search movie showtime shortcut.

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.Nemani,

The simpler way is to adjust the Ascebdent to such a degree ,where the s/l and the ss/l of the Ascendant,appear as the Moon's star-lord and the sub-lord respectively...Isn't it ?

As per K.P., if the sublord and ss/l of the Ascendant apopear as the Moon's st.lord,and sub-lord respectively...that TOB is the EXACT TOB...!

The above K.P.- rule is applicable to correctionswithin + or -1 hour at the maximum...

With best wishes,

L.Y.Rao.

GOOD LUCK !

Raghunatha Rao Nemani <raon1008 Sent: Sunday, 28 January, 2007 3:51:46 PM Re: Chart Recification help and analysis for child birth

 

Om Krishna GuruNamaste Guru Omkar Ji, Bala and Members,Based on my learning from Guru Omkar Ji, let me attempt to see the accuracy of the given natal charts birth time.1) The natal Chart details are:-June 3rd 1970 at Calcutta India. 22N32 88E22 (Lake View Road)Given time: 9.15 PM2) The judgement chart details are :-January 27, 2007Time: 10:21:37 PMTime Zone: 6:00:00 (West of GMT)Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"3) Let me tabulate the following planets from the above two Charts:-============ ========= ========= =======Planet /------->Sign- -->Star-- ->SubLagna------- --->Lord- -->Lord-- ->Lord============ ========= ========= =======Ascendant--- --->Sat-- -->Sun--- ->Jup------------ --------- --------- -------R.P's Moon----->Ven- --->Moon- -->Rahu============ ========= ========= =======4) The first check

is the R.P-Moon's Sign lord is Ven, which is NOT matching with Asc's Sign Lord of Sat. So now we have to see for any connection between Ven and Sat in the Ruling Planet Chart.In R.P Chart:-a) Ven is in Aquarius with a Sign lord of Sat which is matching with the Asc Sign lord of Sat. So this is good.5) The second check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's Star Lord is same as Asc's Star Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star Lord is Sub. So now we have to see for any connection between Moon and Sun in the Ruling Planet Chart.In R.P Chart:-a) Moon is in Taurus with a Sign lord of Ven, in the star of Moon and in the Sub of Rahu.b) Sun is in Capricorn with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Moon and in the sub of Jup.So there is a connection between both Star Lords, which is Moon. Hence there is no rectification required at this second level of Star Lord.6) The third and last

check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's Sub Lord is same as Asc's Sub Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star Lord is Jup and RP Star Lord is Rahu. So now we have to see for any connection between Jup and Rahu in the Ruling Planet Chart.In R.P Chart:-a) Jup is in Scorpio with a Sign Lord of Mars, in the star of Mer and in the Sub of Ven.b) Rahu is in Aquarius with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Jup and in the Sub of Jup.So there is a connection between Star Lord and Sub Lord between R.P's Moon and Asc of Jup. Hence the birth time rectification is not needed at this third level of Sub Lord.Summary is : There is no need for rectification as the reported birth time 9:15 PM is correct.Request Guru Omkar Ji and learned members to correct my analysis and also verify whether the past events provided by the native is matching with this birth time.RegardsRaghunatha

RaoVedic_Science, "bsosale" <bsosale@> wrote:http://groups. / group/Vedic_ Science/message/ 116Dear Swamiji and list members,Here is a chart of a female for rectification.June 3rd 1970 at Calcutta India. 22N32 88E22 (Lake View Road)Given time: 9.15 PMThese are the events given by this lady.. The lagna is in thebegining of Cap.. with less than 10 mins it becomes sag lagna. Sheis really worried about the child birth. She tried IVF for 3 timesalready and planning for her 4th attempt in March 2007. She alsogave a horary # 18 for the same. Thanks- BalaHere are some of her past events..From Native in her own words.I have 2 sisters, 1 elder to me and 1 younger. All of us

did postgraduation. Father retd.as head master, mother housewife. Both mysisters are gold medalists and university toppers.I am average student(first class student but no distinction)Completed M.Sc (Statictics) and P.G. Dip. in CS from India ( nobreaks in education).Started working from Oct'1993 - first job as a computer instructorfor couple of months, then worked as admn. assistant for about2.5years.Oct'1996 - Got appointed as Comp. Programmer in a Public Sector(Coal Mining industry), this job took me away from home for thefirst time but for less than a year, then got transferred to thehometown, which happened all of a sudden and without my asking I waschosen to be transferred.Feb 1999 - Landed in USA. No job stability in first 4 years of stayin USA and was involved in couple of short term contract jobs (withextreme stress from all corners). Jobless for almost 2.5 years ofthis 4 years (did

some odd jobs to survive)Nov 1999 - Got married in India. From day one, marriage has beenfull of arguments and conflictsApr 2002 - Bought house in USAFeb 2003 - Got good paid job but different field though IT.Sept 2004 - Got a good break in a law firm in IT dept with good payand recognition.Tried for children thru artificial means first in India in Aug'2005-19th Aug 2005then second time in USA in June 2006 - 8th june egg retrieval and11th june embryo transferthird time again in USA in Nov 2006 - 24th egg retreival and 27thEmbryo transfereach time results were negative.--- End forwarded message ---

 

Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Kanak,

 

Thanks for the note. Based on your note, it is very clear to me

that, you already knew all the answers to your questions, otherwise

how can you conclude in saying that " Still you are not clear on

subject " . The person have enough knowledge only can access the other

persons knowlege, is it not ?

 

So when you are already mastered the subject and also made a

conclusion that I am NOT clear on the subject, then what answers I

can give and satisfy you. If you do not have the knowledge then, how

can you access my understanding and conlcude by saying " Still you

are not clear on subject " . So logically your intentions of asking

these questions are not good.

 

Now regarding posting the other group's reference in my message. The

purpose of that is not for you as you are already mastered the

subject, but beginners like me who may be interested in learning

from the other group messages. Plese do not assume too many things

on behalf of other people. A friendly suggestion for you. That is

our elders always use to say " Vidhya Dadathi Vinayam " .

 

I do not like to entertain any further in this subject as it has no

more Jyotish value in this thread any more. Before you ask me

another question such as, then why I am writing this note in the

list, the reason is : If I do not reply to your message, then you

will assume some thing else and continue writing this kind of notes

in the future, which has no content value. So I wanted this kind of

communication not to happen with me or any other fellow students in

the future in this list. As this is a place to learn and share and

no one is superior to any one in any way in my humble opinion. So

let us burry this here and move on.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

 

, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

 

Dear Raghunatha,

 

Still you are not clear on subject.i read carefully your mail and

then only i request for more details.

 

1) what about planet are conj with RP?

2) what about aspected planet with RP?

3) What is about node?how they work? which connection we have to

consider first?

4) Are you consider sub sub level as connection?

 

Do not reply with URL of other group, it look you are try to force

to look other group, and also this is one type of cross posting.

 

regards

Kanak Bosmia

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunatha, My comment in bold************* regards Kanak BosmiaRaghunatha Rao Nemani <raon1008 wrote: Om Krishna GuruNamaste Kanak,Thanks for the note. Based on your note, it is very clear to me that, you already knew all the answers to your questions, otherwise how can you conclude in saying that "Still you are not clear on subject". The person have enough knowledge only can access the other persons knowlege, is

it not ? Kanak: How can I know other"s method?I follow only Baskran's method i dont know your GURU's method, so there is no bed intetion at all but i think you drow discussion on some other trck. So when you are already mastered the subject and also made a conclusion that I am NOT clear on the subject, then what answers I can give and satisfy you. If you do not have the knowledge then, how can you access my understanding and conlcude by saying "Still you are not clear on subject". So logically your intentions of asking these questions are not good. Kanak: i clear where you are not clear in 5 point and there is nothing wrong if i ask when i dont understand.If you dont wnat to reply then ok but you ahve no right to pinpot me as "YOUR INTENTION OF ASKING THESE QUESTUIONS ARE NOT GOOD". there is nothing conection with mastr at all that, Please mention where i say i am master.this is

not a way to write with others.Now regarding posting the other group's reference in my message. The purpose of that is not for you as you are already mastered the subject, but beginners like me who may be interested in learning from the other group messages. Plese do not assume too many things on behalf of other people. A friendly suggestion for you. That is our elders always use to say "Vidhya Dadathi Vinayam". Kanak : Thanks for you advice.I do not like to entertain any further in this subject as it has no more Jyotish value in this thread any more. Before you ask me another question such as, then why I am writing this note in the list, the reason is : If I do not reply to your message, then you will assume some thing else and continue writing this kind of notes in the future, which has no content value. So I wanted this kind of communication not to happen

with me or any other fellow students in the future in this list. As this is a place to learn and share and no one is superior to any one in any way in my humble opinion. So let us burry this here and move on. Kanak: this is my last mail to you too. i also dont have any time to spent in non use discussion,as you mention "So I wanted this kind of communication not to happen with me or any other fellow students in the future in this list. " I DECIDED TO STOP ALL MY MAIL TO GROUP.i NEVER WRITE ANYTHING IN GROUP FROM THIS MNT. GOOD BY AND BEST LUCK. RegardsRaghunatha Rao , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:Dear Raghunatha, Still you are not clear on subject.i read carefully your mail

and then only i request for more details.1) what about planet are conj with RP?2) what about aspected planet with RP?3) What is about node?how they work? which connection we have to consider first?4) Are you consider sub sub level as connection?Do not reply with URL of other group, it look you are try to force to look other group, and also this is one type of cross posting.regardsKanak Bosmia"A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first And Honest people are screwed first." Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC 75 BC)

The fish are biting.

Get more visitors on your site using Search Marketing.

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Kanak,

 

Thanks for the note. Yes, I agree with you as you have not mentioned

before you have Mastered the KP method, but on the context of the

subject I have used that. In a group like this the members will

have some different opinioins, and you have expressed your opinion

and I have did mine with a reply. So this is common when people

interact, we should always remember to respect every one. If we do

then we are all fine.

 

Now, why are you saying again, you want to leave the group.

Remember, when you said the same thing sevaral months ago, I was one

of the persons who had convinced you to stay in the group as you add

some value to the original reseach. I would do the same today too

and ask you to stay and continue, but prepared to get challenges

like today we had in the future. If my earlier reply has caused some

anxiety to you then, " I am sorry for that " , but you have put me in

that situaion for that to happen. As new members come and join us

and they will bring some different point of views as well, so we

must be prepared for that as a group members.

 

Leaving a group is a not a solution, rather acceptance and mutual

respect is the key for success for you, me and every one's learning

and sharing.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunatha, Find out any singl word i use unrespecteble for any one, if you can i leave astrology for ever. We all are free to ask question on posting of other members, if we need more details and i am not doing anything wrong if i ask you some question but you take this issue as a prestigue issue and write lungauge which heart me and i never bare this type of luangue, i am not habited for that.You have not mention you opinion but you use bed laungauge in your mail and indirect you poss elegation on me, that my intention is bed. I have many deffernce of oppinon on some rules with lajimi ji even we are good friend we never take anhting personly, as you drow discussion personly , i dont under stand you rintention for that, that is not way of learned perosn, Look past when and where you need my help i allways help you at a time, not? not you but i am alwyas redy for

all kp lover but that dosnt mena any one used unrespcted wrod for me, me self respect is very first then any other thing in world. you write " we should always remember to respect every one. If we do then we are all fine. " where i use wrog word in my mail? what you mean to say by respect other? please drow my attantion where i loss respect in my mail? Find out any my mail where i not respect any new member. even i am the perosn who help new comer in group then any other member. Am i wrong? If after all this i have to face this type of situation it is better to leave and get pice of mind.and dont bother about my leaving group,my father always say's every thing done according to karma, if my karma donot permit me then i never continue in group, do not worry at all. good by with best

regards kanak bosmiaRaghunatha Rao Nemani <raon1008 wrote: Om Krishna GuruNamaste Kanak,Thanks for the note. Yes, I agree with you as you have not mentioned before you have Mastered the KP method, but on the context of the subject I have used that. In a group like this the members will have some different opinioins, and you have expressed your opinion and I have did mine with a reply. So this is common when people interact, we should always remember to respect

every one. If we do then we are all fine. Now, why are you saying again, you want to leave the group. Remember, when you said the same thing sevaral months ago, I was one of the persons who had convinced you to stay in the group as you add some value to the original reseach. I would do the same today too and ask you to stay and continue, but prepared to get challenges like today we had in the future. If my earlier reply has caused some anxiety to you then, "I am sorry for that", but you have put me in that situaion for that to happen. As new members come and join us and they will bring some different point of views as well, so we must be prepared for that as a group members.Leaving a group is a not a solution, rather acceptance and mutual respect is the key for success for you, me and every one's learning and sharing.RegardsRaghunatha Rao"A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first And Honest people are screwed first." Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC 75 BC)

Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Mail Beta.

[Guest guest]

Hare Krsna

Namaste Dear Lajmi Ji. I could not understand your statement

" The simpler way is to adjust the Ascendant

to such a degree, where the s/l and the ss/l of the Ascendant,

appear as the Moon's star-lord and the sub-lord respectively...Isn't

it? " .

 

I think you should not have used the tem " respectively " . And as far

as my knowledge is concerned they can appear in any manner.The

appearance is important as they are the rulers.

 

I have a great respect to you. Please forgive me if my point is

wrong since I am a kid in K.P.

 

With respect

Pavan Kumar

 

 

, Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1

wrote:

>

> Dear Mr.Nemani,

> The simpler way is to adjust the

Ascebdent to such a degree ,where the s/l and the ss/l of the

Ascendant,appear as the Moon's star-lord and the sub-lord

respectively...Isn't it ?

> As per K.P., if the sublord and ss/l

of the Ascendant apopear as the Moon's st.lord,and sub-lord

respectively...that TOB is the EXACT TOB...!

> The above K.P.- rule is applicable to

correctionswithin + or -1 hour at the maximum...

> With best wishes,

> L.Y.Rao.

> GOOD LUCK !

>

>

>

> Raghunatha Rao Nemani <raon1008

>

> Sunday, 28 January, 2007 3:51:46 PM

> Re: Chart Recification help and analysis for

child birth

>

> Om Krishna Guru

>

> Namaste Guru Omkar Ji, Bala and Members,

>

> Based on my learning from Guru Omkar Ji, let me attempt to see the

> accuracy of the given natal charts birth time.

>

> 1) The natal Chart details are:-

>

> June 3rd 1970 at Calcutta India.

> 22N32 88E22 (Lake View Road)

> Given time: 9.15 PM

>

> 2) The judgement chart details are :-

>

> January 27, 2007

> Time: 10:21:37 PM

> Time Zone: 6:00:00 (West of GMT)

> Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

>

> 3) Let me tabulate the following planets from

> the above two Charts:-

>

> ============ ========= ========= =======

> Planet /------->Sign- -->Star-- ->Sub

> Lagna------- --->Lord- -->Lord-- ->Lord

> ============ ========= ========= =======

> Ascendant--- --->Sat-- -->Sun--- ->Jup

> ------------ --------- --------- -------

> R.P's Moon----->Ven- --->Moon- -->Rahu

> ============ ========= ========= =======

>

> 4) The first check is the R.P-Moon's Sign lord is Ven, which is

NOT

> matching with Asc's Sign Lord of Sat. So now we have to see for

any

> connection between Ven and Sat in the Ruling Planet Chart.

>

> In R.P Chart:-

> a) Ven is in Aquarius with a Sign lord of Sat which is matching

with

> the Asc Sign lord of Sat. So this is good.

>

> 5) The second check. We have to check whether the R.P Moon's Star

> Lord is same as Asc's Star Lord. It is not the same as Asc's Star

> Lord is Sub. So now we have to see for any connection between Moon

> and Sun in the Ruling Planet Chart.

>

> In R.P Chart:-

> a) Moon is in Taurus with a Sign lord of Ven, in the star of Moon

> and in the Sub of Rahu.

>

> b) Sun is in Capricorn with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of

Moon

> and in the sub of Jup.

>

> So there is a connection between both Star Lords, which is Moon.

> Hence there is no rectification required at this second level of

> Star Lord.

>

> 6) The third and last check. We have to check whether the R.P

Moon's

> Sub Lord is same as Asc's Sub Lord. It is not the same as Asc's

Star

> Lord is Jup and RP Star Lord is Rahu. So now we have to see for

any

> connection between Jup and Rahu in the Ruling Planet Chart.

>

> In R.P Chart:-

> a) Jup is in Scorpio with a Sign Lord of Mars, in the star of Mer

> and in the Sub of Ven.

>

> b) Rahu is in Aquarius with a Sign Lord of Sat, in the star of Jup

> and in the Sub of Jup.

>

> So there is a connection between Star Lord and Sub Lord between

> R.P's Moon and Asc of Jup. Hence the birth time rectification is

not

> needed at this third level of Sub Lord.

>

> Summary is : There is no need for rectification as the reported

> birth time 9:15 PM is correct.

>

> Request Guru Omkar Ji and learned members to correct my analysis

and

> also verify whether the past events provided by the native is

> matching with this birth time.

>

> Regards

> Raghunatha Rao

>

> Vedic_Science, " bsosale " <bsosale@> wrote:

>

> http://groups. / group/Vedic_ Science/message/ 116

>

> Dear Swamiji and list members,

>

> Here is a chart of a female for rectification.

>

> June 3rd 1970 at Calcutta India. 22N32 88E22 (Lake View Road)

>

> Given time: 9.15 PM

>

> These are the events given by this lady.. The lagna is in the

> begining of Cap.. with less than 10 mins it becomes sag lagna. She

> is really worried about the child birth. She tried IVF for 3 times

> already and planning for her 4th attempt in March 2007. She also

> gave a horary # 18 for the same. Thanks- Bala

>

> Here are some of her past events..

>

> From Native in her own words.

>

> I have 2 sisters, 1 elder to me and 1 younger. All of us did post

> graduation. Father retd.as head master, mother housewife. Both my

> sisters are gold medalists and university toppers.

>

> I am average student(first class student but no distinction)

>

> Completed M.Sc (Statictics) and P.G. Dip. in CS from India ( no

> breaks in education).

> Started working from Oct'1993 - first job as a computer instructor

> for couple of months, then worked as admn. assistant for about

> 2.5years.

>

> Oct'1996 - Got appointed as Comp. Programmer in a Public Sector

> (Coal Mining industry), this job took me away from home for the

> first time but for less than a year, then got transferred to the

> hometown, which happened all of a sudden and without my asking I

was

> chosen to be transferred.

>

> Feb 1999 - Landed in USA. No job stability in first 4 years of stay

> in USA and was involved in couple of short term contract jobs (with

> extreme stress from all corners). Jobless for almost 2.5 years of

> this 4 years (did some odd jobs to survive)

>

> Nov 1999 - Got married in India. From day one, marriage has been

> full of arguments and conflicts

>

> Apr 2002 - Bought house in USA

>

> Feb 2003 - Got good paid job but different field though IT.

>

> Sept 2004 - Got a good break in a law firm in IT dept with good pay

> and recognition.

> Tried for children thru artificial means first in India in

Aug'2005-

> 19th Aug 2005

> then second time in USA in June 2006 - 8th june egg retrieval and

> 11th june embryo transfer

> third time again in USA in Nov 2006 - 24th egg retreival and 27th

> Embryo transfer

> each time results were negative.

>

> --- End forwarded message ---

________

> India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

> http://in.answers./

>

[Guest guest]

Raguhunatha ji,

 

I request you to make a difference between a senior members and other members. As a senior member and a guide to the forum, sometimes one has a right to say and ask something. While we are learning, we should not be offended by it rather take it as an tool for learning. I hope we all understand it and participate in discussion in rather constructive way.

 

Also, please note that cross-postings are not allowed. You are request to check the forum constitution file at Forum/

.. As an important member of this forum, you are expected to comply with the forum policy.

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

On 1/31/07, Raghunatha Rao Nemani <raon1008 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Om Krishna GuruNamaste Kanak,Thanks for the note. Based on your note, it is very clear to me that, you already knew all the answers to your questions, otherwise how can you conclude in saying that " Still you are not clear on subject " . The person have enough knowledge only can access the other persons knowlege, is it not ?So when you are already mastered the subject and also made a conclusion that I am NOT clear on the subject, then what answers I can give and satisfy you. If you do not have the knowledge then, how can you access my understanding and conlcude by saying " Still you are not clear on subject " . So logically your intentions of asking these questions are not good. Now regarding posting the other group's reference in my message. The purpose of that is not for you as you are already mastered the subject, but beginners like me who may be interested in learning from the other group messages. Plese do not assume too many things on behalf of other people. A friendly suggestion for you. That is our elders always use to say " Vidhya Dadathi Vinayam " .I do not like to entertain any further in this subject as it has no more Jyotish value in this thread any more. Before you ask me another question such as, then why I am writing this note in the list, the reason is : If I do not reply to your message, then you will assume some thing else and continue writing this kind of notes in the future, which has no content value. So I wanted this kind of communication not to happen with me or any other fellow students in the future in this list. As this is a place to learn and share and no one is superior to any one in any way in my humble opinion. So let us burry this here and move on.RegardsRaghunatha Rao

, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:Dear Raghunatha, Still you are not clear on subject.i read carefully your mail and then only i request for more details.

1) what about planet are conj with RP?2) what about aspected planet with RP?3) What is about node?how they work? which connection we have to consider first?4) Are you consider sub sub level as connection?

Do not reply with URL of other group, it look you are try to force to look other group, and also this is one type of cross posting.regardsKanak Bosmia