Guest guest Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation. I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 Dear Raichurji,I have checked my horoscope and also that of my wife. Both of us have the second marriage yoga. But we are happily married for the last 31 years and not a single day we have discussed about disharmony in the family. How is this to be explained?? Does this mean that it is applicable only to those who have 7th sublord as Mercury or Jupiterdeposited in dual signs? If you need for research, I will send you both our horoscopes.Thanks.V.Ramachandran.On 10/6/06, andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum wrote: Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation .. I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 Dear Andrew, Although I appreciate your idea,allow me to submit that, I do not favour the formulating of "over-simplified and easily/readily usable formulae..." as such, as it will surely erode upon the honing of "individual skills" of astrologers...to correctly evaluate,after weighing all pros and cons and then prognosticate appropriately...focusing upon quick predictions,with a minmum of evalutaive skills/knowledge... Personally, I look upon this as stemming from the (notorious) "guides syndrome",that Indian students are so used to...(short-cut methods,and limited knowledge etc.)as well as "ready-to-use" formulae for delivering quick "at-a-glance results"...popular with students who are exam-oriented and not knowledge-oriented...(?). I am not therefore comfortable with "Formulating findings into some sort of Ready-Reckoner"...for everthing...reducing prognostication to a mere mechanical job,by applying the given "dormulae"... ! ! Allow me to repeat,a la Yakobovsky,"...the practise of a Science is an Art..." and therefore,I do not favour removing the Art from the Science... ! This is my well-considered personal opinion,with all due respects... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Original Message ----andrew dutta <andrewinfinitumKP System Friday, 6 October, 2006 8:47:04 AM Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation. I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 Dear Shri Dutta Basically, astrology makes no distinction between male and female charts. Histrolically Vedic-or Traditional Astrology has mostly devoted itself to males, thogh there is mention that the rules apply to both males and females. In on classical treatise of 28 chapters only one is specifically devoted to female charts. In KP the only instance one thinks of is Birth of children. There for the Males, one considers the 11th cusp, because it is the 5th cusp of the Wife, where as the 5th is considered for a female chart. Any way your suggesstion is passed on to the proper group. andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum wrote: Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation. I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 Dear Andrew, In addition to Mr.Raichur's explanation,may I also add,that in Vedic Astrology,after a female is married,only her husband's chart is generally examined,except perhaps in Horary Astrology,where a female married or not,or widowed/divorced can proffer a query along with a number (1-249)..in my humble opinion... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! andrew dutta <andrewinfinitumKP System Friday, 6 October, 2006 8:47:04 AM Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation. I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 Dear Mr.Ramachandran, Sorry for butting-in... In K.P., there is no room for a 'yoga' for a second marriage,infact, there is no such thing like 'yogas'... ! Kindly examine the sub-lord of the VIIth cusp... As per K.P.,if the sublord of the VIIth cusp,is a dual planet posited in a dual sign/dual sign,or,in a star whose lord is a dual planet,then alone is a second marriage promised... Kindly therefore cast your Birth Chart strictly as per K.P.,using K.P. Ayanamsa,and examine the respective VIIth cusp sub-lords as above...and, i) if the s/l of the VIIth signifiesV & XI,it shows a permanent tie with the partner... (!), and... ii) if the RPs at birth of both husband and wife are the same ... (not necessarily in the same order),a "made-for-each-other" situation will obtain... iii) if the husband's s/l of the VIIth,signifies II,VII & XI,and the girl's RPs at birth are also the same as significators of II,VI & XI...a harmonious marriage is promised... I have mentioned in brief,the rules,as per Krishnamurthi Padhdhati for enjoying a happy and harmonious married life... Kindly inform how many of these rules apply in your case... Wishing you the very best, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Padma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran Sent: Friday, 6 October, 2006 10:01:34 AMRe: Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Raichurji,I have checked my horoscope and also that of my wife. Both of us have the second marriage yoga. But we are happily married for the last 31 years and not a single day we have discussed about disharmony in the family. How is this to be explained?? Does this mean that it is applicable only to those who have 7th sublord as Mercury or Jupiterdeposited in dual signs? If you need for research, I will send you both our horoscopes.Thanks.V.Ramachandran. On 10/6/06, andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum@ > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation . I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 Dear Yogesh Rao, Thank you for this post: you've explained the essence of astrology in a clear, yet convincing manner! Even if that would be possible, The Art-part, the role of astrologer in it, should always be there, not confined in cook-book rules. Regards, AnnaYogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: Dear Andrew, Although I appreciate your idea,allow me to submit that, I do not favour the formulating of "over-simplified and easily/readily usable formulae..." as such, as it will surely erode upon the honing of "individual skills" of astrologers...to correctly evaluate,after weighing all pros and cons and then prognosticate appropriately...focusing upon quick predictions,with a minmum of evalutaive skills/knowledge... Personally, I look upon this as stemming from the (notorious) "guides syndrome",that Indian students are so used to...(short-cut methods,and limited knowledge etc.)as well as "ready-to-use" formulae for delivering quick "at-a-glance results"...popular with students who are exam-oriented and not knowledge-oriented...(?). I am not therefore comfortable with "Formulating findings into some sort of Ready-Reckoner"...for everthing...reducing prognostication to a mere mechanical job,by applying the given "dormulae"... ! ! Allow me to repeat,a la Yakobovsky,"...the practise of a Science is an Art..." and therefore,I do not favour removing the Art from the Science... ! This is my well-considered personal opinion,with all due respects... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Original Message ----andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum >KP System Friday, 6 October, 2006 8:47:04 AM Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation. I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 Dear Mr. Rao (and all group members), Your email was very insightful! I was not aware that Indian students suffered from such (notorious) syndrome. If using of formulas erode skills, then I am sure mankind is heading for a dark future (smiles) since formulas are used in practically all spheres of human life and knowledge! Firstly, I would beg to differ with you by saying that using of formulas do not reduce skills. Had that been the case we would have degraded in our knowledge of Algebra, Finance, Astronomy and what not, by using the formulas. Formulas are the key to applications—derived after continuous research, application and testing. It helps is testing knowledge and building new knowledge. I have never come across a ‘formula’ that helps to achieve a ‘short-cut’. Rather, formulas help to make better analysis. And this is as true for the science of astrology as it is for the science of engineering. Secondly, I would again beg to differ with you by saying that any research—be it on astrology, Information technology or physics—must be done following some criteria of rigor before we can generalize findings from the sample to the population. Studying specific phenomenon from different angles or perspectives help provide validity and reliability to the results. And doing all these may not lead to any formula creation or ‘ready recokner’ but may only help to sharpen our skills in a particular body of knowledge and make our application more correct. This is the essence of Science. In my email, I only tried to provide such varied perspectives for research in dual marriage. (I came to know about this from Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which he wrote while a graduate student in theoretical physics at Harvard. Initially published as a monograph in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, it was published in book form by the University of Chicago Press in 1962. It has sold some one million copies in 16 languages and is required reading in courses dealing with education, history, psychology, research, and, of course, history and philosophy of science). Thirdly, I would humbly say that our Indian astrological texts are full of astrological dictums which need to be revisited and tested like the way how Raichur ji, TinWin ji, Rangarajan ji, Kanak ji are doing (Kudos to them!). If research created ‘ready reckoners’ then I am sure by now our world would have been the worst place to be with all knowledge creation coming to a grinding halt. Let me now give a small example as to how I would have gone about doing research in dual marriage had I had access to large number of birth charts of dual marriage, a software and the know-how to make program codes. Lets say we have a total of 360 birth charts of people having dual marriages. We can therefore, create a matrix as below. Cause of dual marriage Males Females Total Demise of partner 71 60 131 Divorce 120 109 229 Total 191 169 360 Now, we may be in a better position to say how our astrological dictums reflect reality. We can first test our rules on 131 and 229 birth charts, irrespective of males and females, to see whether astrological indications vary between people who have married more than once due to either demise of partner or divorce. Similarly, we can run the tests between 191 males and 169 females, irrespective of the cause of there dual marriage, to see whether gender makes any difference in the indication. Finally, we may run tests on 71 and 120 male charts to see whether in the same gender causes of dual marriage offer different astrological principle. We can repeat the same with female charts. What Raichur ji et al have done is to run the test straightaway on 360 (that is, 100 in their case) birth charts. We can also have a third cause of dual/multiple marriage. There are males in a particular religious community who are allowed to marry more than once or twice without demise or divorce of their partner(s). What could be the astrological configuration/ K.P. sutras in such cases?? Do we have enough research based astrological indication to correctly point this out in a male nativity?? We as serious students of astrology should account for such phenomenon of human life through proper research of astrological canons. But this is not enough. What we are doing is essentially making a priori fitting of principles on groups of charts. What we need to do is to identify factors contributing to dual/multiple marriages by finding common configuration in each group of charts. This itself may give a totally new astrological principle and take the science forward. Why should we stop ourselves from finding new things? A true scientific temper requires an open mind. We should never forget that it is only with open eye that we can see and with an open mind that we can learn. Mr. Rao, I think astrology is an applied science—applied with respect to the lives of human beings specifically. Research on astrological dictums is very necessary to get clarity about various dictums found in our ancient texts. And to do this we should be ready to address various issues from different angles of human life. Only then perhaps we may be in a better position to offer correct guidance and predictions. But I am sure in no way this would make us mechanical neither would it make a serious student of astrology resort to short-cuts. Good research will only facilitate better and sincere application of astrological principles sans blind faith. I never forget that our Guruji Shri KSK invented KP only because he had an inquisitive, research bent of mind, which did not allow him to accept the traditional astrological dictums without testing. He dedicated his life for the betterment of this science and was blessed my Lord Ganesha to develop this unique method of prediction. I also never forget that his life long research resulted in the beautiful ‘formula’ for sub theory that has illuminated the world of astrology. Best wishes and regards to all our group members. I withdraw myself from any further discussion on this topic. AndrewYogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: Dear Andrew, Although I appreciate your idea,allow me to submit that, I do not favour the formulating of "over-simplified and easily/readily usable formulae..." as such, as it will surely erode upon the honing of "individual skills" of astrologers...to correctly evaluate,after weighing all pros and cons and then prognosticate appropriately...focusing upon quick predictions,with a minmum of evalutaive skills/knowledge... Personally, I look upon this as stemming from the (notorious) "guides syndrome",that Indian students are so used to...(short-cut methods,and limited knowledge etc.)as well as "ready-to-use" formulae for delivering quick "at-a-glance results"...popular with students who are exam-oriented and not knowledge-oriented...(?). I am not therefore comfortable with "Formulating findings into some sort of Ready-Reckoner"...for everthing...reducing prognostication to a mere mechanical job,by applying the given "dormulae"... ! ! Allow me to repeat,a la Yakobovsky,"...the practise of a Science is an Art..." and therefore,I do not favour removing the Art from the Science... ! This is my well-considered personal opinion,with all due respects... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Original Message ----andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum >KP System Friday, 6 October, 2006 8:47:04 AM Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation. I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2006 Report Share Posted October 7, 2006 Dear Lajmiji,Thank you for your reply Sir. Now I have understood the actual KP principles for the second marriage. Sorry for calling it a Yoga. I was confused because there was a third theory using the 9th sub lord. No offence meant. I have checked out the 7th sub lord connection with that of RPs for my wife using same place of birth and birth time. It is a perfect match. I was worried a bit when I found the connection with second marriage and hence wrote the mail. Now, I am absolutely satisfied. Thanks once again. V.Ramachandran.On 10/6/06, Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: Dear Mr.Ramachandran, Sorry for butting-in... In K.P., there is no room for a 'yoga' for a second marriage,infact, there is no such thing like ' yogas'... ! Kindly examine the sub-lord of the VIIth cusp... As per K.P.,if the sublord of the VIIth cusp,is a dual planet posited in a dual sign/dual sign,or,in a star whose lord is a dual planet,then alone is a second marriage promised... Kindly therefore cast your Birth Chart strictly as per K.P.,using K.P. Ayanamsa,and examine the respective VIIth cusp sub-lords as above...and, i) if the s/l of the VIIth signifiesV & XI,it shows a permanent tie with the partner... (!), and... ii) if the RPs at birth of both husband and wife are the same ... (not necessarily in the same order),a " made-for-each-other " situation will obtain... iii) if the husband's s/l of the VIIth,signifies II,VII & XI,and the girl's RPs at birth are also the same as significators of II,VI & XI...a harmonious marriage is promised... I have mentioned in brief,the rules,as per Krishnamurthi Padhdhati for enjoying a happy and harmonious married life... Kindly inform how many of these rules apply in your case... Wishing you the very best, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Padma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran @gmail.com>@gro ups.comFriday, 6 October, 2006 10:01:34 AMRe: Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Raichurji,I have checked my horoscope and also that of my wife. Both of us have the second marriage yoga. But we are happily married for the last 31 years and not a single day we have discussed about disharmony in the family. How is this to be explained?? Does this mean that it is applicable only to those who have 7th sublord as Mercury or Jupiterdeposited in dual signs? If you need for research, I will send you both our horoscopes.Thanks.V.Ramachandran. On 10/6/06, andrew dutta < andrewinfinitum@ > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation . I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2006 Report Share Posted October 8, 2006 Dear Andrew This is a very logical explanation. For married people, when I analyse, I do not limit myself to the husbands chart. Even though I have limited time, owing to work, I am not finding any fault in analysing this way! Regards Rameshandrew dutta <andrewinfinitum wrote: Dear Mr. Rao (and all group members), Your email was very insightful! I was not aware that Indian students suffered from such (notorious) syndrome. If using of formulas erode skills, then I am sure mankind is heading for a dark future (smiles) since formulas are used in practically all spheres of human life and knowledge! Firstly, I would beg to differ with you by saying that using of formulas do not reduce skills. Had that been the case we would have degraded in our knowledge of Algebra, Finance, Astronomy and what not, by using the formulas. Formulas are the key to applications—derived after continuous research, application and testing. It helps is testing knowledge and building new knowledge. I have never come across a ‘formula’ that helps to achieve a ‘short-cut’. Rather, formulas help to make better analysis. And this is as true for the science of astrology as it is for the science of engineering. Secondly, I would again beg to differ with you by saying that any research—be it on astrology, Information technology or physics—must be done following some criteria of rigor before we can generalize findings from the sample to the population. Studying specific phenomenon from different angles or perspectives help provide validity and reliability to the results. And doing all these may not lead to any formula creation or ‘ready recokner’ but may only help to sharpen our skills in a particular body of knowledge and make our application more correct. This is the essence of Science. In my email, I only tried to provide such varied perspectives for research in dual marriage. (I came to know about this from Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which he wrote while a graduate student in theoretical physics at Harvard. Initially published as a monograph in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, it was published in book form by the University of Chicago Press in 1962. It has sold some one million copies in 16 languages and is required reading in courses dealing with education, history, psychology, research, and, of course, history and philosophy of science). Thirdly, I would humbly say that our Indian astrological texts are full of astrological dictums which need to be revisited and tested like the way how Raichur ji, TinWin ji, Rangarajan ji, Kanak ji are doing (Kudos to them!). If research created ‘ready reckoners’ then I am sure by now our world would have been the worst place to be with all knowledge creation coming to a grinding halt. Let me now give a small example as to how I would have gone about doing research in dual marriage had I had access to large number of birth charts of dual marriage, a software and the know-how to make program codes. Lets say we have a total of 360 birth charts of people having dual marriages. We can therefore, create a matrix as below. Cause of dual marriage Males Females Total Demise of partner 71 60 131 Divorce 120 109 229 Total 191 169 360 Now, we may be in a better position to say how our astrological dictums reflect reality. We can first test our rules on 131 and 229 birth charts, irrespective of males and females, to see whether astrological indications vary between people who have married more than once due to either demise of partner or divorce. Similarly, we can run the tests between 191 males and 169 females, irrespective of the cause of there dual marriage, to see whether gender makes any difference in the indication. Finally, we may run tests on 71 and 120 male charts to see whether in the same gender causes of dual marriage offer different astrological principle. We can repeat the same with female charts. What Raichur ji et al have done is to run the test straightaway on 360 (that is, 100 in their case) birth charts. We can also have a third cause of dual/multiple marriage. There are males in a particular religious community who are allowed to marry more than once or twice without demise or divorce of their partner(s). What could be the astrological configuration/ K.P. sutras in such cases?? Do we have enough research based astrological indication to correctly point this out in a male nativity?? We as serious students of astrology should account for such phenomenon of human life through proper research of astrological canons. But this is not enough. What we are doing is essentially making a priori fitting of principles on groups of charts. What we need to do is to identify factors contributing to dual/multiple marriages by finding common configuration in each group of charts. This itself may give a totally new astrological principle and take the science forward. Why should we stop ourselves from finding new things? A true scientific temper requires an open mind. We should never forget that it is only with open eye that we can see and with an open mind that we can learn. Mr. Rao, I think astrology is an applied science—applied with respect to the lives of human beings specifically. Research on astrological dictums is very necessary to get clarity about various dictums found in our ancient texts. And to do this we should be ready to address various issues from different angles of human life. Only then perhaps we may be in a better position to offer correct guidance and predictions. But I am sure in no way this would make us mechanical neither would it make a serious student of astrology resort to short-cuts. Good research will only facilitate better and sincere application of astrological principles sans blind faith. I never forget that our Guruji Shri KSK invented KP only because he had an inquisitive, research bent of mind, which did not allow him to accept the traditional astrological dictums without testing. He dedicated his life for the betterment of this science and was blessed my Lord Ganesha to develop this unique method of prediction. I also never forget that his life long research resulted in the beautiful ‘formula’ for sub theory that has illuminated the world of astrology. Best wishes and regards to all our group members. I withdraw myself from any further discussion on this topic. AndrewYogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Andrew, Although I appreciate your idea,allow me to submit that, I do not favour the formulating of "over-simplified and easily/readily usable formulae..." as such, as it will surely erode upon the honing of "individual skills" of astrologers...to correctly evaluate,after weighing all pros and cons and then prognosticate appropriately...focusing upon quick predictions,with a minmum of evalutaive skills/knowledge... Personally, I look upon this as stemming from the (notorious) "guides syndrome",that Indian students are so used to...(short-cut methods,and limited knowledge etc.)as well as "ready-to-use" formulae for delivering quick "at-a-glance results"...popular with students who are exam-oriented and not knowledge-oriented...(?). I am not therefore comfortable with "Formulating findings into some sort of Ready-Reckoner"...for everthing...reducing prognostication to a mere mechanical job,by applying the given "dormulae"... ! ! Allow me to repeat,a la Yakobovsky,"...the practise of a Science is an Art..." and therefore,I do not favour removing the Art from the Science... ! This is my well-considered personal opinion,with all due respects... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Original Message ----andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum >KP System Friday, 6 October, 2006 8:47:04 AM Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation. I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2006 Report Share Posted October 8, 2006 Dear Mr.Ramachandran, I was quite sure that would be the case,quite unexplicably,you could call it intuition,may be... Thank you for your prompt reply though,and I am looking forward to you and your wife's visit together,to our place,as we stay at Shivaji Park,Rd #2,the road adjacent to the Reliance Web World (which is Plot no 124,ours building the 8th Building from this building due North... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. Padma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2006 8:44:35 AMRe: Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Lajmiji,Thank you for your reply Sir. Now I have understood the actual KP principles for the second marriage. Sorry for calling it a Yoga. I was confused because there was a third theory using the 9th sub lord. No offence meant. I have checked out the 7th sub lord connection with that of RPs for my wife using same place of birth and birth time. It is a perfect match. I was worried a bit when I found the connection with second marriage and hence wrote the mail. Now, I am absolutely satisfied. Thanks once again. V.Ramachandran. On 10/6/06, Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Dear Mr.Ramachandran, Sorry for butting-in.. . In K.P., there is no room for a 'yoga' for a second marriage,infact, there is no such thing like ' yogas'... ! Kindly examine the sub-lord of the VIIth cusp... As per K.P.,if the sublord of the VIIth cusp,is a dual planet posited in a dual sign/dual sign,or,in a star whose lord is a dual planet,then alone is a second marriage promised... Kindly therefore cast your Birth Chart strictly as per K.P.,using K.P. Ayanamsa,and examine the respective VIIth cusp sub-lords as above...and, i) if the s/l of the VIIth signifiesV & XI,it shows a permanent tie with the partner... (!), and... ii) if the RPs at birth of both husband and wife are the same ... (not necessarily in the same order),a "made-for-each- other" situation will obtain... iii) if the husband's s/l of the VIIth,signifies II,VII & XI,and the girl's RPs at birth are also the same as significators of II,VI & XI...a harmonious marriage is promised... I have mentioned in brief,the rules,as per Krishnamurthi Padhdhati for enjoying a happy and harmonious married life... Kindly inform how many of these rules apply in your case... Wishing you the very best, L.Y.Rao. GOOD LUCK ! Padma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran @gmail.com>@gro ups.comFriday, 6 October, 2006 10:01:34 AMRe: Fine tuning dual marriage research Dear Raichurji,I have checked my horoscope and also that of my wife. Both of us have the second marriage yoga. But we are happily married for the last 31 years and not a single day we have discussed about disharmony in the family. How is this to be explained?? Does this mean that it is applicable only to those who have 7th sublord as Mercury or Jupiterdeposited in dual signs? If you need for research, I will send you both our horoscopes.Thanks.V.Ramachandran. On 10/6/06, andrew dutta < andrewinfinitum@ > wrote: Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice theory in astrology. However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and what could be the possible social explanations. 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) who married second time due to demise of the partner and those who married due to divorce or separation . I am sure research through such divisions would yield superb insights. 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make statisitcally valid tests. For this I would request our list members to send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and divorce from their own collections. Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. Regards, Andrew Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty, ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 Fax: 91-4023430468 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 Dear Sri Ramachandran, You should be Congratulated for pronouncing to all of us about you the state of happiness of your married life of 31 years. Marriage ,it is said, either makes you a Happy man or a Philosopher Best Wishes, Satish -- In , " Padma Ramachandran " <padma.ramachandran wrote: > > Dear Lajmiji, > > Thank you for your reply Sir. Now I have understood the actual KP principles > for the second marriage. Sorry for calling it a Yoga. I was confused because > there was a third theory using the 9th sub lord. No offence meant. > > I have checked out the 7th sub lord connection with that of RPs for my wife > using same place of birth and birth time. It is a perfect match. I was > worried a bit when I found the connection with second marriage and hence > wrote the mail. Now, I am absolutely satisfied. Thanks once again. > > V.Ramachandran. > > > On 10/6/06, Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1 wrote: > > > > Dear Mr.Ramachandran, > > Sorry for butting-in... > > In K.P., there is no room for *a > > 'yoga' for a second marriage,infact, there is no such thing like '** > > yogas'... !* > > * * Kindly examine the *sub- lord of theVIIth cusp... > > * > > * *As per K.P.,if the sublord of the > > VIIth cusp,is a dual planet posited in a dual sign/dual sign,or,in a star > > whose lord is a dual planet,then alone is a second marriage promised... > > Kindly therefore cast your Birth > > Chart strictly as per K.P.,using K.P. Ayanamsa,and examine the respective > > VIIth cusp sub-lords as above...and, > > i) if the s/l of the VIIth > > signifiesV & XI,it shows a *permanent tie* with the partner... (!), and... > > * *ii) if the RPs at birth of both *husband > > and wife* are *the same ... *(not necessarily in the same > > order),a * " made-for-each-other " * situation will obtain... > > iii) if the husband's s/l of the > > VIIth,signifies II,VII & XI,and the girl's RPs at birth are also the same as > > significators of II,VI & XI...a harmonious marriage is promised... > > I have mentioned in brief,the rules,as > > per *Krishnamurthi Padhdhati* for enjoying a happy and harmonious married > > life... > > Kindly inform how many of these rules > > apply in your case... > > Wishing you the very best, > > L.Y.Rao. > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > Padma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran > > > > Friday, 6 October, 2006 10:01:34 AM > > Re: Fine tuning dual marriage research > > > > Dear Raichurji, > > > > I have checked my horoscope and also that of my wife. Both of us have the > > second marriage yoga. But we are happily married for the last 31 years and > > not a single day we have discussed about disharmony in the family. How is > > this to be explained?? Does this mean that it is applicable only to those > > who have 7th sublord as Mercury or Jupiterdeposited in dual signs? If you > > need for research, I will send you both our horoscopes.Thanks. > > > > V.Ramachandran. > > > > > > On 10/6/06, andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum@ <andrewinfinitum> > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, > > > > > > The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly > > > impressive. The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress > > > of practice theory in astrology. > > > > > > However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind > > > which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. > > > > > > 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see > > > how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether > > > rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and > > > what could be the possible social explanations. > > > > > > 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) > > > who married second time due to *demise *of the partner and those who > > > married due to *divorce or separation *. I am sure research through such > > > divisions would yield superb insights. > > > > > > 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make > > > statisitcally valid tests. *For this I would request our list members to > > > send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and > > > divorce from their own collections. * > > > > > > Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, > > > greater insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and > > > scientific. I wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these > > > tests. > > > > > > Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > *Prof. Andrew Dutta* > > > Faculty, > > > ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers > > > 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, > > > Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. > > > Tel: 91-4023430254/ 55 Extn: 324 > > > Fax: 91-4023430468 > > > Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com<http://us.rd./evt=42973/*http://www./prev iew> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India<http://us.rd./mail/in/yanswers/*http://in.answers.yaho o.com/> > > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get > > it NOW<http://us.rd./mail/in/messengertagline/*http://in.messen ger.> > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2006 Report Share Posted October 12, 2006 Dear Ramchandra ji, You are right as per all three rules your chart show multiple marriage. but main thing is when? you have not chaque this, this will happn only in DBA. I Guss that you know about 10 KPDP(Krishna mutry dasavidh purtham) and in this 10 KPDP number 10 is most important for relations. many times we see that two person have good friend ship and allof sudan thay sperat why? if you chek number 10 KPDP is will found answer. In your case i am not go in full detils but give you light idea why you are happily married for the last 31 years and not a single day you have discussed about disharmony in the family. Padmaji's Birth RP are: MER-SUN-KET-SAT-RAH(no planet spect on rahu so give result of its starlord MER) Noe as per you your marride life is 31 year long so i guss you married in 1975. at that time your Dasa is RAH and RAH is one of the significatore, next dasa is JUP start from JUP is not in RP and JUP_JUP_JUP was star from 22/may 1992 to 4 Sep 1992.please write what heppan during this perode. any kind of sepration( due to job or any how).after thatall planet match with Birth RP ofPadmaji. as per your chart your birth RP are JUP-SAT-VEN-MER-RAH(JUP-VEN aspect in RAH)-KET(JUP-VEN Conj. with KET)Padmaji's DASA at marriage is also RAH and RAH match with your biorth RP, next DASA JUP is also match with your birth RP and next SAT das also match with your RP. For you information at today your KPDP No: 10 got 59 Marks. if this Marks go bellow 50 it will harm for couple.but in you case there is no problem at all. we have also cehck singla marriage data with this three rules and we found that more then 60% rules indicate multiple marriage, after that i am thinking why this happn, and at same time i read your mail. but i am thinking to check all 100 chart with KPDP no:10 to prove this, if and when i will finished this work we will submit our work in this kp-system group. hope it help regards Kanak Bosmia , " Padma Ramachandran " <padma.ramachandran wrote: > > Dear Raichurji, > > I have checked my horoscope and also that of my wife. Both of us have the > second marriage yoga. But we are happily married for the last 31 years and > not a single day we have discussed about disharmony in the family. How is > this to be explained?? Does this mean that it is applicable only to those > who have 7th sublord as Mercury or Jupiterdeposited in dual signs? If you > need for research, I will send you both our horoscopes.Thanks. > > V.Ramachandran. > > > On 10/6/06, andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum wrote: > > > > Dear Raichur ji, Tin Win ji and all esteemed members, > > > > The research on 100 birth charts about dual marraige is highly impressive. > > The finding of a new rule is equally important for the progress of practice > > theory in astrology. > > > > However, over the last few days a couple of thoughts came in to my mind > > which I would like to share with all of you in order to get deeper insights. > > > > 1) Can birth charts be divided in to groups of males and females to see > > how far the rules apply to each gender? This may enable us to find whether > > rules vary for the two genders for dual marriage. If so, to what extent and > > what could be the possible social explanations. > > > > 2) Can charts also be divided into groups of people (males and fermales) > > who married second time due to *demise *of the partner and those who > > married due to *divorce or separation*. I am sure research through such > > divisions would yield superb insights. > > > > 3) We would require more birth charts to make such groupings and make > > statisitcally valid tests. *For this I would request our list members to > > send birth details of dual marriages for males and females due to demise and > > divorce from their own collections. * > > > > Soemhow I have a feeling that if research is done on these lines, greater > > insight would make our astrological dictums more robust and scientific. I > > wish I had some software and programing knowledge to run these tests. > > > > Nevertheless, heartfelt thanks to Raichur ji et al. > > > > Regards, > > > > Andrew > > > > > > *Prof. Andrew Dutta* > > Faculty, > > ICFAI Institute For Management Teachers > > 6-3-352/2 & 3, 3rd Floor, Astral Heights, > > Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. > > Tel: 91-4023430254/55 Extn: 324 > > Fax: 91-4023430468 > > Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com<http://us.rd./evt=42973/*http://www./prev iew> > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.