Gulbarga Method - My Exercise - 1

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru Namaste Gurus and Learned Members, Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native is married or not providing the native's birth details. I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently. I have used the following principle to answer this question "Is the native is married or not". KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of Moon then the answer is "Yes", other wise the answer is "No". I have taken a random number from software program to answer this question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this question will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting for some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in that list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not want to mix different methods. Horary Number = 60 September 10, 2006 Time: 15:15:30 Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT) Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23" USA In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord of Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is "No", which means the native is not married. So, may I request you to please verify whether the above analysis is correct in arriving at the answer is "No" or not

and correct me if I am wrong. Regards Raghunatha Rao --- original message from another Non KP group ---- Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c Om Sri gurave Namah! Dear What is the marital status of

this native? 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad AP, India . Please include Astrologic

Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunatha Rao garu,

 

My understanding of The Gulbarga Theory is:

 

 

If the Sub Lord of the Horary Number (60) happens to be either

 

Moon Star-Lord Or Lagna Star -Lord among the RPS, the answer is

 

in the affirmative(YES). Otherwise it is NO.

 

 

WHAT PRINCIPLE YOU HAVE APPLIED IS FOR BIRTH TIME CORRECTNESS

 

CHECKING.

 

Please recheck.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

-- In , Raghunatha RaoNemani <raon1008

wrote:

>

> Om Krishna Guru

>

> Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,

>

> Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native is

married or not providing the native's birth details.

>

> I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the

Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.

>

> I have used the following principle to answer this question " Is

the native is married or not " .

>

> KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of Moon

then the answer is " Yes " , other wise the answer is " No " .

>

> I have taken a random number from software program to answer this

question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this question

will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting for

some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in that

list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not want

to mix different methods.

>

> Horary Number = 60

>

> September 10, 2006

> Time: 15:15:30

> Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> USA

>

> In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord of

Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is " No " , which

means the native is not married.

>

> So, may I request you to please verify whether the above analysis

is correct in arriving at the answer is " No " or not and correct me if

I am wrong.

>

> Regards

> Raghunatha Rao

>

> --- original message from another Non KP group ----

>

> Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

>

> Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c

>

> Om Sri gurave Namah!

>

> Dear

>

> What is the marital status of this native?

>

> 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad

> AP, India .

>

> Please include Astrologic

>

>

>

 

> Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and

30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

>

[Guest guest]

-

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sri raghunatha rao garu,

 

P.S to my response just sent.

 

Forgot to add the Lagna is for the place,date, time of

judgement .

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

-- In , Raghunatha RaoNemani <raon1008

wrote:

>

> Om Krishna Guru

>

> Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,

>

> Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native is

married or not providing the native's birth details.

>

> I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the

Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.

>

> I have used the following principle to answer this question " Is

the native is married or not " .

>

> KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of Moon

then the answer is " Yes " , other wise the answer is " No " .

>

> I have taken a random number from software program to answer this

question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this question

will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting for

some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in that

list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not want

to mix different methods.

>

> Horary Number = 60

>

> September 10, 2006

> Time: 15:15:30

> Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> USA

>

> In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord of

Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is " No " , which

means the native is not married.

>

> So, may I request you to please verify whether the above analysis

is correct in arriving at the answer is " No " or not and correct me if

I am wrong.

>

> Regards

> Raghunatha Rao

>

> --- original message from another Non KP group ----

>

> Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

>

> Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c

>

> Om Sri gurave Namah!

>

> Dear

>

> What is the marital status of this native?

>

> 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad

> AP, India .

>

> Please include Astrologic

>

>

>

 

> Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and

30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunath Rao,

 

Can you please post the

1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my study.

 

I hope that you checked both the critera for " YES " in your analysis.

 

Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363

" The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star Lord of

Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at time of

casting, then Answer IS YES. "

 

Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435

" if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord of the

Ascendant or the Moon's Starlord...the answer was a definite " YES " . "

 

BTW, which group was this quiz posted.

 

Thanks,

Krishna

 

, Raghunatha RaoNemani

<raon1008 wrote:

>

> Om Krishna Guru

>

> Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,

>

> Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native is

married or not providing the native's birth details.

>

> I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the

Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.

>

> I have used the following principle to answer this question " Is

the native is married or not " .

>

> KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of Moon

then the answer is " Yes " , other wise the answer is " No " .

>

> I have taken a random number from software program to answer this

question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this question

will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting for

some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in that

list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not want

to mix different methods.

>

> Horary Number = 60

>

> September 10, 2006

> Time: 15:15:30

> Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> USA

>

> In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord of

Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is " No " , which

means the native is not married.

>

> So, may I request you to please verify whether the above analysis

is correct in arriving at the answer is " No " or not and correct me if

I am wrong.

>

> Regards

> Raghunatha Rao

>

> --- original message from another Non KP group ----

>

> Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

>

> Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c

>

> Om Sri gurave Namah!

>

> Dear

>

> What is the marital status of this native?

>

> 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad

> AP, India .

>

> Please include Astrologic

>

>

>

 

> Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and

30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

>

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,

 

Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details from

Raichur Ji's software:-

 

Horary Number = 60

 

September 10, 2006

Time: 15:15:30

Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

USA

 

HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

 

CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket

7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer

8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup

9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer

10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat

11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer

12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven

 

Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga

Principle taking the above as an example.

 

Thanks for your help in advance.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

 

, " gdplus1 " <gdplus1 wrote:

>

> Dear Raghunath Rao,

>

> Can you please post the

> 1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> 2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> 3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my study.

>

> I hope that you checked both the critera for " YES " in your

analysis.

>

> Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363

> " The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star Lord

of

> Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at time

of

> casting, then Answer IS YES. "

>

> Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435

> " if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord of

the

> Ascendant or the Moon's Starlord...the answer was a definite "

YES " . "

>

> BTW, which group was this quiz posted.

>

> Thanks,

> Krishna

>

> , Raghunatha RaoNemani

> <raon1008@> wrote:

> >

> > Om Krishna Guru

> >

> > Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,

> >

> > Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native is

> married or not providing the native's birth details.

> >

> > I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the

> Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.

> >

> > I have used the following principle to answer this

question " Is

> the native is married or not " .

> >

> > KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of

Moon

> then the answer is " Yes " , other wise the answer is " No " .

> >

> > I have taken a random number from software program to answer

this

> question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this

question

> will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting

for

> some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in

that

> list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not

want

> to mix different methods.

> >

> > Horary Number = 60

> >

> > September 10, 2006

> > Time: 15:15:30

> > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > USA

> >

> > In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord

of

> Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is " No " , which

> means the native is not married.

> >

> > So, may I request you to please verify whether the above

analysis

> is correct in arriving at the answer is " No " or not and correct me

if

> I am wrong.

> >

> > Regards

> > Raghunatha Rao

> >

> > --- original message from another Non KP group ----

> >

> > Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

> >

> > Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c

> >

> > Om Sri gurave Namah!

> >

> > Dear

> >

> > What is the marital status of this native?

> >

> > 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad

> > AP, India .

> >

> > Please include Astrologic

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US

(and

> 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,

 

 

 

Appropos your query,following is my answer.

 

 

Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this

 

gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

STARLORD JUPITER

SUBLORD VENUS.

 

 

FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope;

 

gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER

DO STAR LORD KETU

DO SUB LORD VENUS.

 

MOON SIGN LORD MARS

DO STAR LORD KETU

DO SUB LORD RAHU.

 

 

Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD

 

or MOON STAR LORD.

 

 

Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any

relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU, hence

a relation ship is estabilised.

 

Conclusion answer is YES.

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- In , " Raghunatha RaoNemani "

<raon1008 wrote:

>

> Om Krishna Guru

>

> Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,

>

> Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details from

> Raichur Ji's software:-

>

> Horary Number = 60

>

> September 10, 2006

> Time: 15:15:30

> Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> USA

>

> HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

>

> CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

> 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

> 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

> 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

> 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

> 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket

> 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer

> 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup

> 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer

> 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat

> 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer

> 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven

>

> Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga

> Principle taking the above as an example.

>

> Thanks for your help in advance.

>

> Regards

> Raghunatha Rao

>

> , " gdplus1 " <gdplus1@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Raghunath Rao,

> >

> > Can you please post the

> > 1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > 2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > 3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my study.

> >

> > I hope that you checked both the critera for " YES " in your

> analysis.

> >

> > Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363

> > " The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star Lord

> of

> > Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at time

> of

> > casting, then Answer IS YES. "

> >

> > Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435

> > " if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord of

> the

> > Ascendant or the Moon's Starlord...the answer was a definite "

> YES " . "

> >

> > BTW, which group was this quiz posted.

> >

> > Thanks,

> > Krishna

> >

> > , Raghunatha RaoNemani

> > <raon1008@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Om Krishna Guru

> > >

> > > Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,

> > >

> > > Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native

is

> > married or not providing the native's birth details.

> > >

> > > I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the

> > Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.

> > >

> > > I have used the following principle to answer this

> question " Is

> > the native is married or not " .

> > >

> > > KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of

> Moon

> > then the answer is " Yes " , other wise the answer is " No " .

> > >

> > > I have taken a random number from software program to answer

> this

> > question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this

> question

> > will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting

> for

> > some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in

> that

> > list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not

> want

> > to mix different methods.

> > >

> > > Horary Number = 60

> > >

> > > September 10, 2006

> > > Time: 15:15:30

> > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > > USA

> > >

> > > In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord

> of

> > Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is " No " , which

> > means the native is not married.

> > >

> > > So, may I request you to please verify whether the above

> analysis

> > is correct in arriving at the answer is " No " or not and correct

me

> if

> > I am wrong.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Raghunatha Rao

> > >

> > > --- original message from another Non KP group ----

> > >

> > > Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

> > >

> > > Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c

> > >

> > > Om Sri gurave Namah!

> > >

> > > Dear

> > >

> > > What is the marital status of this native?

> > >

> > > 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad

> > > AP, India .

> > >

> > > Please include Astrologic

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US

> (and

> > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

sir, Once in Astrology and Athrishta magazine it discussed and concluded that gulbarga theory dosnt work correctly. What other sr. memberes opine. regards kariavdanaR Satish <rsatish1942 wrote: Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,Appropos your query,following is my answer.Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this gives : SIGN LORD MERCURYSTARLORD JUPITERSUBLORD

VENUS.FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope; gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITERDO STAR LORD KETUDO SUB LORD VENUS.MOON SIGN LORD MARSDO STAR LORD KETUDO SUB LORD RAHU.Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORDor MOON STAR LORD.Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU, hence a relation ship is estabilised. Conclusion answer is YES.Regards,Satish-- In , "Raghunatha RaoNemani" <raon1008 wrote:>> Om Krishna Guru> > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,> > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details from > Raichur Ji's software:-> > Horary Number = 60> > September 10,

2006> Time: 15:15:30> Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)> Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"> USA> > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar> > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS> ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket> 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup> 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket> 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar> 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.> 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven > > Can

you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga > Principle taking the above as an example.> > Thanks for your help in advance.> > Regards> Raghunatha Rao> > , "gdplus1" <gdplus1@> wrote:> >> > Dear Raghunath Rao,> > > > Can you please post the > > 1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub> > 2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub> > 3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub> > details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my study.> > > > I hope that you checked both the critera for "YES" in your > analysis.> > > > Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363 > > "The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star Lord >

of > > Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at time > of > > casting, then Answer IS YES." > > > > Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435> > "if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord of > the > > Ascendant or the Moon's Starlord...the answer was a definite " > YES"."> > > > BTW, which group was this quiz posted.> > > > Thanks,> > Krishna> > > > , Raghunatha RaoNemani > > <raon1008@> wrote:> > >> > > Om Krishna Guru> > > > > > Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,> > > > > > Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native is > > married or not providing the native's birth

details.> > > > > > I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the > > Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.> > > > > > I have used the following principle to answer this > question "Is > > the native is married or not".> > > > > > KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of > Moon > > then the answer is "Yes", other wise the answer is "No".> > > > > > I have taken a random number from software program to answer > this > > question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this > question > > will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting > for > > some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in > that > > list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not > want

> > to mix different methods.> > > > > > Horary Number = 60> > > > > > September 10, 2006> > > Time: 15:15:30> > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)> > > Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"> > > USA> > > > > > In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord > of > > Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is "No", which > > means the native is not married. > > > > > > So, may I request you to please verify whether the above > analysis > > is correct in arriving at the answer is "No" or not and correct me > if > > I am wrong.> > > > > > Regards> > > Raghunatha Rao> > > > > > --- original message from another Non KP group ----> > > > >

> Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm > > > > > > Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c > > > > > > Om Sri gurave Namah! > > > > > > Dear> > > > > > What is the marital status of this native?> > > > > > 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad> > > AP, India .> > > > > > Please include Astrologic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US > (and > > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.> > >> >>

Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Satish Ji and All,

 

Thanks for your reply and it makes a little bit sense now, but I

have few following doubts and need clarifications. Please bear with

me as I am struggling to understand, so I will make my understanding

with questions point wise, so that when you reply to me in that

fashion, it may be easier for me to understand.

 

1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not using

any Tables or books for this exercise.

 

2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the

following from the software:-

 

HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

 

CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

 

Questions:-

 

a) You have mentioned that : Take the Horary No 60 in your case,

from the tables : and you have taken the following:-

 

gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

STARLORD JUPITER

SUBLORD VENUS.

 

But I see from the software as follows :

HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS :

======> Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

 

They are NOT matching with your notes.

 

Then I thought may be I should use the following which is generated

by the software instead:

 

CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl

ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven

 

The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the above is

what you are referring as " Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from

the tables " . I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the Horary

Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please

clarify.

 

3) You have mentioned that " Theory says RP sublord should show

either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.

Here VENUS and KETU are different... "

 

Questions:-

 

a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna and Moon

from the Software, so how can I get this from this software ? If you

do not know as I know you are not the author of the software, that

is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of the

Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare your

analysis.

 

b) Secondly, You have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting to

compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is clear,

but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is RP

Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ?

 

I am sorry for asking some stupid and basic questions, as I am not

fully following hence these question. As you know, I am a beginner

and trying to understand, so please clarify my doubts when you get

some free time.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

 

, " R Satish " <rsatish1942

wrote:

>

>

> Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,

>

>

>

> Appropos your query,following is my answer.

>

>

> Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this

>

> gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> STARLORD JUPITER

> SUBLORD VENUS.

>

>

> FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope;

>

> gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER

> DO STAR LORD KETU

> DO SUB LORD VENUS.

>

> MOON SIGN LORD MARS

> DO STAR LORD KETU

> DO SUB LORD RAHU.

>

>

> Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD

>

> or MOON STAR LORD.

>

>

> Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any

> relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU,

hence

> a relation ship is estabilised.

>

> Conclusion answer is YES.

>

>

>

> Regards,

>

>

> Satish

>> -- In , " Raghunatha RaoNemani "

> <raon1008@> wrote:

> >

> > Om Krishna Guru

> >

> > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,

> >

> > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details

from

> > Raichur Ji's software:-

> >

> > Horary Number = 60

> >

> > September 10, 2006

> > Time: 15:15:30

> > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > USA

> >

> > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS :

Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> >

> > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC

STL :Ket

> > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC

SGL :Jup

> > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON

STL:Ket

> > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON

SGL:Mar

> > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY

LORD :SUN.

> > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket

> > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer

> > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup

> > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer

> > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat

> > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer

> > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven

> >

> > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the

Gulbarga

> > Principle taking the above as an example.

> >

> > Thanks for your help in advance.

> >

> > Regards

> > Raghunatha Rao

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunath Rao Garu, The following is my understanding: 1. The first step is to create chart at the TOJ (Time of Judgement) From the Planetary representation at the Time of Judgement (TOJ) i.e., per the local time, we have an ASC i.e., Let us call it ASC(TOJ). In the output from Software in your example, For ASC(TOJ) SGL = Mer, STL = Ketu. For Moon(TOJ): SGL = Mar, STL = Ketu, SBL = Rahu, SSL = Sun For Fortuna(TOJ): SGL = Sat, STL = Rahu, SBL = Jup, SSL = Ven 2. To complete the Horary Chart for a given number, we replace this ASC(TOJ) with ASC for Horary number 60 called ASC(Horary Number). This ASC(Horary Number) can be looked up in KP Table for Numbers 1 thru 249. Here is the path: hanskpvedic The file name is "KP 1=249 Sublord Table.doc". In your example, ASC (Horary Number 60): SGL = Mer, STL = Jup, SBL = Ven, SSL = Ven Test Number 1: Is SBL of ASC(Horary Number) same as ASC(TOJ) STL ? In your example: SBL of ASC(Horary Number) Ven is not ASC(TOJ) STL i.e., Ketu Test Number 2: Is SBL of ASC(Horary Number) same as Moon(TOJ) STL ? In your example: SBL of ASC(Horary Number) Ven is not Moon(TOJ) STL i.e., Ketu Test Number 3: Is SBL of ASC(Horary Number) same as FortunaMoon(TOJ) STL ? In your example: SBL of ASC(Horary Number) Ven is not Moon(TOJ) STL i.e., Rahu Per KP signification of a planet in the horoscope depends on the Nakshatra or star

in which it is posited. Based on the current chart, Ven is in Ketu constellation. i.e., For Ven(TOJ): SGL = Sun, STL = Ketu, SBL = Mer, SSL = Ketu Since Ketu is Star lord of Venus, Test Number 1 & Test Number 2 passed. If atleast 1 of the 3 tests pass, The question is answered as "YES". Having said that, I request one and all learned members to provide your valuable feedback, Thanks, KrishnaRaghunatha RaoNemani <raon1008 wrote: Om Krishna GuruNamaste Satish Ji and All,Thanks for your reply and it makes a little bit sense now, but I have few following doubts and need clarifications. Please bear with me as I am struggling to understand, so I will

make my understanding with questions point wise, so that when you reply to me in that fashion, it may be easier for me to understand.1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not using any Tables or books for this exercise.2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the following from the software:-HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,MarCUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETSASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.Questions:-a) You have mentioned that : Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables : and you have taken the following:-gives : SIGN LORD MERCURYSTARLORD

JUPITERSUBLORD VENUS.But I see from the software as follows :HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : ======> Jup,Ket,Ven,MarThey are NOT matching with your notes.Then I thought may be I should use the following which is generated by the software instead:CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the above is what you are referring as "Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables". I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the Horary Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please clarify.3) You have mentioned that "Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.Here VENUS and KETU are different..."Questions:-a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna and Moon from the Software, so how can I get this from this software ? If you do

not know as I know you are not the author of the software, that is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of the Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare your analysis.b) Secondly, You have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting to compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is clear, but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is RP Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ?I am sorry for asking some stupid and basic questions, as I am not fully following hence these question. As you know, I am a beginner and trying to understand, so please clarify my doubts when you get some free time.RegardsRaghunatha Rao , "R Satish" wrote:>> > Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,> > > > Appropos your query,following is my answer.> > >

Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this > > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY> STARLORD JUPITER> SUBLORD VENUS.> > > FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope; > > gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER> DO STAR LORD KETU> DO SUB LORD VENUS.> > MOON SIGN LORD MARS> DO STAR LORD KETU> DO SUB LORD RAHU.> > > Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD> > or MOON STAR LORD.> > > Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any > relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU, hence > a relation ship is estabilised. > > Conclusion answer is YES.> > > > Regards,> > > Satish>> -- In , "Raghunatha RaoNemani" > wrote:> >>

> Om Krishna Guru> > > > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,> > > > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details from > > Raichur Ji's software:-> > > > Horary Number = 60> > > > September 10, 2006> > Time: 15:15:30> > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)> > Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"> > USA> > > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar> > > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket> > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup> > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket> > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar> > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY

LORD :SUN.> > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket > > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer > > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup > > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer > > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat > > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer > > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven > > > > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga > > Principle taking the above as an example.> > > > Thanks for your help in advance.> > > > Regards> > Raghunatha Rao

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunatha ji, You are confuse in RP Asc and Horary Asc. First read in book how we take number horary.we take number horary fron stating Deg. Mnt. Sec. of Sub.for example Horay number 1 start from 00 deg, 00 mnt. 00 sec. that means when any one give as horary no 1 the Asc is same alwyas 00 Deg.00 Mnt. 00 Sec. sight lord MAR-star lord KET and sub lords KET.even you cast from your place and i cast from my place Horary No 1 Asc is fix for ever, but wheh we cast Horay chart as per detial givan in books our other cusp sublord will change as per our place. Now what is RP Asc. RP Asc means when you cast Horary chart at the same time and place what is Asc. is RP asc. so bothe are deffer. Now RP Moon: MOON's position are same in both case RP and Hoary chart so you can take Horary

Moon same as RP Moon. Now my commebt in Bold***************************** regards Kanak Bosmia 1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not using any Tables or books for this exercise. Kanak : No problem you can use any software but primery knowladge of casting of Horary chart is must and it is adviceble to understand how to cast Horay chart manualy. we all are not do all

calculations manualy but Knowladge is nessery.2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the following from the software:-HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,MarCUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETSASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.Questions:-a) You have mentioned that : Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables : and you have taken the following:-gives : SIGN LORD MERCURYSTARLORD JUPITERSUBLORD VENUS.But I see from the software as follows :HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP

241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : ======> Jup,Ket,Ven,MarThey are NOT matching with your notes.Then I thought may be I should use the following which is generated by the software instead:CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the above is what you are referring as "Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables". I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the Horary Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please clarify. Kanak: yes Lok above the Blue font mention RP Asc and Orange Font mention Horary Asc.3) You have mentioned that "Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.Here VENUS and KETU are different..."Questions:-a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna and Moon from

the Software, so how can I get this from this software ? If you do not know as I know you are not the author of the software, that is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of the Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare your analysis. Kanak: Software show up tom sub-sub mfor all cusp and Planet and also for RP too. see in above teable you mention: Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : sibg lord Jup, startlord Ket, sublord Ven, sub sublord Mar ASC sign lord Mer ,startlord Jup ,sublord Ven sub sublord Ven : :MOON sign lord Mar ,starlord Ket, sublord Rah, subl sub ord Sun b) Secondly, You

have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting to compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is clear, but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is RP Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ? Kanak: Look in table of Planet possition in software. VEN( Sublord of Asc.) is in the Star of KET. Hope it clear regards Kanak Bosmia I am sorry for asking some stupid and basic questions, as I am not fully following hence

these question. As you know, I am a beginner and trying to understand, so please clarify my doubts when you get some free time.RegardsRaghunatha Rao , "R Satish" <rsatish1942 wrote:>> > Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,> > > > Appropos your query,following is my answer.> > > Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this > > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY> STARLORD JUPITER> SUBLORD VENUS.> > > FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope; > > gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER> DO STAR LORD KETU> DO SUB LORD VENUS.> > MOON SIGN LORD MARS> DO STAR LORD KETU> DO SUB LORD RAHU.> > > Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR

LORD> > or MOON STAR LORD.> > > Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any > relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU, hence > a relation ship is estabilised. > > Conclusion answer is YES.> > > > Regards,> > > Satish>> -- In , "Raghunatha RaoNemani" > <raon1008@> wrote:> >> > Om Krishna Guru> > > > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,> > > > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details from > > Raichur Ji's software:-> > > > Horary Number = 60> > > > September 10, 2006> > Time: 15:15:30> > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)> > Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53'

23"> > USA> > > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar> > > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket> > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup> > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket> > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar> > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.> > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket > > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer > > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup > > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer > > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat > > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer > > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven > >

> > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga > > Principle taking the above as an example.> > > > Thanks for your help in advance.> > > > Regards> > Raghunatha Rao>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

[Guest guest]

Dear Satish

 

Can you please clarify this one for me?For Horary Number 246 (Mars is Sublord).

 

Judgment Time / Location Friday, September 22, 2006 23:10:20 pm in Melbourne, Australia.37S50 145E00 Zone 10 hrs ahead of GMT DST 0

 

Ruling Planet At Judgment(Using Kp Ayanamsa)Lagna Sign Is Virgo.Lagna Star Lord is Sun.Moon Star Lord is Sun.Since there is no connection by nakshatra. But if Mars is conjunct Sun in Virgo. Do we take answer as a yes or a no?

 

RegardsAshy

 

 

 

-

R Satish

Friday, September 22, 2006 3:37 PM

Re: Gulbarga Method - My Exercise - 1

 

 

Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,Appropos your query,following is my answer.Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this gives : SIGN LORD MERCURYSTARLORD JUPITERSUBLORD VENUS.FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope; gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITERDO STAR LORD KETUDO SUB LORD VENUS.MOON SIGN LORD MARSDO STAR LORD KETUDO SUB LORD RAHU.Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORDor MOON STAR LORD.Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU, hence a relation ship is estabilised. Conclusion answer is YES.Regards,Satish-- In , "Raghunatha RaoNemani" <raon1008 wrote:>> Om Krishna Guru> > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,> > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details from > Raichur Ji's software:-> > Horary Number = 60> > September 10, 2006> Time: 15:15:30> Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)> Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"> USA> > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar> > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS> ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket> 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup> 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket> 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar> 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.> 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven > > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga > Principle taking the above as an example.> > Thanks for your help in advance.> > Regards> Raghunatha Rao> > , "gdplus1" <gdplus1@> wrote:> >> > Dear Raghunath Rao,> > > > Can you please post the > > 1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub> > 2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub> > 3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub> > details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my study.> > > > I hope that you checked both the critera for "YES" in your > analysis.> > > > Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363 > > "The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star Lord > of > > Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at time > of > > casting, then Answer IS YES." > > > > Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435> > "if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord of > the > > Ascendant or the Moon's Starlord...the answer was a definite " > YES"."> > > > BTW, which group was this quiz posted.> > > > Thanks,> > Krishna> > > > , Raghunatha RaoNemani > > <raon1008@> wrote:> > >> > > Om Krishna Guru> > > > > > Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,> > > > > > Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native is > > married or not providing the native's birth details.> > > > > > I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the > > Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.> > > > > > I have used the following principle to answer this > question "Is > > the native is married or not".> > > > > > KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of > Moon > > then the answer is "Yes", other wise the answer is "No".> > > > > > I have taken a random number from software program to answer > this > > question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this > question > > will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting > for > > some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in > that > > list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not > want > > to mix different methods.> > > > > > Horary Number = 60> > > > > > September 10, 2006> > > Time: 15:15:30> > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)> > > Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"> > > USA> > > > > > In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord > of > > Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is "No", which > > means the native is not married. > > > > > > So, may I request you to please verify whether the above > analysis > > is correct in arriving at the answer is "No" or not and correct me > if > > I am wrong.> > > > > > Regards> > > Raghunatha Rao> > > > > > --- original message from another Non KP group ----> > > > > > Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm > > > > > > Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c > > > > > > Om Sri gurave Namah! > > > > > > Dear> > > > > > What is the marital status of this native?> > > > > > 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad> > > AP, India .> > > > > > Please include Astrologic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US > (and > > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Kanak Bhai,

 

Yes, you are right I was bit confused with these definitions. Now

with your explanations I am clear now.

 

Thanks again for your help.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

 

 

, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

>

> Dear Raghunatha ji,

>

> You are confuse in RP Asc and Horary Asc.

>

> First read in book how we take number horary.we take number

horary fron stating Deg. Mnt. Sec. of Sub.for example Horay number 1

start from 00 deg, 00 mnt. 00 sec. that means when any one give as

horary no 1 the Asc is same alwyas 00 Deg.00 Mnt. 00 Sec. sight lord

MAR-star lord KET and sub lords KET.even you cast from your place

and i cast from my place Horary No 1 Asc is fix for ever, but wheh

we cast Horay chart as per detial givan in books our other cusp

sublord will change as per our place.

>

> Now what is RP Asc.

>

> RP Asc means when you cast Horary chart at the same time and

place what is Asc. is RP asc.

>

> so bothe are deffer.

>

> Now RP Moon: MOON's position are same in both case RP and Hoary

chart so you can take Horary Moon same as RP Moon.

>

> Now my commebt in Bold*****************************

>

> regards

> Kanak Bosmia

>

>

>

>

> 1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not

using

> any Tables or books for this exercise.

>

> Kanak : No problem you can use any software but primery

knowladge of casting of Horary chart is must and it is adviceble to

understand how to cast Horay chart manualy. we all are not do all

calculations manualy but Knowladge is nessery.

>

> 2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the

> following from the software:-

>

> HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

>

> CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

> 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

> 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

> 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

> 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

>

> Questions:-

>

> a) You have mentioned that : Take the Horary No 60 in your case,

> from the tables : and you have taken the following:-

>

> gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> STARLORD JUPITER

> SUBLORD VENUS.

>

> But I see from the software as follows :

> HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS :

> ======> Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

>

> They are NOT matching with your notes.

>

> Then I thought may be I should use the following which is

generated

> by the software instead:

>

> CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl

> ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven

>

> The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the above

is

> what you are referring as " Take the Horary No 60 in your case,

from

> the tables " . I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the Horary

> Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please

> clarify.

>

> Kanak: yes Lok above the Blue font mention RP Asc and Orange

Font mention Horary Asc.

>

> 3) You have mentioned that " Theory says RP sublord should show

> either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.

> Here VENUS and KETU are different... "

>

> Questions:-

>

> a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna and

Moon

> from the Software, so how can I get this from this software ? If

you

> do not know as I know you are not the author of the software, that

> is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of the

> Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare

your

> analysis.

>

> Kanak: Software show up tom sub-sub mfor all cusp and Planet and

also for RP too. see in above teable you mention:

> Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : sibg lord Jup, startlord Ket,

sublord Ven, sub sublord Mar

>

> ASC sign lord Mer ,startlord Jup ,sublord Ven sub sublord Ven :

>

> :MOON sign lord Mar ,starlord Ket, sublord Rah, subl sub ord

Sun

>

>

>

>

> b) Secondly, You have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting to

> compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is clear,

> but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is RP

> Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ?

>

> Kanak: Look in table of Planet possition in software. VEN(

Sublord of Asc.) is in the Star of KET.

>

>

>

> Hope it clear

>

> regards

>

> Kanak Bosmia

[Guest guest]

Daer Ashy,

 

Welcome aboard. I am not great shakes at astrology, in particular

 

KP. There are bigger stalwarts Like Sri Raichur, whom I hold in

 

reverence.

 

To answer your query, if the planets are in conjunction, I would

 

say the answer is YES.

 

As I believe, this theory is to be applied to minor events. We

 

 

 

still have to rely on standard methods for important matters.

 

Intention is most important, procedures follow.

 

Please verify your question thru standard Horary procedure and

 

gain confidence.

 

 

Best wishes.

 

 

Satish

 

 

 

, " Ashy " <agreeny wrote:

>

> Dear Satish

>

> Can you please clarify this one for me?

> For Horary Number 246 (Mars is Sublord).

>

> Judgment Time / Location

> Friday, September 22, 2006 23:10:20 pm in Melbourne,

Australia.37S50 145E00 Zone 10 hrs ahead of GMT DST 0

>

> Ruling Planet At Judgment(Using Kp Ayanamsa)

> Lagna Sign Is Virgo.

> Lagna Star Lord is Sun.

> Moon Star Lord is Sun.

> Since there is no connection by nakshatra. But if Mars is conjunct

Sun in Virgo. Do we take answer as a yes or a no?

>

> Regards

> Ashy

>

>

> -

> R Satish

>

> Friday, September 22, 2006 3:37 PM

> Re: Gulbarga Method - My Exercise - 1

>

>

>

> Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,

>

> Appropos your query,following is my answer.

>

> Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this

>

> gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> STARLORD JUPITER

> SUBLORD VENUS.

>

> FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope;

>

> gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER

> DO STAR LORD KETU

> DO SUB LORD VENUS.

>

> MOON SIGN LORD MARS

> DO STAR LORD KETU

> DO SUB LORD RAHU.

>

> Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD

>

> or MOON STAR LORD.

>

> Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any

> relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU,

hence

> a relation ship is estabilised.

>

> Conclusion answer is YES.

>

> Regards,

>

> Satish

>

> -- In , " Raghunatha RaoNemani "

> <raon1008@> wrote:

> >

> > Om Krishna Guru

> >

> > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,

> >

> > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details

from

> > Raichur Ji's software:-

> >

> > Horary Number = 60

> >

> > September 10, 2006

> > Time: 15:15:30

> > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > USA

> >

> > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> >

> > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

> > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

> > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

> > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

> > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

> > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket

> > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer

> > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup

> > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer

> > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat

> > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer

> > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven

> >

> > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the

Gulbarga

> > Principle taking the above as an example.

> >

> > Thanks for your help in advance.

> >

> > Regards

> > Raghunatha Rao

> >

> > , " gdplus1 " <gdplus1@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Raghunath Rao,

> > >

> > > Can you please post the

> > > 1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > 2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > 3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my

study.

> > >

> > > I hope that you checked both the critera for " YES " in your

> > analysis.

> > >

> > > Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363

> > > " The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star

Lord

> > of

> > > Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at

time

> > of

> > > casting, then Answer IS YES. "

> > >

> > > Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435

> > > " if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord

of

> > the

> > > Ascendant or the Moon's Starlord...the answer was a

definite "

> > YES " . "

> > >

> > > BTW, which group was this quiz posted.

> > >

> > > Thanks,

> > > Krishna

> > >

> > > , Raghunatha RaoNemani

> > > <raon1008@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Om Krishna Guru

> > > >

> > > > Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,

> > > >

> > > > Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native

> is

> > > married or not providing the native's birth details.

> > > >

> > > > I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the

> > > Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.

> > > >

> > > > I have used the following principle to answer this

> > question " Is

> > > the native is married or not " .

> > > >

> > > > KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord

of

> > Moon

> > > then the answer is " Yes " , other wise the answer is " No " .

> > > >

> > > > I have taken a random number from software program to

answer

> > this

> > > question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this

> > question

> > > will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still

waiting

> > for

> > > some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis

in

> > that

> > > list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do

not

> > want

> > > to mix different methods.

> > > >

> > > > Horary Number = 60

> > > >

> > > > September 10, 2006

> > > > Time: 15:15:30

> > > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > > > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > > > USA

> > > >

> > > > In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star

Lord

> > of

> > > Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is " No " ,

which

> > > means the native is not married.

> > > >

> > > > So, may I request you to please verify whether the above

> > analysis

> > > is correct in arriving at the answer is " No " or not and

correct

> me

> > if

> > > I am wrong.

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > > Raghunatha Rao

> > > >

> > > > --- original message from another Non KP group ----

> > > >

> > > > Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

> > > >

> > > > Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c

> > > >

> > > > Om Sri gurave Namah!

> > > >

> > > > Dear

> > > >

> > > > What is the marital status of this native?

> > > >

> > > > 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad

> > > > AP, India .

> > > >

> > > > Please include Astrologic

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the

US

> > (and

> > > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Daer Sri raghunatha Rao garu,

 

I trust you are satisfied with Sri Kanak's explanation, I am not

replying the same.

 

Gulbarga Theory, in my opinion, is for snapshot predictions

for Yes /No type of situations, minor in Nature.Deatailed chart

preparations require time and energy.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

, " Raghunatha Rao Nemani "

<raon1008 wrote:

>

> Om Krishna Guru

>

> Namaste Kanak Bhai,

>

> Yes, you are right I was bit confused with these definitions. Now

> with your explanations I am clear now.

>

> Thanks again for your help.

>

> Regards

> Raghunatha Rao

>

>

> , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Raghunatha ji,

> >

> > You are confuse in RP Asc and Horary Asc.

> >

> > First read in book how we take number horary.we take number

> horary fron stating Deg. Mnt. Sec. of Sub.for example Horay number

1

> start from 00 deg, 00 mnt. 00 sec. that means when any one give as

> horary no 1 the Asc is same alwyas 00 Deg.00 Mnt. 00 Sec. sight

lord

> MAR-star lord KET and sub lords KET.even you cast from your place

> and i cast from my place Horary No 1 Asc is fix for ever, but wheh

> we cast Horay chart as per detial givan in books our other cusp

> sublord will change as per our place.

> >

> > Now what is RP Asc.

> >

> > RP Asc means when you cast Horary chart at the same time and

> place what is Asc. is RP asc.

> >

> > so bothe are deffer.

> >

> > Now RP Moon: MOON's position are same in both case RP and Hoary

> chart so you can take Horary Moon same as RP Moon.

> >

> > Now my commebt in Bold*****************************

> >

> > regards

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > 1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not

> using

> > any Tables or books for this exercise.

> >

> > Kanak : No problem you can use any software but primery

> knowladge of casting of Horary chart is must and it is adviceble

to

> understand how to cast Horay chart manualy. we all are not do all

> calculations manualy but Knowladge is nessery.

> >

> > 2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the

> > following from the software:-

> >

> > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> >

> > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

> > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

> > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

> > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

> > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

> >

> > Questions:-

> >

> > a) You have mentioned that : Take the Horary No 60 in your case,

> > from the tables : and you have taken the following:-

> >

> > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> > STARLORD JUPITER

> > SUBLORD VENUS.

> >

> > But I see from the software as follows :

> > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS :

> > ======> Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> >

> > They are NOT matching with your notes.

> >

> > Then I thought may be I should use the following which is

> generated

> > by the software instead:

> >

> > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl

> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven

> >

> > The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the above

> is

> > what you are referring as " Take the Horary No 60 in your case,

> from

> > the tables " . I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the Horary

> > Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please

> > clarify.

> >

> > Kanak: yes Lok above the Blue font mention RP Asc and Orange

> Font mention Horary Asc.

> >

> > 3) You have mentioned that " Theory says RP sublord should show

> > either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.

> > Here VENUS and KETU are different... "

> >

> > Questions:-

> >

> > a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna and

> Moon

> > from the Software, so how can I get this from this software ? If

> you

> > do not know as I know you are not the author of the software,

that

> > is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of the

> > Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare

> your

> > analysis.

> >

> > Kanak: Software show up tom sub-sub mfor all cusp and Planet

and

> also for RP too. see in above teable you mention:

> > Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : sibg lord Jup, startlord

Ket,

> sublord Ven, sub sublord Mar

> >

> > ASC sign lord Mer ,startlord Jup ,sublord Ven sub sublord

Ven :

> >

> > :MOON sign lord Mar ,starlord Ket, sublord Rah, subl sub ord

> Sun

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > b) Secondly, You have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting to

> > compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is clear,

> > but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is RP

> > Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ?

> >

> > Kanak: Look in table of Planet possition in software. VEN(

> Sublord of Asc.) is in the Star of KET.

> >

> >

> >

> > Hope it clear

> >

> > regards

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia

>

[Guest guest]

Dear astrobhai,(astrological brothers)

 

I like to share some words about Gulbarga thoery.in prasanna hora tantra the olden scripts given lot of idea about how people will choose the number or flower or color to fix prasanna lagna.

 

like that in KP we are choosing between 1 to 249 that only becoz if current RP . if a native selecting a number then that sing /star /sub of the number has been already there in RP. otherwise native can't choose that number. that's the one resason the native selecting that perticular number. mind flashes the number becoz influance of RP planets. basic truth is RP only choosing the number not the human.

 

so when ever we chooise the numbmer then Horary Asc sub will be thare in RP. then we can tell always YES?

 

and one person asking "when i wil cure from illness" , for this Q if directly we are telling from ASC sublord then what is the use of 6th cusp ect?

 

KSK cleared about lot of blined belive in astrology. but few people making KP system into that path.

 

this is not a good thing for astro!

 

Swami Omkar

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Gopalachary garu,

 

In astrology there is nothing like 100% accuracy.This

science is one of statistical probability. The success rate however

improves with experience and intuition.One is man-made, the otheris

God's gift.

 

With meaning to be disrepectful, personal experience is the best

 

guide.You choose.

 

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

, " Gopalachary p.m. "

<karivadana wrote:

>

> sir,

>

> Once in Astrology and Athrishta magazine it discussed and

concluded that gulbarga theory dosnt work correctly. What other sr.

memberes opine.

>

> regards

>

> kariavdana

>

> R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote:

>

> Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,

>

> Appropos your query,following is my answer.

>

> Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this

>

> gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> STARLORD JUPITER

> SUBLORD VENUS.

>

> FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope;

>

> gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER

> DO STAR LORD KETU

> DO SUB LORD VENUS.

>

> MOON SIGN LORD MARS

> DO STAR LORD KETU

> DO SUB LORD RAHU.

>

> Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD

>

> or MOON STAR LORD.

>

> Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any

> relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU,

hence

> a relation ship is estabilised.

>

> Conclusion answer is YES.

>

> Regards,

>

> Satish

>

> -- In , " Raghunatha RaoNemani "

> <raon1008@> wrote:

> >

> > Om Krishna Guru

> >

> > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,

> >

> > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details

from

> > Raichur Ji's software:-

> >

> > Horary Number = 60

> >

> > September 10, 2006

> > Time: 15:15:30

> > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > USA

> >

> > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> >

> > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

> > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

> > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

> > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

> > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

> > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket

> > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer

> > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup

> > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer

> > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat

> > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer

> > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven

> >

> > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the

Gulbarga

> > Principle taking the above as an example.

> >

> > Thanks for your help in advance.

> >

> > Regards

> > Raghunatha Rao

> >

> > , " gdplus1 " <gdplus1@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Raghunath Rao,

> > >

> > > Can you please post the

> > > 1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > 2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > 3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my

study.

> > >

> > > I hope that you checked both the critera for " YES " in your

> > analysis.

> > >

> > > Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363

> > > " The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star

Lord

> > of

> > > Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at

time

> > of

> > > casting, then Answer IS YES. "

> > >

> > > Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435

> > > " if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord of

> > the

> > > Ascendant or the Moon's Starlord...the answer was a definite "

> > YES " . "

> > >

> > > BTW, which group was this quiz posted.

> > >

> > > Thanks,

> > > Krishna

> > >

> > > , Raghunatha RaoNemani

> > > <raon1008@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Om Krishna Guru

> > > >

> > > > Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,

> > > >

> > > > Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native

> is

> > > married or not providing the native's birth details.

> > > >

> > > > I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the

> > > Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.

> > > >

> > > > I have used the following principle to answer this

> > question " Is

> > > the native is married or not " .

> > > >

> > > > KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of

> > Moon

> > > then the answer is " Yes " , other wise the answer is " No " .

> > > >

> > > > I have taken a random number from software program to answer

> > this

> > > question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this

> > question

> > > will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting

> > for

> > > some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in

> > that

> > > list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do

not

> > want

> > > to mix different methods.

> > > >

> > > > Horary Number = 60

> > > >

> > > > September 10, 2006

> > > > Time: 15:15:30

> > > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > > > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > > > USA

> > > >

> > > > In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord

> > of

> > > Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is " No " ,

which

> > > means the native is not married.

> > > >

> > > > So, may I request you to please verify whether the above

> > analysis

> > > is correct in arriving at the answer is " No " or not and correct

> me

> > if

> > > I am wrong.

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > > Raghunatha Rao

> > > >

> > > > --- original message from another Non KP group ----

> > > >

> > > > Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

> > > >

> > > > Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c

> > > >

> > > > Om Sri gurave Namah!

> > > >

> > > > Dear

> > > >

> > > > What is the marital status of this native?

> > > >

> > > > 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad

> > > > AP, India .

> > > >

> > > > Please include Astrologic

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US

> > (and

> > > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

> > > >

> > >

> >

 

> Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India

> Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

Version 8. Get it NOW

>

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Satish Ji, Ramesh Ji and Kanak Bhai,

 

Thanks to all of you for taking time to making me clear on this

Gulbarga Theory. I have also learnt the principles and for any

important and a major events, I would still rely upon the other

prescribed methods and not this short cut method.

 

Thanks again and your timely help was much appreciated.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

 

 

, " R Satish " <rsatish1942

wrote:

Daer Sri raghunatha Rao garu,

>

> I trust you are satisfied with Sri Kanak's explanation, I am not

> replying the same.

>

> Gulbarga Theory, in my opinion, is for snapshot predictions

> for Yes /No type of situations, minor in Nature.Deatailed

chart

> preparations require time and energy.

>

> Regards,

>

> Satish

>

> , " Raghunatha Rao Nemani "

> <raon1008@> wrote:

> >

> > Om Krishna Guru

> >

> > Namaste Kanak Bhai,

> >

> > Yes, you are right I was bit confused with these definitions.

Now

> > with your explanations I am clear now.

> >

> > Thanks again for your help.

> >

> > Regards

> > Raghunatha Rao

> >

> >

> > , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Raghunatha ji,

> > >

> > > You are confuse in RP Asc and Horary Asc.

> > >

> > > First read in book how we take number horary.we take number

> > horary fron stating Deg. Mnt. Sec. of Sub.for example Horay

number

> 1

> > start from 00 deg, 00 mnt. 00 sec. that means when any one give

as

> > horary no 1 the Asc is same alwyas 00 Deg.00 Mnt. 00 Sec. sight

> lord

> > MAR-star lord KET and sub lords KET.even you cast from your

place

> > and i cast from my place Horary No 1 Asc is fix for ever, but

wheh

> > we cast Horay chart as per detial givan in books our other cusp

> > sublord will change as per our place.

> > >

> > > Now what is RP Asc.

> > >

> > > RP Asc means when you cast Horary chart at the same time and

> > place what is Asc. is RP asc.

> > >

> > > so bothe are deffer.

> > >

> > > Now RP Moon: MOON's position are same in both case RP and

Hoary

> > chart so you can take Horary Moon same as RP Moon.

> > >

> > > Now my commebt in Bold*****************************

> > >

> > > regards

> > > Kanak Bosmia

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > 1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not

> > using

> > > any Tables or books for this exercise.

> > >

> > > Kanak : No problem you can use any software but primery

> > knowladge of casting of Horary chart is must and it is

adviceble

> to

> > understand how to cast Horay chart manualy. we all are not do

all

> > calculations manualy but Knowladge is nessery.

> > >

> > > 2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the

> > > following from the software:-

> > >

> > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> > >

> > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> > > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

> > > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

> > > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

> > > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

> > > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

> > >

> > > Questions:-

> > >

> > > a) You have mentioned that : Take the Horary No 60 in your

case,

> > > from the tables : and you have taken the following:-

> > >

> > > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> > > STARLORD JUPITER

> > > SUBLORD VENUS.

> > >

> > > But I see from the software as follows :

> > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS :

> > > ======> Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> > >

> > > They are NOT matching with your notes.

> > >

> > > Then I thought may be I should use the following which is

> > generated

> > > by the software instead:

> > >

> > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl

> > > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven

> > >

> > > The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the

above

> > is

> > > what you are referring as " Take the Horary No 60 in your case,

> > from

> > > the tables " . I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the

Horary

> > > Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please

> > > clarify.

> > >

> > > Kanak: yes Lok above the Blue font mention RP Asc and Orange

> > Font mention Horary Asc.

> > >

> > > 3) You have mentioned that " Theory says RP sublord should show

> > > either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.

> > > Here VENUS and KETU are different... "

> > >

> > > Questions:-

> > >

> > > a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna

and

> > Moon

> > > from the Software, so how can I get this from this software ?

If

> > you

> > > do not know as I know you are not the author of the software,

> that

> > > is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of

the

> > > Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare

> > your

> > > analysis.

> > >

> > > Kanak: Software show up tom sub-sub mfor all cusp and Planet

> and

> > also for RP too. see in above teable you mention:

> > > Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : sibg lord Jup, startlord

> Ket,

> > sublord Ven, sub sublord Mar

> > >

> > > ASC sign lord Mer ,startlord Jup ,sublord Ven sub sublord

> Ven :

> > >

> > > :MOON sign lord Mar ,starlord Ket, sublord Rah, subl sub

ord

> > Sun

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > b) Secondly, You have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting

to

> > > compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is

clear,

> > > but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is

RP

> > > Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ?

> > >

> > > Kanak: Look in table of Planet possition in software. VEN(

> > Sublord of Asc.) is in the Star of KET.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hope it clear

> > >

> > > regards

> > >

> > > Kanak Bosmia

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Raghunath RaoIn Horary the ascendent for each Number 1 to 249 are fixed, irrespective of time or place. This can be taken from Tables or SW.Manually if you know the Ascendent, you have to work the Siderial time when the Asc at the place will be at that degree. From this you work the other house cusps. Using the SW you need not do anything, this is done by the prog.To test this Take the same Horary No, but at different PLACES and Times, and check the Houses 1 to 6. ! will always be sameThe Ruling planets are the Day Lord. Moon SIGN LORD,STAR LORD and the the ASC SIGN and Star Lords.This ASC, the normal asc will vary with time and place. The Moon is not affected by the Place (only dependent of DATE and Time). Day usually remains unaffected. Do in the SW the natural ascdent is given, along with the Lords.IF you cast a regulat chart at same place, same time, you will get this. Check it upgood

luckKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raghunatha ji, You are confuse in RP Asc and Horary Asc. First read in book how we take number horary.we take number horary fron stating Deg. Mnt. Sec. of Sub.for example Horay number 1 start from 00 deg, 00 mnt. 00 sec. that means when any one give as horary no 1 the Asc is same alwyas 00 Deg.00 Mnt. 00 Sec. sight lord MAR-star lord KET and sub lords KET.even you cast from your place and i cast

from my place Horary No 1 Asc is fix for ever, but wheh we cast Horay chart as per detial givan in books our other cusp sublord will change as per our place. Now what is RP Asc. RP Asc means when you cast Horary chart at the same time and place what is Asc. is RP asc. so bothe are deffer. Now RP Moon: MOON's position are same in both case RP and Hoary chart so you can take Horary Moon same as RP Moon. Now my commebt in Bold***************************** regards Kanak Bosmia 1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not using any Tables or books for this exercise. Kanak : No problem you can use any software but primery knowladge of casting of Horary chart is must and it is adviceble to understand how to cast Horay chart manualy. we all are not do all calculations manualy but Knowladge is nessery.2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the following from the software:-HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,MarCUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETSASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.Questions:-a) You have mentioned that : Take

the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables : and you have taken the following:-gives : SIGN LORD MERCURYSTARLORD JUPITERSUBLORD VENUS.But I see from the software as follows :HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : ======> Jup,Ket,Ven,MarThey are NOT matching with your notes.Then I thought may be I should use the following which is generated by the software instead:CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the above is what you are referring as "Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables". I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the Horary Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please clarify. Kanak: yes Lok above the Blue font mention RP Asc and Orange Font mention Horary Asc.3) You have mentioned

that "Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.Here VENUS and KETU are different..."Questions:-a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna and Moon from the Software, so how can I get this from this software ? If you do not know as I know you are not the author of the software, that is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of the Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare your analysis. Kanak: Software show up tom sub-sub mfor all cusp and Planet and also for RP too. see in above teable you mention: Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : sibg lord Jup, startlord Ket, sublord Ven, sub sublord Mar ASC

sign lord Mer ,startlord Jup ,sublord Ven sub sublord Ven : :MOON sign lord Mar ,starlord Ket, sublord Rah, subl sub ord Sun b) Secondly, You have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting to compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is clear, but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is RP Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ? Kanak: Look in table of Planet possition in software. VEN( Sublord of Asc.) is in the Star of KET. Hope it clear regards Kanak Bosmia I am sorry for asking some stupid and basic questions, as I am not fully following hence these question. As you know, I am a beginner and trying to understand, so please clarify my doubts when you get some free time.RegardsRaghunatha Rao , "R Satish" <rsatish1942 wrote:>> > Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,> > > > Appropos your query,following is my answer.> > > Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this > > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY> STARLORD JUPITER> SUBLORD VENUS.> > > FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006,

15-15-30,make a horoscope; > > gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER> DO STAR LORD KETU> DO SUB LORD VENUS.> > MOON SIGN LORD MARS> DO STAR LORD KETU> DO SUB LORD RAHU.> > > Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD> > or MOON STAR LORD.> > > Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any > relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU, hence > a relation ship is estabilised. > > Conclusion answer is YES.> > > > Regards,> > > Satish>> -- In , "Raghunatha RaoNemani" > <raon1008@> wrote:> >> > Om Krishna Guru> > > > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,> > > > Thanks for your reply and feedback.

I am providing the details from > > Raichur Ji's software:-> > > > Horary Number = 60> > > > September 10, 2006> > Time: 15:15:30> > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)> > Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"> > USA> > > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar> > > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket> > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup> > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket> > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar> > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.> > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket > > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer > >

8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup > > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer > > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat > > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer > > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven > > > > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga > > Principle taking the above as an example.> > > > Thanks for your help in advance.> > > > Regards> > Raghunatha Rao>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less. Good LuckRaichur A RBombay

Tel 2506 2609

How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

[Guest guest]

Om Krishna Guru

 

Namaste Raichur Ji,

 

Thanks for the note and it was an awesome explanation and things are

clear now.

 

Your timely reply was much appreciated and with this note, I am

closing the Gulbarga principle and moving to next. Thank you Sir.

 

Regards

Raghunatha Rao

 

 

, Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote:

>

> Dear Raghunath Rao

>

> In Horary the ascendent for each Number 1 to 249 are fixed,

irrespective of time or place. This can be taken from Tables or SW.

>

> Manually if you know the Ascendent, you have to work the Siderial

time when the Asc at the place will be at that degree. From this you

work the other house cusps. Using the SW you need not do anything,

this is done by the prog.

>

> To test this Take the same Horary No, but at different PLACES and

Times, and check the Houses 1 to 6. ! will always be same

>

> The Ruling planets are the Day Lord. Moon SIGN LORD,STAR LORD and

the the ASC SIGN and Star Lords.

> This ASC, the normal asc will vary with time and place. The Moon

is not affected by the Place (only dependent of DATE and Time). Day

usually remains unaffected. Do in the SW the natural ascdent is

given, along with the Lords.

>

> IF you cast a regulat chart at same place, same time, you will get

this. Check it up

>

> good luck

>

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

> Dear Raghunatha ji,

>

> You are confuse in RP Asc and Horary Asc.

>

> First read in book how we take number horary.we take number

horary fron stating Deg. Mnt. Sec. of Sub.for example Horay number 1

start from 00 deg, 00 mnt. 00 sec. that means when any one give as

horary no 1 the Asc is same alwyas 00 Deg.00 Mnt. 00 Sec. sight lord

MAR-star lord KET and sub lords KET.even you cast from your place

and i cast from my place Horary No 1 Asc is fix for ever, but wheh

we cast Horay chart as per detial givan in books our other cusp

sublord will change as per our place.

>

> Now what is RP Asc.

>

> RP Asc means when you cast Horary chart at the same time and

place what is Asc. is RP asc.

>

> so bothe are deffer.

>

> Now RP Moon: MOON's position are same in both case RP and Hoary

chart so you can take Horary Moon same as RP Moon.

>

> Now my commebt in Bold*****************************

>

> regards

> Kanak Bosmia

>

>

>

>

> 1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not

using

> any Tables or books for this exercise.

>

> Kanak : No problem you can use any software but primery

knowladge of casting of Horary chart is must and it is adviceble to

understand how to cast Horay chart manualy. we all are not do all

calculations manualy but Knowladge is nessery.

>

> 2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the

> following from the software:-

>

> HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

>

> CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

> 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

> 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

> 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

> 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

>

> Questions:-

>

> a) You have mentioned that : Take the Horary No 60 in your case,

> from the tables : and you have taken the following:-

>

> gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> STARLORD JUPITER

> SUBLORD VENUS.

>

> But I see from the software as follows :

> HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS :

> ======> Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

>

> They are NOT matching with your notes.

>

> Then I thought may be I should use the following which is

generated

> by the software instead:

>

> CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl

> ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven

>

> The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the above

is

> what you are referring as " Take the Horary No 60 in your case,

from

> the tables " . I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the Horary

> Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please

> clarify.

>

> Kanak: yes Lok above the Blue font mention RP Asc and Orange

Font mention Horary Asc.

>

> 3) You have mentioned that " Theory says RP sublord should show

> either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.

> Here VENUS and KETU are different... "

>

> Questions:-

>

> a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna and

Moon

> from the Software, so how can I get this from this software ? If

you

> do not know as I know you are not the author of the software, that

> is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of the

> Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare

your

> analysis.

>

> Kanak: Software show up tom sub-sub mfor all cusp and Planet and

also for RP too. see in above teable you mention:

> Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : sibg lord Jup, startlord Ket,

sublord Ven, sub sublord Mar

>

> ASC sign lord Mer ,startlord Jup ,sublord Ven sub sublord Ven :

>

> :MOON sign lord Mar ,starlord Ket, sublord Rah, subl sub ord

Sun

>

>

>

>

> b) Secondly, You have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting to

> compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is clear,

> but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is RP

> Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ?

>

> Kanak: Look in table of Planet possition in software. VEN(

Sublord of Asc.) is in the Star of KET.

>

>

>

> Hope it clear

>

> regards

>

> Kanak Bosmia

>

>

> I am sorry for asking some stupid and basic questions, as I am not

> fully following hence these question. As you know, I am a

beginner

> and trying to understand, so please clarify my doubts when you get

> some free time.

>

> Regards

> Raghunatha Rao

>

> , " R Satish " <rsatish1942@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,

> >

> >

> >

> > Appropos your query,following is my answer.

> >

> >

> > Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this

> >

> > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> > STARLORD JUPITER

> > SUBLORD VENUS.

> >

> >

> > FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope;

> >

> > gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER

> > DO STAR LORD KETU

> > DO SUB LORD VENUS.

> >

> > MOON SIGN LORD MARS

> > DO STAR LORD KETU

> > DO SUB LORD RAHU.

> >

> >

> > Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD

> >

> > or MOON STAR LORD.

> >

> >

> > Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any

> > relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU,

> hence

> > a relation ship is estabilised.

> >

> > Conclusion answer is YES.

> >

> >

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> >

> > Satish

> >> -- In , " Raghunatha RaoNemani "

> > <raon1008@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Om Krishna Guru

> > >

> > > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,

> > >

> > > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details

> from

> > > Raichur Ji's software:-

> > >

> > > Horary Number = 60

> > >

> > > September 10, 2006

> > > Time: 15:15:30

> > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > > USA

> > >

> > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS :

> Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> > >

> > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> > > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC

> STL :Ket

> > > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC

> SGL :Jup

> > > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON

> STL:Ket

> > > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON

> SGL:Mar

> > > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY

> LORD :SUN.

> > > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket

> > > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer

> > > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup

> > > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer

> > > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat

> > > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer

> > > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven

> > >

> > > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the

> Gulbarga

> > > Principle taking the above as an example.

> > >

> > > Thanks for your help in advance.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Raghunatha Rao

>

>

>

>

>

> >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

>

>

>

> Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and

30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

>

>

>

>

> Good Luck

> Raichur A R

> Bombay Tel 2506 2609

>

>

> How low will we go? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone

call rates.

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Members The Gulburga method is simple.If the sublord of the No. is same as Star Lord of Moon ORStar Lord of Normal Local ASC then answer is YES otherwise NOthe KP astro's who made the rules never went into other factors like conjunction etc.good luckR Satish <rsatish1942 wrote: Daer Ashy, Welcome aboard. I am not great shakes at astrology, in particular KP. There are bigger stalwarts Like Sri Raichur, whom I hold in

reverence. To answer your query, if the planets are in conjunction, I would say the answer is YES. As I believe, this theory is to be applied to minor events. We still have to rely on standard methods for important matters. Intention is most important, procedures follow. Please verify your question thru standard Horary procedure and gain confidence. Best wishes. Satish , "Ashy" <agreeny wrote: > > Dear Satish > > Can you please clarify this one for me? > For Horary Number 246 (Mars is Sublord). > > Judgment Time / Location > Friday, September 22, 2006 23:10:20 pm in Melbourne, Australia.37S50 145E00 Zone 10 hrs ahead of GMT DST 0 > > Ruling Planet At Judgment(Using Kp

Ayanamsa) > Lagna Sign Is Virgo. > Lagna Star Lord is Sun. > Moon Star Lord is Sun. > Since there is no connection by nakshatra. But if Mars is conjunct Sun in Virgo. Do we take answer as a yes or a no? > > Regards > Ashy > > > - > R Satish > > Friday, September 22, 2006 3:37 PM > Re: Gulbarga Method - My Exercise - 1 > > > > Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu, > > Appropos your query,following is my answer. > > Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this > > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY > STARLORD JUPITER > SUBLORD VENUS. > > FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope;

> > gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER > DO STAR LORD KETU > DO SUB LORD VENUS. > > MOON SIGN LORD MARS > DO STAR LORD KETU > DO SUB LORD RAHU. > > Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD > > or MOON STAR LORD. > > Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any > relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU, hence > a relation ship is estabilised. > > Conclusion answer is YES. > > Regards, > > Satish > > -- In , "Raghunatha RaoNemani" > <raon1008@> wrote: > > > > Om Krishna Guru > > > > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji, > > > > Thanks for your reply and

feedback. I am providing the details from > > Raichur Ji's software:- > > > > Horary Number = 60 > > > > September 10, 2006 > > Time: 15:15:30 > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT) > > Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23" > > USA > > > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar > > > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS > > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket > > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup > > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket > > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar > > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN. > > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket > > 7th Jup Ven

Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer > > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup > > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer > > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat > > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer > > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven > > > > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga > > Principle taking the above as an example. > > > > Thanks for your help in advance. > > > > Regards > > Raghunatha Rao > > > > , "gdplus1" <gdplus1@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Raghunath Rao, > > > > > > Can you please post the > > > 1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord,

Sub-Sub > > > 2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub > > > 3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub > > > details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my study. > > > > > > I hope that you checked both the critera for "YES" in your > > analysis. > > > > > > Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363 > > > "The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star Lord > > of > > > Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at time > > of > > > casting, then Answer IS YES." > > > > > > Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435 > > > "if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord of > > the > > > Ascendant or the Moon's

Starlord...the answer was a definite " > > YES"." > > > > > > BTW, which group was this quiz posted. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Krishna > > > > > > , Raghunatha RaoNemani > > > <raon1008@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Om Krishna Guru > > > > > > > > Namaste Gurus and Learned Members, > > > > > > > > Some one asked a question in another list: whether a native > is > > > married or not providing the native's birth details. > > > > > > > > I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the > > > Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently. > >

> > > > > > I have used the following principle to answer this > > question "Is > > > the native is married or not". > > > > > > > > KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord of > > Moon > > > then the answer is "Yes", other wise the answer is "No". > > > > > > > > I have taken a random number from software program to answer > > this > > > question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this > > question > > > will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still waiting > > for > > > some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis in > > that > > > list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do not > > want >

> > to mix different methods. > > > > > > > > Horary Number = 60 > > > > > > > > September 10, 2006 > > > > Time: 15:15:30 > > > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT) > > > > Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23" > > > > USA > > > > > > > > In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star Lord > > of > > > Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is "No", which > > > means the native is not married. > > > > > > > > So, may I request you to please verify whether the above > > analysis > > > is correct in arriving at the answer is "No" or not and correct > me > > if > > > I am wrong. > > > >

> > > > Regards > > > > Raghunatha Rao > > > > > > > > --- original message from another Non KP group ---- > > > > > > > > Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm > > > > > > > > Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c > > > > > > > > Om Sri gurave Namah! > > > > > > > > Dear > > > > > > > > What is the marital status of this native? > > > > > > > > 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad > > > > AP, India . > > > > > > > > Please include Astrologic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US > > (and > > > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less. > > > > > > > > > > Good LuckRaichur A RBombay

Tel 2506 2609

Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business.

[Guest guest]

Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Raghunatha ji, You are confuse in RP Asc and Horary Asc. First read in book how we take number horary.we take number horary fron stating Deg. Mnt. Sec. of Sub.for example Horay number 1 start from 00 deg, 00 mnt. 00 sec. that means when any one give as horary no 1 the Asc is same alwyas 00 Deg.00 Mnt. 00 Sec. sight lord MAR-star lord KET and sub lords KET.even you cast from your place and i cast from

my place Horary No 1 Asc is fix for ever, but wheh we cast Horay chart as per detial givan in books our other cusp sublord will change as per our place. Now what is RP Asc. RP Asc means when you cast Horary chart at the same time and place what is Asc. is RP asc. so bothe are deffer. Now RP Moon: MOON's position are same in both case RP and Hoary chart so you can take Horary Moon same as RP Moon. Now my commebt in Bold***************************** regards Kanak Bosmia 1) I am using Raichur Ji's Software only for this and I am not using any Tables or books for this exercise. Kanak : No problem you can use any software but primery knowladge of casting of Horary chart is must and it is adviceble to understand how to cast Horay chart manualy. we all are not do all calculations manualy but Knowladge is nessery.2) When I casted the Prashna using Horary Number 60. I get the following from the software:-HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,MarCUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETSASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.Questions:-a) You have mentioned that : Take the Horary No 60 in your

case, from the tables : and you have taken the following:-gives : SIGN LORD MERCURYSTARLORD JUPITERSUBLORD VENUS.But I see from the software as follows :HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : ======> Jup,Ket,Ven,MarThey are NOT matching with your notes.Then I thought may be I should use the following which is generated by the software instead:CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven The above are matching with what you have mentioned. So the above is what you are referring as "Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables". I am seeing them as the Lagna ( based on the Horary Number 60). Are we saying the same thing or different ? please clarify. Kanak: yes Lok above the Blue font mention RP Asc and Orange Font mention Horary Asc.3) You have mentioned that "Theory says RP sublord

should show either LAGNA STAR LORD or MOON STAR LORD.Here VENUS and KETU are different..."Questions:-a) I do not see the Sublords for the Rruling planets: Lagna and Moon from the Software, so how can I get this from this software ? If you do not know as I know you are not the author of the software, that is fine. But this software is not providing the sub lords of the Ruling Planets, that is what I am seeing when tried to compare your analysis. Kanak: Software show up tom sub-sub mfor all cusp and Planet and also for RP too. see in above teable you mention: Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : sibg lord Jup, startlord Ket, sublord Ven, sub sublord Mar ASC sign lord Mer ,startlord Jup ,sublord

Ven sub sublord Ven : :MOON sign lord Mar ,starlord Ket, sublord Rah, subl sub ord Sun b) Secondly, You have used Ven as RP Sub lord and attempting to compare with Ketu which is Lagna/Moon's Star Lord. That is clear, but Ven is the Sub Lord of Lagna, so why you are saying it is RP Sublord, it is Lagna's Sub Lord is it not ? Kanak: Look in table of Planet possition in software. VEN( Sublord of Asc.) is in the Star of KET. Hope it clear regards Kanak Bosmia I am sorry for asking some stupid and basic questions, as I am not fully following hence these question. As you know, I am a beginner and trying to understand, so please clarify my doubts when you get some free time.RegardsRaghunatha Rao , "R Satish" <rsatish1942 wrote:>> > Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,> > > > Appropos your query,following is my answer.> > > Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this > > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY> STARLORD JUPITER> SUBLORD VENUS.> > > FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope; > > gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD

JUPITER> DO STAR LORD KETU> DO SUB LORD VENUS.> > MOON SIGN LORD MARS> DO STAR LORD KETU> DO SUB LORD RAHU.> > > Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD> > or MOON STAR LORD.> > > Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any > relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU, hence > a relation ship is estabilised. > > Conclusion answer is YES.> > > > Regards,> > > Satish>> -- In , "Raghunatha RaoNemani" > <raon1008@> wrote:> >> > Om Krishna Guru> > > > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,> > > > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details from > > Raichur Ji's

software:-> > > > Horary Number = 60> > > > September 10, 2006> > Time: 15:15:30> > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)> > Place: 93 W 20' 59", 44 N 53' 23"> > USA> > > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar> > > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS> > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket> > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup> > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket> > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar> > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.> > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket > > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer > > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup > > 9th Sat

Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer > > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat > > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer > > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven > > > > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the Gulbarga > > Principle taking the above as an example.> > > > Thanks for your help in advance.> > > > Regards> > Raghunatha Rao >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min

or less.

Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW

[Guest guest]

Dear Kariavdana,

 

Msg#2461, 4779 may help.

 

Regards,

 

tw

 

 

 

, " R Satish " <rsatish1942

wrote:

>

>

>

> Dear Sri Gopalachary garu,

>

> In astrology there is nothing like 100%

accuracy.This

> science is one of statistical probability. The success rate

however

> improves with experience and intuition.One is man-made, the

otheris

> God's gift.

>

> With meaning to be disrepectful, personal experience is the

best

>

> guide.You choose.

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Satish

>

>

>

> , " Gopalachary p.m. "

> <karivadana@> wrote:

> >

> > sir,

> >

> > Once in Astrology and Athrishta magazine it discussed and

> concluded that gulbarga theory dosnt work correctly. What other

sr.

> memberes opine.

> >

> > regards

> >

> > kariavdana

> >

> > R Satish <rsatish1942@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sri Raghunatha Rao garu,

> >

> > Appropos your query,following is my answer.

> >

> > Take the Horary No 60 in your case, from the tables this

> >

> > gives : SIGN LORD MERCURY

> > STARLORD JUPITER

> > SUBLORD VENUS.

> >

> > FOR TIME OF JUDGEMENT.10-9-2006, 15-15-30,make a horoscope;

> >

> > gives: LAGNA SIGN LORD JUPITER

> > DO STAR LORD KETU

> > DO SUB LORD VENUS.

> >

> > MOON SIGN LORD MARS

> > DO STAR LORD KETU

> > DO SUB LORD RAHU.

> >

> > Theory says RP sublord should show either LAGNA STAR LORD

> >

> > or MOON STAR LORD.

> >

> > Here VENUS and KETU are different, hence we check any

> > relationship between the two planets..VENUS is in star of KETU,

> hence

> > a relation ship is estabilised.

> >

> > Conclusion answer is YES.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Satish

> >

> > -- In , " Raghunatha RaoNemani "

> > <raon1008@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Om Krishna Guru

> > >

> > > Namaste Satish Ji and Krishna Ji,

> > >

> > > Thanks for your reply and feedback. I am providing the details

> from

> > > Raichur Ji's software:-

> > >

> > > Horary Number = 60

> > >

> > > September 10, 2006

> > > Time: 15:15:30

> > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > > USA

> > >

> > > HOR.NO : 60 : Asc.for RP 241 Deg 30 Min LORDS : Jup,Ket,Ven,Mar

> > >

> > > CUSP Sgl Stl Sbl Ssl :PLANET Sgl Stl Sbl SsL RULING PLANETS

> > > ASC Mer Jup Ven Ven :SUN. Sun Ven Mer Mer ASC STL :Ket

> > > 2nd Moo Sat Jup Jup :MOON Mar Ket Rah Sun ASC SGL :Jup

> > > 3rd Sun Ket Rah Mer :MARS Mer Sun Ven Ven MOON STL:Ket

> > > 4th Mer Sun Sat Rah :MERC Mer Sun Jup Moo MOON SGL:Mar

> > > 5th Ven Rah Sat Sun :JUP. Ven Jup Jup Ven DAY LORD :SUN.

> > > 6th Mar Mer Moo Moo :VEN. Sun Ket Mer Ket

> > > 7th Jup Ven Ket Sat :SAT. Moo Mer Rah Mer

> > > 8th Sat Moo Jup Ven :RAHU Jup Jup Rah Jup

> > > 9th Sat Mar Moo Ven :KETU Mer Sun Jup Mer

> > > 10th Jup Sat Sat Moo :URAN-R Sat Rah Moo Sat

> > > 11th Mar Ket Mer Mer :NEPT-R Sat Mar Mar Mer

> > > 12th Ven Moo Ven Mer :FOR. Sat Rah Jup Ven

> > >

> > > Can you please write to me the detailed analysis using the

> Gulbarga

> > > Principle taking the above as an example.

> > >

> > > Thanks for your help in advance.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Raghunatha Rao

> > >

> > > , " gdplus1 " <gdplus1@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Raghunath Rao,

> > > >

> > > > Can you please post the

> > > > 1) Asc: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > > 2) Horary Number: Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > > 3) Moon Sign Lord, Star Lord, Sub Lord, Sub-Sub

> > > > details obtained at the time of your analysis by you for my

> study.

> > > >

> > > > I hope that you checked both the critera for " YES " in your

> > > analysis.

> > > >

> > > > Please refer to Raichurji's message# 2363

> > > > " The rule is If the Sublord of the ASC (Horary) is the Star

> Lord

> > > of

> > > > Moon (horary), or the Star Lord of the Regular Ascendent at

> time

> > > of

> > > > casting, then Answer IS YES. "

> > > >

> > > > Also, refer to L.Y.Rao's message# 9435

> > > > " if the s/l of the horary number was the same as the st.lord

of

> > > the

> > > > Ascendant or the Moon's Starlord...the answer was a

definite "

> > > YES " . "

> > > >

> > > > BTW, which group was this quiz posted.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > > Krishna

> > > >

> > > > , Raghunatha RaoNemani

> > > > <raon1008@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Om Krishna Guru

> > > > >

> > > > > Namaste Gurus and Learned Members,

> > > > >

> > > > > Some one asked a question in another list: whether a

native

> > is

> > > > married or not providing the native's birth details.

> > > > >

> > > > > I took that as an exercise to see my understanding on the

> > > > Gulbarga method which I have learnt recently.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have used the following principle to answer this

> > > question " Is

> > > > the native is married or not " .

> > > > >

> > > > > KP Principle: If the Sub lord of the Asc is the Star Lord

of

> > > Moon

> > > > then the answer is " Yes " , other wise the answer is " No " .

> > > > >

> > > > > I have taken a random number from software program to

answer

> > > this

> > > > question. I was hoping that the person who has posted this

> > > question

> > > > will provide the answer, but he did not, as he is still

waiting

> > > for

> > > > some more people to answer. I did not provide my KP analysis

in

> > > that

> > > > list, because that group was not a KP related group and I do

> not

> > > want

> > > > to mix different methods.

> > > > >

> > > > > Horary Number = 60

> > > > >

> > > > > September 10, 2006

> > > > > Time: 15:15:30

> > > > > Time Zone: 5:00:00 (West of GMT)

> > > > > Place: 93 W 20' 59 " , 44 N 53' 23 "

> > > > > USA

> > > > >

> > > > > In the above chart, the Asc Sub Lord is Ven and the Star

Lord

> > > of

> > > > Moon is Ketu. Both are not same, hence the answer is " No " ,

> which

> > > > means the native is not married.

> > > > >

> > > > > So, may I request you to please verify whether the above

> > > analysis

> > > > is correct in arriving at the answer is " No " or not and

correct

> > me

> > > if

> > > > I am wrong.

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Raghunatha Rao

> > > > >

> > > > > --- original message from another Non KP group ----

> > > > >

> > > > > Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:47 pm

> > > > >

> > > > > Marriage-Astroresearch- no 2c

> > > > >

> > > > > Om Sri gurave Namah!

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear

> > > > >

> > > > > What is the marital status of this native?

> > > > >

> > > > > 02-Sep 1963, 4:02:10 PM, Hyderabad

> > > > > AP, India .

> > > > >

> > > > > Please include Astrologic

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the

US

> > > (and

> > > > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India

> > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger

> Version 8. Get it NOW

> >

>