Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Dear all, Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. thanks for you love and respect . GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. regards kanakMukesh Gupta <mg13jan wrote: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:20:24 +0100 (BST)Mukesh Gupta <mg13janWhat is going on in the group?Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmiaCC: lyrastro1, punitp Dear Shri Kanak, 1. I had posted my replies earlier in the group, but these were not displayed on board, perhaps they were stopped by Moderator due to reasons best known to him. I am compelled to write directly. 2. I could not imagine how people make value judgment without knowing a person. Mr. Khullar is not a Professional Astrologer and only doing service to astrology by trying to give missing links in Astrology through his research works. Mr. Khullar has taken Astrology to new heights. He does not need promotion especially amongst those who have very parochial and biased mind. 3. I have followed all your previous mails, wherein you quoted chandrakant Bhatt, Bhaskaran etc. Are you not trying to promote them? You are also so obsessed with your selfish motives that you get violent and stinging on any differing voice/thought and start stinging. The way you have attacked on my person and caste aspersions on me shows your temperament, which is reflective of your level of education. It would have been better if you have discussed on merit and material like Mr. Tinwin. 4. It seems you have a hidden agenda or desires to outcast me and probably Mr. Khullar also at the behest of some vested interests by branding my mails as self/personal promotion only to serve your petty and egoistic motives. 5. Why do you want a debate on who invented CIL theory, which is futile and useless exercise? It seems that you have a hidden desire to establish somebody (You know who???) as inventor of CIL??? Are you not trying to promote somebody else??? It appears that people like you are afraid to discuss any thing, which does not suit to your taste. 6. All the time you harp upon the question” what is wrong in my question?” you must have read all the books of Chandrakant Bhatt who has used same principle/theory of Sub as advocated by Mr. KSK, he has not expressed any gratitude to Shri KSK leave aside any reference of his name. Have you ever asked the same question (which you asked to Mr. Khullar) to the great chandrakant Bhatt????…. 7. From the very beginning you are obsessed with the personal interaction what might have transpired between you and Mr. Khullar. You are not ready to come out of that and are busy in spitting venom against Mr. Khullar. I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings, I never wated to personal. Thanks and Regards, Mukesh Gupta Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Om Krishna Guru Namaste Kanak Bhai, I respect your decision whether to continue remain active in this group or not. But I sincerely request you to continue writing in this group as personally I have learnt a lot of foundations from you for the past 3 weeks since I have started learning KP method. I have also seen you sharing your knowledge and helping others while reading the old archive messages. Now, some times people make comments, which some times may not be liked by you and any one. The best thing is to ignore them and move on. I remember a story, we all have read, which goes like this : " When an Elephant walks on the street, some street dogs bark at him. But the Royal Elephant does not give any damn to street dogs " . The moral is : both are following their paths, hence Elepahnt ignores those barkings and moves on. So if you think, your path is correct then continue otherwise quit. Decision is yours. Honestly, we need good people like you to promote KP and also do some additional research in this area, so my humble request is to consider to be remain in this list and keep writing, keep sharing and keep helping people in need. I always such a good attitude people. I am sure some of the members will agree with my thoughts and they also may join me in requesting you to stay in the list. Regards Raghunatha Rao , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Fwd: What is going on in the group? Dear all, Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. thanks for you love and respect . GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. regards kanak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Dear Kanak, 1. I'm so sad that I don't know what to say after the simple issue of whether New KPA or not has gone far like this beyond my expectation. IN SHORT, WHAT EVER IT MAY BE, YOU SHOULD CONTINUE YOUR CNTRIBUTION TO THE GROUP FOR THE LOVELY SPIRIT OF GURUJI KSK AND BENEFIT OF KP LEARNERS. I also don't stop the posting of supporting references in this regard despite Swami Omkar's saying to post only my experience not references. How can KP learners be blindfolded? What I mean is we don't need to care what some are saying. ONCE AGAIN YOU SHOULD CONTINUE YOUR MISSION OF KP DEVELOPEMNT, THAT IS. 2. It is absolutely correct that Shri Bhatt has never ever no where given a slute to Guruji KSK which shows how he is proud of his wisdom as noticed by my elder KP brother back home. 3. As you know, KP is JUST my crazy hobby without making any penny but spending MONEY on learning materials and YOU and me are still in only this Punit ji's knowledgeable KP group to contribute something for further development of KP. Listen to me. Take care. Your elder KP brother, Tin Win , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: > > Dear all, > > Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: > > As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. > > thanks for you love and respect . > > GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. > > regards > kanak > > Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan wrote: > Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:20:24 +0100 (BST) > Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan > What is going on in the group? > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > CC: lyrastro1, punitp > > Dear Shri Kanak, > > 1. I had posted my replies earlier in the group, but these were not displayed on board, perhaps they were stopped by Moderator due to reasons best known to him. I am compelled to write directly. > > 2. I could not imagine how people make value judgment without knowing a person. Mr. Khullar is not a Professional Astrologer and only doing service to astrology by trying to give missing links in Astrology through his research works. Mr. Khullar has taken Astrology to new heights. He does not need promotion especially amongst those who have very parochial and biased mind. > > 3. I have followed all your previous mails, wherein you quoted chandrakant Bhatt, Bhaskaran etc. Are you not trying to promote them? You are also so obsessed with your selfish motives that you get violent and stinging on any differing voice/thought and start stinging. The way you have attacked on my person and caste aspersions on me shows your temperament, which is reflective of your level of education. It would have been better if you have discussed on merit and material like Mr. Tinwin. > > 4. It seems you have a hidden agenda or desires to outcast me and probably Mr. Khullar also at the behest of some vested interests by branding my mails as self/personal promotion only to serve your petty and egoistic motives. > > 5. Why do you want a debate on who invented CIL theory, which is futile and useless exercise? It seems that you have a hidden desire to establish somebody (You know who???) as inventor of CIL??? Are you not trying to promote somebody else??? It appears that people like you are afraid to discuss any thing, which does not suit to your taste. > > 6. All the time you harp upon the question " what is wrong in my question? " you must have read all the books of Chandrakant Bhatt who has used same principle/theory of Sub as advocated by Mr. KSK, he has not expressed any gratitude to Shri KSK leave aside any reference of his name. Have you ever asked the same question (which you asked to Mr. Khullar) to the great chandrakant Bhatt????…. > > 7. From the very beginning you are obsessed with the personal interaction what might have transpired between you and Mr. Khullar. You are not ready to come out of that and are busy in spitting venom against Mr. Khullar. > > I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings, I never wated to personal. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Mukesh Gupta > > > Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << > > > > Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Kanakji,Plesae dont leave the group. We have very few masters like Raichurji, Lajmiji and your self ( sorry if I have forgotten to mention others )to answer most of our queries. So in the interest of most who benefit from your knowledge, please dont leave the site. Different people have different ways of expressions and they may not mean the way we think. Please bear with all these remarks and in the general interest of we , theKP students, please continue with the group. Thanks,V.Ramachandran.On 9/13/06, Raghunatha RaoNemani <raon1008 wrote: Om Krishna Guru Namaste Kanak Bhai, I respect your decision whether to continue remain active in this group or not. But I sincerely request you to continue writing in this group as personally I have learnt a lot of foundations from you for the past 3 weeks since I have started learning KP method. I have also seen you sharing your knowledge and helping others while reading the old archive messages. Now, some times people make comments, which some times may not be liked by you and any one. The best thing is to ignore them and move on. I remember a story, we all have read, which goes like this : " When an Elephant walks on the street, some street dogs bark at him. But the Royal Elephant does not give any damn to street dogs " . The moral is : both are following their paths, hence Elepahnt ignores those barkings and moves on. So if you think, your path is correct then continue otherwise quit. Decision is yours. Honestly, we need good people like you to promote KP and also do some additional research in this area, so my humble request is to consider to be remain in this list and keep writing, keep sharing and keep helping people in need. I always such a good attitude people. I am sure some of the members will agree with my thoughts and they also may join me in requesting you to stay in the list. Regards Raghunatha Rao , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Fwd: What is going on in the group? Dear all, Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. thanks for you love and respect . GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. regards kanak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Dear Kanak, Please don't leave us. I was just thinking about all the good things going in the group few days back. Regards Bala. Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Daer Kanakbhai, I can talk about people I know or met or interacted with..I cannot talk /write about somebody I donot know. It does not mean, I have anything against them. I am neither propogating someone nor speaking ill about someone else.These are 2 separate actions. The whole contoversey started after Baskaran's intercuspal links theory came into the picture.People in the north are familiar with Khullar who is from Delhi, and may not know about Baskaran. The discussions unfortunately are not issue based hence misunderstandings arise. Mr Gupta is entitled to his opinion as much as you or any one of us are. Please reconsider your decision. Best wishes, Satish Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear all, Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. thanks for you love and respect . GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. regards kanakMukesh Gupta <mg13jan wrote: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:20:24 +0100 (BST)Mukesh Gupta <mg13janWhat is going on in the group?Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmiaCC: lyrastro1, punitp Dear Shri Kanak, 1. I had posted my replies earlier in the group, but these were not displayed on board, perhaps they were stopped by Moderator due to reasons best known to him. I am compelled to write directly. 2. I could not imagine how people make value judgment without knowing a person. Mr. Khullar is not a Professional Astrologer and only doing service to astrology by trying to give missing links in Astrology through his research works. Mr. Khullar has taken Astrology to new heights. He does not need promotion especially amongst those who have very parochial and biased mind. 3. I have followed all your previous mails, wherein you quoted chandrakant Bhatt, Bhaskaran etc. Are you not trying to promote them? You are also so obsessed with your selfish motives that you get violent and stinging on any differing voice/thought and start stinging. The way you have attacked on my person and caste aspersions on me shows your temperament, which is reflective of your level of education. It would have been better if you have discussed on merit and material like Mr. Tinwin. 4. It seems you have a hidden agenda or desires to outcast me and probably Mr. Khullar also at the behest of some vested interests by branding my mails as self/personal promotion only to serve your petty and egoistic motives. 5. Why do you want a debate on who invented CIL theory, which is futile and useless exercise? It seems that you have a hidden desire to establish somebody (You know who???) as inventor of CIL??? Are you not trying to promote somebody else??? It appears that people like you are afraid to discuss any thing, which does not suit to your taste. 6. All the time you harp upon the question” what is wrong in my question?” you must have read all the books of Chandrakant Bhatt who has used same principle/theory of Sub as advocated by Mr. KSK, he has not expressed any gratitude to Shri KSK leave aside any reference of his name. Have you ever asked the same question (which you asked to Mr. Khullar) to the great chandrakant Bhatt????…. 7. From the very beginning you are obsessed with the personal interaction what might have transpired between you and Mr. Khullar. You are not ready to come out of that and are busy in spitting venom against Mr. Khullar. I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings, I never wated to personal. Thanks and Regards, Mukesh Gupta Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Satish Rallabandi <rsatish1942 wrote: Daer Kanakbhai, I can talk about people I know or met or interacted with..I cannot talk /write about somebody I donot know. It does not mean, I have anything against them. I am neither propogating someone nor speaking ill about someone else.These are 2 separate actions. The whole contoversey started after Baskaran's intercuspal links theory came into the picture.People in the north are familiar with Khullar who is from Delhi, and may not know about Baskaran. The discussions unfortunately are not issue based hence misunderstandings arise. Mr Gupta is entitled to his opinion as much as you or any one of us are. Please reconsider your decision. Best wishes, Satish Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear all, Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. thanks for you love and respect . GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. regards kanakMukesh Gupta <mg13jan (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:20:24 +0100 (BST)Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan (AT) (DOT) co.in>What is going on in the group?Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia >CC: lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in, punitp Dear Shri Kanak, 1. I had posted my replies earlier in the group, but these were not displayed on board, perhaps they were stopped by Moderator due to reasons best known to him. I am compelled to write directly. 2. I could not imagine how people make value judgment without knowing a person. Mr. Khullar is not a Professional Astrologer and only doing service to astrology by trying to give missing links in Astrology through his research works. Mr. Khullar has taken Astrology to new heights. He does not need promotion especially amongst those who have very parochial and biased mind. 3. I have followed all your previous mails, wherein you quoted chandrakant Bhatt, Bhaskaran etc. Are you not trying to promote them? You are also so obsessed with your selfish motives that you get violent and stinging on any differing voice/thought and start stinging. The way you have attacked on my person and caste aspersions on me shows your temperament, which is reflective of your level of education. It would have been better if you have discussed on merit and material like Mr. Tinwin. 4. It seems you have a hidden agenda or desires to outcast me and probably Mr. Khullar also at the behest of some vested interests by branding my mails as self/personal promotion only to serve your petty and egoistic motives. 5. Why do you want a debate on who invented CIL theory, which is futile and useless exercise? It seems that you have a hidden desire to establish somebody (You know who???) as inventor of CIL??? Are you not trying to promote somebody else??? It appears that people like you are afraid to discuss any thing, which does not suit to your taste. 6. All the time you harp upon the question” what is wrong in my question?” you must have read all the books of Chandrakant Bhatt who has used same principle/theory of Sub as advocated by Mr. KSK, he has not expressed any gratitude to Shri KSK leave aside any reference of his name. Have you ever asked the same question (which you asked to Mr. Khullar) to the great chandrakant Bhatt????…. 7. From the very beginning you are obsessed with the personal interaction what might have transpired between you and Mr. Khullar. You are not ready to come out of that and are busy in spitting venom against Mr. Khullar. I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings, I never wated to personal. Thanks and Regards, Mukesh Gupta Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. Messages in this topic (6) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic . Dear Kanakji : I agree with Satishji . We all have to control our temper and ignore remarks from personal attacks , from other members of the group . The forum is not intended for giving Educational Degree Certificates . As you know , there is a person in Pune who ,just by looking at an individual , can give immeditely the time,date of birth . I do not believe this great man has a doctorate in Astrology . The main aim of the group is to educate and help people understand the Great Efforts and dedication of Prof.KSK to let people know that there is truth in Astrology and how we can get it , easily without lot of money to the socalled professionals who often fail , buy using other methods. I have often read with a lot of interest your profound knowledge of KP System . As you can remember , Ms. Sandy Gother , also left the group , as the same type of bad comments , made her feel very disappointed . I hope you will reconsider and in the interest of the members who wish to understand and appreciate , more of the KP System , and also as a service to our Guruji , you will continue as a respected member . Regards . Raichur.M Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Dear kanakji, Pl dont leave the group.We need U for ur valuable knowledge. U are one of the few people in the group who is always ready to help us. Really we need ur help. So, pl rethink about ur decission and continue ur writing. Thanks, With regards, Abhijit Lahiri. Padma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran wrote: Kanakji,Plesae dont leave the group. We have very few masters like Raichurji, Lajmiji and your self ( sorry if I have forgotten to mention others )to answer most of our queries. So in the interest of most who benefit from your knowledge, please dont leave the site. Different people have different ways of expressions and they may not mean the way we think. Please bear with all these remarks and in the general interest of we , theKP students, please continue with the group. Thanks,V.Ramachandran. On 9/13/06, Raghunatha RaoNemani <raon1008 > wrote: Om Krishna GuruNamaste Kanak Bhai,I respect your decision whether to continue remain active in this group or not. But I sincerely request you to continue writing in this group as personally I have learnt a lot of foundations from you for the past 3 weeks since I have started learning KP method. I have also seen you sharing your knowledge and helping others while reading the old archive messages.Now, some times people make comments, which some times may not be liked by you and any one. The best thing is to ignore them and move on. I remember a story, we all have read, which goes like this : "When an Elephant walks on the street, some street dogs bark at him. But the Royal Elephant does not give any damn to street dogs". The moral is : both are following their paths, hence Elepahnt ignores those barkings and moves on. So if you think, your path is correct then continue otherwise quit. Decision is yours.Honestly, we need good people like you to promote KP and also do some additional research in this area, so my humble request is to consider to be remain in this list and keep writing, keep sharing and keep helping people in need. I always such a good attitude people.I am sure some of the members will agree with my thoughts and they also may join me in requesting you to stay in the list.RegardsRaghunatha Rao , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:Fwd: What is going on in the group? Dear all,Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow:As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment.thanks for you love and respect .GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL.regardskanak How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 This is a matter of worst that members are hurting each other and not ready to listen others views. I request Gupta ji and Kanak also not to attack each other but continue discussing new principles as well as missing link for the betterment of a bright future of astrology. Kanak, if you leave the group we shall loose an experienced scholar to discuss and cross questions. Thanks & Regards DKBhaskar --- Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: > Dear all, > > Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh > Gupta.which is as bellow: > > As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some > more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to > leave group from right now this moment. > > thanks for you love and respect . > > GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. > > regards > kanak > > Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan wrote: > Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:20:24 +0100 (BST) > Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan > What is going on in the group? > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > CC: lyrastro1, punitp > > Dear Shri Kanak, > > 1. I had posted my replies earlier in the > group, but these were not displayed on board, > perhaps they were stopped by Moderator due to > reasons best known to him. I am compelled to write > directly. > > 2. I could not imagine how people make value > judgment without knowing a person. Mr. Khullar is > not a Professional Astrologer and only doing service > to astrology by trying to give missing links in > Astrology through his research works. Mr. Khullar > has taken Astrology to new heights. He does not need > promotion especially amongst those who have very > parochial and biased mind. > > 3. I have followed all your previous mails, > wherein you quoted chandrakant Bhatt, Bhaskaran etc. > Are you not trying to promote them? You are also so > obsessed with your selfish motives that you get > violent and stinging on any differing voice/thought > and start stinging. The way you have attacked on my > person and caste aspersions on me shows your > temperament, which is reflective of your level of > education. It would have been better if you have > discussed on merit and material like Mr. Tinwin. > > 4. It seems you have a hidden agenda or > desires to outcast me and probably Mr. Khullar also > at the behest of some vested interests by branding > my mails as self/personal promotion only to serve > your petty and egoistic motives. > > 5. Why do you want a debate on who invented > CIL theory, which is futile and useless exercise? It > seems that you have a hidden desire to establish > somebody (You know who???) as inventor of CIL??? Are > you not trying to promote somebody else??? It > appears that people like you are afraid to discuss > any thing, which does not suit to your taste. > > 6. All the time you harp upon the question” > what is wrong in my question?” you must have read > all the books of Chandrakant Bhatt who has used same > principle/theory of Sub as advocated by Mr. KSK, he > has not expressed any gratitude to Shri KSK leave > aside any reference of his name. Have you ever asked > the same question (which you asked to Mr. Khullar) > to the great chandrakant Bhatt????…. > > 7. From the very beginning you are obsessed > with the personal interaction what might have > transpired between you and Mr. Khullar. You are not > ready to come out of that and are busy in spitting > venom against Mr. Khullar. > > I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings, I never > wated to personal. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Mukesh Gupta > > > Find out what India is talking about on - > Answers India > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from > Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me > Crying << > > > > Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small > Business. ________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Dear Shree KanakI cannot see why you want to leave, if a member casts asperation against you.Best is ignore him, Do not reply him, and you may even complain to the Moderator to banish him. Your resigning from the group, neither helps you or the other group members. Please reconsiderKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear all, Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. thanks for you love and respect . GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. regards kanakMukesh Gupta <mg13jan (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:20:24 +0100 (BST)Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan (AT) (DOT) co.in>What is going on in the group?Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia >CC: lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in, punitp Dear Shri Kanak, 1. I had posted my replies earlier in the group, but these were not displayed on board, perhaps they were stopped by Moderator due to reasons best known to him. I am compelled to write directly. 2. I could not imagine how people make value judgment without knowing a person. Mr. Khullar is not a Professional Astrologer and only doing service to astrology by trying to give missing links in Astrology through his research works. Mr. Khullar has taken Astrology to new heights. He does not need promotion especially amongst those who have very parochial and biased mind. 3. I have followed all your previous mails, wherein you quoted chandrakant Bhatt, Bhaskaran etc. Are you not trying to promote them? You are also so obsessed with your selfish motives that you get violent and stinging on any differing voice/thought and start stinging. The way you have attacked on my person and caste aspersions on me shows your temperament, which is reflective of your level of education. It would have been better if you have discussed on merit and material like Mr. Tinwin. 4. It seems you have a hidden agenda or desires to outcast me and probably Mr. Khullar also at the behest of some vested interests by branding my mails as self/personal promotion only to serve your petty and egoistic motives. 5. Why do you want a debate on who invented CIL theory, which is futile and useless exercise? It seems that you have a hidden desire to establish somebody (You know who???) as inventor of CIL??? Are you not trying to promote somebody else??? It appears that people like you are afraid to discuss any thing, which does not suit to your taste. 6. All the time you harp upon the question” what is wrong in my question?” you must have read all the books of Chandrakant Bhatt who has used same principle/theory of Sub as advocated by Mr. KSK, he has not expressed any gratitude to Shri KSK leave aside any reference of his name. Have you ever asked the same question (which you asked to Mr. Khullar) to the great chandrakant Bhatt????…. 7. From the very beginning you are obsessed with the personal interaction what might have transpired between you and Mr. Khullar. You are not ready to come out of that and are busy in spitting venom against Mr. Khullar. I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings, I never wated to personal. Thanks and Regards, Mukesh Gupta Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Dear Kanak, Please don't desert the group. You cannot give penalty to hundreds of members to show your displeasure against one. Come back again to the group. Hasmukhrai J Mehta.bala sosale <bsosale wrote: Dear Kanak, Please don't leave us. I was just thinking about all the good things going in the group few days back. Regards Bala. Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Hasmukhrai J MehtaAstrological services par excellencehttp://www.astroclinica.com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Dear Kanakji, Vandanam! I am requesting you to kindly have your presence continued in this group. Your contribution is helping group members. Lord Krishna's bhakta follows the Geetha Gyanam. Regards and Respects to all Gurujannas. C.K. AnandRaichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: Dear Shree KanakI cannot see why you want to leave, if a member casts asperation against you.Best is ignore him, Do not reply him, and you may even complain to the Moderator to banish him. Your resigning from the group, neither helps you or the other group members. Please reconsiderKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear all, Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. thanks for you love and respect . GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. regards kanakMukesh Gupta <mg13jan (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:20:24 +0100 (BST)Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan (AT) (DOT) co.in>What is going on in the group?Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia >CC: lyrastro1 (AT) (DOT) co.in, punitp Dear Shri Kanak, 1. I had posted my replies earlier in the group, but these were not displayed on board, perhaps they were stopped by Moderator due to reasons best known to him. I am compelled to write directly. 2. I could not imagine how people make value judgment without knowing a person. Mr. Khullar is not a Professional Astrologer and only doing service to astrology by trying to give missing links in Astrology through his research works. Mr. Khullar has taken Astrology to new heights. He does not need promotion especially amongst those who have very parochial and biased mind. 3. I have followed all your previous mails, wherein you quoted chandrakant Bhatt, Bhaskaran etc. Are you not trying to promote them? You are also so obsessed with your selfish motives that you get violent and stinging on any differing voice/thought and start stinging. The way you have attacked on my person and caste aspersions on me shows your temperament, which is reflective of your level of education. It would have been better if you have discussed on merit and material like Mr. Tinwin. 4. It seems you have a hidden agenda or desires to outcast me and probably Mr. Khullar also at the behest of some vested interests by branding my mails as self/personal promotion only to serve your petty and egoistic motives. 5. Why do you want a debate on who invented CIL theory, which is futile and useless exercise? It seems that you have a hidden desire to establish somebody (You know who???) as inventor of CIL??? Are you not trying to promote somebody else??? It appears that people like you are afraid to discuss any thing, which does not suit to your taste. 6. All the time you harp upon the question” what is wrong in my question?” you must have read all the books of Chandrakant Bhatt who has used same principle/theory of Sub as advocated by Mr. KSK, he has not expressed any gratitude to Shri KSK leave aside any reference of his name. Have you ever asked the same question (which you asked to Mr. Khullar) to the great chandrakant Bhatt????…. 7. From the very beginning you are obsessed with the personal interaction what might have transpired between you and Mr. Khullar. You are not ready to come out of that and are busy in spitting venom against Mr. Khullar. I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings, I never wated to personal. Thanks and Regards, Mukesh Gupta Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Dear kanak ji, I have seen mails and want to write you. Dear kanak first of all take my advice as a sentimental human being, in our daily life so many things hurts us and we must have to face them if I closes my eyes that is never be the answer. I knows vedic astrology, I started reading KP just three months back you know why because there are so many things which are not accurate or allmost changed with the time in vedic. Then in this group I saw everyone is very much devoted to Kp but it is my personal point of view there are so many things which KP not explains. I allways takes example first on me and the persons who have accurate date of births or very anxious for horary. At last I have decided that nothing is true 100%. Yes one thing is clear some things are very near to true. YOur determination towards a science is well known to members. BY this group you are helping all those learners who just want to learn this science. So many members come forward for you this is the greatest reward for you. Ignore them whom you do not want to talk/write. Keep yourself only with those people who understands you, who hears you and take your everything very seriously. there is one example: I myself is leaving in a street where so many people are corrupt, drinking, shouting, abusing some times my inner mind say run away from here but i decided to give full time to my work so that I don't get any time to think about those who does not fit on my scenario. I know you will be back in this group soon. Waitin for your letter. vivek > > > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: > Dear all, > > Just now i received a mail from Mr. Mukesh Gupta.which is as bellow: > > As per him i prAmot some one elss and also some more elegation on me so my self respect inssit me to leave group from right now this moment. > > thanks for you love and respect . > > GOOD BYE TO YOU ALL. > > regards > kanak > > Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan wrote: > Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:20:24 +0100 (BST) > Mukesh Gupta <mg13jan > What is going on in the group? > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > CC: lyrastro1, punitp > > Dear Shri Kanak, > > 1. I had posted my replies earlier in the group, but these were not displayed on board, perhaps they were stopped by Moderator due to reasons best known to him. I am compelled to write directly. > > 2. I could not imagine how people make value judgment without knowing a person. Mr. Khullar is not a Professional Astrologer and only doing service to astrology by trying to give missing links in Astrology through his research works. Mr. Khullar has taken Astrology to new heights. He does not need promotion especially amongst those who have very parochial and biased mind. > > 3. I have followed all your previous mails, wherein you quoted chandrakant Bhatt, Bhaskaran etc. Are you not trying to promote them? You are also so obsessed with your selfish motives that you get violent and stinging on any differing voice/thought and start stinging. The way you have attacked on my person and caste aspersions on me shows your temperament, which is reflective of your level of education. It would have been better if you have discussed on merit and material like Mr. Tinwin. > > 4. It seems you have a hidden agenda or desires to outcast me and probably Mr. Khullar also at the behest of some vested interests by branding my mails as self/personal promotion only to serve your petty and egoistic motives. > > 5. Why do you want a debate on who invented CIL theory, which is futile and useless exercise? It seems that you have a hidden desire to establish somebody (You know who???) as inventor of CIL??? Are you not trying to promote somebody else??? It appears that people like you are afraid to discuss any thing, which does not suit to your taste. > > 6. All the time you harp upon the question " what is wrong in my question? " you must have read all the books of Chandrakant Bhatt who has used same principle/theory of Sub as advocated by Mr. KSK, he has not expressed any gratitude to Shri KSK leave aside any reference of his name. Have you ever asked the same question (which you asked to Mr. Khullar) to the great chandrakant Bhatt????…. > > 7. From the very beginning you are obsessed with the personal interaction what might have transpired between you and Mr. Khullar. You are not ready to come out of that and are busy in spitting venom against Mr. Khullar. > > I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings, I never wated to personal. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Mukesh Gupta > > > Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India > Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW > > > > >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << > > > > Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. > > > > > Good Luck > Raichur A R > Bombay Tel 2506 2609 > > > Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.