Is it correct to say that Rahu & Ketu has any apec

September 10, 2006

Respected Kanakji,Rahu and Ketu, as I have learnt are not planets and are not given planet status or any particular house representation, Their signification get attatched to a planet by drishti or conjunction. Similarly, the results of Rahu and Ketu are also dependent on those planets that give them signification. Our great sages have discovered the effect of these nodes in astrology and passed on the knowledge to us. I am too young in astrology to comment about these matters. I do not think in Western Astrology or any other similar science, they believe in Rahu and Kethu. According to me, it is like Vimshotri Dasa system. We do not question the wisdom of our sages why Vimshotri system attributes 18 years to Rahu Dasa and 7 years to Ketu Dasa. At least, I will not question them. I am sorry for having written so much.

V.Ramachandran.On 9/10/06, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

Dear Ramchandran ji, then why we consider node as Planet in our anlysis? all this come from our saga's experince and research, some on ask question that parasar mention about Rasi drashti then why dont we use? but many type of Dasa also mention in old text then why we dont use that all and only use Vimshottary? why not other? this all are good for argument and there is no meaning of all this type of discussion. one can go only with he own experince, this is the final truth.

Many time i write in group that do not follow any one or anything blindly, look, understand, use and if pass in your exam then and then only accept. regards

kanakPadma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran > wrote:

Dear Sir,When Rahu and Ketu are only nodes and not planets, how can they have drishti?? Rahu and Ketu are the intersecting points in the space between earth's orbit and moon's orbit. They are not planets.

Ramachandran. On 9/10/06, scholar_kouts1947 <

scholar_kouts1947 wrote:

Since both the nodes are CHHAYA GRAHA , will

it be correct to that they aspect any planet or Bhava. At the same time they receive aspect from all other solid palanets. Comment,Pliz.

>> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.

September 10, 2006

Dear Ramchandran ji, You have take me in wrong way. what is my mening to aks about Vimshiotary dasa is as we are not ask question each and every thing of astrology , many learned person are doing some work on Node and found that thay give result of Aspect so we have to follow it if we found in our personal experiance. swamiji ask many question on Node and as per him node is not planet so no aspect, my question is regarding to him, when we consider node as planet but thay are not planet, same way when some most senior astrologer do some wrok and say about aspect of node then it is our duty to check it and try to found is it work? then and then only we can say anything on this subject, If we try to give only argument then many person and master in argument and thay convince us that astrology is nothing.

hope i am clear my view. regards kanakPadma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran wrote: Respected Kanakji,Rahu and Ketu, as I have learnt are not planets and are not given planet status or any particular house representation, Their signification get attatched to a planet by drishti or conjunction. Similarly, the results of Rahu and Ketu are also dependent on those planets that give them signification. Our great sages have discovered the effect

of these nodes in astrology and passed on the knowledge to us. I am too young in astrology to comment about these matters. I do not think in Western Astrology or any other similar science, they believe in Rahu and Kethu. According to me, it is like Vimshotri Dasa system. We do not question the wisdom of our sages why Vimshotri system attributes 18 years to Rahu Dasa and 7 years to Ketu Dasa. At least, I will not question them. I am sorry for having written so much. V.Ramachandran. On 9/10/06, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Ramchandran ji, then why we consider node as Planet in our anlysis? all

this come from our saga's experince and research, some on ask question that parasar mention about Rasi drashti then why dont we use? but many type of Dasa also mention in old text then why we dont use that all and only use Vimshottary? why not other? this all are good for argument and there is no meaning of all this type of discussion. one can go only with he own experince, this is the final truth. Many time i write in group that do not follow any one or anything blindly, look, understand, use and if pass in your exam then and then only accept. regards kanakPadma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran > wrote: Dear Sir,When Rahu and Ketu are only nodes and not planets, how can they have drishti?? Rahu

and Ketu are the intersecting points in the space between earth's orbit and moon's orbit. They are not planets. Ramachandran. On 9/10/06, scholar_kouts1947 < scholar_kouts1947 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Since both the nodes are CHHAYA GRAHA , will it be correct to that they aspect any planet or Bhava. At the same time they receive aspect from all other solid palanets. Comment,Pliz. >>

I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail.

September 10, 2006

Regarding Rahu & Kethu, it s shadow planet & during Lunar & Solar eclipse (according to our ancient belief)this planet is a snake, swallowing the Sun & Moon.But in scientific view, the shadow of the earth that makes the Solar & Lunar eclips and psses a bad energy to the earth.So both Rahu & Keth must be the two poles of the earth which also influences us indirectly. This is my own view and there is no reference for this.Just i am thinking about it for along time. Regads Vidhya ganapathyKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear Ramchandran ji, You have take me in wrong way. what is my mening to aks about Vimshiotary dasa is as we are not ask question each and every thing of astrology , many learned person are doing some work on Node and found that thay give result of Aspect so we have to follow it if we found in our personal experiance. swamiji ask many question on Node and as per him node is not planet so no aspect, my question is regarding to him, when we consider node as planet but thay are not planet, same way when some most senior astrologer do some wrok and say about aspect of node then it is our duty to check it and try to found is it work? then and then only we can say anything on this subject, If we try to give only argument then many

person and master in argument and thay convince us that astrology is nothing. hope i am clear my view. regards kanakPadma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran > wrote: Respected Kanakji,Rahu and Ketu, as I have learnt are not planets and are not given planet status or any particular house representation, Their signification get attatched to a planet by drishti or conjunction. Similarly, the results of Rahu and Ketu are also dependent on those planets that give them signification. Our great sages have discovered the effect of these nodes in astrology and passed on the knowledge to us. I am too young in astrology to comment about these matters. I do not think in Western Astrology or any other similar science, they believe in

Rahu and Kethu. According to me, it is like Vimshotri Dasa system. We do not question the wisdom of our sages why Vimshotri system attributes 18 years to Rahu Dasa and 7 years to Ketu Dasa. At least, I will not question them. I am sorry for having written so much. V.Ramachandran. On 9/10/06, Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Dear Ramchandran ji, then why we consider node as Planet in our anlysis? all this come from our saga's experince and research, some on ask question that parasar mention about Rasi drashti then why dont we use? but many type of Dasa also mention in old text then why we

dont use that all and only use Vimshottary? why not other? this all are good for argument and there is no meaning of all this type of discussion. one can go only with he own experince, this is the final truth. Many time i write in group that do not follow any one or anything blindly, look, understand, use and if pass in your exam then and then only accept. regards kanakPadma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran > wrote: Dear Sir,When Rahu and Ketu are only nodes and not planets, how can they have drishti?? Rahu and Ketu are the intersecting points in the space between earth's orbit and moon's orbit. They are not planets. Ramachandran. On 9/10/06, scholar_kouts1947 < scholar_kouts1947 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Since both the nodes are CHHAYA GRAHA , will it be correct to that they aspect any planet or Bhava. At the same time they receive aspect from all other solid palanets. Comment,Pliz. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail.

Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW