Is it correct to say that Rahu & Ketu has any apect

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir,When Rahu and Ketu are only nodes and not planets, how can they have drishti?? Rahu and Ketu are the intersecting points in the space between earth's orbit and moon's orbit. They are not planets.Ramachandran.

On 9/10/06, scholar_kouts1947 <scholar_kouts1947 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Since both the nodes are CHHAYA GRAHA , will it be correct to that they

aspect any planet or Bhava. At the same time they receive aspect from

all other solid palanets. Comment,Pliz.

[Guest guest]

Dear Ramchandran ji, then why we consider node as Planet in our anlysis? all this come from our saga's experince and research, some on ask question that parasar mention about Rasi drashti then why dont we use? but many type of Dasa also mention in old text then why we dont use that all and only use Vimshottary? why not other? this all are good for argument and there is no meaning of all this type of discussion. one can go only with he own experince, this is the final truth. Many time i write in group that do not follow any one or anything blindly, look, understand, use and if pass in your exam then and then only accept. regards kanakPadma Ramachandran <padma.ramachandran wrote: Dear Sir,When Rahu and Ketu are only nodes and not planets, how can they have drishti?? Rahu and Ketu are the intersecting points in the space between earth's orbit and moon's orbit. They are not planets.Ramachandran. On 9/10/06, scholar_kouts1947 <scholar_kouts1947 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Since both the nodes are CHHAYA GRAHA , will

it be correct to that they aspect any planet or Bhava. At the same time they receive aspect from all other solid palanets. Comment,Pliz. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying <<

Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail.