Guest guest Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Hello list members. One of my concerns of late has focused on the applicability of the Sidereal and/or Tropical signs in chart work. I have not used Signs in my astrological practice to any extent for the past 30 years--this also seems to be true of a reasonable percentage of other sidereal astrologers. Lately, I have revisited the subject of " signs. " To facilitate this " revisiting " I have downloaded and recompiled lists of planetary key words and have written out my own definitions of the Sidereal Signs based on ruling and exalted planet meanings. The result of this Sidereal Sign writing has been a collection of views and statements that is similar to the extensive Tropical Zodiac writings found in many books and on-line sites. I am prepared to post my Sidereal Sign meanings in the files section. Therese is also working on completing her set of Sign meanings. There can follow a discussion on this subject. My sense, after this preliminary work, is that the answer may not be fully conclusive and persuasive based on Sign Meanings writings alone. Therefore, it might seem more appropriate to look at the charts of well-known personalities to see which zodiac better describes them. COMPARING ZODIAC INFLUENCE IN WELL-KNOWN PERSONALITIES CHARTS Accordingly, I will post a series of chart commentaries for the list to consider and to discuss. One or a few charts may or may not be enough to settle this age-old question. To keep the discussion tight and on-subject, each chart commentary that I offer will focus on the Ascendant (personality), the Sun (character) and any aspect-patterns that complicate or enrich those two factors. I'll list the sign and degree positions for the Ascendant and Sun positions in each zodiac. I hope this helps to focus any discussions of the list members relative to their usage and understanding of both/either zodiac. Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 At 03:07 PM 1/11/09 -0800, Stephen Glaser wrote: >Even if India's astrology came from the West, it doesn't mean they copied verbatim every interpretation from the West... Of course not, but if you compare Hellenistic writings with India's old texts, it's obvious that they have a common source. And India's oldest text, the Yavanajataka, had a Greek source. Like other cultures, India added to the basic structure and concepts of horoscopic astrology. >> Plus, there is the many yogas between planets and the shadbala determining the strength of the planets seems to suggest they had their own way of seeing astrology. Many of these same planetaray combinations appear in westrn classical writing. But shad bala is distinctly Indian. True, there are many copy errors which is why modern translators try to find various copies of the same text. These different copies are always discussed in the preface of the translations. This applies to the newer western translations of astrological texts. As far as I know, this type of scholarly study hasn't been done with the Indian texts. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.