Guest guest Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Hi everybody, I realized a study on the 100 biggest billionaires in the world (Forbes List). This study reveals the meaning of the zodiac Sumerian. It's the confirmation that the sidereal zodiac is the only one to tell the truth! http://astrologie.eklablog.com/article-18600-144986-forbes-portraits-astraux.htm\ l The reals rules astrology are: - Aries: Mercury (Nebo) - Taurus: Sun (Mithra) - Gemini: Kethu - Cancri: Venus (Ninmah) - Leo: Jupiter (Marduk) - Virgo: Mars (Nergal) - Libra: Uranus (Anu) - Scorpio: Moon (Sin) - Sagittarius: Rahu - Capricornus: Neptune (Enki) - Aquarius: Saturn (Ninurta) - Pisces: Pluto Good reading. Kind regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Bonjour Patrice, Thanks for your research. It's always a good reason to practice my French. This is an obvious point that I'm sure you know already, but with a sample size that small (100), I don't know that sign frequencies of 16% are going to be that significant. I doubt they would be categorized as " statistically significant " in the formal sense. I would also be cautious about reading too much into the over-representation of Mercury conjunctions. Since it is very often conjunct Sun and Venus, this will distort the frequency. I think if you could duplicate these findings in a larger sample, like 1000 billionaires, then that would provide more compelling evidence. The way globalization is going these days, it shouldn't be too hard to find data sets that large. If I understand your main point of the sidereal zodiac correctly, I'm not sure why it makes more astrological sense for Taurus Suns and Scorpio Moons to appear more frequently in the charts of rich people. Why not Scorpio Suns and Taurus Moons? Taurus Suns do show up a bit more frequently than chance, it would probably do so only by a very small amount, like less than 5%. In order to establish statistical significance for such a small correlation, you would need an enormous set of data -- thousands of cases. This is the main problem with trying to prove astrological ideas with statistics. Most single factors can only account for a tiny correlation (if anything) by themselves, so one needs a huge dataset to approach significance. This is one reason why it may be more productive to structure multi-factored studies. (For example, people with Taurus Suns AND Mars-Jupiter conjunctions) This would require even more cases to achieve significance unfortunately, but the correlation levels may be higher. Amicalement, Christophe Patrice <aartbouriche wrote: Hi everybody, I realized a study on the 100 biggest billionaires in the world (Forbes List). This study reveals the meaning of the zodiac Sumerian. It's the confirmation that the sidereal zodiac is the only one to tell the truth! http://astrologie.eklablog.com/article-18600-144986-forbes-portraits-astraux.htm\ l The reals rules astrology are: - Aries: Mercury (Nebo) - Taurus: Sun (Mithra) - Gemini: Kethu - Cancri: Venus (Ninmah) - Leo: Jupiter (Marduk) - Virgo: Mars (Nergal) - Libra: Uranus (Anu) - Scorpio: Moon (Sin) - Sagittarius: Rahu - Capricornus: Neptune (Enki) - Aquarius: Saturn (Ninurta) - Pisces: Pluto Good reading. Kind regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Dear Patrice, This looks very interesting, thank you for posting. However, as I cannot read French can you please provide a translation? Sincerely Shaun I realized a study on the 100 biggest billionaires in the world (Forbes List). This study reveals the meaning of the zodiac Sumerian. It's the confirmation that the sidereal zodiac is the only one to tell the truth! <http://astrologie.eklablog.com/article-18600-144986-forbes-portraits-astrau x.html> http://astrologie.eklablog.com/article-18600-144986-forbes-portraits-astraux ..html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2008 Report Share Posted June 15, 2008 Hi Chris, In fact, we can make 1 000 charts... But the results are the same again... The reals tendencies begin at 30/35 charts... 100 charts are a simply confirmation... You can make this study! Scorpio: very good for money with the Moon Taurus: with the Sun Virgo: with Mars, etc. A bientôt! Patrice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2008 Report Share Posted June 16, 2008 Patrice, If the correlations are that solid, then I would encourage you to expand the study and publish it somewhere, such as Correlation or Journal for Scientific Exploration. Cheers, Chris Patrice <aartbouriche wrote: Hi Chris, In fact, we can make 1 000 charts... But the results are the same again... The reals tendencies begin at 30/35 charts... 100 charts are a simply confirmation... You can make this study! Scorpio: very good for money with the Moon Taurus: with the Sun Virgo: with Mars, etc. A bientôt! Patrice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.