Pisces sidereal..

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the message Therese.

 

Sorry for the confusion.

 

Here is the proper link

http://journalofastrology.com/ARTICLES/hillary_clinton_7.htm

 

I actually was led to that site through this one where you can see the

chart too.

http://www.lightonVedic Astrology.com/dailyjyotish-050406.htm

 

Speaking of Rao himself he doesn't seem to have a very nice amiable

image. I am amazed that you have met him at conference. You sure have

a lot of experience and are a great resource, having seen astrology

from many perspectives. My learning, unfortunately, has mostly come

from net resources so far, due to a variety of personal reasons. And

there aren't many good sites to learn from unlike tropical astro. I

too have heard he has a unique take on things.

 

As for Hillary I too have some hesitation accepting her as Gemini

ascendant which comes with 8 pm chart. But I shouldn't meddle in

things about which I have no clue.

 

Testing her dashas and stuff is beyond me. I sure am interested in

knowing how you arrived at her time going by her personality traits if

that is the process that was used to reach that conclusion.

 

Thanks

Shiv

 

, Therese Hamilton

<eastwest wrote:

>

> At 11:59 PM 3/19/08 -0000, Shiv wrote:

>

> >K.N. Rao is a very famous Indian astrologer and supports this evening

> >time going by dashas etc. So he does support pisces moon. I am not

> >that knowledgeable to comment on his analysis.

> >But here's the link.

> >

> >http://www.journalofastrology.com/article.php?article_id=148

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

> Shiv, thanks for the link. I went to the site but Rao wasn't the

author of

> the article. However, I'm firmly convinced of Hillary's morning time

after

> testing past events.

>

> I have met K.N. Rao at the California conference in the early 90s.

He would

> hold court in the evening after class sessions, and at the time he was

> living mostly on coffee and chocolate! I have many of his books. He

is to

> be commended for emphasizing reserch, but he's not always right.

Still, his

> approach is far better than those who simply repeat ancient slokas

that no

> longer have meaning for modern life and have never really been tested.

>

> Rao ran into some kind of legal trouble in the U.S. which is one

reason he

> stopped coming to America. It's long ago (for my memory) and I don't

> remember the details.

>

> Therese

>

[Guest guest]

At 11:59 PM 3/19/08 -0000, Shiv wrote:

 

>K.N. Rao is a very famous Indian astrologer and supports this evening

>time going by dashas etc. So he does support pisces moon. I am not

>that knowledgeable to comment on his analysis.

>But here's the link.

>

>http://www.journalofastrology.com/article.php?article_id=148

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Shiv, thanks for the link. I went to the site but Rao wasn't the author of

the article. However, I'm firmly convinced of Hillary's morning time after

testing past events.

 

I have met K.N. Rao at the California conference in the early 90s. He would

hold court in the evening after class sessions, and at the time he was

living mostly on coffee and chocolate! I have many of his books. He is to

be commended for emphasizing reserch, but he's not always right. Still, his

approach is far better than those who simply repeat ancient slokas that no

longer have meaning for modern life and have never really been tested.

 

Rao ran into some kind of legal trouble in the U.S. which is one reason he

stopped coming to America. It's long ago (for my memory) and I don't

remember the details.

 

Therese

[Guest guest]

At 04:52 AM 3/20/08 -0000, Shiv wrote:

 

>Speaking of Rao himself he doesn't seem to have a very nice amiable

>image. I am amazed that you have met him at conference. You sure have

>a lot of experience and are a great resource, having seen astrology

>from many perspectives.

 

 

Ah, there are perks that go with age--lots and lots of years to study,

learn and experiment! I really wonder about the 20 somethings who are

writing astrology books.

 

>Testing [Hillary's] dashas and stuff is beyond me. I sure am interested in

>knowing how you arrived at her time going by her personality traits if

>that is the process that was used to reach that conclusion.

 

I would never try to rectify a chart via personality traits, even with my

psychology degrees. Personality is too nebulous and changeable. I used

solar returns for important years in Hillary's life, and also the natal

chart itself. For example 7th lord Mars is in the 10th house, and Hillary's

husband was president for 8 years. Also Mercury on the ascendant can be

highly intelligent, and Hillary is that. Lots of strong yogas in the a.m.

chart, but I still worry about McCain's solar return and other cyclic

charts. Why would a 70 year old want to be president????

 

Therese