Books on Nakshatras

[Guest guest]

mr. g. singh namashkar try Astroclinica.com u may talk to hasmukrai mehta ji the owner and also kp practitoner takecare raj k.hbk1hbk_2100 <hbk1hbk_2100 wrote: To All,Can anyone tell me from where I can buy the following astrology books:Nakshatras Chintamani by Chandrakant Bhatt.I believe there are three books by the same author on Nakshatras.ThanksG. Singh , "hbk1hbk_2100"

<hbk1hbk_2100 wrote:>> Dear Rao ji, > > I agree with your analysis. The vedic astrology is unable to > explain why one person having a gajkesri yoga is working as a manual > laborer and the other one with the same yoga is a millionaire.> > Best wishes> > G. Singh> > > > > , Yogesh Rao Lajmi <lyrastro1@> > wrote:> >> > Dear vinivj,> > Haven't you come across many people having one of > the so-called Panch-Mahapurasha-Yogas, without any cancellation of > Yoga,but leading a life of penury...? Perhaps to get over such > occurences a number of "Daridra" Yogas have had to be invented...> > Haven't you also come across so-called Daridra > Yoga natives become

Millionaires...? !> > Krishnamurthiji,and several among his > students,have given umpteen numbers of examples of such Birth-> Charts....> > K.P., does not therefore recognise such yogas at > all...!> > With best wishes,> > L.Y.Rao.> > GOOD LUCK !> > > > vinivj <vinivj@> wrote:> > Only the D-24 from JHora 7.0> > > > Ruchaka D-24 Ma > > Natural leader, enterprising and bold> > Mars in a kendra in moolatrikona or own or exaltation sign> > Sasa D-24 Sa > > Wandering leader of free spirit> > Saturn in a kendra in moolatrikona or own or exaltation sign> > Vosi D-24 Ma > > Skillful, charitable and learned> > Planets other than Moon in 12th from Sun> > Nipuna (Budha-Aditya) D-24 Su, Me > > Skillful, expert, well-known and respected> >

Sun and Mercury together or in mutual 7ths> > Daama/Daamini D-24 Naabhasa yoga - throughout life > > Rich, famous, helpful, many children> > Seven planets in 6 rasis> > Sankha D-24 Su, Me > > Wealth, good spouse and children, kind, pious, intelligent, long-> > lived> > The 5th and 6th lords in mutual kendras, strong lagna lord> > Mridanga D-24 Ma, Sa > > King or an equal and happy> > Planets in own/exaltation sign in kendras/konas and strong lagna > > lord> > Rajayoga D-24 Ve, Su > > Successful and high achievements> > Conjunction, aspect or exchange of kendra/kona lords> > Rajayoga D-24 Sa, Ma > > Successful and high achievements> > Conjunction, aspect or exchange of kendra/kona lords> > Raja (AK-PK) D-24 Me, Su > > Loyal following and power> > Atma karaka and putra karaka

together or in 1st/5th> > Yogada (HL) D-24 Ve > > Wealth and prosperity> > Associated with lagna and HL (by aspect, conjunction or > > ownership)> > Raja Sambandha D-24 Ra, Sa > > Important person in a king's court> > Amatya karaka conjoining/aspecting 10th lord> > > > Asc s/l is Ra and 11th cusp s/l is Mo (the current MD).> > > > The list of KP based houses from JHora 7.0> > > > Body/Cusp Nakshatra lord Sub lord Prati-sub Sookshma-sub Praana-> sub > > Deha-sub> > > > As Mo Ra Ra Sa Ra > > Ve> > Su Sa Ra Ra Me Ju > > Ra> > Mo Su Ve Su Su Ke > > Sa> > Ma Ke Sa Ma Sa Mo > > Me> > Me Ju Ve Ma Sa Ra > > Su> > Ju Ra Ve Ma Ke Ke > > Ve> > Ve Ra Ma Sa Ve Sa > > Ju> > Sa Me

Ve Mo Me Ju > > Ma> > Ra Sa Sa Ke Ra Ra > > Sa> > Ke Su Sa Ve Sa Ma > > Ma> > Ur Ju Ju Sa Sa Me > > Ra> > Ne Ma Ra Sa Ma Ra > > Ke> > Pl Ke Ke Sa Me Me > > Mo> > 1st house Mo Ra Ra Sa Ra > > Ve> > 2nd house Ra Sa Ra Ju Sa > > Ke> > 3rd house Sa Mo Ve Sa Ra > > Ke> > 4th house Ke Me Ve Ju Mo > > Ra> > 5th house Mo Ra Ra Sa Ra > > Ve> > 6th house Ra Sa Ra Ju Sa > > Ke> > 7th house Sa Mo Ve Sa Ra > > Ke> > 8th house Ke Me Ve Ju Mo > > Ra> > 9th house Mo Ra Ra Sa Ra > > Ve> > 10th house Ra Sa Ra Ju Sa > > Ke> > 11th house Sa Mo Ve Sa Ra > > Ke> > 12th house Ke Me Ve Ju Mo > > Ra> > > > Casted the chart at Chennai

at 10.04 AM ISt on July 30th, 2006.> > > > , "Raghunatha RaoNemani" > > <raon1008@> wrote:> > >> > > Om Krishna Guru> > > > > > Namaste All,> > > > > > May I request you to cast a KP Horaray Chart for me and tell me > > what > > > is my Siddhamsa ( D-24 ) Lagna is ?> > > > > > The Number I got for this Horary question is : 143.> > > > > > As you know I am a beginner in KP learning, so I would really > > > appreciate providing the Horaray Chart and also your analysis in > > > detail, so that me other fellow students can benefit from your > > reply.> > > > > > Thanks for your help in advance.> > > > > >

Regards> > > Raghunatha Rao> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Answers> >>

Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

[Guest guest]

Hi Francois, Therese and others,

 

I too have Shubhakaran's books of nakshatras, but I'm not sure if they've

increased my understanding of them much. The first book has some interesting

interpretations that differ from the usual Western ones and that are quite

fitting. But overall every nakshatra seems to contain so diverse features

that it's difficult to find the basic idea of each.

 

So far the best nakshatra descriptions I know were online on Joni Patry's

site - I checked the site out and it seems to have disappeared! It used to

be at http://www.galacticcenter.org . What a pity. The second excellent

source about nakshatras is Svoboda's and DeFouw's Light on Life. I've heard

praise of Prash Trivedi's 27 Celestial Portals and I'm going to buy it some

day. Nakshatras are very interesting, sometimes they are even more

interesting than signs. Tropicalists could use them too, like fixed stars,

taking precession into consideration. Someone should write a " Linda

Goodman's Sun Signs " about nakshatras, then people would start to use them

much more than now.

 

Best, Sari

[Guest guest]

Thanks for your comments, Sari. Another good book on the mansions is

Kenneth Johnson's " Mansions of the Moon. " But no book is perfect, and

astrologers should be testing the interpretation of the mansions in all

their horoscopes.

 

Therese

 

At 03:11 PM 1/10/08 +0200, Sari wrote:

>...The second excellent

>source about nakshatras is Svoboda's and DeFouw's Light on Life. I've heard

>praise of Prash Trivedi's 27 Celestial Portals and I'm going to buy it some

>day. Nakshatras are very interesting, sometimes they are even more

>interesting than signs. Tropicalists could use them too, like fixed stars,

>taking precession into consideration. Someone should write a " Linda

>Goodman's Sun Signs " about nakshatras, then people would start to use them

>much more than now.

>

>Best, Sari

[Guest guest]

Dear friends,

 

No book can be perfect.

Cause perfectness cannot be encompassed in

a few hundred pages of literature.

Neither can the Writer of most of the

books be considered perfect. Only God is

perfect. It would be fallacy to search for

perfection in Mortals. Perception perhaps is

a different matter coupled with intution,

which must be developed on a individual level.

 

The 27 Divisions of nakshatras or the

Constellations can be used very effectively

to produce the best astrology in application.

 

1) Use Placidus Cusp

2) Deduct Lahiris Ayanamsha.

3) Now check the Planets fall in which

Nakshatra ?

4) Who are the Lords of the Nakshatras where these

planets falls ?

5) Note down the Cusps represented by these Lords,

and also where they are placed .

6) These houses represented would be the effects

the planets would give when they get

power as MahaDasha (Main period) and antardasha

sub (period) running ?

 

Okay ?

 

Any doubts ,please question me. I would love sharing

what I possess.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

, Therese Hamilton

<eastwest wrote:

>

> Thanks for your comments, Sari. Another good book on the mansions

is

> Kenneth Johnson's " Mansions of the Moon. " But no book is perfect,

and

> astrologers should be testing the interpretation of the mansions

in all

> their horoscopes.

>

> Therese

>

> At 03:11 PM 1/10/08 +0200, Sari wrote:

> >...The second excellent

> >source about nakshatras is Svoboda's and DeFouw's Light on Life.

I've heard

> >praise of Prash Trivedi's 27 Celestial Portals and I'm going to

buy it some

> >day. Nakshatras are very interesting, sometimes they are even

more

> >interesting than signs. Tropicalists could use them too, like

fixed stars,

> >taking precession into consideration. Someone should write

a " Linda

> >Goodman's Sun Signs " about nakshatras, then people would start to

use them

> >much more than now.

> >

> >Best, Sari

>

[Guest guest]

All books are good.

Unfortunately none of these books or their authors

teach how to apply what they have written,in predictive

astrology. So they remain good at theoretical level.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

, " Sari M " <gerdapp

wrote:

>

> Hi Francois, Therese and others,

>

> I too have Shubhakaran's books of nakshatras, but I'm not sure if

they've

> increased my understanding of them much. The first book has some

interesting

> interpretations that differ from the usual Western ones and that

are quite

> fitting. But overall every nakshatra seems to contain so diverse

features

> that it's difficult to find the basic idea of each.

>

> So far the best nakshatra descriptions I know were online on Joni

Patry's

> site - I checked the site out and it seems to have disappeared! It

used to

> be at http://www.galacticcenter.org . What a pity. The second

excellent

> source about nakshatras is Svoboda's and DeFouw's Light on Life.

I've heard

> praise of Prash Trivedi's 27 Celestial Portals and I'm going to

buy it some

> day. Nakshatras are very interesting, sometimes they are even more

> interesting than signs. Tropicalists could use them too, like

fixed stars,

> taking precession into consideration. Someone should write

a " Linda

> Goodman's Sun Signs " about nakshatras, then people would start to

use them

> much more than now.

>

> Best, Sari

>

[Guest guest]

Hello Bhaskar,

 

On Friday, January 11, 2008 12:11 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

 

> The 27 Divisions of nakshatras or the Constellations can be used very

> effectively to produce the best astrology in application.

>

> 1) Use Placidus Cusp

> 2) Deduct Lahiris Ayanamsha.

> 3) Now check the Planets fall in which nakshatra ?

> 4) Who are the Lords of the Nakshatras where these planets falls ?

> 5) Note down the Cusps represented by these Lords, and also where they are

> placed .

> 6) These houses represented would be the effects he planets would give

> when they get ower as MahaDasha (Main period) and antardasha ub (period)

> running ?

 

I am very glad to meet you here!

 

I have read about a similar technique a few years ago. A Belgium jyotishi,

Jean Dethier, who went in India for the first time in 1974, wrote a book

about it. In Madras, he met K. Neelakantan who thought him this technique.

However, there was a subtility about empty houses. So, houses represented by

Starlords were understood this way:

 

- A planet represents the house where its starlord falls;

- A planet represents the empty house ruled by its starlord;

- A planet which has all its nakshatras empty represents the house it is

located in and the empty house it rules.

 

Are we talking about the same technique? Or is it different?

 

Now, something I don't understand clearly, about the effects. Suppose that

the Moon falls in 17:38 Leo (in the 8th house, placidean cusps). Its

Starlord is Venus. If, for instance, Vénus falls in the 1st house, the

effects of the Moon will be in the first house. Suppose I read any cookbook,

should I read the effect of Moon in the first house or those of Venus in

first house? In other words, given the rulerships of the starlord on a

planet, the effect in a house, is that of the planet represented by the

Starlord or that of the Starlord? Or both?

 

Many thanks!

 

--

Best regards,

François

[Guest guest]

Dear Francois,

 

As per Your Example-

 

Moon falls in 17.38 Leo.

and 8th Cusp.

Which may mean that the ascendant is

Capricorn.

Now assuming StarLord of Moon

is Venus and Venus is placed in the 1st House.

What effects would Moon give, when the

native falls under the influence of

the Main period of Moon which remains

for 10 Years ?

 

This is easy to put in one Line-

 

Moon, 8, 7 Venus 1, 5,10

 

These figures now show the exact effect which

Moon would give to the native.

 

Here 8 and 7 for Moon means,

Moon placed in 8th House and Lord of 7th House.

Venus placed in 1st House and Lord

of 5th and 10th house.

 

Translated into predictions -( If Query is

connected to Business.)

 

Answer - The Native would suffer from Loss

of any existing Partnership, and begin a new

Business related to Finance through self efforts .

 

The Moon Shows the source and Venus shows

the results through this source. The 7th house

means partnership, and the 8th shows trouble

brewing. The 1st house shows sel Efforts,

the 5th shows Speculations or Finance,

and the 10th shows, Enterprise.

 

That sums up the Effect of Moon.

 

The technique you mentioned seems to be the same

which I have mentioned above. It works very well.

 

Same Example above but different Query -

If someone is asking when he would meet his Love.

The above figures would show problem in

Marriage at source side of Moon and at results side

would show that he would be meeting his Love during

this period, which is represented again by the

5th house.

 

Conclusion - Planet would show the Source, and the

StarLord of this planet would show the Results that

this Planet would bring in.

 

Please feel free to ask . I will answer whatever I know.

If I am able to contribute here, I would consider

myself fortunate enough.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

, " CARRIERE Francois "

<fc21063 wrote:

>

> Hello Bhaskar,

>

> On Friday, January 11, 2008 12:11 PM, Bhaskar

<bhaskar_jyotish

> wrote:

>

> > The 27 Divisions of nakshatras or the Constellations can be used

very

> > effectively to produce the best astrology in application.

> >

> > 1) Use Placidus Cusp

> > 2) Deduct Lahiris Ayanamsha.

> > 3) Now check the Planets fall in which nakshatra ?

> > 4) Who are the Lords of the Nakshatras where these planets

falls ?

> > 5) Note down the Cusps represented by these Lords, and also

where they are

> > placed .

> > 6) These houses represented would be the effects he planets

would give

> > when they get ower as MahaDasha (Main period) and antardasha ub

(period)

> > running ?

>

> I am very glad to meet you here!

>

> I have read about a similar technique a few years ago. A Belgium

jyotishi,

> Jean Dethier, who went in India for the first time in 1974, wrote

a book

> about it. In Madras, he met K. Neelakantan who thought him this

technique.

> However, there was a subtility about empty houses. So, houses

represented by

> Starlords were understood this way:

>

> - A planet represents the house where its starlord falls;

> - A planet represents the empty house ruled by its starlord;

> - A planet which has all its nakshatras empty represents the house

it is

> located in and the empty house it rules.

>

> Are we talking about the same technique? Or is it different?

>

> Now, something I don't understand clearly, about the effects.

Suppose that

> the Moon falls in 17:38 Leo (in the 8th house, placidean cusps).

Its

> Starlord is Venus. If, for instance, Vénus falls in the 1st house,

the

> effects of the Moon will be in the first house. Suppose I read any

cookbook,

> should I read the effect of Moon in the first house or those of

Venus in

> first house? In other words, given the rulerships of the starlord

on a

> planet, the effect in a house, is that of the planet represented

by the

> Starlord or that of the Starlord? Or both?

>

> Many thanks!

>

> --

> Best regards,

> François

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Francoise,

 

I just noticed a mail from the Group

" Jyotish group " and saw your name which

struck me a chord, that I have heard this name

before,and just realised that You are the same

gentleman when I read Your full name here.

Oh thats good to know that we are already

members of the same Group.

 

Great coincidence.

 

best wishes,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

, " Bhaskar "

<bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

> Dear Francois,

>

> As per Your Example-

>

> Moon falls in 17.38 Leo.

> and 8th Cusp.

> Which may mean that the ascendant is

> Capricorn.

> Now assuming StarLord of Moon

> is Venus and Venus is placed in the 1st House.

> What effects would Moon give, when the

> native falls under the influence of

> the Main period of Moon which remains

> for 10 Years ?

>

> This is easy to put in one Line-

>

> Moon, 8, 7 Venus 1, 5,10

>

> These figures now show the exact effect which

> Moon would give to the native.

>

> Here 8 and 7 for Moon means,

> Moon placed in 8th House and Lord of 7th House.

> Venus placed in 1st House and Lord

> of 5th and 10th house.

>

> Translated into predictions -( If Query is

> connected to Business.)

>

> Answer - The Native would suffer from Loss

> of any existing Partnership, and begin a new

> Business related to Finance through self efforts .

>

> The Moon Shows the source and Venus shows

> the results through this source. The 7th house

> means partnership, and the 8th shows trouble

> brewing. The 1st house shows sel Efforts,

> the 5th shows Speculations or Finance,

> and the 10th shows, Enterprise.

>

> That sums up the Effect of Moon.

>

> The technique you mentioned seems to be the same

> which I have mentioned above. It works very well.

>

> Same Example above but different Query -

> If someone is asking when he would meet his Love.

> The above figures would show problem in

> Marriage at source side of Moon and at results side

> would show that he would be meeting his Love during

> this period, which is represented again by the

> 5th house.

>

> Conclusion - Planet would show the Source, and the

> StarLord of this planet would show the Results that

> this Planet would bring in.

>

> Please feel free to ask . I will answer whatever I know.

> If I am able to contribute here, I would consider

> myself fortunate enough.

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

>

>

>

> , " CARRIERE Francois "

> <fc21063@> wrote:

> >

> > Hello Bhaskar,

> >

> > On Friday, January 11, 2008 12:11 PM, Bhaskar

> <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > wrote:

> >

> > > The 27 Divisions of nakshatras or the Constellations can be

used

> very

> > > effectively to produce the best astrology in application.

> > >

> > > 1) Use Placidus Cusp

> > > 2) Deduct Lahiris Ayanamsha.

> > > 3) Now check the Planets fall in which nakshatra ?

> > > 4) Who are the Lords of the Nakshatras where these planets

> falls ?

> > > 5) Note down the Cusps represented by these Lords, and also

> where they are

> > > placed .

> > > 6) These houses represented would be the effects he planets

> would give

> > > when they get ower as MahaDasha (Main period) and antardasha

ub

> (period)

> > > running ?

> >

> > I am very glad to meet you here!

> >

> > I have read about a similar technique a few years ago. A Belgium

> jyotishi,

> > Jean Dethier, who went in India for the first time in 1974,

wrote

> a book

> > about it. In Madras, he met K. Neelakantan who thought him this

> technique.

> > However, there was a subtility about empty houses. So, houses

> represented by

> > Starlords were understood this way:

> >

> > - A planet represents the house where its starlord falls;

> > - A planet represents the empty house ruled by its starlord;

> > - A planet which has all its nakshatras empty represents the

house

> it is

> > located in and the empty house it rules.

> >

> > Are we talking about the same technique? Or is it different?

> >

> > Now, something I don't understand clearly, about the effects.

> Suppose that

> > the Moon falls in 17:38 Leo (in the 8th house, placidean cusps).

> Its

> > Starlord is Venus. If, for instance, Vénus falls in the 1st

house,

> the

> > effects of the Moon will be in the first house. Suppose I read

any

> cookbook,

> > should I read the effect of Moon in the first house or those of

> Venus in

> > first house? In other words, given the rulerships of the

starlord

> on a

> > planet, the effect in a house, is that of the planet represented

> by the

> > Starlord or that of the Starlord? Or both?

> >

> > Many thanks!

> >

> > --

> > Best regards,

> > François

> >

>