Guest guest Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 > Earthquake Details > Magnitude 6.2 > Date-Time a.. Wednesday, January 09, 2008 at 14:40:01 UTC > b.. Wednesday, January 09, 2008 at 06:40:01 AM at epicenter > Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones > Location 51.701°N, 131.096°W > Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program > Region QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION > Distances a.. 275 km (171 miles) WNW (296°) from Port Hardy, > BC, Canada Hello everyone, The details of this eartquake were sent on Political_Astrology by Francoise Frigola. I would like to follow these earthquake events on USGS website. Apparently, Fagan and Bradley used such event to adjust their fiducial point to get the right sidereal zodiac. So, it might be a useful exercise for me, as an amateur siderealist. However, I wonder about these events. USGS website, for example, states that Alaska is the most earthquale-prone area and very active. It gets mag. 7 earthquake at least once a year. So, either its the best area to be tested, or " we can predict anything and it will work " ;-) So, is there something one need to aware of, when attempting to evaluate the possibilities of earthquakes, using a sidereal zodiac. Of course, I will have to read the archives, since there are many examples here. Thank you. Best regards, François Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2008 Report Share Posted January 10, 2008 At 05:36 PM 1/9/08 -0000, Francois wrote: > >...The details of this earthquake were sent on Political_Astrology by >Francoise Frigola. > >I would like to follow these earthquake events on USGS website. >Apparently, Fagan and Bradley used such event to adjust their >fiducial point to get the right sidereal zodiac... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bradley used rainfall to zero in on an exact ayanamsa. However his raw data isn't available so cannot be checked. There have been questions about his methods. But with the extreme weather conditions we have today in various countries. it would be very easy to try to duplicate his findings. He based his conclusions on the Capricorn ingress. >So, it might be a >useful exercise for me, as an amateur siderealist. However, I wonder >about these events. USGS website, for example, states that Alaska is >the most earthquale-prone area and very active. Yes, Alaska is very prone to strong quakes, so it's best to begin quake research with the 'biggies' that affected large numbers of people. Alaska quakes can happen in isolated areas. The files section of this site has quake charts and commentaries by Matthew Quellas (Fagan-Bradley) and myself (Krishnamurti). I use the monthly solar ingress, and Matthew uses the cardinal ingresses (I believe--you can check the charts.) Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.