Guest guest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 I've been looking around the internet but I have not been able to find out how the dates are different for different dears. Some sites say give these dates: ARIES 4-15 TAURUS 05-15 GEMINI 06-16 CANCER 07-17 LEO 08-17 VIRGO 09-17 LIBRA 10-17 SCORPIO 11-17 SAGITTARIUS 12-16 CAPRICORN 1-15 AQUARIUS 2-15 PISCES 3-15 Another site says the dates are the following: Aries Taurus Gemini Cancer Leo Virgo Libra Scorpio Sagittarius Capricorn Aquarius Pisces Apr 14 May 13 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 16 Sep 16 Oct 16 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 14 Feb 13 Mar 13 Which calendar is correct? If they are both correct then which years are they for? What is the pattern for figuring out which calendar is right for which year? I would really appreciate your explanation of this matter. sincerely, Jonathan Riley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 At 08:07 PM 11/23/07 -0800, Jonathan Rilen wrote: >I've been looking around the internet but I have not been able to find out how the dates are different for different years. Some sites say give these dates: > > ARIES 4-15 > TAURUS 05-15 > GEMINI 06-16 > CANCER 07-17 > LEO 08-17 > VIRGO 09-17 > LIBRA 10-17 > SCORPIO 11-17 > SAGITTARIUS 12-16 > CAPRICORN 1-15 > AQUARIUS 2-15 > PISCES 3-15 (...) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hi Jonathan, Date differences are due to two reasons: (1) Leap year will change the dates when the Sun enters a new sidereal sign. The same happens in the tropical zodiac. (2) However, the main reason that different sites give different start dates for the signs is because different ayanamsas are used, ayanamsa being the difference between the tropical and sidereal zodiacs. There is approximately a degree's difference between the Fagan-Bradley and Lahiri/Krishnamurti ayanamsas. So the date when the sun enters the sidereal signs will be a day earlier for the Lahiri ayanamsa and a day later for Fagan-Bradley. The little used Raman ayanamsa will give start dates two days before Fagan-Bradley. Confusing?? Yes!! The controversy over the ayanamsa is one of the main reasons astrologers stay with the tropical zodiac. If you have additional questions, please feel free to ask. Perhaps someone else can give a more detailed explanation, but the crux of the question is in the ayanamsa. The calendar doesn't change, but the beginning of the sidereal zodiac depends on the ayanamsa. Sincerely, Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 Thanks very much Therese for your help. Which system do you think is more correct? The one with the slightly earlier dates or the one with most days starting on the 15th and 17th? Jonathan Riley therese hamilton <eastwest Friday, November 23, 2007 9:18:04 PM Re: Do Sidereal sun sign threshold dates depend on the year? At 08:07 PM 11/23/07 -0800, Jonathan Rilen wrote: >I've been looking around the internet but I have not been able to find out how the dates are different for different years. Some sites say give these dates: > > ARIES 4-15 > TAURUS 05-15 > GEMINI 06-16 > CANCER 07-17 > LEO 08-17 > VIRGO 09-17 > LIBRA 10-17 > SCORPIO 11-17 > SAGITTARIUS 12-16 > CAPRICORN 1-15 > AQUARIUS 2-15 > PISCES 3-15 (...) ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ Hi Jonathan, Date differences are due to two reasons: (1) Leap year will change the dates when the Sun enters a new sidereal sign. The same happens in the tropical zodiac. (2) However, the main reason that different sites give different start dates for the signs is because different ayanamsas are used, ayanamsa being the difference between the tropical and sidereal zodiacs. There is approximately a degree's difference between the Fagan-Bradley and Lahiri/Krishnamurti ayanamsas. So the date when the sun enters the sidereal signs will be a day earlier for the Lahiri ayanamsa and a day later for Fagan-Bradley. The little used Raman ayanamsa will give start dates two days before Fagan-Bradley. Confusing?? Yes!! The controversy over the ayanamsa is one of the main reasons astrologers stay with the tropical zodiac. If you have additional questions, please feel free to ask. Perhaps someone else can give a more detailed explanation, but the crux of the question is in the ayanamsa. The calendar doesn't change, but the beginning of the sidereal zodiac depends on the ayanamsa. Sincerely, Therese <!-- #ygrp-mkp{ border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;} #ygrp-mkp hr{ border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrp-mkp #hd{ color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;} #ygrp-mkp #ads{ margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrp-mkp .ad{ padding:0 0;} #ygrp-mkp .ad a{ color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} --> <!-- #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{ font-family:Arial;} #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{ margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{ margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} --> <!-- #ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;} #ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrp-text{ font-family:Georgia; } #ygrp-text p{ margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrp-tpmsgs{ font-family:Arial; clear:both;} #ygrp-vitnav{ padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;} #ygrp-vitnav a{ padding:0 1px;} #ygrp-actbar{ clear:both;margin:25px 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;} #ygrp-actbar .left{ float:left;white-space:nowrap;} ..bld{font-weight:bold;} #ygrp-grft{ font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;} #ygrp-ft{ font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666; padding:5px 0; } #ygrp-mlmsg #logo{ padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrp-vital{ background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;} #ygrp-vital #vithd{ font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:upp\ ercase;} #ygrp-vital ul{ padding:0;margin:2px 0;} #ygrp-vital ul li{ list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee; } #ygrp-vital ul li .ct{ font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-ri\ ght:.5em;} #ygrp-vital ul li .cat{ font-weight:bold;} #ygrp-vital a{ text-decoration:none;} #ygrp-vital a:hover{ text-decoration:underline;} #ygrp-sponsor #hd{ color:#999;font-size:77%;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov{ padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{ padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov li{ list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{ text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;} #ygrp-sponsor #nc{ background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad{ padding:8px 0;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{ font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%\ ;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad a{ text-decoration:none;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{ text-decoration:underline;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad p{ margin:0;} o{font-size:0;} ..MsoNormal{ margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrp-text tt{ font-size:120%;} blockquote{margin:0 0 0 4px;} ..replbq{margin:4;} --> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 Jon, perhaps your question boils down the question of What is the difference between the Tropical Zodiac and the Sidereal Zodiac? The first thing I think it helps to understand is that Astrology is both a science and an art. I have always thought of astrology as " astronomy-plus. " Astrology is all the computer calculations and space telescopes and lonely observatories that comprise astronomy— which for the most part simply locate the positions of the planets, stars and other objects in the universe—the `PLUS' means that astrology goes several steps further into the MEANING and IMPORT of each body's presence and the further calculation and interpretation of the MEANING and IMPORT of their positions among themselves and us on this our planet, Earth. What does this mean? It means that anyone interested in Astrology needs to have a grounding in its " basics, " and that's Astronomy. Astronomy is Astrology 101. You should have a basic understanding of the items talked about and the terms used, and a perfunctory knowledge of spherical geometry would help. Now that you know the names of the planets and the constellations and can go out and pick them out in the night sky now, you need to understand their movement and be able to calculate their positions where they were in the past and where they will be in the future. This study will lead you into the study of History and Archeology; Sociology and Paleontology; Psychology and Physiology--and then you are into Mythology and you will suddenly find yourself in the company of the ancient Gods and Heroes and fables and storybooks will come alive! You will be one with them and accepted by them and you can converse and learn many insights and emerge a much better person than when you entered this Hall of Learning—the skies above you! Within which you live and move and have your being. Am I saying that Astrology is mystical? Yes, and you can go with that wherever it may take you. Is Astrology scientific? Yes—and more. Astrology is metaphysical, which means " beyond physics " —or, again, " physics-PLUS " . There is a planet there ho-hum, physics say, but the astrologer sees it has MEANING and there is a MEANING why it is in that place and further there is a MEANING in its interaction with other likewise MEANINGFUL bodies up there. Just like us...me and thee... In other words, life is a mystery that has meaning, everything has meaning, and astrology is one excellent " key " to unlocking that mystery. Now back to the question: " What is the difference between the Tropical Zodiac and the Sidereal Zodiac? " If you have done your homework, the answer lies in the definitions of `Zodiac' and `Precession of the Equinoxes', where the actual `difference' (in degrees) of annual motion is expressed by the word `precession' or the Indian word `ayanamsa' as Therese said. If you were to Google " Precession of the Equinoxes " you would find this in Wikipedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession_of_the_equinoxes> " Currently, this annual motion is about 50.3 seconds of arc per year or 1 degree every 71.6 years. The process is slow, but cumulative. A complete precession cycle covers a period of approximately 25,765 years, the so called Platonic year, during which time the equinox regresses a full 360° through all twelve constellations of the zodiac. " An interesting question is: Which `Zodiac' moves, the Tropical or the Sidereal? Most astrologers would tell you that the Sidereal is the one that moves and the Tropical is `fixed'; others would say the opposite. My way of thinking is that they both move, since everything in the universe is moving [to split hairs], but since the Sidereal Zodiac by definition is comprised of the `fixed' stars—and since Precession itself is defined by the warp and wobble of the movement of the planet Earth itself vis a vis everything else—I think that seemingly paradoxically it is the Tropical Zodiac that moves the most. But what is moving? Actually there is only one Zodiac, one `belt' in the sky wherein the planets of our solar system reside. The difference is in where they start: Where is the Vernal starting point which is 0 degrees Aries in the Tropical Zodiac. Where is 0 degrees in the Sidereal constellation Aries? They both are, in essence, imaginary points. One because it is a mathematical point determined by the Earth's movement; the other is a more-or-less agreed upon special point in the heavens where the constellation Aries begins. The former is the beginning of the Tropical zodiac, the latter the Sidereal. Without going any further into it, one thing is certain and that is that they are currently separating at the rate of " 50.3 seconds of arc per year, or one degree every 71.6 years. " When did they coincide? That bit of wisdom multiplied by the present rate of precession will give you the present difference between the two zodiacs. However, estimates vary from approximately 300 B.C. to 300 A.D. as the coinciding date, so you have to [study it and] decide for yourself. That is the reason for the differing `ayanamsas' today. Again, if you were to Google `Ayanamsa' you will find an interesting discussion in Wikipedia which should bring you up to speed on everybody's thinking. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayanamsa> So, Jon, the short answer to your question, " Do Sidereal sun sign threshold dates depend on the year " is a resounding " YES! " Though it depends upon which 'Ayanamsa' you choose to use as the the exact amount. Today it is roughly 24 degrees. If you are looking at the chart and planetary positions of an adult born, say, 30 to 50 years ago, then if you were to subtract 24 degrees from every zodiacal position then you would have a good approximation of their Sidereal " signs " —though in this case you would be speaking of " constellations " would you not— and there we go again? I hope I haven't raised more questions than I tried to answer! But maybe that wouldn't be a bad thing, either. Best Regards, DR , Jon Riley <jrtokyo1988 wrote: > > I've been looking around the internet but I have not been able to find out how the dates are different for different dears. Some sites say give these dates: > > ARIES 4-15 > TAURUS 05-15 > GEMINI 06-16 > CANCER 07-17 > LEO 08-17 > VIRGO 09-17 > LIBRA 10-17 > SCORPIO 11-17 > SAGITTARIUS 12-16 > CAPRICORN 1-15 > AQUARIUS 2-15 > PISCES 3-15 > > Another site says the dates are the following: > > Aries > Taurus > Gemini > Cancer > Leo > Virgo > Libra > Scorpio > Sagittarius > Capricorn > Aquarius > Pisces > > Apr 14 > May 13 > Jun 15 > Jul 15 > Aug > 16 > Sep 16 > Oct 16 > Nov 15 > Dec 15 > Jan 14 > Feb 13 > Mar 13 > Which calendar is correct? If they are both correct then which years are they for? What is the pattern for figuring out which calendar is right for which year? > > I would really appreciate your explanation of this matter. > > sincerely, > > Jonathan Riley > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 At 09:19 AM 11/24/07 -0800, you wrote: >Thanks very much Therese for your help. Which system do you think is more correct? The one with the slightly earlier dates or the one with most days starting on the 15th and 17th? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hi Jonathan, I started to research the ayanamsa way back in the 70s. I used Fagan-Bradley for awhile (later dates), but when I started to study India's astrology I found that Lahiri (earlier dates) gave better results with the predictive 'dasa' planetary periods system. Finally after more research I changed to Krishnamurti, a slight modification from Lahiri. I've found that ingress charts (when the Sun first enters a sign) to be very important with Krishnamurti for natural cataclysms such as the loss of New Orleans and major earthquakes in the world. However, this site is owned by a man who uses the western Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa, and no doubt he and others will swear by that ayanamsa and the later start dates. So it's all up to individual research and preference. I saw that you were on moderated status, so I placed you on unmoderated status so that there will no longer be a delays if you post messages again. Sincerely, Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 So are these dates accurate? Aries Taurus Gemini Cancer Leo Virgo Libra Scorpio Sagittarius Capricorn Aquarius Pisces Apr 14 May 13 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 16 Sep 16 Oct 16 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 14 Feb 13 Mar 13 therese hamilton <eastwest Saturday, November 24, 2007 1:43:28 PM Re: Do Sidereal sun sign threshold dates depend on the year? At 09:19 AM 11/24/07 -0800, you wrote: >Thanks very much Therese for your help. Which system do you think is more correct? The one with the slightly earlier dates or the one with most days starting on the 15th and 17th? ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ Hi Jonathan, I started to research the ayanamsa way back in the 70s. I used Fagan-Bradley for awhile (later dates), but when I started to study India's astrology I found that Lahiri (earlier dates) gave better results with the predictive 'dasa' planetary periods system. Finally after more research I changed to Krishnamurti, a slight modification from Lahiri. I've found that ingress charts (when the Sun first enters a sign) to be very important with Krishnamurti for natural cataclysms such as the loss of New Orleans and major earthquakes in the world. However, this site is owned by a man who uses the western Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa, and no doubt he and others will swear by that ayanamsa and the later start dates. So it's all up to individual research and preference. I saw that you were on moderated status, so I placed you on unmoderated status so that there will no longer be a delays if you post messages again. Sincerely, Therese <!-- #ygrp-mkp{ border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;} #ygrp-mkp hr{ border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrp-mkp #hd{ color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;} #ygrp-mkp #ads{ margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrp-mkp .ad{ padding:0 0;} #ygrp-mkp .ad a{ color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} --> <!-- #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{ font-family:Arial;} #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{ margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{ margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} --> <!-- #ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;} #ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrp-text{ font-family:Georgia; } #ygrp-text p{ margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrp-tpmsgs{ font-family:Arial; clear:both;} #ygrp-vitnav{ padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;} #ygrp-vitnav a{ padding:0 1px;} #ygrp-actbar{ clear:both;margin:25px 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;} #ygrp-actbar .left{ float:left;white-space:nowrap;} ..bld{font-weight:bold;} #ygrp-grft{ font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0;} #ygrp-ft{ font-family:verdana;font-size:77%;border-top:1px solid #666; padding:5px 0; } #ygrp-mlmsg #logo{ padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrp-vital{ background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:2px 0 8px 8px;} #ygrp-vital #vithd{ font-size:77%;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:bold;color:#333;text-transform:upp\ ercase;} #ygrp-vital ul{ padding:0;margin:2px 0;} #ygrp-vital ul li{ list-style-type:none;clear:both;border:1px solid #e0ecee; } #ygrp-vital ul li .ct{ font-weight:bold;color:#ff7900;float:right;width:2em;text-align:right;padding-ri\ ght:.5em;} #ygrp-vital ul li .cat{ font-weight:bold;} #ygrp-vital a{ text-decoration:none;} #ygrp-vital a:hover{ text-decoration:underline;} #ygrp-sponsor #hd{ color:#999;font-size:77%;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov{ padding:6px 13px;background-color:#e0ecee;margin-bottom:20px;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov ul{ padding:0 0 0 8px;margin:0;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov li{ list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;font-size:77%;} #ygrp-sponsor #ov li a{ text-decoration:none;font-size:130%;} #ygrp-sponsor #nc{ background-color:#eee;margin-bottom:20px;padding:0 8px;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad{ padding:8px 0;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad #hd1{ font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#628c2a;font-size:100%;line-height:122%\ ;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad a{ text-decoration:none;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad a:hover{ text-decoration:underline;} #ygrp-sponsor .ad p{ margin:0;} o{font-size:0;} ..MsoNormal{ margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrp-text tt{ font-size:120%;} blockquote{margin:0 0 0 4px;} ..replbq{margin:4;} --> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Share Posted November 24, 2007 Thank you for your comprehensive explanation. I'm bad in math though. Would you tell me an easy way to tell which day the signs change depending on the year? like 1960, 1880 or 1980 for example? Aries Taurus Gemini Cancer Leo Virgo Libra Scorpio Sagittarius Capricorn Aquarius Pisces Apr 14 May 13 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 16 Sep 16 Oct 16 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 14 Feb 13 Mar 13 Which year is the above zodiac for? - Jonathan Riley Don Ridgway <scribe Saturday, November 24, 2007 11:40:06 AM Re: Do Sidereal sun sign threshold dates depend on the year? Jon, perhaps your question boils down the question of What is the difference between the Tropical Zodiac and the Sidereal Zodiac? The first thing I think it helps to understand is that Astrology is both a science and an art. I have always thought of astrology as " astronomy-plus. " Astrology is all the computer calculations and space telescopes and lonely observatories that comprise astronomy— which for the most part simply locate the positions of the planets, stars and other objects in the universe—the `PLUS' means that astrology goes several steps further into the MEANING and IMPORT of each body's presence and the further calculation and interpretation of the MEANING and IMPORT of their positions among themselves and us on this our planet, Earth. What does this mean? It means that anyone interested in Astrology needs to have a grounding in its " basics, " and that's Astronomy. Astronomy is Astrology 101. You should have a basic understanding of the items talked about and the terms used, and a perfunctory knowledge of spherical geometry would help. Now that you know the names of the planets and the constellations and can go out and pick them out in the night sky now, you need to understand their movement and be able to calculate their positions where they were in the past and where they will be in the future. This study will lead you into the study of History and Archeology; Sociology and Paleontology; Psychology and Physiology-- and then you are into Mythology and you will suddenly find yourself in the company of the ancient Gods and Heroes and fables and storybooks will come alive! You will be one with them and accepted by them and you can converse and learn many insights and emerge a much better person than when you entered this Hall of Learning—the skies above you! Within which you live and move and have your being. Am I saying that Astrology is mystical? Yes, and you can go with that wherever it may take you. Is Astrology scientific? Yes—and more. Astrology is metaphysical, which means " beyond physics " —or, again, " physics-PLUS " . There is a planet there ho-hum, physics say, but the astrologer sees it has MEANING and there is a MEANING why it is in that place and further there is a MEANING in its interaction with other likewise MEANINGFUL bodies up there. Just like us...me and thee... In other words, life is a mystery that has meaning, everything has meaning, and astrology is one excellent " key " to unlocking that mystery. Now back to the question: " What is the difference between the Tropical Zodiac and the Sidereal Zodiac? " If you have done your homework, the answer lies in the definitions of `Zodiac' and `Precession of the Equinoxes', where the actual `difference' (in degrees) of annual motion is expressed by the word `precession' or the Indian word `ayanamsa' as Therese said. If you were to Google " Precession of the Equinoxes " you would find this in Wikipedia: <http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Precession_ of_the_equinoxes> " Currently, this annual motion is about 50.3 seconds of arc per year or 1 degree every 71.6 years. The process is slow, but cumulative. A complete precession cycle covers a period of approximately 25,765 years, the so called Platonic year, during which time the equinox regresses a full 360° through all twelve constellations of the zodiac. " An interesting question is: Which `Zodiac' moves, the Tropical or the Sidereal? Most astrologers would tell you that the Sidereal is the one that moves and the Tropical is `fixed'; others would say the opposite. My way of thinking is that they both move, since everything in the universe is moving [to split hairs], but since the Sidereal Zodiac by definition is comprised of the `fixed' stars—and since Precession itself is defined by the warp and wobble of the movement of the planet Earth itself vis a vis everything else—I think that seemingly paradoxically it is the Tropical Zodiac that moves the most. But what is moving? Actually there is only one Zodiac, one `belt' in the sky wherein the planets of our solar system reside. The difference is in where they start: Where is the Vernal starting point which is 0 degrees Aries in the Tropical Zodiac. Where is 0 degrees in the Sidereal constellation Aries? They both are, in essence, imaginary points. One because it is a mathematical point determined by the Earth's movement; the other is a more-or-less agreed upon special point in the heavens where the constellation Aries begins. The former is the beginning of the Tropical zodiac, the latter the Sidereal. Without going any further into it, one thing is certain and that is that they are currently separating at the rate of " 50.3 seconds of arc per year, or one degree every 71.6 years. " When did they coincide? That bit of wisdom multiplied by the present rate of precession will give you the present difference between the two zodiacs. However, estimates vary from approximately 300 B.C. to 300 A.D. as the coinciding date, so you have to [study it and] decide for yourself. That is the reason for the differing `ayanamsas' today. Again, if you were to Google `Ayanamsa' you will find an interesting discussion in Wikipedia which should bring you up to speed on everybody's thinking. <http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Ayanamsa> So, Jon, the short answer to your question, " Do Sidereal sun sign threshold dates depend on the year " is a resounding " YES! " Though it depends upon which 'Ayanamsa' you choose to use as the the exact amount. Today it is roughly 24 degrees. If you are looking at the chart and planetary positions of an adult born, say, 30 to 50 years ago, then if you were to subtract 24 degrees from every zodiacal position then you would have a good approximation of their Sidereal " signs " —though in this case you would be speaking of " constellations " would you not— and there we go again? I hope I haven't raised more questions than I tried to answer! But maybe that wouldn't be a bad thing, either. Best Regards, DR , Jon Riley <jrtokyo1988@ ...> wrote: > > I've been looking around the internet but I have not been able to find out how the dates are different for different dears. Some sites say give these dates: > > ARIES 4-15 > TAURUS 05-15 > GEMINI 06-16 > CANCER 07-17 > LEO 08-17 > VIRGO 09-17 > LIBRA 10-17 > SCORPIO 11-17 > SAGITTARIUS 12-16 > CAPRICORN 1-15 > AQUARIUS 2-15 > PISCES 3-15 > > Another site says the dates are the following: > > Aries > Taurus > Gemini > Cancer > Leo > Virgo > Libra > Scorpio > Sagittarius > Capricorn > Aquarius > Pisces > > Apr 14 > May 13 > Jun 15 > Jul 15 > Aug > 16 > Sep 16 > Oct 16 > Nov 15 > Dec 15 > Jan 14 > Feb 13 > Mar 13 > Which calendar is correct? If they are both correct then which years are they for? What is the pattern for figuring out which calendar is right for which year? > > I would really appreciate your explanation of this matter. > > sincerely, > > Jonathan Riley > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2007 Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 At 01:52 PM 11/24/07 -0800, Jonathan wrote: >So are these dates accurate? Hi Jonathan, There are no absolutely fixed days because each year is different. The sun might enter a sign just before a certain day or just as the day is finishing. It also depends on where you live--what continent or state. The easiest way to find out exactly when the Sun enters a sign is to buy an inexpensive astrology software program and calculate the date/year you are wondering about. There might even be free sites to compute horoscopes on the internet. I know there are free ephemeris sites which give planetary positions for each day for every year. Maybe someone here has the links?? Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2007 Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 Hi, Jon, I apologize to you and to everybody else for getting so verbose in my post, I see I was really on a roll there and may have gotton off the subject several times. I found a Tropical/Sidereal calendar of sorts you can refer to to find the ingress dates of the Sun into the signs at: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereal_astrology> Also, I am sending you by private email my updated small astrological program which uses the ultra-accurate Swiss Ephemeris and calculates the Sun, Moon, and planets in as well as the new " dwarf planets, " [Pluto,] Ceres, and Eris (2003 UB313), including Chiron and Pholus (larger than Chiron), and selected fixed stars, Aldebaran, Antares, Arcturus, Spica and the Galactic Center. It now calculates the Longitudinal positions for all these in the Tropical Zodiac AND the Sidereal Zodiac (Fagan/Bradley ayanamsha). It is now called " Astro2006SEZ. " Now you can have access to the positions of all the new interesting astronomical objects in one place! If anybody else here is interested I will have it ready for free public download in a day or so at <http://www.astrologysociety.com> after I've made a professional InstallShield install/uninstall and updates to the Readme.txt file. Best Regards, DR , Jon Riley <jrtokyo1988 wrote: > > Thank you for your comprehensive explanation. I'm bad in math though. Would you tell me an easy way to tell which day the signs change depending on the year? like 1960, 1880 or 1980 for example? > Aries > Taurus > Gemini > Cancer > Leo > Virgo > Libra > Scorpio > Sagittarius > Capricorn > Aquarius > Pisces > > Apr 14 > May 13 > Jun 15 > Jul 15 > Aug > 16 > Sep 16 > Oct 16 > Nov 15 > Dec 15 > Jan 14 > Feb 13 > Mar 13 > Which year is the above zodiac for? > > - Jonathan Riley > > > Don Ridgway <scribe > > Saturday, November 24, 2007 11:40:06 AM > Re: Do Sidereal sun sign threshold dates depend on the year? > > > > > > > Jon, perhaps your question boils down the question of What is the > > difference between the Tropical Zodiac and the Sidereal Zodiac? > > > > The first thing I think it helps to understand is that Astrology is > > both a science and an art. I have always thought of astrology > > as " astronomy-plus. " Astrology is all the computer calculations and > > space telescopes and lonely observatories that comprise astronomy— > > which for the most part simply locate the positions of the planets, > > stars and other objects in the universe—the `PLUS' means that > > astrology goes several steps further into the MEANING and IMPORT of > > each body's presence and the further calculation and interpretation > > of the MEANING and IMPORT of their positions among themselves and us > > on this our planet, Earth. > > > > What does this mean? It means that anyone interested in Astrology > > needs to have a grounding in its " basics, " and that's Astronomy. > > Astronomy is Astrology 101. You should have a basic understanding of > > the items talked about and the terms used, and a perfunctory > > knowledge of spherical geometry would help. > > > > Now that you know the names of the planets and the constellations > > and can go out and pick them out in the night sky now, you need to > > understand their movement and be able to calculate their positions > > where they were in the past and where they will be in the future. > > > > This study will lead you into the study of History and Archeology; > > Sociology and Paleontology; Psychology and Physiology-- and then you > > are into Mythology and you will suddenly find yourself in the > > company of the ancient Gods and Heroes and fables and storybooks > > will come alive! You will be one with them and accepted by them and > > you can converse and learn many insights and emerge a much better > > person than when you entered this Hall of Learning—the skies above > > you! Within which you live and move and have your being. > > > > Am I saying that Astrology is mystical? Yes, and you can go with > > that wherever it may take you. Is Astrology scientific? Yes—and > > more. Astrology is metaphysical, which means " beyond physics " —or, > > again, " physics-PLUS " . There is a planet there ho-hum, physics say, > > but the astrologer sees it has MEANING and there is a MEANING why it > > is in that place and further there is a MEANING in its interaction > > with other likewise MEANINGFUL bodies up there. Just like us...me > > and thee... > > > > In other words, life is a mystery that has meaning, everything has > > meaning, and astrology is one excellent " key " to unlocking that > > mystery. > > > > Now back to the question: " What is the difference between the > > Tropical Zodiac and the Sidereal Zodiac? " > > > > If you have done your homework, the answer lies in the definitions > > of `Zodiac' and `Precession of the Equinoxes', where the > > actual `difference' (in degrees) of annual motion is expressed by > > the word `precession' or the Indian word `ayanamsa' as Therese said. > > > > If you were to Google " Precession of the Equinoxes " you would find > > this in Wikipedia: > > <http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Precession_ of_the_equinoxes> > > > > " Currently, this annual motion is about 50.3 seconds of arc per year > > or 1 degree every 71.6 years. The process is slow, but cumulative. A > > complete precession cycle covers a period of approximately 25,765 > > years, the so called Platonic year, during which time the equinox > > regresses a full 360° through all twelve constellations of the > > zodiac. " > > > > An interesting question is: Which `Zodiac' moves, the Tropical or > > the Sidereal? Most astrologers would tell you that the Sidereal is > > the one that moves and the Tropical is `fixed'; others would say the > > opposite. My way of thinking is that they both move, since > > everything in the universe is moving [to split hairs], but since the > > Sidereal Zodiac by definition is comprised of the `fixed' stars— and > > since Precession itself is defined by the warp and wobble of the > > movement of the planet Earth itself vis a vis everything else—I > > think that seemingly paradoxically it is the Tropical Zodiac that > > moves the most. > > > > But what is moving? Actually there is only one Zodiac, one `belt' in > > the sky wherein the planets of our solar system reside. The > > difference is in where they start: Where is the Vernal starting > > point which is 0 degrees Aries in the Tropical Zodiac. Where is 0 > > degrees in the Sidereal constellation Aries? > > > > They both are, in essence, imaginary points. One because it is a > > mathematical point determined by the Earth's movement; the other is > > a more-or-less agreed upon special point in the heavens where the > > constellation Aries begins. The former is the beginning of the > > Tropical zodiac, the latter the Sidereal. > > > > Without going any further into it, one thing is certain and that is > > that they are currently separating at the rate of " 50.3 seconds of > > arc per year, or one degree every 71.6 years. " > > > > When did they coincide? That bit of wisdom multiplied by the present > > rate of precession will give you the present difference between the > > two zodiacs. However, estimates vary from approximately 300 B.C. to > > 300 A.D. as the coinciding date, so you have to [study it and] > > decide for yourself. That is the reason for the > > differing `ayanamsas' today. > > > > Again, if you were to Google `Ayanamsa' you will find an interesting > > discussion in Wikipedia which should bring you up to speed on > > everybody's thinking. > > <http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Ayanamsa> > > > > So, Jon, the short answer to your question, " Do Sidereal sun sign > > threshold dates depend on the year " is a resounding " YES! " Though it > > depends upon which 'Ayanamsa' you choose to use as the the exact > > amount. > > > > Today it is roughly 24 degrees. If you are looking at the chart and > > planetary positions of an adult born, say, 30 to 50 years ago, then > > if you were to subtract 24 degrees from every zodiacal position then > > you would have a good approximation of their Sidereal " signs " — though > > in this case you would be speaking of " constellations " would you not— > > and there we go again? > > > > I hope I haven't raised more questions than I tried to answer! But > > maybe that wouldn't be a bad thing, either. > > > > Best Regards, > > DR > > > > , Jon Riley > > <jrtokyo1988@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > I've been looking around the internet but I have not been able to > > find out how the dates are different for different dears. Some sites > > say give these dates: > > > > > > ARIES 4-15 > > > TAURUS 05-15 > > > GEMINI 06-16 > > > CANCER 07-17 > > > LEO 08-17 > > > VIRGO 09-17 > > > LIBRA 10-17 > > > SCORPIO 11-17 > > > SAGITTARIUS 12-16 > > > CAPRICORN 1-15 > > > AQUARIUS 2-15 > > > PISCES 3-15 > > > > > > Another site says the dates are the following: > > > > > > Aries > > > Taurus > > > Gemini > > > Cancer > > > Leo > > > Virgo > > > Libra > > > Scorpio > > > Sagittarius > > > Capricorn > > > Aquarius > > > Pisces > > > > > > Apr 14 > > > May 13 > > > Jun 15 > > > Jul 15 > > > Aug > > > 16 > > > Sep 16 > > > Oct 16 > > > Nov 15 > > > Dec 15 > > > Jan 14 > > > Feb 13 > > > Mar 13 > > > Which calendar is correct? If they are both correct then which > > years are they for? What is the pattern for figuring out which > > calendar is right for which year? > > > > > > I would really appreciate your explanation of this matter. > > > > > > sincerely, > > > > > > Jonathan Riley > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.