For therese hamilton == use of signs

[Guest guest]

Therese, I don't use signs. I do use the Sidereal methods that Cyril

Fagan developed. Precession correction does obtain the same positions

and equivalent charts as doing them in the Sidereal Zodiac. I feel

that if I presented the charts in either zodiac, the same

interpretations would result as there is no virtual dependence upon signs.

 

Another discussion possibility would be that of limiting signs to just

the Sun positions as signs are mathematical constructs that are

projected into space and have little or nothing to do with the

planets. At least one can link the Sun and signs due to seasonal

declination and that influence on everyone's common cultural

influences due to planting, weather and all of those things that have

been part of our lives since way back when.

 

If you really don't want to use my " signless " (except for the

convenience of placement and measuring) form of Sidereal Astrology

techniques I'll be happy to desist. It just that in my other areas of

endeavor where I work with a mix of student levels and orientation it

just seems more comfortable for others to adapt. Dave

[Guest guest]

Dear All !

In my opinion, signs are very important factors in

interpreting the horoscope, no matter which system one

is using the sign-placement is one of the major

factor. Nowdays I'm even using

constellation-bounderies as well as specific sidereal

and simple tropical signs. If you think of Morin, it's

absolutely necessary to use the tropical in orer to

evaluate the chart. All the Best, Peter Kecskés

 

--- dadsnook2000 <dadsnook wrote:

 

> Therese, I don't use signs. I do use the Sidereal

> methods that Cyril

> Fagan developed. Precession correction does obtain

> the same positions

> and equivalent charts as doing them in the Sidereal

> Zodiac. I feel

> that if I presented the charts in either zodiac, the

> same

> interpretations would result as there is no virtual

> dependence upon signs.

>

> Another discussion possibility would be that of

> limiting signs to just

> the Sun positions as signs are mathematical

> constructs that are

> projected into space and have little or nothing to

> do with the

> planets. At least one can link the Sun and signs due

> to seasonal

> declination and that influence on everyone's common

> cultural

> influences due to planting, weather and all of those

> things that have

> been part of our lives since way back when.

>

> If you really don't want to use my " signless "

> (except for the

> convenience of placement and measuring) form of

> Sidereal Astrology

> techniques I'll be happy to desist. It just that in

> my other areas of

> endeavor where I work with a mix of student levels

> and orientation it

> just seems more comfortable for others to adapt.

> Dave

>

>

 

 

 

______________________________\

____

Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join 's user panel and

lay it on us. http://surveylink./gmrs/_panel_invite.asp?a=7