Guest guest Posted January 8, 2007 Report Share Posted January 8, 2007 At 07:22 PM 1/7/07 -0000, Don wrote: >Hi, Therese (Teresa?); Both, I'm afraid depending on the date and circumstance. It's amazing how many different ways people spell my name. Legally I'm Teresa; astrologically, Therese. >Speaking of ayanamsas, do I recall you quoting Edgar Cayce on >astrology? I studied his writings and came away with the impression >that the Sidereal Zodiac is the more accurate... Yes, Edgar Cayce did make such comments as " The signs are 30 degrees off. Place the signs in the Persian calendar rather than the Egyptian... " But if you scan the readings, his sources used both the constellations and the tropical signs, but then if you draw up the horoscope that sign is nowhere to be found! I have stacks of research papers on what Cayce says about astrology, and I've calculated many of the timed horoscopes. >, and what's more that >Arcturus a Bootis was the center of our galaxy. He didn't say that exactly: ....For Arcturus is that junction between the spheres of activity as related to cosmic force, and is that about which this particular environ or sphere of activity rotates... " (Reading 263-15) We all know that Cayce's language is difficult, and there are a number of readings on Arcturus that would have to be synthesized. Cayce does say that when our planetary evolution is completed here, then Arcturus is the doorway out of this system. This refers to our between-life sojourns in the planetary spheres. >So I used Arcturus >as my ayanamsha for years. Has anyone else heard this or used Arcturus in their studies? The Lahiri ayanamsa places Arcturus at 0Libra23, which is close, but not exact. Spica is placed just at the boundary of Virgo-Libra, so this is a critical location in the zodiac for anyone who has the acendant or key planets there. >And why are Tropical charts used in Cayce books? Because the authors of those books are Tropical astrologers and don't know how to use a sidereal zodiac! Same with the people who run the Cayce organization. They don't know much about the technical aspects of astrology and depend on advice from others. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2007 Report Share Posted January 8, 2007 Therese, Thank you very very much for your insightful answers to my years of lingering questions and misunderstanding. Seriously. Don - therese hamilton Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:17 PM Mathematics of the ancient zodiac At 07:22 PM 1/7/07 -0000, Don wrote: >Hi, Therese (Teresa?); Both, I'm afraid depending on the date and circumstance. It's amazing how many different ways people spell my name. Legally I'm Teresa; astrologically, Therese. >Speaking of ayanamsas, do I recall you quoting Edgar Cayce on >astrology? I studied his writings and came away with the impression >that the Sidereal Zodiac is the more accurate... Yes, Edgar Cayce did make such comments as " The signs are 30 degrees off. Place the signs in the Persian calendar rather than the Egyptian... " But if you scan the readings, his sources used both the constellations and the tropical signs, but then if you draw up the horoscope that sign is nowhere to be found! I have stacks of research papers on what Cayce says about astrology, and I've calculated many of the timed horoscopes. >, and what's more that >Arcturus a Bootis was the center of our galaxy. He didn't say that exactly: ...For Arcturus is that junction between the spheres of activity as related to cosmic force, and is that about which this particular environ or sphere of activity rotates... " (Reading 263-15) We all know that Cayce's language is difficult, and there are a number of readings on Arcturus that would have to be synthesized. Cayce does say that when our planetary evolution is completed here, then Arcturus is the doorway out of this system. This refers to our between-life sojourns in the planetary spheres. >So I used Arcturus >as my ayanamsha for years. Has anyone else heard this or used Arcturus in their studies? The Lahiri ayanamsa places Arcturus at 0Libra23, which is close, but not exact. Spica is placed just at the boundary of Virgo-Libra, so this is a critical location in the zodiac for anyone who has the acendant or key planets there. >And why are Tropical charts used in Cayce books? Because the authors of those books are Tropical astrologers and don't know how to use a sidereal zodiac! Same with the people who run the Cayce organization. They don't know much about the technical aspects of astrology and depend on advice from others. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2007 Report Share Posted January 8, 2007 At 08:40 PM 1/7/07 -0500, Don wrote: >Therese, >Thank you very very much for your insightful answers to my years of lingering questions and misunderstanding. Seriously. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I'm happy I could help, Don. I have the Cayce CD as well as the two big astrology books his organization published in the 80s, so if you have any further questions about Cayce's astrology, just ask! I also have all the smaller books on Cayce's astrology from other authors, but these have the author's own ideas mixed with Cayce's. Lots of vertabim quotes from the readings, however. Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.