RE: Digest Number 1258

[Guest guest]

Hello Chris. The first one you mentioned was without a birth time.

You asked how such a date is to figure out for a delineation without a

birth time.

The second is with birth time. What exactly is what you want to know? Why

this

second one, with birthtime? What is your proposal now?

And who is he/she you know from the LR Databank, if you leave it now?

I casted already the chart and would like to know (for my file).

Greetings and gratefully yours

Anny

[Guest guest]

Hi Anny,

 

I thought I included Habermas' birth time -- 20.00.

 

My idea here was simply to generate some discussion about real charts

of real people. Seeing the various approaches we use to interpret a

horoscope might be a stimulating exercise for members. I find that no

matter how accomplished we are in reading, it's always interesting to

see how others do it.

 

And since it's a blind chart, it provides a challenge to see how well

the various techniques appear to work. Of course, this isn't quite the

same as reading for a client since there is no living person across

the table from you and one may not take as much time to prepare the

interpretation as one would for a real person. Still, I find these

kinds of debates valuable.

 

Just so you know, the person in mystery chart 2 is not anyone in ADB.

She is just a person I know.

 

Chris

 

 

 

, " Anny van Berckel "

<avbdk wrote:

>

> Hello Chris. The first one you mentioned was without a birth time.

> You asked how such a date is to figure out for a delineation without a

> birth time.

> The second is with birth time. What exactly is what you want to

know? Why

> this

> second one, with birthtime? What is your proposal now?

> And who is he/she you know from the LR Databank, if you leave it now?

> I casted already the chart and would like to know (for my file).

> Greetings and gratefully yours

> Anny

>