Guest guest Posted March 9, 2005 Report Share Posted March 9, 2005 I have asked this question on the Physics of Sidereal site and am repeating it here, hoping the larger membership may provide some answers or comments. " What is the rational and explanation for Fagan's promotion of using the 5/4's symbolic rotation of the Solar Return angles between successive Solar Returns? " Calculating PSSR charts, wherein the MC moves about 1.25 degrees per day, results in the relocation of the Sun's house position in successive Solar Returns, placing the Sun about three houses ahead of its prior S/R position. This is true of all types of Solar Returns and is a well recognized fact. I realize that this phenomena is related to the earth's orbit and the 365.25 rotations of the earth in each year. But, Fagan glossed over this process in his Primer of Sidereal Astrology after having done a nice concise presentation of the calculation of Secondary Progressions. He clearly intended the first explanation to support and lead into the PSSR progression explanation -- but its clarity escapes me. I am writing a small book at this time that examines Natal, Solar Return and PSSR angles and their interpretive meanings. I have found over the last 3 decades that the PSSR angles, when making frequent contact with Solar Return and Natal chart angles, have very specific and helpful interpretations that can be applied. This short book, which will be placed into Adobe's .pdf format and be made available in the Files section, will hopefully prove interesting and helpful to those who use PSSRs. I just want to make sure that my explanation of the progression rate, and how it is derived, will be clear. Thank you. Dave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2005 Report Share Posted March 11, 2005 Dave, I don't know if I have a rationale for the PSSR rate itself, but there is an essential difference in the nature the Quotidian and PSSR rates. The Quotidian is based on a correspondance of the _time period_ of one rotation of the earth following the Solar Return with the period of one sidereal year following the return. The motions of the planets through the zodiac and around the mundane sphere during a single sidereal day are " projected " out through the following year to give indications of possible events. The PSSR rate, however, is not based on equating a shorter period of time with a longer period. In the course of a year the sidereal time of the PSSR chart advances about 30 hr. 09 min. 13 sec. on average, but this should _not_ be thought of as the 30+ hours immediately following the solar return. If that were so the planets motions through those first 30 hours of the year would be the unique " progressed " positions for the PSSR chart, whereas Cyril Fagan said that the progressed planets of the PSSR were the same as the Quotidian. The reason for this is that the PSSR is as you wrote just a " symbolic " rotation of the angles _through the course of the entire year_. There is no real 30 hours of time involved. The angles of the Solar Return simply advance 1 1/4 degrees every day until they " catch up " with the angles of the next years Solar Return. Therefore there is a continuous " progression " of the angles from one Solar Return to another throughout one's lifetime. You may be already familiar with this information yourself Dave, but then maybe someone who has not heard of the PSSR progression can benefit. Gary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2005 Report Share Posted March 11, 2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 jlcur wrote: | | You may be already familiar with this information yourself Dave, | but then maybe someone who has not heard of the PSSR progression | can benefit. | | Gary | | ---- | Gary is right about what he said. It is a continuous motion That | moves from one to the next Solar Return in a straight smooth motion | of 1 1/4 degree per day. The SQ progression maintains the Hour | Angle of the Sun, the rotation of the angles expressed as an | encress in the Right Ascension of the Apparent Sun against the | constant of the Hour Angle. (LHAS) ~ Because the PSSR moves 1 1/4 degree per day, if a planet is near an angle at the time of the SSR, it is likely to make a pass over the same angle shortly before the expiration of the current, and start of the next Solar Return. Bert Fannin | | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCMgh5lTXkMf18q9QRAlD8AKDzG4zrUE/bUeTUObWXhmx0SP9AsACdGVTA JMbym1jV9MX7MPPQgeMSp+w= =li/V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2005 Report Share Posted March 11, 2005 For Bert and Gary, Thank you for your comments. I've used the PSSRs for very many years and have been pleased with their consistency. Of course, I use some techniques along with them that others may not. My problem was not so much as calculating or using them, but finding the clearest manner for explaining their basis. I had been questioned about this and upon looking at Fagan's explanation in the Primer of Sidereal Astrology, I found his answer or rational to be unclear. I am soliciting " explanations " in terms of " why " the system is valid relative to astrological practice so as to better teach others. Thank you for your responses. Dave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.