Guest guest Posted January 4, 2005 Report Share Posted January 4, 2005 Message: 7 Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:17:48 -0800 Therese Hamilton <eastwest A case for Krishnamurti Hi Theres and everyone, You wrote " I hadn't checked the navamsa for the Quake/Tsunami, but when I calculated the navamsa chart this evening, I was reminded of why I settled on the Krishnamuti ayanamsa years ago after researching Fagan and Lahiri. " ............ I notified, that the navamsa with Lahiri ayamsa is better speaking for a certain situation than Krishnamurti ayamsa. I was surprised about the difference at a certain moment. The Ascendant Navamsa for ESouth Azie is with Lahiri 15 Sag 06. Mid Sagitarius has most power, I have learned. Pluto navamsa I have in IV navamsa, significant for the upheavel. Pluto: alter/change. Hades in X navamsa is square Uranus/Vulkanus. Vulkanus::Force/Overpower and Hades: clean up/disintegrate. I have the impression, you throw out the baby with the bath-water as I notified in your message 4 by wiping away the significance of the signs. I guess most siderealists are convinced to adopt the ayamsa/sidereal zodiac before, because this significance of signs answers far better in view of a person compared with the sidereal birthchart.Do not you think so that tropicalists should make their own rules, if they prefer to stick to the tropical zodiac to work with instead of advising us siderealists to drop rules which are oldest proving sound, after changing the zodiac? The knowledge of astrology, which is taught to pupils for hundreds of years are still based on the experiences with the sidereal zodiac. Ptolemaus was a known astrologer when he wrote his books the VP was on 7 Aries! I admit it asks much patience and experience with the rules to follow easily all forwards/rules in one alinea for a right prognose. Anyway without Ptolemaus I also recognize a person in an interview comparing the birth chart with sign characteristics and planetes while watching TV. The book on " scientific analysis of horoscope " from Mr L.R. Chawdhri is putting me right, teaching these old rules. May be it is my Scorpio influence to assume that tropicalists should make a choice: either drop the whole astrology as several notified and decent astrologers have done in the 70th years, or reinstall their programm into the sidereal zodiac and avoid muddling up the two zodiacs. in a tryout of analyse. Kind regards, and best wishes for all. Anny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.