Fagan Bradley: naked eye observations

[Guest guest]

Hi Bert,

 

Why just disasters? I think that using the unequal system comes

closer to the use of coordinates. The way stars shine into northern

Europe is different than how they shine into the equator. You can

allready see the difference clearly while looking at the sky with

your naked eye. Compare the sky with Northern Europe and Africa. The

sun sets on different times and even more suddenly at the Equator,

than in Northern Europe. The days are longer in the summer and the

nights are longer in the winter. This absolutely has an strong

impact on the houses. It is a pity that noone replied to my link

about the investigations (astrologic and astronomical) of P.

Svarogich. True they are difficult to read, but surely interesting

and profound.

 

Greetings,

 

Anne

 

, Bert Fannin

<bwfannin@e...> wrote:

> Anne wrote:

>

> >Hi Francois,

> >

> >I also like to use Fagan Bradley more often than the vedic vehlow.

> >

> >Greetings,

> >________________

> >Anne:

> >

> >

> Here is an experiment you might try.

>

> 1. Find a really good mundane disaster and do the Caplunar

Ingress

> covering the period of the event. This should be done using not

only

> Fagan/Allen but all of the other ayanamsah your astrology program

(s) can

> muster.

> 2. Now take a look at what is on or near the angles. See

which puts

> the the proper planets on the angles symbolic of the event.

> 3. Calculate the Capsolar Ingress as above. and progress this

> chart, at the SQ rate on the Right Ascension of the Apparent Sun

(RAAS)

> 4. See in which, if any, the proper planets (Solar and

Transit)

> are brought to the angles by SQ.

> 5. Check out the difference between the ST of the SQ and the

ST

> with which the planet(s) cross the angles. See what the mean

difference

> is in the charts for each of the test ayanamsahs

>

> I have not tried this yet myself, though I should, but I

suspect

> that when the difference in time/Longitude of Sun or Moon is

applied to

> the ayanamsah, it will equal very nearly that of the Bradly

revision of

> Fagan's original determination. that is the way Bradley refined

Fagan

> determination in the first place. By testing mundane events first

with

> the Lunar Ingresses, and then with the progression of the Solar

> ingresses. (See Sidereal.zip for Unavailing a New Tool.).

[Guest guest]

*Anne:

You have a good point, the eye-ball astrology is different tin

higher latitudes then in lower. But this is not a question of naked Eye

observation. This is a question of the displacement off the angles

caused by the change in Ayanamsah. This is measured in Sidereal Time,

and must be calculated. But you are right, disasters are not the only

event that Bradley used. He used anything and everything from Mining

Disasters to Royal weddings. All were gist for the data mill. Please

download Sidereal.zip and have a look at Unavailing a New Tool. The same

technique he used there can be used to test the respective Ayanamsahs.

 

:-)

 

Bert

 

> ------

> <>

> Hi Bert,

>

> Why just disasters? I think that using the unequal system comes

> closer to the use of coordinates. The way stars shine into northern

> Europe is different than how they shine into the equator. You can

> allready see the difference clearly while looking at the sky with

> your naked eye. Compare the sky with Northern Europe and Africa. The

> sun sets on different times and even more suddenly at the Equator,

> than in Northern Europe. The days are longer in the summer and the

> nights are longer in the winter. This absolutely has an strong

> impact on the houses. It is a pity that noone replied to my link

> about the investigations (astrologic and astronomical) of P.

> Svarogich. True they are difficult to read, but surely interesting

> and profound.

>

> Greetings,

>

> Anne

> ------

> <Extra text snipped>