Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Hi Francois, I also like to use Fagan Bradley more often than the vedic vehlow. Greetings, Anne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Anne wrote: >Hi Francois, > >I also like to use Fagan Bradley more often than the vedic vehlow. > >Greetings, >________________ >Anne: > > Here is an experiment you might try. 1. Find a really good mundane disaster and do the Caplunar Ingress covering the period of the event. This should be done using not only Fagan/Allen but all of the other ayanamsah your astrology program(s) can muster. 2. Now take a look at what is on or near the angles. See which puts the the proper planets on the angles symbolic of the event. 3. Calculate the Capsolar Ingress as above. and progress this chart, at the SQ rate on the Right Ascension of the Apparent Sun (RAAS) 4. See in which, if any, the proper planets (Solar and Transit) are brought to the angles by SQ. 5. Check out the difference between the ST of the SQ and the ST with which the planet(s) cross the angles. See what the mean difference is in the charts for each of the test ayanamsahs I have not tried this yet myself, though I should, but I suspect that when the difference in time/Longitude of Sun or Moon is applied to the ayanamsah, it will equal very nearly that of the Bradly revision of Fagan's original determination. that is the way Bradley refined Fagan determination in the first place. By testing mundane events first with the Lunar Ingresses, and then with the progression of the Solar ingresses. (See Sidereal.zip for Unavailing a New Tool.). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.