[PoliticalAstrology] The 2006 election - Brian

[Guest guest]

Page, Janis wrote:

 

>hi Virginia,

>

>about Satan's spawn, but I'm talking about Rove, not Hillary... yes he does

seem to be " bush's man " . I'm hoping this gang of thugs does trip and fall hard,

because I'm thinking that if they have their way that yes, there will be more

war all over (the slaughter of Saddam's victims is beyond belief - speaking of

war crimes). I think they want enough blood and chaos that they will go for

martial law and let bush have his fantasy of being dictator. I don't think it

will work, still seems he may be taken out by someone(s) on his own side, but

his megalomania is on steroids getting worse fast, and he's clearly going for

amassing more power, as evidenced by putting Gonzales " the torture guy " who also

helped write our favorite Patriot Act over Justice and Condi (wonder if she'll

refer to bush as " her husband " again???) over State. these are two people of

questionable capacity but of unswerving loyalty to bush. what do you want to

bet that will be the top criteria for supreme court appointees? we know that

hitting ('castrating' might be too harsh, or not - certianly controlling) the

Supreme Court and disgorging the separation of powers and checks and balances is

a top priority to Rove and Cheney too, isn't it? they've got the Supremes in

their sight, and other court appointments too, for that matter. we can assume

that they are quite cranky that courts and judges have dared to dispute their

illegalities... hmm, what would it take for bush and cheney to have a major

disagreement?? that could be helpful. anyway, if they have their way there

may not be another presidential election. I'm watching Pluto approach Capr and

the Aries point in 2008 with a wary eye. then Hades... and in 2010 Jupiter and

Uranus conj at zero Aries. hmm! maybe it will take that long for a new

beginning?? dunno. for now, there's that 'pride goeth before a fall'...

>--janis

>

>

>vmreal [vmreal]

>Monday, November 15, 2004 9:30 PM

>PoliticalAstrology

>[PoliticalAstrology] Re: The 2006 election - Brian

>

>

>

>Well, all three were in Repug hands for this election. And we had

>major screwups (even if you wanted to rule out foul play) this year

>*without* Merc Rx to blame (credit?)... Shouldering responsibility

>is not exactly in these guys' repertoire, but I wouldn't mind seeing

>some of those chickens (chickenhawks?) come home to roost...

>

>As for Karl Rove, I've gotten the impression that he's Bush's man,

>through & through. Will he be the chief architect for the next GOP

>campaign(s)? Well, he might go back to his consulting business in

>TX, or he might stay on in D.C.- he may not even have decided yet.

>

>But the extreme complacency of our media in re: this year's election

>irregularities bodes well for more GOP 'victories' in 2006 & 2008.

>Meanwhile the Dems are all strategizing at the grand opening of the

>Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, & some of those people

>seem to believe Hillary stands a snowball's chance in hell of ever

>being elected... Nothing personal against her, but I know of so

>many people who think she is Satan's spawn- how do the Dems think

>they'd be able to change that, I wonder?

>

>Personally, I'd like to see Bill Richardson run for office- I'd vote

>for him. And unlike Kerry, he has charisma to spare! And he was

>smart enough to stay far, far away from the #2 spot on the Kerry

>ticket. (He was born 15 Nov 1947 in Pasadena, CA- if anyone has a

>time for him, I would love to know it.)

>

>Musing in print,

>Virginia

>

>_____________________________

>

>

 

Janis:

Reread _The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire_. You will see that

this seems some how all too familiar. History repeats itself.

 

 

Bert :'(

 

>

>

>

>

>

>-

>

>

>

>