Guest guest Posted November 6, 2004 Report Share Posted November 6, 2004 Hi Therese ... Very interesting Florida stats. Apropos Ed Kohout's provocative messages, please review this scary commentary on post-election events in the Mid-west: http://michiganimc.org/feature/display/7644/index.php Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: Want to see something scary? Especially the graphs. http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2004 Report Share Posted November 6, 2004 John, And of course nothing of this was televised. Thanks for the link. I can't believe that lawyers aren't working on Ohio and Florida through day and night. In the meantime...my blood runs cold as everything our country was built on seems to be dying. Please everyone, check out the two links below and do some printouts. How long before these stories won't be allowed on the web? Televised reports are already compromised. Therese At 05:57 PM 11/6/04 +0000, John wrote: > >Apropos Ed Kohout's provocative messages, please review this scary commentary on post-election events in the Mid-west: > >http://michiganimc.org/feature/display/7644/index.php > >Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: >Want to see something scary? Especially the graphs. > >http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2004 Report Share Posted November 6, 2004 John, Therese and List, While I'm sure there was some measure of vote fraud going on in the election (just like there always is), I'm unsure how decisive it was. The main point for conspiracy oriented folks have to address first is why did Bush's share of the popular vote increase in the states he lost this time over 2000. Take a look at Bush's popular vote count in a few of Kerry's states: 2000 2004 California 42% 44% Michigan 46% 48% New York 35% 40% New Jersey 40% 46% Massachusetts 33% 37% Connecticut 38% 44% Rhode Island 32% 39% I think it is highly unlikely to think that the Republicans would have bothered with vote fraud in these clearly Kerry states, with the possible exception of NJ. So if these are authentic results, it shows that Bush's popularity went up over 2000 across the country. So is it so hard to believe that he actually outpolled Kerry in the battleground states? So far, not a peep out of Michael Moore on this issue. Chris - " Therese Hamilton " <eastwest Saturday, November 06, 2004 2:59 PM Re: Florida Statistics > > John, > > And of course nothing of this was televised. Thanks for the link. I can't > believe that lawyers aren't working on Ohio and Florida through day and > night. In the meantime...my blood runs cold as everything our country was > built on seems to be dying. Please everyone, check out the two links below > and do some printouts. How long before these stories won't be allowed on > the web? Televised reports are already compromised. > > Therese > > At 05:57 PM 11/6/04 +0000, John wrote: > > > >Apropos Ed Kohout's provocative messages, please review this scary > commentary on post-election events in the Mid-west: > > > >http://michiganimc.org/feature/display/7644/index.php > > > >Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: > >Want to see something scary? Especially the graphs. > > > >http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2004 Report Share Posted November 7, 2004 Chris.......If there was fraud, then they would say, OH LOOK at at Bush in Kerry states?? His popularity was increasing over 2000. But that was against a different candidate? Apples/Oranges. You can prove anything with statistics. This whole election has Neptunian fraud written all over it. Just like Bush and the last 4 years. Cognitive dissonance. Kind regards Kit Christopher Kevill <christopher.kevill wrote: John, Therese and List, While I'm sure there was some measure of vote fraud going on in the election (just like there always is), I'm unsure how decisive it was. The main point for conspiracy oriented folks have to address first is why did Bush's share of the popular vote increase in the states he lost this time over 2000. Take a look at Bush's popular vote count in a few of Kerry's states: 2000 2004 California 42% 44% Michigan 46% 48% New York 35% 40% New Jersey 40% 46% Massachusetts 33% 37% Connecticut 38% 44% Rhode Island 32% 39% I think it is highly unlikely to think that the Republicans would have bothered with vote fraud in these clearly Kerry states, with the possible exception of NJ. So if these are authentic results, it shows that Bush's popularity went up over 2000 across the country. So is it so hard to believe that he actually outpolled Kerry in the battleground states? So far, not a peep out of Michael Moore on this issue. Chris - " Therese Hamilton " <eastwest Saturday, November 06, 2004 2:59 PM Re: Florida Statistics > > John, > > And of course nothing of this was televised. Thanks for the link. I can't > believe that lawyers aren't working on Ohio and Florida through day and > night. In the meantime...my blood runs cold as everything our country was > built on seems to be dying. Please everyone, check out the two links below > and do some printouts. How long before these stories won't be allowed on > the web? Televised reports are already compromised. > > Therese > > At 05:57 PM 11/6/04 +0000, John wrote: > > > >Apropos Ed Kohout's provocative messages, please review this scary > commentary on post-election events in the Mid-west: > > > >http://michiganimc.org/feature/display/7644/index.php > > > >Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: > >Want to see something scary? Especially the graphs. > > > >http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2004 Report Share Posted November 7, 2004 Therese, I think we are doing OK with Kerry. One time from his lips and the other from his mother, which is a lot more than we have from a lot more people. I haven't looked yet but one of Edward's two times should show announcement of his wife's cancer. Dark*Star ________________________________ Christopher Kevill wrote: > John, Therese and List, > > While I'm sure there was some measure of vote fraud going on in the election > (just like there always is), I'm unsure how decisive it was. > > The main point for conspiracy oriented folks have to address first is why > did Bush's share of the popular vote increase in the states he lost this > time over 2000. > > Take a look at Bush's popular vote count in a few of Kerry's states: > > 2000 2004 > > California 42% 44% > Michigan 46% 48% > New York 35% 40% > New Jersey 40% 46% > Massachusetts 33% 37% > Connecticut 38% 44% > Rhode Island 32% 39% > > I think it is highly unlikely to think that the Republicans would have > bothered with vote fraud in these clearly Kerry states, with the possible > exception of NJ. So if these are authentic results, it shows that Bush's > popularity went up over 2000 across the country. > > So is it so hard to believe that he actually outpolled Kerry in the > battleground states? > > So far, not a peep out of Michael Moore on this issue. > > Chris > > - > " Therese Hamilton " <eastwest > > Saturday, November 06, 2004 2:59 PM > Re: Florida Statistics > > > > > John, > > > > And of course nothing of this was televised. Thanks for the link. I can't > > believe that lawyers aren't working on Ohio and Florida through day and > > night. In the meantime...my blood runs cold as everything our country was > > built on seems to be dying. Please everyone, check out the two links below > > and do some printouts. How long before these stories won't be allowed on > > the web? Televised reports are already compromised. > > > > Therese > > > > At 05:57 PM 11/6/04 +0000, John wrote: > > > > > >Apropos Ed Kohout's provocative messages, please review this scary > > commentary on post-election events in the Mid-west: > > > > > >http://michiganimc.org/feature/display/7644/index.php > > > > > >Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: > > >Want to see something scary? Especially the graphs. > > > > > >http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > > > Post message: > > Subscribe: - > > Un: - > > List owner: -owner > > > > Shortcut URL to this page: > > / > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2004 Report Share Posted November 7, 2004 Chris, All I know for sure is the statistical work done on Florida and the demonstratons in Ohio. Any state that used optical scan equipment is suspsect in my opinion. There were 29 or 39 of them. I've seen both figures. Therese At 04:19 PM 11/6/04 -0500, Chris wrote: > >While I'm sure there was some measure of vote fraud going on in the election >(just like there always is), I'm unsure how decisive it was. > >The main point for conspiracy oriented folks have to address first is why >did Bush's share of the popular vote increase in the states he lost this >time over 2000. > >Take a look at Bush's popular vote count in a few of Kerry's states: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2004 Report Share Posted November 7, 2004 http://www.nov3.us/ [cynthianovak] The above link was sent to me on the 1st. There was a call for national demonstartions on the 3rd. That one was in OH is not that impressive since there were 3 planned in Texas according to the website. Now, they are organizing for futher activity and protests. There was a plan to protest if Kerry won too. The website has changed, you can see what us is about today, but they were preparing to protest no matter what across the nation on the 3rd. Though y'all would like to know. Sure am curious who is funding this....aren't you c Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2004 Report Share Posted November 7, 2004 Yeah Kit -- I guess it's a question of how deep the Republican conspiracy is. If it's really deep, then we'll never know for sure. Chris - " Kit Karson " <skyguides Saturday, November 06, 2004 7:29 PM Re: Re: Florida Statistics Chris.......If there was fraud, then they would say, OH LOOK at at Bush in Kerry states?? His popularity was increasing over 2000. But that was against a different candidate? Apples/Oranges. You can prove anything with statistics. This whole election has Neptunian fraud written all over it. Just like Bush and the last 4 years. Cognitive dissonance. Kind regards Kit Christopher Kevill <christopher.kevill wrote: John, Therese and List, While I'm sure there was some measure of vote fraud going on in the election (just like there always is), I'm unsure how decisive it was. The main point for conspiracy oriented folks have to address first is why did Bush's share of the popular vote increase in the states he lost this time over 2000. Take a look at Bush's popular vote count in a few of Kerry's states: 2000 2004 California 42% 44% Michigan 46% 48% New York 35% 40% New Jersey 40% 46% Massachusetts 33% 37% Connecticut 38% 44% Rhode Island 32% 39% I think it is highly unlikely to think that the Republicans would have bothered with vote fraud in these clearly Kerry states, with the possible exception of NJ. So if these are authentic results, it shows that Bush's popularity went up over 2000 across the country. So is it so hard to believe that he actually outpolled Kerry in the battleground states? So far, not a peep out of Michael Moore on this issue. Chris - " Therese Hamilton " <eastwest Saturday, November 06, 2004 2:59 PM Re: Florida Statistics > > John, > > And of course nothing of this was televised. Thanks for the link. I can't > believe that lawyers aren't working on Ohio and Florida through day and > night. In the meantime...my blood runs cold as everything our country was > built on seems to be dying. Please everyone, check out the two links below > and do some printouts. How long before these stories won't be allowed on > the web? Televised reports are already compromised. > > Therese > > At 05:57 PM 11/6/04 +0000, John wrote: > > > >Apropos Ed Kohout's provocative messages, please review this scary > commentary on post-election events in the Mid-west: > > > >http://michiganimc.org/feature/display/7644/index.php > > > >Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: > >Want to see something scary? Especially the graphs. > > > >http://ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2004 Report Share Posted November 7, 2004 Hi, I do find now in Edward's 7:02 the announcement of his wife's cancer; no focus in the 7:23. This is only looking at the integrity of the natal with no work up. It is my suspicion (read private mythology) that telling everybody about your cancer increases it's ferocity. What I admired (the only thing) about Jacqueline Suzanne, author of Valley of the Dolls was that she told no one about her situation (Christian Science). Only her husband and doctor knew. ____________________ Dark Star wrote: > Therese, > > I think we are doing OK with Kerry. One time from his lips and the > other from his mother, which is a lot more than we have from a lot > more people. I haven't looked yet but one of Edward's two times > should show announcement of his wife's cancer. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.