Guest guest Posted October 17, 2004 Report Share Posted October 17, 2004 Message: 1 Sat, 16 Oct 2004 16:18:50 -0000 " alfonsoosorio " <alfonsoosorio Proving astrology- Why it should be valid I would like to put my 5 grams of salt in this interesting debate about the validity of research in astrology. Alfons! There is a difference between research in which astrologers are interested and the research which certain scientist and university are interested in. And you know quite well why. These opponents do not know what to expect what is major and minor importance in astrology. And all these experiments have been useless with the tropical zodiac. was delluding myself, something that really bothers me and I always try to avoid it. It must have been the tropical zodiac you practiced with. Indeed astrologers with mathematical discipline were the best astrologers, but with the computer now as a help for the practice they are living longer. It was not a healthy profession, because it was all night's time to complete a sound report. Several of them died an early death in the pre computertime. I know what you are writing about I used mathematics too in the seventies. A tip for you, you are insulting. Astrology is not a special item anymore for the happy few, who like mathematics, but you forget, that psychology students alike Therese were obliged to be educated with mathematics before she was permitted to start her study at the university. It is the same here. Therese knows what she dislikes. And I know what you like about mathemamtics. You wrote By this way , astrologers are saying to the world: you can´t never prove astrology does not work and since I have found that it does, leave me alone doing my astrology! As long as astrologers are using the tropical zodiac astrology will be unacceptable for various disciplines at the university. And they are right. Indeed they look different at astrology when I say to them " if I knew that astrology is fake, why should I spend all my free time with figuring out charts? Quite a challenge to ask your clients their birthdate (time?) Indeed it is interesting -your challenge- but I have time short to pick up the glove. You wrote Because dear Anny, you forget that a circunference, the zodiac circle, has just 360 degrees and some of you are introducing even 3000 asteroids in it!!. There are only a few which are properly studied. I experienced several interesting events with them. You did notyet loose your initial scorn well? At astrologers or the astrology? All astrologers will admit to you they need more experience for ever. I regret your attitude, because we could learn more from each other. You wrote: Anny says that any astrologer involved in research, should " have an scorpio influence " . Well, specifically what does this means? I did not mean that it is a law. Libra astrologers are different. I do not want to insult you with my remark. Libra = art and Astrology holds the art of weighing the possibilities for the client to grow in whatever way. I meant the Scorpio influence is evident in an astrologer's chart, (database) who spends his/her life enjoying in investigation to merit the reward of acceptation in the world of science. Maybe you know a better way to explain, without insulting another. Anny My sincere thanks to Matthew Quellas for the Solar Fire bi-wheel form which clearly shows the relationship of the cyclic charts to the natal chart. http://users.snowcrest.net/sunrise/LostZodiac.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.