RE: Digest Number 663

[Guest guest]

______________________

______________________

 

Message: 1

Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:41:50 -0800

Therese Hamilton <eastwest

 

Hi Therese! I am glad you warned Vince about his date.

 

Indeed I thought it was 1 May 1980! Now I am glad for

him he is born in January. Boy what a difference!

Now I have experienced the necessity of mental strength

and spiritual love for an astrologer to be able to help

also anyone with such a chart.Afterall astrology is meant

for growing selfknowledge for selfadjusting. A forward

for mental and physical health instead of forecasting,

though useful before difficult decisions.

 

Regards,

Anny

 

 

______________________

______________________

 

Message: 2

Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:10:07 -0000

" rahasyavadi " <rahasyavadi

Re: The state Astrology is in

 

, Therese Hamilton

<eastwest@s...> wrote:

 

> Ah, Geoffrey Dean, the bane of astrologers!! I have his book and

knew Geoff when he wrote it. He was my house guest once. He gave out

false information

 

Gee, I am surprised! Did you profit from his book on research turning

it into the sidereal zodiac? In our society of research on astrology

I spoke his friend, here in Holland, who lived in Astralie 70th - 80th

years. I asked him Geoffrey's birthdate.He had not know and there was

no intention to ask him again. Geoffrey refused to give him.The friend

was so faithful in his friendship to Geoffrey that he lost his own

faith in astrology. He wrote a book himself " Planetes talk " in which

he proved to be opposed to the sidereal zodiac. The tropical zodiac

was to prefere, because it is the intellectual zodiac.I have forgotten

his argument against the sidereal zodiac.

 

 

> here by my computer: Geoffrey Dean, December 30, 1935 16:30 or :31,

Eltham,

 

I have Elham in my program.

 

Regards,

Anny

______________________

______________________