Guest guest Posted February 24, 2004 Report Share Posted February 24, 2004 Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: At 10:30 AM 2/22/04 -0800, Juan wrote: >>My question to you is simply how do you define Mars traits >>without Mars present? Sure one can see some Pluto traits >>and mistake them for Mars but hold 180 degree difference >>of a opinion to the one you have expressed above. ------------------------- >> [TH] However, the Gauquelins did a fine job of isolating >>traits for the various planets. In the process they disproved >>some accepted meanings of planets. ------------------------- >To answer all these questions it's necessary to have some >understanding of statistics and how they work. It's possible >for something to be highly significant via statistics, yet to have >little practical value. I have an understanding of statistics and how they work. I'll also suggest that ever since opinions have developed " The Traits of Mars " , statistics have contributed. > No, Mars and Pluto traits are not at all alike according to >Donald Bradley. >I agree with Bradley on that. I think its quite easy to mix metaphors and mistakenly perceive Martian traits for Plutonian traits. Its' not intentional but as in evaluating Scorpion " traits " understandable. Juan... PS: Thanks for the Resource on Statistics >(Excerpt from the ADB site: Practical Significance vs. >Statistical Significance in Astrological Research by Jose E. Becerra) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.