Eshelman's book

[Guest guest]

At 05:58 PM 7/20/04 -0400, Francois wrote:

 

>I have browsed this book once but didn't bought it. What I remember is that

>its principles are the same of Alexandre Volguine's book which has been

>translated from french ot english (tropical astrology). So I am confident on

>your conclusions. Furthermore, Volguine's book has an addenda from Maurice

>H. Froger on precessed solar and lunar returns. Since I am now using

>sidereal astrology, I do find precessed tropical or sidereal returns more

>accurate (this year, my father's death was very clear in my solar return,

>using whole sign house system).

 

Hi Francois,

 

I haven't seen Volgine's book, but Eshelman's book has been out of print

for awhile. I wish you had purchased it when it was available! I'm

wondering if you mean that the 'non-precessed' returns are very clear,

which are the sidereal returns? (Unless I have my terminology wrong. I find

that as I get older, I visualize charts, but often have trouble with the

verbal analysis...getting the words the way I want them.)

 

The big difference between Donald Bradley's book on Returns and Jim

Eshelman's is that Bradley used house analysis quite a bit. Houses more or

less fall by the wayside as sidereal astrology developed.

 

Therese