Bradley's Jupiter/Rainfall/Ayanamsa

[Guest guest]

At 09:18 AM 1/27/04 -0000, Matthew wrote:

>The following selection is taken from the " Ayanamsa " file in

>Sidereal.zip. It, in turn, is drawn from Garth Allen, aka Don

>Bradley, writing in the August 1964 American Astrology Magazine.

 

>...In view of professional and institutional considerations, we are

>requested to divulge only a bare minimum of information about this

>project. Permission to publish an adaptation of **one** of the diagrams,

>and tell its content, however, has been cordially granted, in the

>mutual hope that it will nip in the bud this growing threat of a

> " controversy " over the synetic fiducial.

 

This is the major problem with Bradley's study. We have no raw data, no

actual lists of figures, not even exactly how the statistics were

performed. Bradley could have used millions of cases, but if we can't

re-examine the raw data, it means very little (from the scientific

standpoint, at least.)

 

Where is the list of weather stations? Where is the list of data from these

stations? What were the exact years covered in the study? Why should the

data be confidential? (That makes no sense.)

 

Also, (unless I'm missing something?) I haven't seen the graph Bradley

discusses. It's also important that low rainfall is compared to high

rainfall--just as one ayanamsa has to be compared to another.

 

I'm sorry, but scientists would simply shake their heads and walk away

without all the details of this (and other) studies. Our job is to see what

we can discover **now.**

 

May Bradley rest in peace. We have our own work to do.

 

Therese