Guest guest Posted September 30, 2004 Report Share Posted September 30, 2004 QUESTION FROM A NOVICE: Please, anyone in the group, explain how SIRIUS is understood to be " in Cancer " . As a fixed star is this so for SIRIUS whether by Tropical or by Sidereal astrology, or is SRIUS " in Gemini " in Sidereal astrology .... Please HELP ... I'm JOHN There are 2 messages in this issue. Topics in this digest: 1. RE: Digest Number 903 " Anny van Berckel " 2. Re: Digest Number 883 Dark Star ______________________ ______________________ Message: 1 Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:55:59 +0200 " Anny van Berckel " RE: Digest Number 903 Dear Cynthia. Thank you! I thought Kelley was an astrologer, because it was written some years ago she figured out everything, for Mrs Reagan. Indeed it is a rare time. Formerly in the 50th years I once read that the filmindustry engaged themselves with publishers to tell stories about the stars, instead of the film, to activate visiting the films and so it has been getting worse since they include persons, who are in the picture of social society. I wonder how the Bush family is thinking of the publishement, since I saw, that the cover of the book shows intimate family pictures of the family. Funny is, while I seldom or never buy them,the people involved confessed occasionally in TV program they buy them themselves to read about the others. That was an eyeopener. I like the dialogue too, if it is not too technical. I love the person in the radix. Succes with your work! Regards, Anny Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:25:34 -0500 " cynthianovak " RE: Digest Number 902 Dear Anny I do not think that Kitty Kelley is an astrologer. She did write about former president Reagan and Mrs. Reagan's use of astrologers. The bod thing about Kelley's writings is that she has a lot to say, but does not have sources who will be identified. As a reader, you believe her if you dislike the victim, subject, of her book. It makes me very sad when this type of book comes out. I feel that it brings out the worst in man unkind. Gossip is a nasty tool and it seems to be used more and more. I don't know why this is. I suspect it has something to do with the outer or transpersonal planets on one side of the heavens and the personal planet on the other. Perhaps we are grabbed by the great serpent Rahu and Ketu and swept along. These are challenging times. I appreciate the dialogue here. cynthia ______________________ ______________________ Message: 2 Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:36:27 -0700 Dark Star Re: Digest Number 883 Hi, The 11:31 am is more widely used. It offers up 7 out of 7 factors in masculine constellations. Formidable. Dark*Star ------------------------ Anny van Berckel wrote: > Hi All. Concoleezza 's birthdate I came up 14 November 1954 (supposed, she > told about her next birthday a few days earlier unofficially.. Calculation > produces 9.56 AM, > Gerald Koenig > > . Others think she was > born close to noon. > ______________________ ______________________ " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: / ------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.